[Possibilities of tissue perfusion assessment in abdominal surgery: integration into the intraoperative system of safety control points]. / Vozmozhnosti otsenki perfuzii tkanei v abdominal'noi khirurgii: integratsiya v sistemu intraoperatsionnykh kontrol'nykh tochek bezopasnosti.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possibility of integrating tissue perfusion assessment techniques (ICG perfusion and imaging photoplethysmography - iPPG) into the system of intraoperative control points of laparoscopic interventions with a reconstructive component. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative assessment of ICG fluorescence and iPPG were used during 8 laparoscopically assisted interventions: gastrectomy for gastric cancer (total - 2 and distal - 1) and colorectal resections (left-sided colorectal resections - 4 and right hemicolectomy - 1). RESULTS: Four stages are presented for the assessment of tissue perfusion: initial assessment, before intestine transection, before anastomosis formation, and evaluation of anastomosis. From the point of view of the significance of clinical decision-making, the «before intestine transection¼ stage is of great importance, due to the ease of transferring the resection level to the optimal tissue perfusion zone. CONCLUSION: Integration of tissue perfusion assessment techniques into the system of intraoperative checkpoints is possible and promising.

Implementing surgical mentorship in a resource-constrained context: a mixed methods assessment of the experiences of mentees, mentors, and leaders, and lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: A well-qualified workforce is critical to effective functioning of health systems and populations; however, skill gaps present a challenge in low-resource settings. While an emerging body of evidence suggests that mentorship can improve quality, access, and systems in African health settings by building the capacity of health providers, less is known about its implementation in surgery. We studied a novel surgical mentorship intervention as part of a safe surgery intervention (Safe Surgery 2020) in five rural Ethiopian facilities to understand factors affecting implementation of surgical mentorship in resource-constrained settings. METHODS: We designed a convergent mixed-methods study to understand the experiences of mentees, mentors, hospital leaders, and external stakeholders with the mentorship intervention. Quantitative data was collected through a survey (n = 25) and qualitative data through in-depth interviews (n = 26) in 2018 to gather information on (1) intervention characteristics including areas of mentorship, mentee-mentor relationships, and mentor characteristics, (2) organizational context including facilitators and barriers to implementation, (3) perceived impact, and (4) respondent characteristics. We analyzed the quantitative and qualitative data using frequency analysis and the constant comparison method, respectively; we integrated findings to identify themes. RESULTS: All mentees (100%) experienced the intervention as positive. Participants perceived impact as: safer and more frequent surgical procedures, collegial bonds between mentees and mentors, empowerment among mentees, and a culture of continuous learning. Over 70% of all mentees reported their confidence and job satisfaction increased. Supportive intervention characteristics included a systems focus, psychologically safe mentee-mentor relationships, and mentor characteristics including generosity with time and knowledge, understanding of local context, and interpersonal skills. Supportive organizational context included a receptive implementation climate. Intervention challenges included insufficient clinical training, inadequate mentor support, and inadequate dose. Organizational context challenges included resource constraints and a lack of common understanding of the intervention. CONCLUSION: We offer lessons for intervention designers, policy makers, and practitioners about optimizing surgical mentorship interventions in resource-constrained settings. We attribute the intervention's success to its holistic approach, a receptive climate, and effective mentee-mentor relationships. These qualities, along with policy support and adapting the intervention through user feedback are important for successful implementation.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Surgical safety checklists for cesarean delivery.

The routine use of surgical safety checklists can reduce perioperative complications. Generic surgical safety checklists are insufficient for cesarean delivery because each cesarean delivery involves 2 patients (the mother and the fetus or newborn), each with separate care teams and health and safety considerations. To address the added complexity of care coordination and communication inherent in cesarean delivery, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine presents sample standard surgical safety checklists for cesarean delivery that include elements of care for both the mother and newborn. In addition, we present an alternative checklist for time-critical emergency cesarean deliveries in which there is no time to safely perform the standard checklist and a sample preoperative checklist for use before moving the patient to the operating room. We also recommend steps for implementation of the checklists at individual facilities.

A multimodal mentorship intervention to improve surgical quality in Tanzania's Lake Zone: a convergent, mixed methods assessment.

BACKGROUND: Safe, high-quality surgical care in many African countries is a critical need. Challenges include availability of surgical providers, improving quality of care, and building workforce capacity. Despite growing evidence that mentoring is effective in African healthcare settings, less is known about its role in surgery. We examined a multimodal approach to mentorship as part of a safe surgery intervention (Safe Surgery 2020) to improve surgical quality. Our goal was to distill lessons for policy makers, intervention designers, and practitioners on key elements of a successful surgical mentorship program. METHODS: We used a convergent, mixed-methods design to examine the experiences of mentees, mentors, and facility leaders with mentorship at 10 health facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone. A multidisciplinary team of mentors worked with surgical providers over 17 months using in-person mentorship, telementoring, and WhatsApp. We conducted surveys, in-depth interviews, and focus groups to capture data in four categories: (1) satisfaction with mentorship; (2) perceived impact; (3) elements of a successful mentoring program; and (4) challenges to implementing mentorship. We analyzed quantitative data using frequency analysis and qualitative data using the constant comparison method. Recurrent and unifying concepts were identified through merging the qualitative and quantitative data. RESULTS: Overall, 96% of mentees experienced the intervention as positive, 88% were satisfied, and 100% supported continuing the intervention in the future. Mentees, mentors, and facility leaders perceived improvements in surgical practice, the surgical ecosystem, and in reducing postsurgical infections. Several themes related to the intervention's success emerged: (1) the intervention's design, including its multimodality, side-by-side mentorship, and standardization of practices; (2) the mentee-mentor relationship, including a friendly, safe, non-hierarchical, team relationship, as well as mentors' understanding of the local context; and (3) mentorship characteristics, including non-judgmental feedback, experience, and accessibility. Challenges included resistance to change, shortage of providers, mentorship dose, and logistics. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a multimodal mentorship approach is promising in building the capacity of surgical providers. By distilling the experiences of the mentees, mentors, and facility leaders, our lessons provide a foundation for future efforts to establish effective surgical mentorship programs that build provider capacity and ultimately improve surgical quality.

How to avoid pneumocephalus in deep brain stimulation surgery? Analysis of potential risk factors in a series of 100 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Accuracy of lead placement is the key to success in deep brain stimulation (DBS). Precise anatomic stereotactic planning usually is based on stable perioperative anatomy. Pneumocephalus due to intraoperative CSF loss is a common procedure-related phenomenon which could lead to brain shift and targeting inaccuracy. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential risk factors of pneumocephalus in DBS surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center analysis in patients undergoing bilateral DBS. We quantified the amount of pneumocephalus by postoperative CT scans and corrected the data for accompanying brain atrophy by an MRI-based score. Automated computerized segmentation algorithms from a dedicated software were used. As potential risk factors, we evaluated the impact of trephination size, the number of electrode tracks, length of surgery, intraoperative blood pressure, and brain atrophy. RESULTS: We included 100 consecutive patients that underwent awake DBS with intraoperative neurophysiological testing. Systolic and mean arterial blood pressure showed a substantial impact with an inverse correlation, indicating that lower blood pressure is associated with higher volume of pneumocephalus. Furthermore, the length of surgery was clearly correlated to pneumocephalus. CONCLUSION: Our analysis identifies intraoperative systolic and mean arterial blood pressure as important risk factors for pneumocephalus in awake stereotactic surgery.

Development and upgrading of public primary healthcare facilities with essential surgical services infrastructure: a strategy towards achieving universal health coverage in Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Infrastructure development and upgrading to support safe surgical services in primary health care facilities is an important step in the journey towards achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Quality health service provision together with equitable geographic access and service delivery are important components that constitute UHC. Tanzania has been investing in infrastructure development to offer essential safe surgery close to communities at affordable costs while ensuring better outcomes. This study aimed to understand the public sector's efforts to improve the infrastructure of primary health facilities between 2005 and 2019. We assessed the construction rates, geographic coverage, and physical status of each facility, surgical safety and services rendered in public primary health facilities. METHODS: Data was collected from existing policy reports, the Services Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool (physical status), the Health Facility Registry (HFR), implementation reports on infrastructure development from the 26 regions and 185 district councils across the country (covering assessment of physical infrastructure, waste management systems and inventories for ambulances) and Comprehensive Emergence Obstetric Care (CEMONC) signal functions assessment tool. Data was descriptively analyzed so as to understand the distribution of primary health care facilities and their status (old, new, upgraded, under construction, renovated and equipped), and the service provided, including essential surgical services. RESULTS: Of 5072 (518 are Health Centers and 4554 are Dispensaries) existing public primary health care facilities, the majority (46%) had a physical status of A (good state), 33% (1693) had physical status of B (minor renovation needed) and the remaining facilities had physical status of C up to F (needing major renovation). About 33% (1673) of all health facilities had piped water and 5.1% had landline telecommunication system. Between 2015 and August 2019, a total of 419 (8.3%) health facilities (Consisting of 350 health centers and 69 District Council Hospitals) were either renovated or constructed and equipped to offer safe surgery services. Of all Health Centers only 115 (22.2%) were offering the CEMONC services. Of these 115 health facilities, only 20 (17.4%) were offering the CEMONC services with all 9 - signal functions and only 17.4% had facilities that are offering safe blood transfusion services. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that between 2015 and 2019 there has been improvement in physical status of primary health facilities as a result constructions, upgrading and equipping the facilities to offer safe surgery and related diagnostic services. Despite the achievements, still there is a high demand for good physical statuses and functioning of primary health facilities with capacity to offer essential and safe surgical services in the country also as an important strategy towards achieving UHC. This is also inline with the National Surgical, Obstetrics and Anesthesia plan (NSOAP).

Mathematical model of the risk of drug error during anaesthesia: the influence of drug choices, injection routes, operation duration and fatigue.

The incidence of an anaesthetic drug error can be directly observed in large trials. In an alternative approach, we developed a probabilistic mathematical model in which the anaesthetist is modelled as a 'fallible entity' who makes repeated drug administration choices during an operation. This fallibility was factored in the model as an initial 'intrinsic error rate'. The choices faced included: dose; timing of administration; and the routes available for injection (e.g. venous, arterial, epidural, etc.). Additionally, we modelled the effect of fatigue as a factor that magnifies the cumulative error rate. For an initial intrinsic error rate of 1 in 1000 (which from first principles we consider a reasonable estimate), our model predicted a cumulative probability of error over a ~12 h operation of ~10%; that is, 1 in 10 operations this long results in some drug error. This is similar to the rate reported by large observational trials. Serious errors constitute a small fraction of all errors; our model predicts a Poisson distribution for the uncommon serious errors, also consistent with independent observations. Even modest assumptions for the development of fatigue had a dramatic and adverse impact on the cumulative error rate. The practice implications of our modelling include: exercising caution or avoiding starting work if under par; added vigilance in unfamiliar environments; keeping anaesthetic recipes simple; and recognising that operation durations > 5-6 h constitute a time of exaggerated risk. These implications are testable predictions in observational trials. If validated, our model could serve as a potential research tool to investigate the impact of safety interventions on the rate of intrinsic error using simulation.

Safety of outpatient admission and comparison of different surgical techniques in adult tonsillectomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the safety of outpatient admission and the effects of surgical technique in tonsillectomy operations of adult patients. METHODS: The digital database was scanned for patients aged ≥ 15 years that underwent tonsillectomy in our institution between years 2014 and 2018. Demographic and clinical characteristics, the surgical technique, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, re-admissions after discharge, complications and interventions performed were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients met the inclusion criteria, comprising 139 (50.4%) females and 137 (49.6%) males with a mean age of 27.17 ± 9.41 years. The most common indication was recurrent tonsillitis (n = 223, 80.8%), and surgical techniques used were bipolar scissors (CURIS®, Sutter Medizintechnik, Germany) (n = 137, 49.6%), cold dissection (n = 75, 27.2%) and/or plasma blade (PEAK Surgical, Medtronic, USA) (n = 64, 23.2%). A total of 43 (15.5%) re-admissions from 37 (13.4%) patients were recorded because of bleeding (n = 33, 70.2%) and/or odynodysphagia (n = 13, 27.7%). Non-surgical interventions were sufficient in 32 (74.4%) cases, while surgical interventions were required in 11 (25.6%) patients. In patients where "hot" techniques (bipolar scissors, plasma blade) were used and in patients with complaints in the first 24 h postoperatively, significantly increased rates of elongated LOS values for more than 1 day were determined (p < 0.01, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adult tonsillectomy is a safe surgical procedure with low complication, re-operation and mortality rates. Significantly increased rates of elongated LOS values for more than 1 day and re-admissions after discharge were determined in those patients having complications in the first 24 h postoperatively. Cold dissection seems to be more advisable than hot techniques for outpatient tonsillectomy among adult patients.

Safe Veress Needle Intraperitoneal Placement and Safer Laparoscopic Entry.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Fifty percent of laparoscopic bowel and vascular injuries occur at the time of entry. These serious complications can lead to significant morbidity and even mortality. This video demonstrates 3 techniques that have been developed to minimize the risk of these injuries during entry. DESIGN: Step-by-step description of 3 techniques that can be used as a highly reliable and safe method of obtaining intraperitoneal entry during laparoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Caudal displacement of the umbilicus before insertion of the veress needle allows for a median displacement of 6 cm between the site of entry and the common iliac vessels. An entry pressure of less than 9 mm Hg is suggestive of successful intraperitoneal entry. The left upper quadrant should be used in specific cases instead of the umbilicus as the point of entry for the veress needle. The use of a visualized trocarless cannula instead of a conventional primary trocar for entry after insufflation allows for real-time recognition of injury and converts linear penetrating force to radial torque. CONCLUSION: These 3 techniques can help decrease the risk and improve intraoperative recognition of serious bowel and vascular injuries during laparoscopy.

Guidelines and checklists for short-term missions in global pediatric surgery: Recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics Delivery of Surgical Care Global Health Subcommittee, American Pediatric Surgical Association Global Pediatric Surgery Committee, Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Committee on International Education and Service, and American Pediatric Surgical Nurses Association, Inc. Global Health Special Interest Group.

Pediatric surgeons, anesthesia providers, and nurses from North America and other high-income countries are increasingly engaged in resource-limited areas, with short-term missions as the most common form of involvement. However, consensus recommendations currently do not exist for short-term missions in pediatric general surgery and associated perioperative care. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Delivery of Surgical Care Subcommittee and American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Global Pediatric Surgery Committee, with the American Pediatric Surgical Nurses Association, Inc. (APSNA) Global Health Special Interest Group, and the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia (SPA) Committee on International Education and Service generated consensus recommendations for short-term missions based on extensive experience with short-term missions. Three distinct, but related areas were identified: (i) Broad goals of surgical partnerships between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries. A previous set of guidelines published by the Global Paediatric Surgery Network Collaborative (GPSN) was endorsed by all groups; (ii) Guidelines for the conduct of short-term missions were developed, including planning, in-country perioperative patient care, post-trip follow-up, and sustainability; and (iii) travel and safety considerations critical to short-term mission success were enumerated. A diverse group of stakeholders developed these guidelines for short-term missions in low- and middle-income countries. These guidelines may be a useful tool to ensure safe, responsible, and ethical short-term missions given increasing engagement of high-income country providers in this work.

Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at a teaching hospital in India and evaluation of the effects on perioperative complications.

BACKGROUND: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was developed to help operating teams reduce the occurrence of patient harm. The Checklist is a simple, practical tool that any surgical team in the world can use to ensure that the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative steps that have been shown to benefit patients are undertaken in a timely and efficient way. METHODS: This study was carried out at Rajarajeswari Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India, to study the effects of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist on mortality and morbidity in surgical patients, to identify the potential problems in the long-term implementation of the same, and to document the complications in patients undergoing a major surgery during the study period. Data collection followed patients prospectively until discharge or for 30 days, whichever came first, for complications and death. RESULTS: There were a total of 73 complications during the period of the study (4.1%). Of these, more than half (44) were surgical wound infections. The proportion of patients who received prophylactic antibiotics was 100% during the period of the study and the checklist identified a deficit and corrected the same in 27 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The checklist was successfully implemented in the said hospital, and the appropriate processes were studied. The use of the checklist was successful in drawing the attention of the personnel to the issue of patient safety, its magnitude, and the appropriate steps to be taken in this regard. The number of omissions in the operation rooms was significantly reduced.

WHO safe surgery checklist: Barriers to universal acceptance.

Development of the Safe Surgery Checklist is an initiative taken by the World Health Organization (WHO) with an aim to reduce the complication rates during the surgical process. Despite gross reduction in the infection rate and morbidity following adoption of the checklist, many health-care providers are hesitant in implementing it in their everyday practice. In this article, we would like to highlight the hurdles in adoption of the WHO Surgical Checklist and measures that can be taken to overcome them.

The Use of Surgical Care Improvement Projects in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially mortal complication in patients undergoing surgery. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism can be seen up to 40 % of patients who have no or inappropriate VTE prophylaxis during perioperative period.In addition to the preoperative and intraoperative preventive measures, the standardization of postoperative care and follow-up are essential to reduce VTE risk. Modern healthcare prioritizes patient's safety and aims to reduce postoperative morbidity by using standardized protocols. Use of quality improvement projects with well-organized surgical care has an important role to prevent VTE during hospital stay. Present surgical care improvement projects have provided us the opportunity to identify patients who are vulnerable to VTE. Description and introduction of the quality standards for VTE prevention in the educational materials, meetings and at the medical schools will increase the VTE awareness among the health care providers. You are going to find the characteristics of the major surgical quality improvement projects and their relations with VTE in the chapter.

Working towards safer surgery in Africa; a survey of utilization of the WHO safe surgical checklist at the main referral hospitals in East Africa.

BACKGROUND: Mortality from anaesthesia and surgery in many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa remain at levels last seen in high-income countries 70 years ago. With many factors contributing to these poor outcomes, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the "Safe Surgery Saves Lives" campaign in 2007. This program included the design and implementation of the "Surgical Safety Checklist", incorporating ten essential objectives for safe surgery. We set out to determine the knowledge of and attitudes towards the use of the WHO checklist for surgical patients in national referral hospitals in East Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the main referral hospitals in Mulago (Uganda), Kenyatta (Kenya), Muhimbili (Tanzania), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (Rwanda) and Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Kamenge (Burundi). Using a pre-set questionnaire, we interviewed anaesthetists on their knowledge and attitudes towards use of the WHO surgical checklist. RESULTS: Of the 85 anaesthetists interviewed, only 25 % regularly used the WHO surgical checklist. None of the anaesthetists in Mulago (Uganda) or Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Kamenge (Burundi) used the checklist, mainly because it was not available, in contrast with Muhimbili (Tanzania), Kenyatta (Kenya), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (Rwanda), where 65 %, 19 % and 36 %, respectively, used the checklist. CONCLUSION: Adherence to aspects of care embedded in the checklist is associated with a reduction in postoperative complications. It is therefore necessary to make the surgical checklist available, to train the surgical team on its importance and to identify local anaesthetists to champion its implementation in East Africa. The Ministries of Health in the participating countries need to issue directives for the implementation of the WHO checklist in all hospitals that conduct surgery in order to improve surgical outcomes.

Compliance and Effectiveness of WHO Surgical Safety Check list: A JPMC Audit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), compliance and its effectiveness in reducing complications and final outcome of patients. METHODS: This was a prospective study done in Department of General Surgery (Ward 02), Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi. The study included Total 3638 patients who underwent surgical procedure in elective theatre in four years from November 2011 to October 2015 since the SSC was included as part of history sheets in ward. Files were checked to confirm the compliance with regards to filling the three stage checklist properly and complications were noted. RESULTS: In 1st year, out of 840 surgical procedures, SSC was properly marked in 172 (20.4%) cases. In 2nd year, out of 857 surgical procedures 303 (35.3%) cases were marked which increased in 3rd year out of 935 surgical procedures 757 (80.9%) cases and in 4th year out of 932 surgical procedures 838 (89.9%) cases were marked. No significant change in site and side (left or right) complications were noted in all four years. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) was noted in 59 (7.50%), 52 (6.47%), 44 (4.70%) and 20 (2.12%) cases in 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th year respectively. SSI in laparoscopic cholecystectomies was 41 (20.8 %), 45 (13%), 20 (5.68%) and 4 (1.12%) in 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th year respectively. No significant change in chest complications were noted in all four years. Mortality rate also remained same in all four years. CONCLUSION: WHO SSC is an effective tool in reducing in-hospital complications thus producing a favorable outcome. Realization its efficacy would improve compliance.

A Quantitative Analysis of Intraoperative Distractions and When They Occur During General Surgical Operations.

Introduction Distractions in operating theatres prevent team members from concentrating on the complex tasks required for a successful operation. This can be a potential hazard to care for, and previously, correlations have been made between increased theatre distractions and adverse events. However, it remains unclear how frequently such events occur during routine care in theatres. The present study aims to quantify distractions and analyse any differences between staff groups, operative stages, and modes of operation. Methods A single-centre prospective study was conducted to assess disruptions in general surgical theatres. Events were recorded using a previously described categorization system on a proforma by a single researcher. The source and severity of distraction were recorded, as well as the mode of operation (elective/emergency), stage of operation, and staff team (scrubbed/floor). Results A total of 4,219 minutes of surgery were observed over four weeks, and 1,095 distraction events were recorded. Of the 14 elective and nine emergency procedures recorded, there was a mean of 54.8 distractions per procedure and a frequency of one distraction every three minutes and 51 seconds (15.6 hr-1). Irrelevant communication relating to the patient's case was the most common source, accounting for 24.7% of all distractions. The most frequently disrupted stage of the procedure for scrubbed staff was during anastomosis/resection for both elective and emergency procedures, with 16.9 and 32.6 distractions occurring per hour, respectively. Scrubbed staff were significantly more susceptible to distraction in emergency procedures than the floor staff. Discussion Our study reflects previous assessments with irrelevant communications and emergency procedures yielding the highest prevalence of distraction. This investigation provides novel information about the different stages of general surgery and the frequency of distractions that occur.

Obstacles to using the safe surgery checklist: Perspectives of first-line personnel.

Objectives: The safe surgery checklist, presented by the World Health Organization in 2008, is an aid to performing surgical interventions safely. Research indicates that the use of checklists in clinical activities leads to a reduced number of adverse events. However, research suggests that the use of checklists differs between different institutions and even between units in the same organisation. The intention of this study is to identify factors regarded by the health personnel in 'the sharp end' as obstacles to using the checklist. Methods: The study has a qualitative, case-based design. It is performed by the Hazard Identification method, which is a method for revealing safety hazards based on workers' experiences. Results: Obstacles were identified related to the content of the list, areas of use, distribution of responsibilities connected with the use of the list, and finally the organisation and management of safety efforts related to clinical activities. The use of checklists must be part of a system's perspective, and deviations from checklists must be discussed in the organisation. The informants also claimed that checklists should be implemented for interventions located outside the operating theatres and for emergency treatments. Conclusions: Even though the majority of employees believe that checklists are necessary, many surrounding factors are perceived as obstacles to their use. Not least, site-specific factors may be revealed by use of the Hazard Identification method.

Assessing Ethiopia's surgical capacity in light of global surgery 2030 initiatives: Is there progress in the past decade?

Background: Surgical, anesthetic, and obstetric (SAO) care plays a crucial role in global health, recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS). LCoGS outlines six indicators for integrating SAO services into a country's healthcare system through National Surgical Obstetrics and Anesthesia Plans (NSOAPs). In Ethiopia, surgical services progress lacks evaluation. This study assesses current Ethiopian surgical capacity using the LCoGS NSOAPs framework. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of published literature on critical LCoGS NSAOPs metrics to extract information on key domains; service delivery, workforce, infrastructure, finance, and information management. Results: Ethiopia's surgical services face challenges, including a low surgical volume (43) and a scarcity of specialist SOA physicians (0.5) per 100,000 population. Over half of Ethiopians reside outside the 2-hour radius of surgery-ready hospitals, and 98 % face surgery-related impoverished expenditures. Lacking the LCoGS-recommended SOA reporting systems, approximately 44 % of facilities exist for handling bellwether procedures. Despite the prevalence of essential surgeries, primary district hospitals have limited operative infrastructures, resulting in disparities in the surgical landscape. Most surgery-ready facilities are concentrated in cities, leaving Ethiopia's 80 % rural population with inadequate access to surgical care. Conclusion: Ethiopia's surgical capacity falls below LCoGS NSOAPs recommendations, with challenges in infrastructure, personnel, and data retrieval. Critical measures include scaling up access, workforce, public insurance, and information management to enhance SAO services. Ethiopia pioneered in Sub-Saharan Africa by establishing Saving Lives Through Safe Surgery (SaLTS) in response to NSOAPs, but progress lags behind LCoGS recommendations.

Perioperative capacity and contextual challenges in teaching hospitals of southern Ethiopia: explanatory sequential mixed-methods research.

BACKGROUND: Previous Ethiopian literature on surgical capacity and challenges has focused on quantitative investigations, lacking contextual understanding. This explanatory sequential mixed-methods research (MMR) aimed to assess perioperative capacity and contextual challenges at three teaching hospitals in southern Ethiopia. METHODS: A quantitative survey assessed workforce, infrastructure, service delivery, financing, and information systems. The survey findings were explained by qualitative semi-structured interviews of twenty perioperative providers. Descriptive statistics were integrated with qualitative thematic analysis findings using the narrative waving approach. Key findings from both datasets were linked using a joint display table. RESULTS: The survey revealed shortages in the specialist workforce (with a ratio of 0.58 per 100,000 population), surgical volume (at 115 surgeries per 100,000 population), equipment, supplies, financing, and perioperative data tracking. Hospitals' radiology services and blood products were only available 25-50% of the time, while anesthetic agents and essential laboratory services were often available 51-75% of the time. Perioperative management protocols were used rarely (1-25% of the time). Over 90% of patients lack health insurance coverage. Qualitative data also revealed scarcity of perioperative resources and equipment; unaffordable perioperative costs, lack of health insurance coverage, and unforeseen expenses; poor patient safety culture and communication barriers across the perioperative continuum of care; workforce shortages, job dissatisfaction, and concerns of competence; and weak national governance, and sociopolitical turmoil, and global market volatility exacerbating local challenges. These challenges are linked to risks in quality of care and patient safety, according to clinicians. CONCLUSION: The study identifies deficiencies in the health system and sociopolitical landscape affecting safe surgery conduct. It highlights the need for comprehensive health system strengthening to expand workforce, upgrade facilities, improve safety culture, resilience, and leadership to ensure timely access to essential surgery. Exploring external factors, such as the impact of national governance and sociopolitical stability on reform efforts is also essential.

Implementation of Escape Room as an Educational Strategy to Strengthen the Practice of Safe Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Describe a safe surgery learning experience based on interactive escape room activities to engage and train nursing and physician teams. DESIGN: This paper is based on the authors' participatory and observational experiences creating the Escape Room activity. SETTING: Jundiai Regional Hospital, Surgical Department. PARTICIPANTS: Nurses, nurses assistant/technician and physicians and medical residents who work in the surgical center. RESULTS: Results identified were promising, which broadens the perspective for further studies using the Escape Room activity in the hospital environment through structured research that can assess its implications for teaching and learning. CONCLUSION: We see opportunities for using the escape room activity as a teaching tool to implement other learning objectives.