RESUMO
The objective of this study was to predict the droplet size and the spraying angle during the process of binder atomization in pharmaceutical fluidized bed granulation using an empirical model. The effects of the binder viscosity, the atomization pressure, and the spray rate on the droplet size and the spraying angle were investigated using a response surface central composite design and analysis of variance. Prediction models for droplet size and spraying angle were then established using stepwise regression analysis and were validated by comparing the measured and predicted values. The results showed that the droplet size model and the spraying angle model were well established, with an R2 of 0.93 (p < 0.0001) and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 10.10, and an R2 of 0.82 (p < 0.0001) and an RMSE of 3.69, respectively. The error between the measured and predicted values of the droplet size and the spraying angle were less than 10%, indicating that the established models were accurate. The results of the present study were significant in predicting the droplet size and spraying angle in the process of pharmaceutical fluidized bed granulation.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Empírica , Derivados da Hipromelose/síntese química , Tamanho da Partícula , Povidona/síntese química , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/métodos , Previsões , ViscosidadeRESUMO
The need for reliable assessments of soil erosion rates in Serbia has directed attention to the potential for using (137)Cs measurements to derive estimates of soil redistribution rates. Since, to date, this approach has not been applied in southeastern Serbia, a reconnaissance study was undertaken to confirm its viability. The need to take account of the occurrence of substantial Chernobyl fallout was seen as a potential problem. Samples for (137)Cs measurement were collected from a zone of uncultivated soils in the watersheds of Pcinja and South Morava Rivers, an area with known high soil erosion rates. Two theoretical conversion models, the profile distribution (PD) model and diffusion and migration (D&M) model were used to derive estimates of soil erosion and deposition rates from the (137)Cs measurements. The estimates of soil redistribution rates derived by using the PD and D&M models were found to differ substantially and this difference was ascribed to the assumptions of the simpler PD model that cause it to overestimate rates of soil loss. The results provided by the D&M model were judged to more reliable.