Anticoagulation reversal (vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, andexanet-α, protamine).

Bleeding events are common in patients prescribed anticoagulants and can have devastating consequences. Several specific and nonspecific agents have been developed to reverse the effects of anticoagulant drugs or toxins. Vitamin K, as the oldest of these antidotes, specifically counteracts the effects of pharmaceuticals and rodenticides designed to deplete stores of vitamin K-dependent factors. In cases of life-threatening bleeding, the addition of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) allows for the immediate replacement of coagulation factors. While the use of PCCs has been extended to the non-specific reversal of the effects of newer direct oral anticoagulants, the specific agents idarucizumab, targeting dabigatran and andexanet-α, binding factor Xa inhibitors, have recently been developed and are being preferentially recommended by most guidelines. However, despite having rapid effects on correcting coagulopathy, there is to date a lack of robust evidence establishing the clear superiority of direct oral anticoagulant-specific reversal agents over PCCs in terms of haemostatic efficacy, safety or mortality. For andexanet-α, a potential signal of increased thromboembolic risks, comparatively high costs and low availability might also limit its use, even though emerging evidence appears to bolster its role in intracranial haemorrhage. Protamine is the specific agent for the reversal of unfractionated heparin anticoagulation used mainly in cardiovascular surgery. It is much less effective for low molecular weight heparin fragments and is usually reserved for cases with life-threatening bleeding.

Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Regimen in Cardiac Transplant. Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Blood Product Transfusion.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the characteristics, clinical outcomes, and blood product transfusion (BPT) rates of patients undergoing cardiac transplant (CT) while receiving uninterrupted anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, and observational study of adult patients who underwent CT was performed. Patients were classified into four groups: (1) patients without anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (control), (2) patients on antiplatelet therapy (AP), (3) patients on vitamin K antagonists (AVKs), and (4) patients on dabigatran (dabigatran). The primary endpoints were reoperation due to bleeding and perioperative BPT rates (packed red blood cells (PRBC), fresh frozen plasma, platelets). Secondary outcomes assessed included morbidity and mortality-related events. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients included, 6 (11%) received no therapy (control), 8 (15%) received antiplatelet therapy, 15 (27%) were on AVKs, and 26 (47%) were on dabigatran. There were no significant differences in the need for reoperation or other secondary morbidity-associated events. During surgery patients on dabigatran showed lower transfusion rates of PRBC (control 100%, AP 100%, AVKs 73%, dabigatran 50%, p = 0.011) and platelets (control 100%, AP 100%, AVKs 100%, dabigatran 69%, p = 0.019). The total intraoperative number of BPT was also the lowest in the dabigatran group (control 5.5 units, AP 5 units, AVKs 6 units, dabigatran 3 units; p = 0.038); receiving significantly less PRBC (control 2.5 units, AP 3 units, AVKs 2 units, dabigatran 0.5 units; p = 0.011). A Poisson multivariate analysis showed that only treatment on dabigatran reduces PRBC requirements during surgery, with an expected reduction of 64.5% (95% CI: 32.4%-81.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients listed for CT requiring anticoagulation due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, the use of dabigatran and its reversal with idarucizumab significantly reduces intraoperative BPT demand.

ANMCO/SIMEU consensus document on the use of reversal agents for antithrombotic therapies in patients with ongoing bleeding or at high risk of haemorrhagic events.

In recent decades, an incredible evolution in antithrombotic therapies used for treating patients with atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolism has been observed, leading to the availability of increasingly safe drugs. Nonetheless, bleeding complications remain a significant concern, with considerable health, social, and economic implications. To improve the acute management of patients experiencing or at risk for major bleeding events, specific reversal agents for antithrombotic drugs have been recently developed. While these agents demonstrate effectiveness in small-scale pharmacodynamic studies and clinical trials, it is imperative to balance the benefits of reversing antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy against the risk of prothrombotic effects. These risks include the potential loss of antithrombotic protection and the prothrombotic tendencies associated with bleeding, major surgery, or trauma. This joint document of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri) and the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine (Società Italiana di Medicina d'Emergenza-Urgenza) delineates the key features and efficacy of available reversal agents. It also provides practical flowcharts to guide their use in patients with active bleeding or those at elevated risk of major bleeding events.

Dabigatran pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic in sheep: Informing dose for anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: The effect of the anticoagulant, dabigatran, and its antagonist, idarucizumab, on coagulation remains poorly quantified. There are few pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data available to determine dabigatran dose in humans or animals undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Five sheep were given intravenous dabigatran 4 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected for thromboelastometric reaction time (R-time) and drug assay at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 480 min, and 24 h. Plasma dabigatran concentrations and R-times were analyzed using an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using non-linear mixed effects. The impact of idarucizumab 15 mg/kg administered 120 min after dabigatran 4 mg/kg and its effect on R-time was observed. RESULTS: A 2-compartment model described dabigatran pharmacokinetics with a clearance (CL 0.0453 L/min/70 kg), intercompartment clearance (Q 0.268 L/min/70 kg), central volume of distribution (V1 2.94 L/70 kg), peripheral volume of distribution (V2 9.51 L/70 kg). The effect compartment model estimates for a sigmoid EMAX model using Reaction time had an effect site concentration (Ce50 64.2 mg/L) eliciting half of the maximal effect (EMAX 180 min). The plasma-effect compartment equilibration half time (T1/2keo) was 1.04 min. Idarucizumab 15 mg/kg reduced R-time by approximately 5 min. CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran reversibly binds to the active site on the thrombin molecule, preventing activation of coagulation factors. The pharmacologic target concentration strategy uses pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic information to inform dose. A loading dose of dabigatran 0.25 mg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of dabigatran 0.0175 mg/kg/min for 30 min and a subsequent infusion dabigatran 0.0075 mg/kg/min achieves a steady state target concentration of 5 mg/L in a sheep model.

Continuing Education Case Study Quiz.

Goal: The goal of this activity is to educate pharmacists about the use of idarucizumab for the reversal of dabigatran anticoagulant activity. Objectives: At the completion of this activity, the reader will be able to:1.Describe the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of idarucizumab.2.Discuss the risks associated with the use of idarucizumab.3.Discuss the potential benefit of idarucizumab for an individual patient.4.Apply the information on the use of idarucizumab to a case study.

[Overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants]. / Überdosierung von direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. Incorrectly dosed DOAC treatment is associated with excess mortality. PURPOSE: This article aims at raising awareness of DOAC overdosing and its causes as well as presenting a diagnostic and therapeutic work-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a case presentation, a structured review of the current literature on DOAC overdosing was performed and treatment recommendations were extracted. RESULTS: In addition to wittingly or unwittingly increased DOAC intake, common causes of overdose are inadequate dose adjustment for concomitant medication or comorbidities. Global coagulation testing should be supplemented with DOAC-specific testing. Severe bleeding and the need for invasive diagnostics or urgent surgery represent indications for treating DOAC overdoses. Based on the cause of an DOAC overdose, active charcoal, endoscopic pill rescue, antagonization with idarucizumab or andexanet alfa and the targeted substitution of coagulation factors represent treatment options. CONCLUSION: The sensitization of clinicians is important to ensure a timely diagnosis and adequate treatment of DOAC overdosing. This report provides an overview of current knowledge on diagnostics and treatment; however, further studies are necessary to improve the existing algorithms.

Latest advances in the reversal strategies for direct oral anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Since the late 2000s, Europe has granted approval for various thrombotic risk-related uses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Unlike traditional anticoagulants, DOACs do not necessitate routine coagulation monitoring. Nevertheless, clinical practice often encounters bleeding events associated with these medications, making the need for effective reversal strategies evident. OBJECTIVES: The study aims to take stock of current reversal strategies for DOACs, with a particular emphasis on the latest compounds that have been developed or are currently under development. METHODS: For obtaining information regarding the ongoing reversal strategies and the compounds under development, we referred to ClinicalTrials website, PubMed, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: In 2024, two specific antidotes to DOACs have already received approval when reversal of anticoagulation is needed owing to life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding: idarucizumab that reverses the effects of dabigatran, and andexanet alfa, designed to counteract activated factor X inhibitors such as apixaban and rivaroxaban. Furthermore, ciraparantag, a potential universal reversal agent, is currently in advanced stages of clinical development. Concerns remain regarding the safety of specific reversal agents, especially concerning the risk of thrombosis. Additionally, the cost of these antidotes remains high. Consequently, nonspecific strategies to counteract anticoagulant medications, including activated charcoal, hemodialysis, and concentrates of coagulation factors, still have utility. CONCLUSION: With the validation of specific and nonspecific antidotes, DOACs could supplant traditional oral anticoagulants. This progress represents a significant advancement in anticoagulation therapy. However, ongoing research is crucial to address remaining safety concerns of the specific reversion agents of DOACs in clinical practice.

Idarucizumab in dabigatran-treated patients with acute stroke: a review and clinical update.

Idarucizumab is an antibody fragment specific for the immediate reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation effects. The use of idarucizumab is approved for dabigatran-treated patients suffering from life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding and those in need of urgent surgery or invasive procedures. Data from randomized controlled clinical trials and real-world experience provide reassuring evidence about the efficacy and safety of idarucizmab use in patients with acute stroke. In this narrative review, we summarize the available real-world evidence and discuss the relevance and importance of idarucizumab treatment in acute stroke patients in everyday clinical practice. In addition, we also discuss special issues like prothrombin complex concentrate application as an alternative to idarucizumab, its application before endovascular therapy, sensitivity of thrombi to lysis, and necessary laboratory examinations.

Cardiac Tamponade and Duodenal Hemorrhage Caused by Inappropriate Use of Dabigatran in a Patient With End-Stage Renal Failure: A Case Report.

A 72-year-old man with end-stage renal failure, receiving 220 mg of dabigatran for chronic atrial fibrillation, was admitted with generalized edema and shortness of breath. Cardiac tamponade caused by pericardial hemorrhage due to inappropriate dabigatran use was treated with pericardial drainage and idarucizumab. Although coagulability normalized, consecutive duodenal hemorrhages occurred, requiring arterial embolization for hemostasis. In cases of severely impaired renal function, the usual dose of idarucizumab may not be sufficient to reverse the effects of dabigatran. Therefore, we considered the need for repeated idarucizumab administration to prevent recurrent bleeding.

Is there a role for the laboratory monitoring in the management of specific antidotes of direct oral anticoagulants?

Given the growing number of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), patients requiring rapid neutralization is also increasing in case of major bleedings or urgent surgery/procedures. Idarucizumab is commercialized as a specific antidote to dabigatran while andexanet alfa has gained the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency approval as an oral anti-factor Xa inhibitors antidote. Other antidotes or hemostatic agents are still under preclinical or clinical development, the most advanced being ciraparantag. DOAC plasma levels measurement allows to appropriately select patient for antidote administration and may prevent unnecessary prescription of expensive molecules in some acute clinical settings. However, these tests might be inconclusive after some antidote administration, namely andexanet alfa and ciraparantag. The benefit of laboratory monitoring following DOAC reversal remains unclear. Here, we sought to provide an overview of the key studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of DOAC reversal using the most developed/commercialized specific antidotes, to discuss the potential role of the laboratory monitoring in the management of patients receiving DOAC specific antidotes and to highlight the areas that deserve further investigations in order to establish the exact role of laboratory monitoring in the appropriate management of DOAC specific antidotes.

Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH.

The currently approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in clinical practice. Although serious bleeding risks are lower with DOACs than with vitamin K antagonists, bleeding remains the most frequent side effect. Andexanet alfa and idarucizumab are the currently approved specific reversal agents for oral factor (F)Xa inhibitors and dabigatran, respectively. Our prior guidance document was published in 2016, but with more information available on the utility and increased use of these reversal agents and other bleeding management strategies, we have updated this International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidance document on DOAC reversal. In this narrative review, we compare the mechanism of action of specific and nonspecific reversal agents, review the clinical data supporting their use, and provide guidance on when reversal is indicated. In addition, we briefly discuss the reversal of oral FXIa inhibitors, a new class of DOACs currently under clinical development.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Recent Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is an effective stroke therapy that remains underused. Currently, the use of IVT in patients with recent direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) intake is not recommended. In this study we aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke and recent DOAC use. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions evaluating IVT with recent DOAC use was conducted. Outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, any intracranial hemorrhage, serious systemic bleeding, and 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale score 0-2). Additionally, rates were compared between patients receiving IVT using DOAC and non-DOAC by a random effect meta-analysis to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for each outcome. Finally, sensitivity analysis for idarucizumab, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and timing of DOAC administration was completed. Fourteen studies with 247 079 patients were included (3610 in DOAC and 243 469 in non-DOAC). The rates of IVT complications in the DOAC group were 3% (95% CI, 3-4) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, 12% (95% CI, 7-19) any ICH, and 0.7% (95%CI, 0-1) serious systemic bleeding, and 90-day functional independence was achieved in 57% (95% CI, 43-70). The rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.4 versus 3.5%; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.67-1.36]), any intracranial hemorrhage (17.7 versus 17.3%; OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.61-2.48]), serious systemic bleeding (0.7 versus 0.6%; OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.79-2.02]), and 90-day modified Rankin scale score 0-2 (46.4 versus 56.8%; OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.400-3.67]) did not differ between DOAC and non-DOAC groups. There was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate based on idarucizumab administration. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with IVT in recent DOAC versus non-DOAC use have similar rates of hemorrhagic complications and functional independence. Further prospective randomized trials are warranted.

Farmacocinética de dabigatrán y utilización de su antídoto idarucizumab / Pharmacokinetics of dabigatran and use of its antidote idarucizumab

Una de las ventajas de dabigatrán, un nuevo anticoagulante oral de acción directa, es la disponibilidad de un antídoto que permite revertir su actividad: idarucizumab. Este fármaco es utilizado en procedimientos o intervenciones quirúrgicas de urgencia y en hemorragias potencialmente mortales o no controladas.Dabigatrán presenta una semivida de 12-14 horas, alargándose si la función renal está afectada. La decisión de cuándo interrumpir su administración depende del valor del aclaramiento de creatinina y del riesgo hemorrágico de la intervención.Presentamos el caso de un paciente en tratamiento con dabigatrán que ingresa para la realización de una cirugía de cadera tras una caída. Al ingreso se suspende dabigatrán, llevándose a cabo la cirugía al décimo día tras su suspensión. Antes de la cirugía se decide la administración de idarucizumab por continuar alterados los tiempos de coagulación.Exponemos en este caso la falta de mejoría de los tiempos de coagulación tras el uso del antídoto, cuya explicación se pueda deber al largo periodo entre la administración de idarucizumab y la última dosis de dabigatrán administrada (10 días).Por lo tanto, en caso de no poder medir los niveles de dabigatrán, es importante tener en cuenta además de los tiempos de coagulación, aspectos farmacológicos del dabigatrán como la farmacocinética, para evitar la administración innecesaria del antídoto, que puede suponer un riesgo y costes innecesarios. (AU)

One of the advantages of dabigatran, a new direct-acting oral anticoagulant, is the availability of an antidote to reverse its activity: idarucizumab. This drug is used in emergency surgical procedures or interventions and in life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding.Dabigatran has a half-life of 12-14 hours, lengthening if renal function is affected. The decision on when to interrupt the administration depends on the creatinine clearance rate and the bleeding risk of the procedure.We present the case of a patient on dabigatran treatment who was hospitalized for hip surgery after a fall. On admission, dabigatran was suspended, and surgery was performed on the tenth day after its suspension. Before surgery, it was decided to administer idarucizumab due to continued altered coagulation times.In this case, it is reported the lack of improvement in clotting times after the use of the antidote, which may be explained by the long period of time between the administration of idarucizumab and the last dose of dabigatran administered (10 days).Therefore, in case of dabigatran levels cannot be measured, it is important to consider, in addition to clotting times, pharmacological aspects of dabigatran such as pharmacokinetics, in order to avoid unnecessary administration of the antidote, which may entail unnecessary risk and costs. (AU)

Experiencia con idarucizumab como agente reversor de dabigatran / Experience with idarucizumab as a reverse agent of dabigatran

Resumen Los anticoagulantes orales directos (AOD), entre ellos dabigatrán, poseen un perfil riesgo-beneficio favorable comparados con warfarina y además no requieren monitoreo del efecto anticoagulante. Sin embargo, en ocasiones de sangrado con amenaza de vida o requerimiento de procedimiento quirúrgico de emergencia, es de gran utilidad revertir inmediatamente el efecto anticoagulante. Idarucizumab, fragmento de un anticuerpo monoclonal humanizado, revierte inmediatamente el efecto de dabigatrán y es actualmente el único agente reversor de un AOD disponible en Argentina. Presentamos una serie de 8 pacientes a los que se les administró idarucizumab para revertir el efecto de dabigatrán. Todos eran mayores de 65 años, recibían 110 o 150 mg cada 12 horas de dabigatrán y 7/8 estaban anticoagulados por fibrilación auricular; tres tenían indicación discutida para AOD y otro, una dosis mayor a la recomendada. Dos requirieron reversión debido a una cirugía de urgencia, y 6 tuvieron sangrado con amenaza de vida: tres hemorragias digestivas y tres sangrados intra-craneanos (en dos ocasiones traumático). En todos los casos se observó normalización de la hemostasia quirúrgica o control de sangrado crítico. No se observaron complicaciones trombóticas posteriores a la administración del antídoto. Dos fallecieron dentro de los 30 días de la administración por causas no relacionadas con la reversión. Ninguno de nuestros pacientes requirió administración de una segunda dosis de idarucizumab. Nuestro resultado es similar a lo informado en la literatura internacional.

Abstract Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), among them dabigatran, have a favorable benefit-risk profile compared with warfarin, and no monitoring of the anticoagulant effect is required. However, reversing the anticoagulant effect immediately is very useful in cases of life-threatening bleeding and emergency surgical procedure requirement. Idarucizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody fragment, is currently the only reversal agent of a DOAC available in Argentina. Idarucizumab immediately reverse the effect of dabigatran. We present a series of 8 real-life clinical cases who received idarucizumab to reverse the effect of dabigatran. All of the patients were older than 65 years, were receiving 110 or 150 mg every 12 hours of dabigatran and 7/8 were anticoagulated because of atrial fibrillation. Three had a debatable indication for DOACs and another, a higher dose than recommended. Two required reversal due to emergency surgery, and 6 cases had life-threatening bleeding: three gastrointestinal hemorrhages and three intracranial bleeding (Two had a head trauma). In all cases normalization of surgical hemostasis or control of critical bleeding was observed. No hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications were observed after antidote administration. Two died within 30 days of administration of idarucizumab, due to causes unrelated to the reversal. None of our patients required administration of a second dose of idarucizumab. Our result is similar to that reported in international literature.