Global disparities in the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: results from an international online survey study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore current practice and interregional differences in the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). We triangulated these observations considering countries' gross national income (GNI), disease subtypes, and symptoms using patient-reported information. METHODS: A cross-sectional ancillary analysis of the 'COVID-19 vaccination in auto-immune disease' (COVAD) e-survey containing demographic characteristics, IIM subtypes (DM, PM, IBM, anti-synthetase syndrome [ASSD], immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy [IMNM], overlap myopathies [OM]), current symptoms (surrogate for organ involvement) and treatments (corticosteroids [CS], immunomodulators [IM], i.e. antimalarials, immunosuppressants [IS], IVIG, biologic treatments and targeted-synthetic small molecules). Treatments were presented descriptively according to continents, GNI, IIM and organ involvement, and associated factors were analysed using multivariable binary logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of 18 851 respondents from 94 countries, 1418 with IIM were analysed (age 61 years, 62.5% females). DM (32.4%), IBM (24.5%) and OM (15.8%) were the most common subtypes. Treatment categories included IS (49.4%), CS (38.5%), IM (13.8%) and IVIG (9.4%). Notably, treatments varied across regions, GNI categories (IS mostly used in higher-middle income, IM in lower-middle income, IVIG and biologics largely limited to high-income countries), IIM subtypes (IS and CS associated with ASSD, IM with OM and DM, IVIG with IMNM, and biologic treatments with OM and ASSD) and disease manifestations (IS and CS with dyspnoea). Most inter-regional treatment disparities persisted after multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: We identified marked regional treatment disparities in a global cohort of IIM. These observations highlight the need for international consensus-driven management guidelines considering patient-centred care and available resources.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Mental Illnesses Among Patients with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: An 18-year population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors surrounding mental illnesses in patients diagnosed with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used nationwide, population-based claim data taken from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) to identify patients certified as having a catastrophic illness for Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Systemic sclerosis (SSc), Dermatomyositis (DM), Polymyositis (PM) or Sjogren's syndrome (SS) from the years 2002-2020. We furthermore calculated the incidence of mental illness in patients diagnosed with SARDs while exploring factors associated with the development of mental illness using multivariable Cox regression analysis shown as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among the 28 588 participants, the average age was 47.4 (SD 14.9) years, with most participants being female (76.4%). When compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis, patients with SLE (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10-1.32), SS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.19-1.39), and DM (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04-1.32) showed a significantly increased risk of developing mental illness. Additionally, when compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis, patients with SLE (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.21-1.44), SSc (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02-1.41), SS (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.26), DM (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.44-2.07), and PM (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.32-2.03) showed a significantly increased risk of antidepressant use. CONCLUSIONS: This population-based cohort study revealed that patients diagnosed with SLE, SS and DM had significantly higher risks of developing mental illness when compared with patients with RA.

Association of Serum Soluble Transferrin Receptor Concentration With Markers of Inflammation: Analysis of 1001 Patients From a Tertiary Rheumatology Center.

OBJECTIVE: Soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) is considered to be a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of iron deficiency, especially in the setting of inflammation, as it is thought to not be affected by inflammation. We analyzed the relationship between sTfR levels and inflammatory markers in patients with known or suspected inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD). METHODS: Blood samples of 1001 patients with known or suspected IRD referred to a tertiary rheumatology center were analyzed. Study participants were classified as patients with active IRD and patients with inactive IRD or without IRD. Correlation analyses were used to explore the relationship between sTfR levels and inflammatory markers (ie, C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). We applied multiple linear regression analysis to evaluate the predictive value of CRP levels for sTfR concentrations after adjustment for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: There were positive correlations between inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR) and serum sTfR levels (ρ 0.44, ρ 0.43, respectively; P < 0.001), exceeding the strength of correlation between inflammatory markers and the acute phase reactant ferritin (ρ 0.30, ρ 0.23, respectively; P < 0.001). Patients with active IRD demonstrated higher serum sTfR levels compared to patients with inactive or without IRD (mean 3.99 [SD 1.69] mg/L vs 3.31 [SD 1.57] mg/L; P < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, CRP levels are predictive for serum sTfR concentrations (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence against the concept that sTfR is a biomarker not affected by inflammation.

Factors Associated With an Electronic Health Record-Based Definition of Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19 in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Many individuals with rheumatic disease are at higher risk for severe acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to evaluate risk factors for postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) using an electronic health record (EHR)-based definition. METHODS: We identified patients with prevalent rheumatic diseases and COVID-19 within the Mass General Brigham healthcare system. PASC was defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes, relevant labs, vital signs, and medications at least 30 days following the first COVID-19 infection. Patients were followed until the earliest of incident PASC, repeat COVID-19 infection, 1 year of follow-up, death, or February 19, 2023. We used multivariable Cox regression to estimate the association of baseline characteristics with PASC risk. RESULTS: Among 2459 patients (76.37% female, mean age 57.4 years), the most common incident PASC manifestations were cough (14.56%), dyspnea (12.36%), constipation (11.39%), and fatigue (10.70%). Serious manifestations including acute coronary disease (4.43%), thromboembolism (3.09%), hypoxemia (3.09%), stroke (1.75%), and myocarditis (0.12%) were rare. The Delta wave (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.49-0.82) and Omicron era (aHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.62) were associated with lower risk of PASC than the early pandemic period (March 2020-June 2021). Age, obesity, comorbidity burden, race, and hospitalization for acute COVID-19 infection were associated with greater risk of PASC. Glucocorticoid (GC) use (aHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.34 compared to no use) was associated with greater risk of PASC. CONCLUSION: Among patients with rheumatic diseases, following their first COVID-19 infection, we found a decreased risk of PASC over calendar time using an EHR-based definition. Aside from GCs, no specific immunomodulatory medications were associated with increased risk, and risk factors were otherwise similar to those seen in the general population.

The effectiveness of the doxorubicin-etoposide-methylprednisolone regimen for adult HLH secondary to rheumatic disease.

To investigate the efficacy of the doxorubicin-etoposide-methylprednisolone, DEP) regimen as an effective treatment for adult Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis secondary to rheumatic disease and analyze prognosis in these patients. Fifty-eight adult patients diagnosed with Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis secondary to rheumatic disease admitted to Beijing Friendship Hospital from 1st Jan. 2018 to 31st Dec. 2022 were retrospectively included in this study. Patients were grouped according to previous treatment. Clinical data and laboratory characteristics of patients were retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy was evaluated every 2 weeks after initiating the first course of the DEP regimen and until the last inpatient or 31st Dec. 2023. 26 patients were included in Group A and 32 patients were included in Group B due to the previous treatment. After the first course of the DEP regimen, the overall response rate of all patients was 82.8%, with 13.8% in complete response and 69% in partial response. There was no significant statistical objective response rate between the two groups after the DEP regimen, except at 2-week. Serum ferritin, sCD25, ALT, AST, and DBIL concentrations were significantly lower at 2, 4 and 6-week than pre-treatment (P < 0.05). The overall mortality rate is 20.7% (12/58). Importantly, advanced age, initial level of HB and PLT, and central nervous system (CNS) involvement were independent poor risk factors affecting OS in bivariate analysis. The DEP regimen is effective for adult HLH secondary rheumatic disease with a high overall rate and accepted side effects.

Using the Online Elicitation of Personal Utility Functions Approach to Derive a Patient-Based 5-Level Version of EQ-5D Value Set: A Study in 122 Patients With Rheumatic Diseases From Germany.

OBJECTIVES: Traditional preference elicitation methods, such as discrete choice experiments or time trade-off, usually require large sample sizes. This can limit their applicability in patient populations, where recruiting enough participants can be challenging. The objective of this study was to test a new method, called the Online elicitation of Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) approach, to derive an EQ-5D-5L value set from a relatively small sample of patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: OPUF is a new type of online survey that implements compositional preference elicitation techniques. Central to the method are 3 valuation steps: (1) dimension weighting, (2) level rating, and (3) anchoring. An English demo version of the OPUF survey can be accessed at https://valorem.health/eq5d5l. From the responses, a personal EQ-5D-5L utility function can be constructed for each participant, and a group-level value set can be derived by aggregating model coefficients across participants. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients with rheumatic disease from Germany completed the OPUF survey. The survey was generally well received; most participants completed the survey in less than 20 minutes and were able to derive a full EQ-5D-5L value set. The precision of mean coefficients was high, despite the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that OPUF can be used to derive an EQ-5D-5L value set from a relatively small sample of patients. Although the method is still under development, we think that it has the potential to be a valuable preference elicitation tool and to complement traditional methods in several areas.

The Elusive Truth of Cannabinoids for Rheumatic Pain.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Medical cannabis (MC) has entered mainstream medicine by a unique route. Regulatory acceptance as a medical product in many jurisdictions has bypassed the traditional evidence-based pathway required for therapies. Easier access to MC, especially related to recreational legalization of cannabis, has led to widespread use by patients for symptom relief of a variety of medical conditions and often without medical oversight. Musculoskeletal pain remains the most common reason for MC use. This review examines real-world issues pertaining to MC and offers some guidance for clinical care of patients with rheumatic diseases being treated with MC. RECENT FINDINGS: Controlled clinical studies of cannabis products in patients with rheumatic diseases have been small and tested a range of compounds, routes of administration, and clinical populations, limiting our ability to generate conclusions on MC's effectiveness in this population. Observational cohort studies and surveys suggest that use of MC and related products in patients with rheumatic diseases improves pain and associated symptoms but is commonly accompanied by mild to moderate side effects. Conflicting evidence contributes to practitioner and patient uncertainty regarding the use of MC for rheumatic disease-related pain. Despite promising preclinical and observational evidence that MC and cannabis-derived compounds are useful in the management of rheumatic disease-related pain, there remains limited high-quality clinical evidence to substantiate these findings. There are a significant number of clinical trials on this topic currently planned or underway, however, suggesting the next decade may yield more clarity. Nevertheless, given that many people with rheumatic diseases are using cannabis products, healthcare professionals must remain apprised of the evidence pertaining to cannabinoids, communicate such evidence to patients in a meaningful way that is free from personal bias and stigma, and maintain strong collaborative clinical care pertaining to MC.

Incidence of diabetic retinopathy in anti-tnf treated rheumatic disease patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of anti-TNF (biological) therapies on the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 50 diabetic patients with rheumatic diseases (group 1) was performed. An age-, sex-, and HbA1c-matched control group (group 2) was formed from a pool of diabetic patients who underwent regular eye examinations. The presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy was also assessed. Comorbidities such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, and hyperlipidemia were also evaluated as possible confounding factors. RESULTS: Hundred eyes of 50 patients were evaluated in each group. Only three patients in group 1 had non-proliferative retinopathy. The median duration of rheumatic disease was 9 years, whereas that of diabetes was 11 years. The mean duration of anti-TNF therapy was 4 years. In the control group of diabetes-only patients, 13 patients developed some form of newly diagnosed diabetic retinopathy during the last five years. The calculated retinopathy occurrence between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In this study, the incidence rate ratio for patients receiving anti-TNF treatment was calculated as 0.4 in the study. CONCLUSION: TNF inhibitors, with their anti-inflammatory effects, positively impact diabetic complications by reducing the incidence of retinopathy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate retinopathy development after anti-TNF therapy.

COVID-19 and autoimmune rheumatic disease: behavioural changes adopted by patients amid the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Amid concerns about severe COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRD) during the outbreak, it is crucial to explore behavioural changes, whether healthy or unhealthy, arising from this patient population in response to the changing healthcare environment. AIM: To investigate COVID-19-driven behavioural changes in patients with AIRD. METHODS: This observational study invited patients who attended the rheumatology clinic of the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital from 1 August 2020 to 1 July 2021, to respond to a survey questionnaire distributed on the patient's WhatsApp platform. Variables observed were changes in patient behaviour and decision-making related to medication, healthcare service utilisation and clinical advice. RESULTS: Results for 233 patients were analysed in the study, the majority (89.7%) of whom were women. The most significant behavioural changes were a reduction in hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dosage, adoption of telemedicine for clinical consultation and keen adherence to protective/preventive health measures. Patients also expressed anxiety regarding the risk of contracting COVID-19 (52.5%), infecting their families (66.5%) and losing income (50.2%) due to the pandemic. Women and students were more likely to engage in self-isolation/shielding behaviour. Employed participants practised social distancing more, reduced HCQ dosage and had more fear of losing income. Having mixed connective tissue disease is associated with being anxious about the risk of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in behaviour changes among patients with AIRD. Despite the perceived risk, most of these patients continue to adhere to their prescribed medication regimens, especially maintaining the dosage of traditional immunosuppressive agents.

Clinical outcomes and risk factors in patients with COVID-19 and autoimmune rheumatic diseases: insights from a major Australian hospital study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease (AIIRD) are at higher risk of severe infections because of their underlying diseases and immunosuppression. Our objective was to elucidate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with AIIRD presenting with COVID-19 and their relation to disease severity. We explored whether variables, including underlying diagnosis, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and COVID-19 vaccine status, were associated with more severe forms of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2022, 151 patients with AIIRD and COVID-19 infection were analysed using a binary regression model and a multinomial regression model. RESULTS: The average age was 61.5 years, and average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 2.1; 106 (70.2%) patients were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 70 (46.4%) patients were receiving prednisolone. In the multivariable logistic regression model, ages between 50 and 69 years (odds ratio (OR) = 5.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.35-25.25) and older than 70 years (OR = 5.29; 95% CI = 1.21-23.14), prior prednisolone treatment (OR = 7.09; 95% CI = 2.63-19.11) and vaccination status including one and two doses (OR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05-0.69) and three and four doses (OR = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.02-0.35) were all statistically significant factors related to changes in the severity level of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Severity of COVID-19 infection in patients with AIIRD is affected by age, background steroid use and vaccination status. Factors including sex, comorbidity, diagnosis of AIIRDs and use of DMARDs, including conventional synthetic, biologics and targeted DMARDs, were not significantly associated with COVID-19 severity.

COVID-19 vaccination and infection status: a cross-sectional survey of patients with rheumatic diseases in China.

To evaluate the vaccination status and clinical practice of patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) during the COVID-19 pandemic in China and to explore the impact of vaccination on infection severity in patients with RD. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among RD patients in outpatient and inpatient settings of the Rheumatology and Immunology Department in our hospital. Participants' characteristics, vaccination status, COVID-19 infection status, and medication for acute COVID-19 were collected. A total of 749 valid surveys were included in the study. A total of 271 (36.2%) patients were not vaccinated, and 478 (63.8%) patients received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. 83.3% of patients were vaccinated with inactivated vaccines. Several patients with RD experienced the disease flare (57, 11.9%) and some adverse reactions (31, 6.5%) after COVID-19 vaccination. The COVID-19 infection rate was 84.1% in our study, which was not reduced by vaccination. However, vaccinated patients with RD showed decreased frequencies of pneumonia and hospitalization, compared with those of unvaccinated patients. Independent factors associated with hospitalization were COVID-19 vaccination (OR = 0.422, 95% CI 0.227-0.783), advanced age (OR = 1.070, 95% CI 1.046-1.095), ILD (OR = 1.245, 95% CI 1.082-1.432), and glucocorticoid (OR = 4.977, 95% CI 2.326-10.647). Adverse reactions to vaccines and disease flare are not common in RD patients. Although COVID-19 vaccination could not reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection in RD patients, it may effectively decrease the frequencies of pneumonia and hospitalization after infection. It is recommended that patients with RD should receive COVID-19 vaccination if there are no contraindications because the benefits outweigh the risks.

The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on rheumatic disease patients' satisfaction with access to medical services.

The COVID-19 hurt various lifestyle aspects, especially the treatment and follow-up of patients with chronic diseases such as autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (RD). The new circumstances changed the frequency of medical examinations and the way patients with rheumatic diseases are followed up. The objective is to study the impact of COVID-19 on RD patients' satisfaction with access to medical services. A national multicenter observational cross-sectional anonymous online survey was conducted on patients with RD using a specially developed web-based platform and structured questionnaire https://rheumatologycovid19.bg/ . The study was carried out with the support of intra-university project №6/2022 MU-Plovdiv. 1288 patients participated, with an average age of 47.03 (SD ± 12.80 years), of whom 992 (81.6%) were women. The questionnaire contained 41 questions grouped into 5 panels. Descriptive statistics were used-mean, alternative analysis, logistic regression and Decision Tree using the CRT (classification and regression trees) method. The study found that RD patients' satisfaction with access to medical services was influenced by communication type and the frequency of visits to the rheumatologist, difficulties in prescribing and finding medicines and the presence of comorbidities. The likelihood of patients' satisfaction with their rheumatologist was 5.5 and 3 times higher for in-person and other means of communication, respectively, compared to those without any communication. The relative share of patients who communicated by phone was larger (59%) compared to pre-pandemic (41%), where direct contact with the physician prevailed (80%). The results of the study confirmed the need to optimize remote access to medical care for patients with RD during the pandemic.

The History of Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Autoimmune Diseases.

In 1979, it became recognized in the literature that what we call hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) was a nonmalignant disease of histiocytes. Subsequently a familial form and a secondary form of HLH were differentiated. When HLH is secondary to an autoimmune disease, rheumatologists refer to this entity as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) to differentiate it from HLH itself. Although the first cases of MAS likely appeared in the literature in the 1970s, it was not until 1985 that the term activated macrophages was used to describe patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) complicated by MAS and the term macrophage activation syndrome first appeared in the title of a paper in 1993.MAS is one of the many types of secondary HLH and should not be confused with primary HLH. Experience has taught that MAS secondary to different autoimmune diseases is not equal. In the 30 years since initial description in patients with sJIA, the clinical spectrum, diseases associated with MAS, therapy, and understanding the pathogenesis have all made significant gains. The diagnostic/classification criteria for MAS secondary to sJIA, SLE, RA, and KD differ based on the different laboratory abnormalities associated with each (Ahn et al., J Rheumatol 44:996-1003, 2017; Han et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:e44, 2016; Ravelli et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:481-489, 2016; Borgia et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 70:616-624, 2018). These examples include the thrombocytosis associated with sJIA, a chronic generalized activation of the immune system, leading to elevations of fibrinogen and sIL-2R, low platelet count associated with SLE, and more acute inflammation associated with KD. Therefore, individual diagnostic criteria are required, and they all differ from the diagnostic criteria for HLH, which are based on a previously non-activated immune system (Ahn et al., J Rheumatol 44:996-1003, 2017; Han et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:e44, 2016; Ravelli et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:481-489, 2016; Borgia et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 70:616-624, 2018; Henter et al., Pediatr Blood Cancer 48:124-131, 2007). This helps to explain why the HLH diagnostic criteria do not perform well in MAS.The initial treatment remains high-dose steroids and IVIG followed by the use of a calcineurin inhibitor for resistant cases. IVIG can be used if there is a concern about malignancy to wait for appropriate investigations or with steroids. Interluekin-1 inhibition is now the next therapy if there is a failure to respond to steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. Advances in understanding the mechanisms leading to MAS, which has been greatly aided by the use of mouse models of MAS and advances in genome sequencing, offer a bright future for more specific therapies. More recent therapies are directed to specific cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of MAS and can lead to decreases in the morbidity and mortality associated with MAS. These include therapies directed to inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway and/or specific cytokines, interleukin-18 and gamma interferon, which are currently being studied in MAS. These more specific therapies may obviate the need for nonspecific immunosuppressive therapies including high-dose prolonged steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and etoposide.

Roles of the Caspase-11 Non-Canonical Inflammasome in Rheumatic Diseases.

Inflammasomes are intracellular multiprotein complexes that activate inflammatory signaling pathways. Inflammasomes comprise two major classes: canonical inflammasomes, which were discovered first and are activated in response to a variety of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and non-canonical inflammasomes, which were discovered recently and are only activated in response to intracellular lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Although a larger number of studies have successfully demonstrated that canonical inflammasomes, particularly the NLRP3 inflammasome, play roles in various rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), infectious arthritis (IR), gouty arthritis (GA), osteoarthritis (OA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), psoriatic arthritis (PA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and Sjögren's syndrome (SjS), the regulatory roles of non-canonical inflammasomes, such as mouse caspase-11 and human caspase-4 non-canonical inflammasomes, in these diseases are still largely unknown. Interestingly, an increasing number of studies have reported possible roles for non-canonical inflammasomes in the pathogenesis of various mouse models of rheumatic disease. This review comprehensively summarizes and discusses recent emerging studies demonstrating the regulatory roles of non-canonical inflammasomes, particularly focusing on the caspase-11 non-canonical inflammasome, in the pathogenesis and progression of various types of rheumatic diseases and provides new insights into strategies for developing potential therapeutics to prevent and treat rheumatic diseases as well as associated diseases by targeting non-canonical inflammasomes.

Synthesized pyrrole ester ameliorates adjuvant­induced arthritis in Wistar rats by alleviating inflammation and downregulating the pro­inflammatory cytokines.

Piperine is an amide alkaloid responsible for producing the pungent smell that comes from black pepper. Piperine has been explained to exhibit significant properties such as anti-rheumatic, anti-inflammatory, and antihypertensive effects. The aim of the study was to synthesize pyrrole ester from piperine and evaluate its anti-arthritis effects in adjuvant-induced arthritis female Wistar rats. In this study, pyrrole ester (AU-5) was designed, synthesized and evaluated for ant-arthritic activity in adjuvant-induced arthritis Wistar rats. The synthesized pyrrole ester (AU-5) was administered in three selected doses (20, 10 and 5 mg/kg) to the arthritic-induced model. The administered ester significantly inhibited the increase in arthritis index, paw and ankle joint swelling compared to the arthritic control group. Similarly, the treated rats exhibited a remarkable increase in body weight increase, improved haematological, biochemical, histopathological and radiological parameters. Moreover, the excess production of rheumatoid factor (RF), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was noticeably attenuated in all AU-5-treated rats. However, the spleen index, tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were distinctly lowered compared to arthritic control rats. Moreover, AU-5 showed promising liver protection by lowering the level of liver function markers Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in serum. Henceforth, it might be concluded that AU-5 has an anti-arthritic effect which can be credited to the down regulation of inflammatory markers and the pro-inflammatory cytokines.

[The subanalysis of Rheuma-VOR demonstrates a considerable need for rheumatological care]. / Die Subanalyse von Rheuma-VOR zeigt den erheblichen Bedarf der rheumatologischen Versorgung auf.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases can prevent consequential damage such as permanently limited mobility and joint or organ damage. Simultaneously, there is an increasing deficit in medical care owing to the lack of rheumatological capacity. Rural regions are particularly affected. OBJECTIVES: The available unconfirmed diagnoses of the study Rheuma-VOR were analysed regarding another definitive inflammatory rheumatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The returned questionnaires of the rheumatologists participating in Rheuma-VOR were screened for definitive inflammatory rheumatic diseases other than the required diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or spondyloarthritis. RESULTS: Of 910 unconfirmed diagnoses, in 245 patients another definitive diagnosis could be confirmed. A total of 29.8% of the diagnoses corresponded to degenerative joint changes or chronic pain syndrome, whereas 26.1% involved different forms of inflammatory arthritis. The majority of diagnoses (40.5%) were collagenosis or vasculitis, DISCUSSION: The available data show that a rheumatological presentation was indicated for the majority of patients. Owing to the increasing deficits in medical care a prior selection of the patients is crucial to make optimal use of restricted rheumatological capacities.

Characteristics of anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis with thrombotic microangiopathy.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 antibody (anti-MDA5 Ab)-positive dermatomyositis (DM) is a representative of rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia. However, its association with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), characterized by thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, and organ dysfunction, has not been defined. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of anti-MDA5 Ab-positive DM accompanied by TMA. METHODS: We reviewed our hospital records from November 2009 to September 2022. We included patients in accordance with the 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria and the criteria of Bohan and Peter. TMA was diagnosed according to the criteria for transplantation-associated TMA proposed by the International Working Group. RESULTS: This study enrolled a total of 26 anti-MDA5 Ab-positive DM patients, four of whom developed TMA. The patients with TMA had an increased urine protein/creatinine ratio. In addition, these four of them showed significantly elevated levels of ferritin and anti-MDA5 Ab titers and were considered to have high disease activity; yet, all of them survived. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that anti-MDA5 Ab-positive DM patients with hyperferritinemia, a high anti-MDA5 Ab titer, and an increased urine protein/creatinine ratio should be carefully managed, bearing in mind a complication of TMA.

Serologic Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) have an increased risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), primarily attributed to the use of immunosuppressive drugs such as glucocorticoids, which may attenuate the response to vaccines. This meta-analysis assessed the serologic response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IMIDs. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched on August 1, 2021, for observational studies. Data extracted included reference population, medications, vaccination, and proportion of patients achieving a serologic response. RESULTS: The analysis included 25 observational studies (5360 patients). Most of the studies used messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273), with a small number of studies including other types of vaccines (AZD1222, CoronaVac, BBV152, Ad26.COV2.S). Serologic response after 1 dose (6 studies) and 2 doses (17 studies) of mRNA vaccine were 73.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.7%-79.5%) and 83.4% (95% CI, 76.8%-88.4%), respectively. On meta-regression, anti-CD20 therapy was associated with lower response rates (P < .001) and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy also showed a trend toward lower response rates (P = .058). Patients with IMIDs were less likely to achieve a serologic response compared with controls after 2 doses of mRNA vaccine (6 studies; odds ratio, 0.086; 95% CI, 0.036-0.206; P < .001). There were not enough studies to assess response to the adenoviral or inactivated vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with IMIDs have a reduced response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. These results suggest that IMID patients receiving mRNA vaccines should complete the vaccine series without delay and support the strategy of providing a third dose of the vaccine.

Is vaccination against COVID-19 associated with autoimmune rheumatic disease flare? A self-controlled case series analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRD) flare. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with AIRDs vaccinated against COVID-19 who consulted for disease flare between 1 December 2020 and 31 December 2021 were ascertained in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (Aurum). AIRD flare was defined as consultation for AIRD with CS prescription on the same day or the next day. Vaccination was defined using date of vaccination and product code. The observation period was partitioned into vaccine-exposed (21 days after vaccination), pre-vaccination (7 days before vaccination) and remaining vaccine-unexposed periods. Participants contributed data with multiple vaccinations and outcomes. Season adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and 95% CI were calculated using self-controlled case series analysis. RESULTS: Data for 3554 AIRD cases, 72% female, mean age 65 years and 68.3% with RA, were included. COVID-19 vaccination was associated with significantly fewer AIRD flares in the 21-day vaccine-exposed period when all vaccinations were considered [aIRR (95% CI) 0.89 (0.80, 0.98)]. Using dose-stratified analyses there was a statistically significant negative association in the 21 days after first COVID-19 vaccination but no association after the second or third COVID-19 vaccinations [aIRR (95% CI) 0.76 (0.66, 0.89), 0.94 (0.79, 1.11) and 1.01 (0.85, 1.20), respectively]. On AIRD-type stratified analyses, vaccination was not associated with disease flares. Vaccination without or after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, and with vectored DNA or mRNA vaccines, associated with comparable reduced risk of AIRD flares in the vaccine-exposed period after first COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination against COVID-19 was not associated with increased AIRD flares regardless of prior COVID-19, AIRD type, and whether mRNA or DNA vaccination technology were used.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in inflammatory arthritis patients: serial surveys from a large longitudinal national Australian cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To determine COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rates in inflammatory arthritis patients and identify factors associated with changing vaccine hesitancy over time. METHODS: This investigation was a prospective cohort study of inflammatory arthritis patients from community and public hospital outpatient rheumatology clinics enrolled in the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD). Two surveys were conducted, one immediately prior to (pre-pandemic) and another approximately 1 year after the start of the pandemic (follow-up). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy was measured at follow-up, and general vaccine hesitancy was inferred pre-pandemic; these were used to identify factors associated with fixed and changing vaccine beliefs, including sources of information and broader beliefs about medication. RESULTS: Of the 594 participants who completed both surveys, 74 (12%) were COVID-19 vaccine hesitant. This was associated with pre-pandemic beliefs about medications being harmful (P < 0.001) and overused (P = 0.002), with stronger beliefs resulting in vaccine hesitancy persistent over two time points (P = 0.008, P = 0.005). For those not vaccine hesitant pre-pandemic, the development of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was associated with a lower likelihood of seeking out vaccine information from health-care professionals (P < 0.001). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was not associated with new influenza vaccine hesitancy (P = 0.138). CONCLUSION: In this study of vaccine beliefs before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in inflammatory arthritis patients varied, depending on vaccine attitudes immediately prior to the start of the pandemic. Fixed beliefs reflected broader views about medications, while fluid beliefs were highly influenced by whether they sought out information from health-care professionals, including rheumatologists.