Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase as a predictor of benefit from S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To improve the prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma, we investigated potential biomarkers that may enable the selection of patients for whom postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is likely effective. METHODS: The cohort of this retrospective study included 170 surgically resected cholangiocarcinoma patients, 26 with gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy (GEM group), 36 with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1 group), and 103 receiving no adjuvant chemotherapy (NC group). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust patient backgrounds; 36 patients from the NC group then were selected. Immunohistochemistry of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) was performed to determine the correlation between their expression and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: After matching, the backgrounds of these three groups were unbiased. No significant improvement of DFS by adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in the whole cohort. However, among the high-OPRT-expression patients, DFS of GEM, S-1, and NC groups at 5 years was 28.8%, 53.8%, and 25.5%, respectively. The DFS of the S-1 group was significantly longer than that of the NC group (P = 0.034). On the other hand, no significant differences in DFS were observed among the low OPRT expression patients. hENT1 expression was shown to have no predictive value. Multivariate analysis of the high-OPRT-expression patients demonstrated that S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy can reduce tumor recurrence (HR, 0.303; P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Cholangiocarcinoma patients with high OPRT expression would benefit from postoperative adjuvant S-1 therapy, which increases the DFS. Assessment of OPRT expression may contribute to the optimization of adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma.

Oral fluoropyrimidine versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of advanced gastric and colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu) is one of the most commonly prescribed antineoplastic agents against gastric and colorectal cancers. Continuous infusion would be the optimal way of its administration, however, may usually cause thrombosis, infection, and prolonged hospital stay. Oral fluoropyrimidines would be an attractive alternative, but their efficiency and toxicities for the treatment of gastric and colorectal cancer are still obscure as compared with infusion 5-Fu. METHODS: Literature retrieval, trials selection and assessment, data collection, and statistic analysis were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook. The outcome measures were tumor response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Twenty-nine randomized controlled trials, comprising totally 15 154 patients, were included. Meta-analysis showed similar overall outcome in terms of response rate (1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-1.12), progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.00; 95%CI, 0.94-1.06), and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.96; 95%CI, 0.92-1.01) between oral fluoropyrimidine-based and intravenous 5-Fu-based regimens in gastric and colorectal cancer patients. The risk of grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis was more prominent in intravenous 5-Fu-based regimens; while more frequent grade 3/4 hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and anorexia were detected in oral fluoropyrimidine-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Oral-fluoropyrimidines showed equivalent response and similar survival outcomes, but different toxicity profiles, as compared with intravenous 5-Fu. Thus, it would be a more convenient and adjustable alternative in treatment of advanced gastric and colorectal cancer.

A phase I/II study of S-1 and irinotecan (IRIS) combined with cetuximab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1401).

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the tolerability, efficacy, and safety of tri-weekly irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) and weekly cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: The main eligibility criteria were RAS wild-type mCRC with no prior chemotherapy. S-1 was given orally at a dose of 40 mg/m2 (40-60 mg) twice for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest. Irinotecan was given on day 1 of each cycle at a dose of 150 mg/m2. Cetuximab was administered on days 1 (400 mg/m2), 8 (250 mg/m2), and 15 (250 mg/m2), and then once weekly (250 mg/m2) thereafter. A standard 3 + 3 phase I dose de-escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose (RD) of irinotecan. The primary end point of the Phase II study was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Between December 2014 and September 2017, 4 and 54 patients were enrolled in phase I and phase II studies, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the phase I study, and the RD of irinotecan was 150 mg/m2. In the phase II study, the ORR was 56.9% (90% confidence interval 44.4%-68.7%). The safety profile revealed that the most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (31.4%), appetite loss (27.5%), hypokalemia (11.8%), and diarrhea (11.8%). Grade 3/4 hand-foot skin syndrome occurred in nine patients (9.8%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the efficacy and safety of IRIS combined with cetuximab were comparable to those for other first-line treatments. This regimen is a good candidate for first-line treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC.

Intravenous 5-Fluorouracil in Patients With Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: In the EXTREME trial, a combination of cisplatin or carboplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cetuximab was superior to cisplatin/carboplatin plus 5-FU for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). With the aim of improving fluoropyrimidine-related tolerance without decreasing its efficacy, the safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus the oral fluoropyrimidine tegafur and cetuximab were investigated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 104 patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC was conducted. Patients were treated with carboplatin (area under the curve: 5 mg/mL/min) on day 1, oral tegafur (250 mg/m2 twice daily) for 21 consecutive days, and cetuximab (400 mg/m2 as an initial 2-hour intravenous infusion, then 250 mg/m2 as a 1-hour weekly infusion for 3 weeks) for ≤6 cycles. Patients who responded to the therapy then received weekly cetuximab maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Treatment was well tolerated with a high level of compliance (relative dose intensity: 96%, 88%, and 81% for carboplatin, tegafur, and cetuximab, respectively). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 38% of patients (skin reactions in 17% of patients, anemia 4%, and neutropenia 3%). Grade 1-2 AEs included skin reactions (52% of patients), hypomagnesemia (20%), asthenia (19%), and anemia (13%). No venous thrombosis related to chemotherapy perfusion was observed. Over a median follow-up of 21 months, the median overall and progression-free survival were 11 and 6 months, respectively, and the overall response rate was 35%. CONCLUSIONS: Carboplatin plus oral tegafur and cetuximab is a safe, well-tolerated first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.

Application of Lepidic Component Predominance to Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Oral Fluoropyrimidines for Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the present study we aimed to investigate whether the predominance of the lepidic component in tumors was associated with the outcome of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I lung adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Charts for patients with pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed and then outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy were assessed according to the lepidic component predominance in tumors. Prognostic factors were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazard model. Propensity scores were determined using the optimal matching method on the basis of Cox modeling and matched (1:1) analysis was applied after classification into lepidic and nonlepidic predominant tumors. RESULTS: Among 798 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma, 168 received adjuvant chemotherapy. Although adjuvant chemotherapy conferred no disease-free survival (DFS) advantage upon patients with lepidic predominant tumors, it improved DFS in T1b and T2a nonlepidic predominant tumors (P = .045 and P = .029, respectively). Propensity score matched analysis revealed no survival benefits of adjuvant oral fluoropyrimidines in lepidic predominant tumors (DFS, P = .461 and overall survival, P = .983) and the positive survival advantages in nonlepidic predominant tumors (DFS, P = .015 and overall survival, P = .027). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant oral fluoropyrimidines conferred a better survival advantage upon patients with nonlepidic predominant tumors than patients with lepidic predominant tumors. The predominance of a lepidic component could serve as an indicator of adjuvant chemotherapy with oral fluoropyrimidines in stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

Concurrent radiotherapy with oral fluoropyrimidine versus gemcitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine (GEM) is the most widely utilized systemic agent in combination with radiation therapy (RT) for treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) in the concurrent setting. Despite recent interest in using two novel oral fluoropyrimidines (FUs), capecitabine and S-1, in this setting, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support this approach. METHODS: Trials published between 1994 and 2014 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library). All prospective studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment response, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively), and toxicities were extracted and analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis software (version 2.0). RESULTS: Twenty-three cohorts with 843 patients were included: 497 patients were treated with GEM and 346 patients were treated with oral FU. Pooled OS was significantly higher at 1 and 2 years for S-1 plus RT than for GEM plus RT (relative risk [RR] 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.65; P=0.03; and RR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.18-2.60, P=0.002, respectively), while 1-year PFS and ORR were not significantly different between S-1 and GEM-based chemoradiotherapy (P=0.37 and P=0.06, respectively). Additionally, comparable efficacy was found between capecitabine and GEM-based chemoradiotherapy in terms of OS, PFS, and ORR. As for grade 3 and 4 acute toxicity, oral FU plus RT significantly reduced the risk of developing hematologic toxicities, nausea, and vomiting when compared to GEM plus RT (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Oral FU plus RT may be a safe and feasible regimen for patients with LAPC, with similar efficacy and low rate of toxicities compared with GEM plus RT. Our findings support the need to compare S-1 with GEM in the concurrent setting in large prospective RCTs due to its potential survival benefits.

Efficacy of S-1 in colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine that consists of tegafur, 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine and potassium oxonate. It has been developed as a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil with the goal of improving therapeutic efficacy and tolerability. AREAS COVERED: This review aims to provide an evidence-based update of clinical trials that have investigated the clinical efficacy, adverse-event profile, dosage and administration of S-1, given alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutics and new target-oriented drugs, in the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). Additionally, differences in the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of S-1 between Caucasians and Asians have been described. Finally, the therapeutic efficacy of S-1 regarding metastatic CRC or postoperative CRC has been discussed. Available data have stimulated further research, including Phase III trials for the treatment of advanced CRC. EXPERT OPINION: Treatment using S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (± bevacizumab) and irinotecan has achieved promising results in terms of feasibility, safety and effectiveness. Furthermore, S-1 is an acceptable treatment as adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer.