Does the Primary Surgical Approach Matter When Choosing the Approach for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Multiple surgical approaches are used for primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). This study sought to investigate prevalence of discordance of pTHA and rTHA surgical approaches and to evaluate how approach concordance impacts postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent rTHA from 2000 to 2021 was conducted at 3 large urban academic centers. Patients who had minimum 1-year follow-up post-rTHA were included and grouped based on whether they received pTHA via a posterior (PA), direct anterior (DA), or laterally based (DL) approach, and by concordance of index rTHA approach with their pTHA approach. Of the 917 patients studied, 839 (91.5%) were included in the concordant cohort and 78 (8.5%) in the discordant cohort. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Discordance was most prevalent in the DA-pTHA subset (29.5%), compared to the DL-pTHA subset (14.7%) or PA-pTHA subset (3.7%). Discordance varied significantly between primary approaches among all revisions, with DA-pTHA patients having the highest discordance rate for patients revised for aseptic loosening (46.3%, P < .001), fracture (22.2%, P < .001), and dislocation (33.3%, P < .001). There were no differences between groups in dislocation rate, re-revision for infection, or re-revision for fracture. CONCLUSION: The results of this multicenter study showed patients who received pTHA via the DA were more likely to receive rTHA via a discordant approach compared to other primary approaches. Since approach concordance did not impact dislocation, infection, or fracture rates after rTHA, surgeons can feel reassured using a separate approach for rTHA. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

How Does Surgical Approach Affect Characteristics of Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been voiced regarding how surgical approach impacts risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study investigated how surgical approach impacts rate, direction, and timing of dislocations following THA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 13,335 primary THAs from 2011 to 2020 and identified 118 patients with prosthetic hip dislocation. Patients were stratified into cohorts by surgical approach used during primary THA. Patient demographics, index THA acetabular cup positioning, number, direction, timing of dislocations, and subsequent revisions were collected. RESULTS: Dislocation rate differed significantly between posterior approach (PA), direct anterior approach (DAA), and laterally-based approach (LA) (1.1 versus 0.7% versus 0.5%, P = .026). Rate of hips dislocating anteriorly was lowest in the PA group (19.2%) compared to LA (50.0%) and DAA groups (38.2%, P = .044). There was no difference in rate of hips dislocating posteriorly (P = .159) or multidirectional (P = .508) instability; notably 58.8% of dislocations in the DAA cohort occurred posteriorly. There were no differences in dislocation timing or revision rate. Acetabular anteversion was highest in the PA cohort compared to DAA and LA (21.5 versus 19.2 versus 11.7 degrees, P = .049). CONCLUSION: After THA, patients in the PA group had a slightly higher dislocation rate compared to the DAA and LA groups. The PA group had a lower rate of anterior dislocation and nearly 60% of DAA dislocations occurred posteriorly. However, with no differences in other parameters including revision rates or timing, our data suggests surgical approach may impact dislocation characteristics to a lesser degree than previous studies have suggested.

Cement Mantle Quality and Stem Alignment in Cemented Collarless Polished Tapered Stems Implanted via the Direct Anterior and Direct Lateral Approaches: A Single Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the stem alignment and the quality of cement mantle of collarless polished tapered cemented stems inserted through the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the direct lateral approach (DLA). METHODS: A comparative retrospective study of 232 hybrid total hip arthroplasties using a cemented collarless polished tapered stem through either the DAA (n = 147) or DLA (n = 85) was performed. Radiographic evaluation included stem alignment, cement mantle quality, and cement mantle thickness. RESULTS: On anteroposterior radiographs, stems implanted through the DLA were more likely to be in neutral alignment, than those implanted through the DAA (83.5%[n = 71] versus 71.4% [n = 105]; P = <.001). No difference between approaches was noted for stem alignment on lateral radiographs or cement mantle quality. Multivariate analysis revealed factors associated with suboptimal cement mantle and included Dorr type B or C femur as well as male gender. A mean cement mantle thickness ≥2mm was achieved in all Gruen zones for both approaches. CONCLUSION: In our series, the DAA was associated with a higher incidence of coronal plane stem malalignment compared to the DLA when using cemented tapered polished femoral components for total hip arthroplasty. No difference in lateral stem alignment or cement mantle quality was found.

Direct anterior approach versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: In the current literature, there is no consensus on the best surgical approach in hip replacement for femoral neck fractures (FNFs). AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the direct lateral approach (DLA) in patients treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for FNFs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with displaced FNFs (Garden type III and IV) treated operatively using BHA and THA were enrolled. The surgical approach techniques DAA and DLA are compared. The analysed variables are: mean surgery time, number of blood units transfused perioperatively, percentage of patients transfused, perioperative complications, pain and functional outcomes at 1 and 6 months and mortality at 1, 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, 37 patients underwent BHA by the DAA and 38 patients underwent BHA by the DLA, 69 patients underwent THA by the DAA and 60 patients underwent THA by the DLA. For THA, the DAA compared to the DLA had a higher mean surgery time (100.8 min vs. 97.7 min), a lower mean number of blood units transfused perioperatively (1.4 U vs. 1.9 U), a significantly lower percentage of patients transfused (53.6% vs. 71.7%), a higher rate of perioperative complications (10.1% vs. 1.6%), a lower pain referred and better functional outcomes in the first 6 postoperative months and a significantly lower mortality rate at 12 months (2.9% vs. 16.7%). For BHA, the advantages of the DAA over DLA are not as significant. CONCLUSIONS: The direct anterior approach in THA for FNFs provides significant benefits in the early post-operative period compared to the direct lateral approach in terms of functional recovery, residual pain, blood loss and mortality rate in the elderly active population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Heterotopic ossification in primary total hip arthroplasty using the posterolateral compared to the direct lateral approach.

PURPOSE: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful procedure. However, in time, heterotopic ossification (HO) can form due to, amongst others, soft tissue damage. This can lead to pain and impairment. This study compares the formations of HO between patients who underwent either THA with the posterolateral approach (PA) or with the direct lateral approach (DLA). Our hypothesis is that patients who underwent THA with a PA form less HO compared to THA patients who underwent DLA. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 296 consecutive patients were included who underwent THA. A total of 127 patients underwent THA with the PA and 169 with the DLA. This was dependent on the surgeon's preference and experience. More than 95% of patients had primary osteoarthritis as the primary diagnosis. Clinical outcomes were scored using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS), radiological HO were scored using the Brooker classification. Follow-up was performed at 1 and 6 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight patients (87%) completed the 6-year follow-up. HO formation occurred more in patients who underwent DLA, compared to PA (43(30%) vs. 21(18%), p = 0.024) after 6 years. However, the presence of severe HO (Brooker 3-4) was equal between the DLA and PA (7 vs. 5, p = 0.551). After 6 years the HHS and NRS for patient satisfaction were statistically significant higher after the PA (95.2 and 8.9, respectively) compared to the DLA (91.6 and 8.5, respectively) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). The NRS for load pain was statistically significant lower in the PA group (0.5) compared to the DLA group (1.2) (p = 0.004). The NRS for rest pain was equal: 0.3 in the PA group and 0.5 in the DLA group. CONCLUSION: THA with the PA causes less HO formation than the DLA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registrated as HipVit trial, NL 32832.100.10, R-10.17D/HIPVIT 1. Central Commission Human-Related research (CCMO) Registry.

One-stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty in patient with sickle cell disease and previous Girdlestone procedure on the right side: First presentation in Togo.

80% of Sickle Cell Disease cases are estimated to be in Sub-Saharan Africa. It can lead to various acute and chronic complications and osteonecrosis of the femoral head is one of these. Girdlestone procedure is an option to treat osteonecrosis in patients who could not afford arthroplasty. We report here the first case of bilateral total hip arthroplasty in a patient with a previous Girdlestone procedure on the right side and an osteonecrosis of the femoral hip on the left side.

A scoping review comparing two common surgical approaches to the hip for hemiarthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture is a common surgical procedure. A number of distinct approaches are used to access the hip joint. The most commonly used are the direct lateral approach (DLA), and the posterior approach (PA). Internationally there is little consensus on which of these approaches to use. Current guidance is based on a limited selection of evidence and choice of approach is frequently based on surgeon preference. Historically, recommendations have been made based on dislocation rates. In light of technical advancements and greater recognition of patient priorities, outcomes such as post-operative function and pain may be considered more important in the modern context. The aim of this scoping review was to summarise the literature pertaining to the comparison of common surgical approaches to the hip for hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: A scoping review methodology was used to examine the range and nature of primary research. Using systematic methods we searched for studies that directly compared the DLA and PA. Studies reporting the following outcomes were considered; dislocation, mortality, pain, activities of daily living, functionality, health-related quality of life, length of stay, surgeon assessment of difficulty, and adverse events. MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched. Relevant information was extracted and synthesis of the retrieved data followed a basic content analytical approach. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were retrieved: 12 observational studies and 1 randomised trial. The majority of studies were based at single sites. Larger observational studies using multi-site and national registry data have emerged in recent years. Reporting of technique and outcomes is inconsistent. A trend for higher rates of dislocation using the PA was observed and eight studies recommended the use of the DLA over the PA. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review demonstrates that the existing evidence is highly heterogeneous in nature and not of a sufficient quality to inform practice recommendations. This issue would be best addressed by additional RCTs, and high quality national-level observational data. Standardisation of the recording of patient risk factors, surgical and post-operative intervention protocols, and outcomes in all study designs would strengthen the potential for valid comparison of future findings.

Component Placement in Direct Lateral vs Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Radiographic Outcomes From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: End-stage coxarthrosis is increasingly common; however, limited evidence exists on the effect of direct lateral approach (DLA) and minimally invasive direct anterior approach (MIDA) on component placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We therefore conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine the component placement in DLA vs MIDA in THA. METHODS: Between January 2012 and June 2013, 164 patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed coxarthrosis aged 20-80 years were randomized to either DLA or MIDA (active comparator). Excluded were patients with previous ipsilateral hip surgery, a body mass index >35 kg/m2, and/or mental disability. Primary clinical outcomes have been published elsewhere. Secondary outcomes included radiographic assessment of the acetabular component (cement-mantle thickness, inclination, and anteversion), femoral stem position (varus/valgus and THA index), offset restoration, and leg length discrepancy. RESULTS: The mean cement-mantle was significantly thicker in zone 1 in the MIDA group (mean difference = 0.51 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.93, P = .018), and the mean degrees of inclination and anteversion were higher in the MIDA group (mean difference = 2.5°, 95% CI 0.3-4.6, P = .023 and mean difference = 3.6°, 95% CI 2.2-5.0, P < .0001, respectively). According to the defined reference range, cup inclination was more often adequate in the DLA group (67.9% (53/78) in the DLA group vs 52.4% (43/82) in the MIDA group, P = .045). There were no differences in frontal or lateral femoral stem position, global offset restoration, or leg length discrepancy. CONCLUSION: In this population of Norwegian patients with coxarthrosis, radiographic assessment showed limited differences in component placement between MIDA and DLA. The findings suggest that component placement is similar in the 2 surgical approaches.

Outcomes using the extensor digitorum communis splitting approach for the treatment of radial head fractures.

BACKGROUND: Surgery on the radial head is usually performed via the Kocher interval. Iatrogenic injury to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) and lateral ligamentous complex are known complications of lateral elbow approaches. The extensor digitorum communis (EDC) splitting approach for lateral elbow exposure is known to provide better access to the anterior half of the radial head while reducing the risk of injury to the lateral ligaments. The aim of this study was to provide clinical outcome data for the EDC splitting approach. METHODS: Thirteen patients with closed radial head fractures underwent internal fixation or replacement via the EDC splitting approach. Patients were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. Clinical assessments of the elbows were also performed. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation of their radial heads, and 3 underwent radial head replacements. At final follow-up, all patients achieved good to excellent Mayo Elbow Performance scores, with a mean score of 90 (range 80-100). They had a mean ASES elbow score of 89.6 (range 77-97) and a mean Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score of 12.8 (range 6.67-25.8). Patients reported a mean overall ASES satisfaction score of 8.5 (range 6-10). There were no significant surgical complications, including iatrogenic damage to the PIN or the lateral ligaments. CONCLUSION: The EDC splitting approach is a feasible method of exposing the lateral elbow, providing safe and reliable access to the radial head.

Comparison of Gait Motion Including Postoperative Trunk Deflection Between Direct Lateral and Anterolateral Approaches in Supine Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: A prospective study was conducted to compare the effect of an anterolateral approach in the supine position (ALS) with that of a direct lateral (DL) approach on gait motion, including trunk deflection, in walking after total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that trunk deflection in walking after ALS would be significantly improved in comparison with use of the DL approach. METHODS: The subjects were 15 patients, with 7 in the ALS group and 8 in the DL group. Walking before and 9 and 28 weeks after surgery was analyzed using 3-dimensional motion analysis. RESULTS: Walking velocity, stride length, hip joint range of motion in the sagittal plane in walking, and locomotion range of trunk inclination were significantly improved 28 weeks after surgery in both groups. In gait analysis, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: This study was conducted to compare the effect of ALS with that of a DL approach on locomotion in walking after total hip arthroplasty. Hip pain at 9 weeks after surgery was significantly improved using ALS compared to the DL approach, but there were no significant differences in gait function at 28 weeks after surgery using ALS or DL approach. Further long-term studies are required to examine differences between these procedures.

No Differences in Major In-Hospital Outcome Metrics When Comparing the Direct Lateral Approach to the Posterior Approach for Hemiarthroplasties After Traumatic Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Introduction: The surgical approach of hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures remains debated. The study objective was to compare in-hospital outcomes for geriatric displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty based on surgical approach (direct lateral vs. posterior approach). Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included geriatric patients (≥60 y/o) admitted 7/1/2016-3/31/2020 treated with hemiarthroplasty. Outcomes included: operative time (incision to closure), length of stay (HLOS), and blood loss volume (mL). The Harding direct lateral approach was compared to the posterior approach; P < .05. Results: There were 164 patients (59% direct lateral, 41% posterior). Patients treated with the direct lateral approach had an advanced directive (P = .03), dementia, (P = .03), or were functionally dependent (P = .03) more often than patients treated with the posterior approach. Time to surgery was comparable between groups (P = .52). The direct lateral approach was associated with a shorter operative time (2.3 vs. 2.8 h, P = .03), a longer HLOS (5.0 vs. 4.0 days, P < .01), and a lower median volume of blood loss (50 vs. 100 mL, P = .01), than the posterior approach, respectively. In a stratified analysis, for those who were not functionally dependent, did not have dementia or an advanced directive, the direct lateral approach led to a longer HLOS (P = .03) and shorter operative time (P = .04) than the posterior approach. Whereas among those who were functionally dependent, had dementia or had an advanced directive, the direct lateral approach led to less blood loss (P = .02) than the posterior approach. Discussion: While those treated with the direct lateral approach lost significantly less blood, they had a significantly longer HLOS than those treated with the posterior approach. Comorbidities significantly modified outcomes, which may suggest their presence could assist with treatment decisions. Conclusions: This study found neither approach, the direct lateral nor posterior, to be superior. Surgical approach could remain physician preference.

Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Lateral Position.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of artificial total hip arthroplasty(THA) for femoral neck fracture between direct anterior approach(DAA) in lateral position and posterior lateral approach(PLA). Methods: Comparison of 200 cases of patients who underwent THA collected between September 2019 and August 2021 was done. Incision length, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, difference in postoperative haemoglobin from preoperative levels, length of hospital stay, postoperative time to get off the floor, visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, preoperative and postoperative Harris scores for the hip, and measurements of the acetabular abduction angle and anterior acetabular tilt angle at 6 months postoperatively were collected, and all the cases were followed up for at least 2 years. Results: Compared with the PLA group, the DAA group had a shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative haemoglobin reduction compared with the preoperative period, a shorter hospital stay and an earlier first time to get off the floor after surgery, however, the comparison of operative times was not statistically significant; Patients in the DAA group had a lower VAS in the early postoperative period compared to PLA; Patients in the DAA group had higher hip Harris scores at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively; There was no significant difference in acetabular abduction angle and acetabular anterior tilt angle between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Compared to PLA, DAA in THA is minimally invasive, has less pain, less bleeding, earlier time out of bed, shorter hospital stay, better early hip function, faster rehabilitation, and better joint stability.

Total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy using a monoblock cylindrical cementless stem for severe developmental hip dysplasia (Crowe type III, IV).

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with Crowe type III and IV dislocated hips is challenging because of the hip deformity in these patients. In addition to the usual total hip replacement, shortening and reduction of the femur are often required. We herein report on our surgical technique using a monoblock cylindrical cementless stem and a direct lateral approach. METHODS: This study included patients with a diagnosis of severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (Crowe types III and IV) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty at our hospital from August 2019 to January 2022. Eleven hips of seven patients were treated. All patients underwent horizontal osteotomy using a monoblock cylindrical cementless stem and a direct lateral approach. Complications such as dislocation, infection, and implant dropout were evaluated. In addition, the clinical assessment included the hip range of motion at the last observation and hip function based on the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ). RESULTS: The average operation time was 224 min (range, 194-296 min), and the average bleeding amount was 396.1 g (range, 20-1010 g). The main complications were acetabular implant dislocation, postoperative dislocation, intraoperative arterial injury, intraoperative proximal femoral fracture, subsidence of femoral implant. and postoperative pulmonary infarction, which occurred in one patient each. CONCLUSION: Total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III and IV hips is associated with various surgical technical difficulties because of its anatomical characteristics. While patients with severe osteoporosis are contraindicated, the use of a cylindrical monoblock cementless stem and the direct lateral approach makes it possible to simplify the procedure for shortening the femur and increase the indications for surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level Ⅳ.

Difference in Muscle Strength and Functional Outcome in Direct Lateral Approach versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background and Purpose: The choice between posterior approach (PA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a contentious issue regarding clinical outcome optimization and restoring patient function. Previous studies have evaluated the postsurgical outcomes mostly in the form of Harris hip score (HHS), and the data to objectively measure the postoperative muscle power is scarce. We intend to objectively compare the hip abduction and extension strengths and other functional outcomes with a very simple tool in PA and DLA in the Indian population as most patients do not undergo as intensive rehabilitation in the postoperative period as in the western world. Materials and Methods: A total of 158 patients underwent THA during the study period, of which 48 met inclusion criteria and only 42 completed 6 months follow-up. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up. At each visit, muscle strength was tested using a customized sling device mounted on a pulling apparatus fitted on the wall, as well as a pain score (VAS), Harris hip score (HHS), and Short Form Survey (SF-36). Results: The study showed statistically significant better hip muscle strength at 2 weeks postoperative for leg press test and 2 weeks as well as 6 weeks postoperative for hip abduction strength in the PA. However, no differences were noted during the 3 or 6 months follow-up period among the DLA and PA. The surgical approach used has no effect on VAS, HHS, or SF-36 scorings. Conclusion: The weak abductor mechanism at 2 and 6 weeks and extension mechanism at 2 weeks in a cohort of DLA in contrast to the PA are seen in the early postoperative period and hence are short-lived muscle weakness. However, there is no effect on VAS, HSS, and SF-36 scores. Therefore, the surgical approach is to be chosen according to the surgeon's expertise.

Direct Anterior vs. Direct Lateral Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture.

BACKGROUND: This study compared outcomes of the direct anterior approach (DAA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) for treating displaced femoral neck fractures in active elderly patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included active elderly patients who sustained a displaced femoral neck fracture and underwent a cementless total hip arthroplasty either with a supine DAA or a decubitus DLA. Patients were assessed using the Harris hip score at discharge and at a 6-week follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 41 women and 18 men were included in the study. Of those, 22 underwent DLA and 37 received DAA, all performed by the same team. In both groups, 69% were women, mean age was 70 years, and mean BMI was 25.2. Mean hemoglobin loss was 2.3 g/dl between admission and the first post-operative day in both groups. Similar numbers in each cohort were discharged home rather than to a rehabilitation center. The patients who underwent the DAA experienced a 2-day reduction in their hospital stay compared to the DLA group (4.2 ± 1.9 vs. 6.8 ± 3.7, respectively; p < 0.001). The Harris hip score in the DAA group was significantly higher at the 6-week follow-up than in the DLA group (87.23 ± 7.75 vs. 81.23 ± 7.67, respectively; p < 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The patients who underwent THA with the DAA demonstrated better short term outcomes compared to the alternative approach for displaced femoral neck fractures in active elderly patients. DAA helped patients regain independence faster and might decrease hospitalization and rehabilitation costs. Based on these results, we recommend using the DAA for active elderly patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture.

Increased risk of high-grade heterotopic ossification using direct lateral approach versus a muscle-sparing anterolateral approach to the hip: radiological results from a randomised trial in patients with a femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hemiarthroplasty is a common treatment in patients with displaced femoral neck fracture. Due to positive claims of less pain, earlier mobilisation and favourable functional outcome, the anterior approaches to the joint are gaining in popularity. This randomised controlled trial investigated if component placement and heterotopic ossification differed between a muscle sparing anterior approach and a direct lateral approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 150 patients operated with an uncemented hemiarthroplasty, were randomised to anterolateral or direct lateral approach and assessed postoperatively radiologically. Measurements included leg-length discrepancy, femoral offset, femoral stem position, canal fill ratio and the presence of heterotopic ossification after 12 months. RESULTS: There was an increased risk of high-grade heterotopic ossification in the direct lateral approach (p < 0.05). We found no statistically significant differences in leg-length discrepancy, femoral stem position or femoral offset. CONCLUSIONS: Hemiarthroplasty performed in the direct lateral approach resulted in a higher incidence of Brooker grade 3 heterotopic ossification. Our results support equal geometrical restoration and similar component placement with both approaches. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03974698Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty, Radiological Features Comparing Lateral Versus Anterolateral Approach https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03974698?term=raymond+tellefsen…draw=2…rank=1.

A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty between the Direct Lateral Approach and Posterior Lateral Approach with EOS 2D/3D X-Ray Imaging System.

OBJECTIVE: The classical approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) are the direct lateral approach (DLA) and posterior lateral approach (PLA). There are few studies comparing implant orientation with these two approaches, and the impact of surgical approaches on implant orientation remains controversial. With the rise of the EOS imaging system, we aimed to use it to identify the differences between and factors associated with implant orientation after THA using DLA and PLA. METHODS: In our department from January 2019 to December 2021, 321 primary unilateral THAs that used PLA and DLA were enrolled. A total of 201 patients who received PLA and 120 patients who received DLA were included in this study. Two blinded observers measured each case using EOS imaging data. Postoperative imaging metrics and other relevant influencing factors of the two surgical approaches were compared. Postoperative imaging metrics, including the anteversion and inclination of the cup, anteversion of the stem, and combined anteversion were measured based on EOS. Other relevant influencing factors included age, approach, gender, laterality, BMI, anterior pelvic plane inclination, femoral head diameter, femoral offset, lateral pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, pelvis axial rotation, sacral slope, sagittal pelvic tilt, and surgery time. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of acceptability for each imaging data point. RESULTS: No dislocation was found in the 321 patients who underwent primary THA during this period. The mean anteversion and combined anteversion of the cups using the DLA were 21.33° ± 17.31° (-51.7°-60.8°) and 33.71° ± 20.85° (-38.8°-77.6°) and PLA were 25.34° ± 12.76° (-5.5°-57.0°) and 42.37° ± 18.85° (-8.7°-84.7°), respectively. The DLA group had smaller anteversion (p = 0.038) and combined anteversion (p < 0.001). We found that surgical approach (p < 0.05), anterior pelvic plane inclination (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.001), and femoral head diameter (p < 0.001) were important factors affecting acetabular cup anteversion (R2 = 0.375) and combined anteversion (R2 = 0.525). CONCLUSIONS: In total hip arthroplasty, different prosthesis installation directions should be made according to different surgical approaches. Compared with the direct lateral approach, the acetabular anteversion can be intentionally enlarged when using the posterolateral approach. Surgical approach, anterior pelvic plane inclination (APPI), gender, and femoral head diameter were significant predictors of prosthesis orientation. The anterior pelvic plane inclination may be a useful standard for assessing the position of the prosthesis using EOS.

Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has become one of the most reliable surgical interventions that has improved the quality of life in many patients. THA allows patients to have increased mobility, range of motion, and reduced pain in patients with degenerative hip joints. This surgical procedure has become an effective treatment option for several chronic conditions affecting the hip joint. Although this surgery has been shown to give promising results in patients with hip pathology, selecting the approach for THA is a critical step in pre-operative planning. The best approach for this surgical procedure depends on multiple factors and each present with their own challenges, success rates, and limitations. To further elucidate the advantages and disadvantages associated with different surgical approaches, we critically review each surgical approach along with the different causes of failure of the THA procedure.

Functional Outcomes of Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Compared to Direct Lateral Approach for Total HIP Arthroplasty Following Acute Femoral Neck Fractures.

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is becoming a more frequent treatment in the active elderly population. Since there is limited research available presenting clinical outcomes after THA using the anterior-based muscle sparing (ABMS) approach, the aim of this study was to compare this surgical approach to the direct lateral (DL) approach in patients treated by THA for FNFs. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data prospectively collected as a part of our "Hip Fracture Unit" and included 163 patients who underwent THA from January 2016 to January 2019 for acute displaced FNFs. Results: A total of 132 patients who completed a minimum 2-years follow up (69 in the ABMS group and 63 in DL group) were included. The ABMS group demonstrated significantly shorter time to reach milestone for hospital discharge (1.5 Days vs 2.1 days, P = .018), while no statistically significant differences were detected in peri-operative complications. At 3 months, the timed up and go test, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford ip Score (OHS) were significantly better (P = .024, .032 and .034, respectively) in the ABMS group compared to the DL group. No differences were found in functional outcomes (HHS and OHS) nor in complication rate at 6, 12 and 24 months. Discussion: This is one of the first studies to analyze functional results of THA performed for FNFs through an ABMS approach. Results are in line with those already present in the Literature. Conclusion: ABMS approach allows earlier mobilization and better early functional outcomes, compared to DL approach, in patients undergoing THA for acute displaced FNF. No differences are found after 6 months in functional results and complications rate.

The influence of anterior and posterior knot placement on hip function after total hip arthroplasty using a modified Dall's approach: a prospective non-randomised comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The direct lateral modified Dall's approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides an excellent vision of the hip joint by osteotomising the greater trochanter (GT). A robust method for the reattachment of osteotomised fragments is essential to prevent complications around the GT. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene cables are reported to be useful for reattachment; but the optimal suture method of these cables is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the knot position on hip function after primary THA. METHODS: In a prospective non-randomised study 216 primary THA were included, being scheduled for an operation with a modified Dall's approach. They were divided into 2 groups, anterior (A) and posterior (P) according to the knot position for the GT. Hip function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), pain visual analogue scale (VAS), satisfaction VAS and Merle d'Aubigne-Postel hip score at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. A logistic regression analysis was used to investigate factors influenced by the knot position. RESULTS: Patient demographics were comparable between the 2 groups. Differences of the knot position did not affect the radiological failure rate of GT reattachment. Regression analysis showed a significantly positive impact on pain VAS and flexion range at 6 months postoperatively for posterior knot position. CONCLUSIONS: For the reattachment of osteotomised fragments, the posterior knot may be superior to the anterior knot.