Catheter-based therapy for high-risk or intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: death and re-hospitalization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Catheter-based therapies (CBTs) have been developed as a treatment option in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). There remains a paucity of data to inform decision-making in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE. The aim of this study was to characterize in-hospital and readmission outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE treated with vs. without CBT in a large retrospective registry. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE were identified using the 2017-20 National Readmission Database. In-hospital outcomes included death and bleeding and 30- and 90-day readmission outcomes including all-cause, venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related and bleeding-related readmissions. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between CBT and no CBT. RESULTS: A total of 14 903 [2076 (13.9%) with CBT] and 42 829 [8824 (20.6%) with CBT] patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk PE were included, respectively. Prior to IPTW, patients with CBT were younger and less likely to have cancer and cardiac arrest, receive systemic thrombolysis, or be on mechanical ventilation. In the IPTW logistic regression model, CBT was associated with lower odds of in-hospital death in high-risk [odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.87] and intermediate-risk PE (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.83). Patients with high-risk PE treated with CBT were associated with lower risk of 90-day all-cause [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83] and VTE (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34-0.63) readmission. Patients with intermediate-risk PE treated with CBT were associated with lower risk of 90-day all-cause (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.72-0.79) and VTE (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.76) readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high-risk or intermediate-risk PE, CBT was associated with lower in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Catheter-based therapy for intermediate or high-risk pulmonary embolism is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with cancer: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common complication among patients with cancer and is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. Catheter-based therapies (CBT), including catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and mechanical thrombectomy, have been developed and are used in patients with intermediate or high-risk PE. However, there is a paucity of data on outcomes in patients with cancer as most clinical studies exclude this group of patients. AIMS: To characterize outcomes of patients with cancer admitted with intermediate or high-risk PE treated with CBT compared with no CBT. METHODS: Patients with an admission diagnosis of intermediate or high-risk PE and a history of cancer from October 2015 to December 2018 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital death or cardiac arrest (CA) and major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between patients treated with and without CBT. Variables that remained unbalanced after IPTW were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2084 unweighted admissions (10,420 weighted) for intermediate or high-risk PE and cancer were included, of which 136 (6.5%) were treated with CBT. After IPTW, CBT was associated with lower death or CA (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46-0.64) but higher major bleeding (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21-1.65). After stratifying by PE risk type, patients treated with CBT had lower risk of death or CA in both intermediate (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36-0.75) and high-risk PE (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.53). However, patients with CBT were associated with increased risk of major bleeding in intermediate-risk PE (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.67-2.69) but not in those with high-risk PE (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with cancer hospitalized with intermediate or high-risk PE, treatment with CBT was associated with lower risk of in-hospital death or CA but higher risk of bleeding. Prospective studies and inclusion of patients with cancer in randomized trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Paradigm Shift of Interventional Strategies and Outcomes for Acute Limb Ischemia Post-Pandemic.

PURPOSE: We performed a large-scale comparison of patients treated for acute limb ischemia (ALI) in the pre-COVID (2017-2019) and COVID (2020-2022) eras to evaluate changes in interventional strategies and compare factors associated with adverse outcomes. We sought to characterize patient outcomes in an evolving ALI treatment algorithm in response to pandemic-associated presentation delays and rapid technological advancements in mechanical thrombectomy (MT). METHODS: Using the TriNetX global research network, we conducted a multicenter query across 80 health care organizations (HCOs) spanning 4 countries for patients treated for ALI. Propensity score matching was performed to account for comorbidities. Risk of adverse outcomes within 30 days was calculated for each era, including re-intervention (RI30), major/minor amputation, and death. Patients were then stratified by initial intervention: open revascularization (OR), MT, or catheter-directed thrombolysis and adjunctive endovascular procedures alone (CDT/EP). Risk of adverse outcomes was compared between treatment groups of the same era. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the pre-COVID era and COVID era cohorts included 7344 patients each. COVID era patients experienced a statistically significant higher risk of 30-day mortality (RR=1.211, p=0.027). Mechanical thrombectomy interventions were performed more frequently in the COVID era (RR=1.314, p<0.0001). Comparing outcomes between treatment groups, MT patients required RI30 more than OR patients (pre-COVID: RR=2.074, p=0.006; COVID: RR=1.600, p=0.025). Open revascularization patients had higher 30-day mortality (pre-COVID: RR=2.368, p<0.0001; COVID: RR=2.013, p<0.0001) and major amputations (pre-COVID: RR=2.432, p<0.0001; COVID: RR=2.176, p<0.0001) than CDT/EP. Pre-COVID CDT/EP patients were at higher risk for RI30 (RR=1.449, p=0.005) and minor amputations (RR=1.500, p=0.010) than OR. The MT group had higher major amputation rates than CDT/EP (pre-COVID: RR=2.043, p=0.019; COVID: RR=1.914, p=0.007). COVID-era MT patients had greater 30-day mortality (RR=1.706, p=0.031) and RI30 (RR=1.544, p=0.029) than CDT/EP. CONCLUSION: Significant shifts toward an MT-based approach have been observed in the last 3 years. Although MT required more RI30 than OR, there was no associated consequence of mortality and limb salvage. The increased mortality seen among COVID-era patients could be explained by delayed presentation, as well as poorly understood pro-thrombogenic or pro-inflammatory mechanisms related to the first waves of COVID. More research is necessary to determine an optimal treatment algorithm. CLINICAL IMPACT: Comorbid risk factors and severity of ischemia must be carefully considered before selecting an interventional strategy to prevent adverse outcomes and maximize limb salvage. Open revascularization strategies are associated with increased mortality and limb loss compared to less-invasive thrombolytic therapy alone. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT)-based approaches have been increasingly used in the last 3 years. Patients receiving MT are more likely to require reintervention within 30 days.

A Review of the Effectiveness and Safety of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Venous Thromboembolism.

CLINICAL IMPACT: Catheter-directed thrombolysis reduces the thrombolytic time and dose of thrombolytic drugs without affecting the thrombolytic effect to ensure that bleeding does not occur. This helps clinicians choose safer CDT treatments for their patients. We combine the historical process of catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy for VTE and prospect the future development of CDT.

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for (Not Immediately) Threatened Acute Lower Limb Ischemia: Clinical Outcome and Efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the short- and midterm outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for acute lower limb ischemia (ALI), classes Rutherford 1 and 2, with specific attention to functional outcome. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with ALI treated with CDT from 2 vascular centers between May 2018 and April 2021. Cases were analyzed in groups according to the Rutherford (1 and 2) classification. The primary endpoint was functional outcome during follow-up, assessed by Rutherford's chronic limb ischemia classification. Functional outcomes over time were analyzed by generalized estimating equations. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate reintervention, amputation, survival, and reintervention-free survival rates. RESULTS: Two hundred cases were included (Rutherford 1, n = 51; Rutherford 2, n = 149). Total median treatment duration was 27 hours in the Rutherford 1 group and 39 hours in the Rutherford 2 group (P= 0.120). Initial clinical success was high (Rutherford 1, 82% vs Rutherford 2, 89%; P= 0.253). Complications were comparable between the 2 groups: major bleeding 8% vs 10% (P= 0.634), major amputation 4% vs 7% (P= 0.603), and mortality 6% vs 6% (P= 0.967). Median follow-up was 32 months (0-63 months). During follow-up, there was a high number of reinterventions (43%) and amputations (20%) in patients with Rutherford 1 limb ischemia, which was comparable to patients with Rutherford 2 limb ischemia. Fifty-six percent of the patients with Rutherford 1 limb ischemia reaching 2 years of follow-up were asymptomatic, 20% had mild and 16% had moderate to severe claudication. Initial clinical success following CDT and not immediately threatened ischemia at presentation are associated with improved functional outcomes during follow-up (P < 0.001 and P= 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, CDT was effective in reestablishing arterial flow for not immediately threatened ALI. Patients with Rutherford 1 limb ischemia who receive CDT had a more favorable functional outcome than patients with more severe limb ischemia (Rutherford 2). However, reinterventions were required frequently, and there was a substantial risk of complications. CLINICAL IMPACT: Acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) does not immediately jeopardize limb survival in patients with Rutherford 1 limb ischemia but can induce disabling claudication. In such patients, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is often performed to improve functional outcome. However, previous reports warned about the complications of CDT, and so far, mid- and long-term functional outcomes have not been reported. This study, in which a large cohort of patients with ALI was included, demonstrates a high technical success of CDT for not immediately threatened ALI with more favorable functional outcomes when compared with those with threatened limbs. Nevertheless, major complications pose a serious risk, and the need for reinterventions in the long term is high.

Outcomes of Catheter Directed Thrombolysis for Early and Late Re-occlusions in Acute Lower Limb Ischemia.

PURPOSE: Acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) is a sudden decrease in arterial limb perfusion due to an arterial blockage, threatening limb and life. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is a minimally invasive procedure to remove such obstructions. However, approximately one-third of patients endure a re-occlusion after successful CDT. This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of CDT for early (<1 year) and late (>1 year) re-occlusions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study reviewed patients from 2 medical centers with an acute arterial re-occlusion of the lower limb after successful CDT between December 1996 and April 2021. The primary endpoints were angiographic success, defined as thrombus dissolution over 95% with outflow to at least 1 crural artery, and clinical success, defined as a score of ≥1 on the Rutherford scale for assessing changes in clinical status. Secondary endpoints included bleeding complications, patency, amputation, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate patency, survival, and freedom from amputation. RESULTS: Seventy-seven cases were included, with 52 early re-occlusions (<1 year) and 25 late re-occlusions (>1 year). The median time to re-occlusion since the last CDT treatment was 4 months in the early re-occlusion group and 24 months in the late re-occlusion group. Angiographic success was achieved in 73% of early and 64% of late re-occlusions. Clinical success rates were 80.8% for the early and 80.0% of the late re-occlusion cases. Major bleeding occurred in 2% of the early and 8% of the late re-occlusion group. Patients were followed up until symptoms or signs of limb ischemia were resolved, with a median follow-up time of 15 months for the early and 22 months for the late re-occlusion group. During follow-up, secondary re-occlusions were observed in 59.6% of the early and 44% in the late group. Cumulative amputation rates at 1, 5, and 8 years were 36%, 36%, and 52% for early and 18%, 30%, and 30% for the late re-occlusions, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our experience, CDT is an effective short-term revascularization strategy for the majority of patients with both early and late re-occlusions. Long-term results are limited by secondary re-occlusions and limb loss. CLINICAL IMPACT: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is a well-established treatment for acute lower limb ischemia (ALI). Re-occlusions after successful treatment are, however, observed in almost a third of the patients. Yet, the outcomes of CDT for re-occlusions for patients who were previously treated with CDT are not well known. This study showed that CDT is effective in achieving revascularization in cases of early and late re-occlusion after treatment for ALI, but the risk for further re-occlusions is high. Future studies should focus on maintaining patency after successful CDT for ALI.

Trends and outcomes of lytic-based therapies for high-risk pulmonary embolism: A nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic thrombolysis (ST) is the guideline-recommended treatment for high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), although catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) may provide a treatment alternative associated with lower rates of bleeding. Furthermore, the treatment trends and outcomes among those with high-risk PE according to treatment assignments of no lytic therapy (NLT), ST, and CDT are underreported. METHODS: Patients hospitalized for high-risk PE between 2016 and 2019 were identified by administrative claims codes from the National Readmission Database. Therapy assignment was similarly defined by administrative codes, then stratified into NLT, ST, and CDT cohorts to report patient characteristics, care settings, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality with rates adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics using multivariable logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and 90-day readmission. Over the years of interest, trends in lytic treatment along with concomitant use of mechanical or surgical thrombectomy were reported. RESULTS: Among 74,516 patients with high-risk PE, 61,569 (82.6%) received NLT, 8445 (11.3%) received ST, and 4502 (6.04%) received CDT. The NLT subgroup, relative to ST and CDT, tended to be older (66.1 ± 15.4, 62.8 ± 15.3, and 63.4 ± 14.4; p < 0.001) and more frequently women (56.0%, 54.4%, and 51.3%; p < 0.001), respectively. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate was highest for ST (18.8%, 34.1%, and 18.3% for NLT, ST, and CDT, respectively; p < 0.001) and persisted after multivariable adjustment (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.43; 95% CI 0.38-0.49; p < 0.0001) of in-hospital mortality for CDT relative to ST. The unadjusted rate of ICH or GIB was lowest for NLT (1.0%, 2.0%, and 0.6% for NLT, ST, and CDT, respectively; p < 0.001). CDT, relative to ST, was associated with reduced odds of ICH (aOR 0.32; 95% CI 0.18-0.55; p < 0.0001) and GIB (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.98; p < 0.0001). Readmissions were highest for NLT (21.7%, 9.6%, and 12.1% for NLT, ST, and CDT, respectively; p < 0.001). CDT was associated with a higher incidence of 90-day readmission relative to ST (aOR 1.32; 95% CI 1.10-1.57; p < 0.001). From 2016 to 2019, individual treatment trends were not significantly different, although NLT tended to be offered among smaller and rural hospitals. Rates of concomitant thrombectomy were low in all three treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among a large, contemporary, US cohort with high-risk PE, over 80% of patients did not receive any form of thrombolysis. High-risk PE that did receive systemic thrombolysis was associated with the highest rates of in-hospital mortality, suggesting opportunities to study the implementation of lytic and nonlytic-based treatments to improve outcomes for those presenting with high-risk PE.

Outcomes With Hybrid Catheter-Directed Therapy Compared With Aspiration Thrombectomy for Patients With Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

PURPOSE: Intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism (IHR PE) is a challenging form of embolism obstruction that causes right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The optimal management of IHR PE has not been established. This single-center prospective, observational study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of complex catheter-directed therapy (CDT) - catheter-directed mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (CDMT) supplemented with catheter-directed thrombolysis (hybrid CDT) in comparison to CDMT alone for IHR PE. METHODS: A propensity score based on the pulmonary embolism severity index class and Miller obstruction index (MOI) was calculated, and 21 hybrid CDT cases (mean age 54.8 (14.7) years, 9/21 women) were matched with 21 CDMT cases (mean age 58.8 (14.9) years, 13/21 women). The baseline demographics, clinical, and treatment characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were detected regarding baseline demographics and PE severity parameters. Hybrid CDT demonstrated a higher reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (hybrid CDT: median mPAP reduction 8 mmHg (IQR: 6-10 mmHg) vs CDMT: median mPAP reduction 6 mmHg (IQR: 4-7 mmHg); P = 0.019), MOI score (hybrid CDT: median change - 5 points (IQR: 5-6 points) vs CDMT median change - 3 points (IQR: 3-5 points); P = 0.019), and median RV: left ventricular ratio (hybrid CDT: median change 0.4 (IQR: 0.3-0.45) vs CDMT median change 0.26 (IQR: 0.2-0.4); P = 0.007). No major bleeding was observed. Both the hybrid CDT and CDMT alone treatments are safe and effective in managing IHR PE. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid CDT is a promising technique for the management of IHR PE with insufficient thrombus load reduction by CDMT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT0447356-registration date 16 July 2020.

Pulmonary embolism response teams. A description of the first 36-month Australian experience.

BACKGROUND: High/intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) confers increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. International guidelines recommend the formation of a PE response team (PERT) for PE management because of the complexity of risk stratification and emerging treatment options. However, there are currently no available Australian data regarding outcomes of PE managed through a PERT. AIMS: To analyse the clinical and outcome data of patients from an Australian centre with high/intermediate-risk PE requiring PERT-guided management. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of 75 consecutive patients with high/intermediate-risk PE who had PERT involvement, between August 2018 and July 2021. We recorded clinical and interventional data at the time of PERT and assessed patient outcomes up to 30 days from PERT initiation. We used unpaired t tests to compare right to left ventricular (RV/LV) ratios by computed tomography criteria or transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline and after interventions. RESULTS: Data were available for 74 patients. Initial computed tomography pulmonary angiography RV/LV ratio was increased at 1.65 ± 0.5 and decreased to 1.30 ± 0.29 following PERT-guided interventions (P < 0.001). TTE RV/LV ratio also decreased following PERT-guided management (1.09 ± 0.19 vs 0.93 ± 0.17; P < 0.001). 20% of patients had any bleeding complication, but two-thirds were mild, not requiring intervention. All-cause mortality was 6.8%, and all occurred within the first 7 days of admission. CONCLUSION: The PERT model is feasible in a large Australian centre in managing complex and time-critical PE. Our data demonstrate outcomes comparable with existing published international PERT data. However, successful implementation at other Australian institutions may require adequate centre-specific resource availability and the presence of multispeciality input.

Ultrasound Combined With Continuous Microbubble Injection to Enhance Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Vitro and in Vivo.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of microbubble perfusion mode on catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), we evaluated the effect of two different types of microbubble perfusion modes (continuous injection versus bolus injection) on the thrombolytic efficacy of CDT in vitro and further assessed the effect of continuous microbubble injection on CDT in vivo. METHODS: In an in vitro experimental setup, 50 fresh bovine whole blood clots were randomized into five groups: ultrasound and continuous microbubble injection-enhanced CDT (US + cMB + CDT), ultrasound and bolus microbubble injection-enhanced CDT (US + bMB + CDT), US + CDT, US + cMB, and CDT. In a porcine femoral vein thrombosis model, 16 completely obstructive thrombi were randomly assigned to the CDT group and the US + cMB + CDT group, respectively. Thrombolysis rate, vascular recanalization rate, hematoxylin-eosin, and immunofluorescence staining were used to evaluate the thrombolytic effect in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: In vitro, US + cMB + CDT group resulted in a significantly higher thrombolysis rate compared with the other four groups (P < .05). Meanwhile, this group also demonstrated a looser clot structure and more disrupted fibrin structures. In vivo, US + cMB + CDT contributed to a significantly higher vascular recanalization rate compared with CDT (87.50% versus 25.00%, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: US + cMB + CDT was more effective than US + bMB + CDT in thrombolysis, and ultrasound combined with continuous microbubble injection could enhance the thrombolytic efficacy of CDT.

Evidence-Based Update on Transcatheter Therapies for Pulmonary Embolism.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Multiple new therapies are in development and under study to improve our contemporary care of patients with PE. We review and compare here these novel therapeutics and technologies. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple novel therapeutic devices have been developed and are under active study. This work has advanced the care of patients with intermediate and high-risk PE. Novel therapies are improving care of complex PE patients. These have inspired large multicenter international randomized controlled trials that are actively recruiting patients to advance the care of PE. These studies will work towards advancing guidelines for clinical care of patients with PE.

Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence, Innovation, and Horizons.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The goal of this review is to discuss the most up-to-date literature on epidemiology, diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of acute PE. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite an increase in annual incidence rate of PE in the United States and development of multiple advanced therapies for treatment of acute PE, PE-related mortality is not consistently decreasing across populations. Although multiple risk stratification schemes have been developed, it is still unclear which advanced therapy should be used for the individual patient and optimal timing. Fortunately, multiple randomized clinical trials are underway to answer these questions. Nevertheless, up to 50% of patients have persistent reduced quality of life 6 months after acute PE, termed post-PE syndrome. Despite advances in therapeutic options for management of acute PE, many questions remain unanswered, including optimal risk stratification and management of acute PE.

Comparing anticoagulant therapy alone, anticoagulant therapy in combination with catheter-directed thrombolysis, and anticoagulant therapy in combination with pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis in the patients with optional inferior vena cava filter-related thrombosis: A single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the treatment methods and efficacy of inferior vena cava filter thrombosis (IVCFT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, the clinical data for 47 patients with IVCFT who underwent sequential treatment at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital, from January 2020 to January 2023 were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment method: anticoagulant therapy (AC group), anticoagulation plus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT group), and anticoagulation plus AngioJet thrombectomy plus catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT group). The evaluation criteria for efficacy mainly included preoperative and postoperative clinical symptoms (Villalta score), thrombus diameter, thrombus clearance rate, filter retrieval rate, filter retention time, and urokinase dosage. RESULTS: This study included 47 patients, of whom 31 were males (65.9%) and 16 females (34.1%), with a mean age of 72.05 ± 8.32 years. An Aegisy filter was used in seven patients, whereas an Illicium filter was used in forty patients. There were a total of nineteen patients in the anticoagulation-only group, with complete dissolution of the intraluminal thrombus in five patients, a residual thrombus with a maximum diameter ≤1 cm in three patients, and a residual thrombus with a maximum diameter >1 cm in eleven patients. The Villalta score was 7.16 ± 0.6 before treatment and decreased to 3.79 ± 0.59 after treatment. The thrombus diameter decreased from an average of 1.46 ± 0.2 cm before treatment to an average of 0.85 ± 0.14 cm after treatment. The retrieval rate for the filters was 42.11% (8/19), with an average dwell time of 27.4 ± 1.3 days for the filters. The CDT group consisted of 17 patients. Among whom we observed, complete dissolution of the intraluminal thrombus was observed in six patients, residual thrombus with a maximum diameter ≤1 cm in nine patients, and residual thrombus with a maximum diameter >1 cm in two patients. The Villalta score decreased from 7.53 ± 0.83 before treatment to 2.06 ± 0.39 after treatment. The thrombus diameter also decreased from 1.46 ± 0.16 cm before treatment to 0.35 ± 0.11 cm after treatment. The retrieval rate of the filters was 88.24% (15/17), and the average filter indwelling time was 19.25 ± 4.5 days. The PCDT group consisted of 11 patients. We observed complete dissolution of the intraluminal thrombus in four patients, residual thrombus with a maximum diameter ≤1 cm in six patients, and residual thrombus with a maximum diameter >1 cm in one patient. The Villalta score decreased from 7.45 ± 0.76 before treatment to 2.09 ± 0.55 after treatment. The thrombus diameter decreased from 1.50 ± 0.21 cm before treatment to 0.33 ± 0.35 cm after treatment, and the rate of filter retrieval was 90.91% (10/11). CONCLUSION: The three treatments of anticoagulation therapy, CDT, and PCDT were meaningful for preoperative and postoperative thrombolysis and symptom improvement in patients with IVCFT. The application of CDT and PCDT was superior to anticoagulation therapy, while there was no significant difference between the CDT and PCDT group. The retrieval rate of filters in the anticoagulation therapy group was the lowest, with no significant difference between the CDT and PCDT group.

Short-term outcomes of endovascular management of acute limb ischemia using aspiration mechanical thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Management of acute limb ischemia (ALI) has seen greater utilization of catheter-based interventions over the last two decades. Data on their efficacy is largely based on comparisons of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and open thrombectomy. During this time, many adjuncts to CDT have emerged with different mechanisms of action, including pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) and aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT). However, the safety and efficacy of newer adjuncts like AMT have not been well established. This study is a retrospective analysis of the contemporary management of ALI comparing patients treated with aspiration mechanical thrombectomy to patients treated with the more established CDT adjunct, pharmacomechanical thrombolysis. METHODS: Patients undergoing peripheral endovascular intervention for ALI using an adjunctive device were identified through query of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) module from 2014 to 2019. Patients with a nonviable extremity (Rutherford ALI Stage 3), prior history of ipsilateral major amputation, popliteal aneurysm, procedures that were deemed elective (>72 h from admission), procedures that did not utilize an endovascular adjunctive device, and patients without short-term follow-up were all excluded from analysis. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of freedom from major amputation and/or death in the perioperative time period. RESULTS: We identified 528 patients with Rutherford ALI Stage 1 or 2 who were treated with an endovascular adjunct. 433 patients did not undergo aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (no AMT group) and 95 patients did undergo aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT group). The amputation-free survival across all patients was 93.4%. There were significant differences in demographic, comorbidity, and treatment variables between groups (e.g., gender, prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), history of prior peripheral artery disease intervention, and history of prior infra-inguinal PVI), so a propensity score matched analysis was included to account for these group differences. In the propensity score matched analysis, there was no significant difference in major amputation (AMT 7.4% vs no AMT 3.2%, p = 0.13) or death (AMT 95.8% survival vs no AMT 98.4% survival, p = 0.23) with the use of aspiration mechanical thrombectomy. However, there was significantly worse amputation-free survival with the use of aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT 88.4% vs no AMT 95.3%, p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, prior supra-inguinal bypass (OR 4.85, 1.70-13.84, p = 0.003), Rutherford ALI Stage 2B (OR 3.13, 1.47-6.67, p = 0.003), and aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (OR 2.71, 1.03-7.17, p = 0.05) were associated with the composite outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term amputation-free survival rates of endovascular management of acute limb ischemia are adequate across all modalities. However, aspiration mechanical thrombectomy was associated with significantly worse amputation-free survival compared to other endovascular adjuncts alone (i.e., pharmacomechanical thrombolysis). Severe limb ischemia (Rutherford ALI Stage 2B) and prior supra-inguinal bypass were associated with worse amputation-free survival regardless of the choice of endovascular intervention.

Perioperative complications of minor and major reinterventions for peripheral arterial disease.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) frequently require reinterventions after lower-extremity revascularization (LER) to maintain perfusion. Current Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines define reinterventions as major or minor based on the magnitude of the procedure. While prior studies have compared primary LER procedures of different magnitudes, similar studies for reinterventions have not been performed. The objective of this study is to compare perioperative outcomes associated with major and minor reinterventions. METHODS: Patients undergoing LER for PAD at a tertiary care center from 2013 to 2017 were included. A retrospective review of electronic medical records was performed, and reinterventions were categorized as major or minor based on the procedure magnitude. Minor reinterventions included endovascular procedures and open revision with patch angioplasty, while major reinterventions were characterized by open surgical or endovascular LER with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Perioperative outcomes following LER were captured and compared for major and minor reinterventions. An additional subgroup analysis was performed comparing outcomes associated with major reinterventions stratified into open major surgical reinterventions and CDT. RESULTS: This study included 713 patients over a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. A total of 291 patients underwent 696 ipsilateral reinterventions (range = 1-12 reinterventions). Most reinterventions were minor (72.1%, N = 502) and 27.9% (N = 194) were major. Patients receiving reinterventions had an average age of 67.2 ± 11.5 and most were white (73.5%) males (60.1%) initially treated for claudication (58.2%) and CLTI (41.8%). There was significantly higher post-operative bleeding (9.8% vs 3.4%, p = .001), arterial thrombosis (3.1% vs 1.0%, p = .047), and acute renal failure (6.2% vs 2.4%, p = .014) after major reinterventions than minor. Additionally, major reinterventions had significantly higher return to the OR (17.0% vs 11.3%, p = .046) and longer hospital stays (7.5 vs 4.3 days, p = <.0001). Overall, major reinterventions were associated with significantly increased perioperative morbidity (37.6% vs 19.7%, p ≤ .001) with no difference in perioperative mortality. In the subgroup analysis, open reinterventions resulted in significantly longer hospital stays (8.6 days vs 5.5 days, p ≤ .001) and more wound infections than CDT (11.0% vs 0%, p = .017). However, there was no other significant difference in morbidity or mortality following treatment with open surgical reinterventions or CDT. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, major reinterventions after LER were associated with greater perioperative morbidity than minor reinterventions, with no difference in mortality. Major reinterventions performed via open surgery and CDT had similar morbidity and mortality.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relative safety and efficacy of treating lower extremity deep vein thrombosis via pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) as approaches to treating deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities (LEDVT). METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang, Embase, Chinese Science and Technology Journal, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were systematically searched for relevant articles published through October 2023, after which appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen out relevant articles. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used to extract key data from these studies, and pooled analyses were conducted based on mead difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) values and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered at INPLASY.COM (No. INPLASY2023100075). RESULTS: In total, 31 relevant studies enrolling 2413 patients were included in this meta-analysis, with 1184 and 1229 patients in the AngioJet and CDT groups, respectively. These analyses revealed that the AngioJet group exhibited significantly higher rates of early postoperative deep vein patency (MD = 7.73, 95% CI (3.29, 12.17), p = .0006) and affected limb symptom improvement (MD = 6.31, 95% CI (1.82,10.80), p = .006) relative to the CDT group, whereas no differences in grade II or III thrombus clearance rates (OR = 1.30, 95% CI (0.95, 1.77), p = .10) or changes in thigh circumference before and after treatment (MD = 0.01, 95% CI (-0.80, 0.83), p = .97) were observed. The AngioJet group also exhibited lower urokinase doses (MD = -145.33, 95% CI (-164.28,126.38), p < .00001), shorter thrombolysis time (MD = -2.35, 95% CI(-2.80, -1.90), p < .00001), a less prolonged hospital stay (MD = -3.13, 95% CI(-3.81, -2.45), p < .00001), lower rates of PTS incidence (OR = 0.56, 95% CI(0.36, 0.88), p = .01), and reduced complication rates (OR = 0.51, 95% CI(0.31, 0.83), p = .0007). CONCLUSION: Studies published to date suggest that relative to CDT treatment, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy is associated with improved thrombus clearance, fewer complications, and lower complication rates in LEDVT patients, underscoring the safety and efficacy of this therapeutic strategy.

The outcome of endovenous intervention for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis with and without inferior vena cava filter.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is an endovenous interventional therapy that can quickly remove the acute thrombus, thereby improving the clinical outcomes of proximal DVT. However, instrumentation of extensive fresh thrombus may be associated with iatrogenic pulmonary embolism (PE). Therefore, we aimed to compare CDT's safety, complications, and perioperative embolic (PE) insults for acute iliofemoral DVT, with and without an IVC filter. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients having acute proximal DVT for less than 14 days and undergoing endovenous therapy were included and presented to the vascular surgery department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Egypt. The patients were randomized into two equal groups, Groups A and B, each having 60 patients. Group A was treated with IVC filter insertion, while Group B was treated without a filter. The anticoagulation and CDT procedures were similar between the two groups. RESULTS: The sample included 96 females (80%) and 24 males (20%), with a mean age of 32.6 ± 7.2 years. Clinically no clinical PE occurred in both groups. However, radiologically, new lesions in multislice CT pulmonary angiogram and V/Q scan were noted in two of 60 patients (3.33%) of the IVC filter group, compared with three patients (5 %) in the non-filtered group. CONCLUSION: Endovenous intervention in the form of CDT for acute iliofemoral DVT without an IVC filter is safe and not associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolization than filter usage. The routine use of IVC filters should not be used mandatorily during CDT.

Venographic classification and long-term surgical treatment outcomes for axillary-subclavian vein thrombosis due to venous thoracic outlet syndrome (Paget-Schroetter syndrome).

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the clinical presentation, operative findings, and surgical treatment outcomes for axillary-subclavian vein (AxSCV) thrombosis due to venous thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center review of 266 patients who had undergone primary surgical treatment of VTOS between 2016 and 2022. The clinical outcomes were compared between the patients in four treatment groups determined by intraoperative venography. RESULTS: Of the 266 patients, 132 were male and 134 were female. All patients had a history of spontaneous arm swelling and idiopathic AxSCV thrombosis, including 25 (9%) with proven pulmonary embolism, at a mean age of 32.1 ± 0.8 years (range, 12-66 years). The timing of clinical presentation was acute (<15 days) for 132 patients (50%), subacute (15-90 days) for 71 (27%), and chronic (>90 days) for 63 patients (24%). Venography with catheter-directed thrombolysis or thrombectomy (CDT) and/or balloon angioplasty had been performed in 188 patients (71%). The median interval between symptom onset and surgery was 78 days. After paraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression and external venolysis, intraoperative venography showed a widely patent AxSCV in 150 patients (56%). However, 26 (10%) had a long chronic AxSCV occlusion with axillary vein inflow insufficient for bypass reconstruction. Patch angioplasty was performed for focal AxSCV stenosis in 55 patients (21%) and bypass graft reconstruction for segmental AxSCV occlusion in 35 (13%). The patients who underwent external venolysis alone (patent or occluded AxSCV; n = 176) had a shorter mean operative time, shorter postoperative length of stay and fewer reoperations and late reinterventions compared with those who underwent AxSCV reconstruction (patch or bypass; n = 90), with no differences in the incidence of overall complications or 30-day readmissions. At a median clinical follow-up of 38.7 months, 246 patients (93%) had no arm swelling, and only 17 (6%) were receiving anticoagulation treatment; 95% of those with a patent AxSCV at the end of surgery were free of arm swelling vs 69% of those with a long chronic AxSCV occlusion (P < .001). The patients who had undergone CDT at the initial diagnosis were 32% less likely to need AxSCV reconstruction at surgery (30% vs 44%; P = .034) and 60% less likely to have arm swelling at follow-up (5% vs 13%; P < .05) vs those who had not undergone CDT. CONCLUSIONS: Paraclavicular decompression, external venolysis, and selective AxSCV reconstruction determined by intraoperative venography findings can provide successful and durable treatment for >90% of all patients with VTOS. Further work is needed to achieve earlier recognition of AxSCV thrombosis, prompt usage of CDT, and even more effective surgical treatment.

Comparison of interventions for intermediate to high-risk pulmonary embolism: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple interventions, including catheter-directed therapy (CDT), systemic thrombolysis (ST), surgical embolectomy (SE), and therapeutic anticoagulation (AC) have been used to treat intermediate to high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), but the most effective and safest treatment remains unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety outcomes of each intervention. METHODS: We queried PubMed and EMBASE in January 2023 and performed a network meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT), including high or intermediate-risk PE patients, and comparing AC, CDT, SE, and ST. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and major bleeding. The secondary outcomes included long-term mortality (≥6 months), recurrent PE, minor bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: We identified 11 RCTs and 42 observational studies involving 157,454 patients. CDT was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than ST (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.41 [0.31-0.55]), AC (OR [95% CI]: 0.33 [0.20-0.53]), and SE (OR [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.39-0.96]). Recurrent PE in CDT was lower than ST (OR [95% CI]: 0.66 [0.50-0.87]), AC (OR [95% CI]: 0.36 [0.20-0.66]), and trended lower than SE (OR [95% CI]: 0.71 [0.40-1.26]). Notably, ST had higher major bleeding risks than CDT (OR [95% CI]: 1.51 [1.19-1.91]) and AC (OR [95% CI]: 2.21 [1.53-3.19]). By rankogram analysis, CDT presented the highest p-score in in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and recurrent PE. CONCLUSION: In this network meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs involving patients with intermediate to high-risk PE, CDT was associated with improved mortality outcomes compared to other therapies, without significant additional bleeding risk.

Mechanical thrombectomy versus catheter directed thrombolysis in patients with pulmonary embolism: A multicenter experience.

OBJECTIVES: Compare in-hospital outcomes of patients treated with either mechanical thrombectomy (MT) or catheter directed lysis (CDL) in treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing MT or CDL for acute PE between 2014 and 2021. The primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death, significant bleed, vascular complication, or need for mechanical support post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcome in addition to blood transfusions, invasive hemodynamics, echocardiographic data, and intensive care unit (ICU) utilization. RESULTS: 458 patients were treated for PE with 266 patients in the CDL arm and 192 patients in the MT arm. The primary composite endpoint was not significantly different between the two groups with CDL 12% versus MT 11% (p = 0.5). There was a significant difference in total length of ICU time required with more in the CDL group versus MT (3.8 ± 2.0 vs. 2.8 ± 3.0 days, p = 0.009). All other secondary end points showed no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing catheter directed treatment of PE, there was no difference between MT and CDL in terms of in-hospital mortality, bleeds, catheter-related complications, and hemodynamics.