Examining the Association Between Objective Physical Activity and Momentary Pain: A Systematic Review of Studies Using Ambulatory Assessment.

Chronic pain (CP) is a debilitating and increasingly common health condition that adversely impacts function, including physical activity (PA). Research using ambulatory assessment (AA) methods (eg, ecological momentary assessment, actigraphy) offers promise for elucidating the relationship between momentary pain and objective PA in CP populations. This study aimed to systematically review articles assessing the association between momentary pain and PA in adults with CP as measured using AA and to make recommendations for the measurement and study of this relationship. Five databases were systematically searched, and 13 unique records (N = 768) met the inclusion criteria. CP conditions included mixed/nonspecific CP (k = 3), low back pain (k = 2), fibromyalgia (k = 1), unspecified arthritis (k = 1), and hip/knee osteoarthritis (k = 6). The average age of participants across studies was 55.29 years, and the majority identified as women (60.68%) and White (83.16%). All studies measured objective PA via actigraphy, and momentary pain with either a diary/log or ratings on an actigraph. Studies varied in the quantification of PA (ie, activity counts, step count, moderate-vigorous PA), statistical method (ie, correlation, regression, multilevel modeling), and inclusion of moderators (eg, pain acceptance). Studies reported mixed results for the pain-PA relationship. This heterogeneity suggests that no summarizing conclusions can be drawn about the pain-PA relationship without further investigation into its complex nuances. More within-person and exploratory examinations that maximize the richness of AA data are needed. A greater understanding of this relationship can inform psychotherapeutic and behavioral recommendations to improve CP outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a systematic review of the literature on the association between momentary pain and PA in adults with CP as measured using AA methods. A better understanding of this nuanced relationship could help elucidate areas for timely intervention and may inform clinical recommendations to improve CP outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023389913.

Momentary pain assessments reveal benefits of endoscopic discectomy: a prospective cohort study.

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common back disorder that evokes back and/or leg pain. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a minimally invasive surgery for patients with LDH. However, there is little evidence of effectiveness of PELD compared with conservative treatments. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to quantify the efficacy of PELD compared with conservative treatments. METHODS: Here, we conducted a prospective observational cohort study using momentary pain assessments via a smartphone app during 3 months following surgery. The trajectories of daily ecological momentary pain assessments were fitted with an exponential model containing two parameters: a pain reduction coefficient and the percentage of persistent pain. To control for selection bias between PELD and Conservative groups (N = 167 and 34), we used inverse probability (IP) of treatment weighting for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Compared with conservative treatments, both momentary pain rating and the exponential model showed statistically significant pain recovery following PELD (p < 0.001). In addition, PELD had a faster pain recovery rate (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.75 (1.40, 2.20), p < 0.001), greater overall pain recovery rate (odds ratio (95%CI): 2.35 (2.01, 5.26), p < 0.001), faster pain reduction (t199 = 3.32, p = 0.001), and lower estimated persistent pain (Z = 2.53, p = 0.011). Greater pain intensity and lower anxiety before the surgery were predictors of faster pain reduction in the recovery subgroup following PELD. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, momentary pain rating and the model fitting revealed that PELD provided rapid pain recovery that lasted for at least three months. Greater pain intensity and lower anxiety before the surgery were predictors of faster pain reduction in the recovery subgroup following PELD. Daily momentary pain rating on a smartphone may be able to provide more informative data to evaluate effect of an intervention than pain assessment on hospital visits.