Pathogenic variant-based preconception carrier screening in the Israeli Jewish population.

Preconception carrier screening allows identification of couples at risk to have offspring with autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders. In a current multiethnic world, screening based on self-reported ancestry has limitations. Here we describe the findings of a comprehensive pan-ethnic variant-based carrier screening, using the Israeli Jewish population as a model. The cohort included 1696 individuals (848 couples) tested with the 'MyScreen' multigene panel. The panel covers 1206 variants spanning 385 genes, known in different Jewish ethnicities and local Arab, Druze and Bedouin populations. Out of these, 205 variants in 143 genes are Jewish founder variants. We identified 859 (50.6%), carriers of at least one variant in 151 genes. Importantly, 569 (66.2%) of carriers could be missed by the current Israeli screening program. In total, 1:40 (2.5%) of carrier couples were identified by the 'MyScreen' panel, compared with 1:144 (0.7%) found by the ethnicity-based screening. Surprisingly, 90 individuals (10.5%) were carriers of variants "unexpected" for their reported origin, and 16 variants were previously unreported in Jewish patients. Our results support the advantages of variant-based comprehensive carrier screening for detection of carriers and at-risk couples in a diverse population with many founder disease-causing variants.

Clinical experience with carrier screening in a general population: support for a comprehensive pan-ethnic approach.

PURPOSE: To present results from a large cohort of individuals receiving expanded carrier screening (CS) in the United States. METHODS: Single-gene disorder carrier status for 381,014 individuals was determined using next-generation sequencing (NGS) based CS for up to 274 genes. Detection rates were compared with literature-reported values derived from disease prevalence and carrier frequencies. Combined theoretical affected pregnancy rates for the 274 screened disorders were calculated. RESULTS: For Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) diseases, 81.6% (4434/5435) of carriers identified did not report AJ ancestry. For cystic fibrosis, 44.0% (6260/14,229) of carriers identified had a variant not on the standard genotyping panel. Individuals at risk of being a silent spinal muscular atrophy carrier, not detectable by standard screening, comprised 1/39 (8763/344,407) individuals. For fragile X syndrome, compared with standard premutation screening, AGG interruption analysis modified risk in 83.2% (1128/1356) premutation carriers. Assuming random pairing across the study population, approximately 1/175 pregnancies would be affected by a disorder in the 274-gene screening panel. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard screening, NGS-based CS provides additional information that may impact reproductive choices. Pan-ethnic CS leads to substantially increased identification of at-risk couples. These data support offering NGS-based CS to all reproductive-aged women.

The evolving landscape of expanded carrier screening: challenges and opportunities.

Carrier screening allows individuals to learn their chance of passing on an autosomal or X-linked condition to their offspring. Initially introduced as single-disease, ancestry-based screening, technological advances now allow for the possibility of multi-disease, pan-ethnic carrier screening, which we refer to as "expanded carrier screening." There are numerous potential benefits to expanded carrier screening, including maximizing the opportunity for couples to make autonomous reproductive decisions, and efficiency and marginal additional costs of including more conditions if the test is already being offered. While numerous laboratories currently offer expanded carrier screening services, it is not yet commonly used in clinical practice, and there is a lack of consensus among experts about the service, including whether this should be offered to individuals and couples, whether this should be offered preconception or prenatally, and what conditions to include in screening programs. Challenges for expanded carrier screening programs include a lack of demand from the public, low prioritization by health systems, the potential for pressure to undergo screening, the possibility of disability-based discrimination, needed adaptations to pre- and post-test counseling, technical limitations, and the evolving technological and socio-political landscape.