Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 21(1): 228, 2021 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34016057

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many factors cause hospital mortality (HM) after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective research in a single center from October 2005 to June 2019. The study included 463 living donor LT patients. They were divided into a no-HM group (n = 433, 93.52%) and an HM group (n = 30, 6.48%). We used logistic regression analysis to determine how clinical features and surgical volume affected HM. We regrouped patients based on periods of surgical volume and analyzed the clinical features. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that donor age (OR = 1.050, 95% CI 1.011-1.091, p = 0.012), blood loss (OR = 1.000, 95% CI 1.000-1.000, p = 0.004), and annual surgical volumes being < 30 LTs (OR = 2.540, 95% CI 1.011-6.381, p = 0.047) were significant risk factors. A comparison of years based on surgical volume found that when the annual surgical volumes were at least 30 the recipient age (p = 0.023), donor age (p = 0.026), and ABO-incompatible operations (p < 0.001) were significantly higher and blood loss (p < 0.001), operative time (p < 0.001), intensive care unit days (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.011), rate of re-operation (p < 0.001), and HM (p = 0.030) were significantly lower compared to when the annual surgical volumes were less than 30. CONCLUSIONS: Donor age, blood loss and an annual surgical volume < 30 LTs were significant pre- and peri-operative risk factors. Hospital mortality and annual surgical volume were associated with statistically significant differences; surgical volume may impact quality of care and transplant outcomes.


Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Doadores Vivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Curr Oncol ; 24(5): 324-331, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29089800

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Resection is the cornerstone of cure for gastric adenocarcinoma; however, several aspects of surgical intervention remain controversial or are suboptimally applied at a population level, including staging, extent of lymphadenectomy (lnd), minimum number of lymph nodes that have to be assessed, gross resection margins, use of minimally invasive surgery, and relationship of surgical volumes with patient outcomes and resection in stage iv gastric cancer. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in databases including medline (up to 10 June 2016), embase (up to week 24 of 2016), the Cochrane Library and various other practice guideline sites and guideline developer Web sites. A practice guideline was developed. RESULTS: One guideline, seven systematic reviews, and forty-eight primary studies were included in the evidence base for this guidance document. Seven recommendations are presented. CONCLUSIONS: All patients should be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting, and computed tomography (ct) imaging of chest and abdomen should always be performed when staging patients. Diagnostic laparoscopy is useful in the determination of M1 disease not visible on ct images. A D2 lnd is preferred for curative-intent resection of gastric cancer. At least 16 lymph nodes should be assessed for adequate staging of curative-resected gastric cancer. Gastric cancer surgery should aim to achieve an R0 resection margin. In the metastatic setting, surgery should be considered only for palliation of symptoms. Patients should be referred to higher-volume centres and those that have adequate support to manage potential complications. Laparoscopic resections should be performed to the same standards as those for open resections, by surgeons who are experienced in both advanced laparoscopic surgery and gastric cancer management.

3.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 163(4): 729-736, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32453628

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To define critical elements that contribute to successful parathyroidectomy based on a high-volume single-surgeon experience and explore learning curve characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic analysis of prospectively maintained quality assurance database. SETTING: Academic tertiary care endocrine surgery practice. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, 4737 consecutive patients who underwent thyroid or parathyroid surgery from 2004 to 2020 were identified. Demographic data acquisition was undertaken on a subset of these patients who had initial surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism during the academic years 2005 to 2018. Patients with renal or syndromic hyperparathyroidism and those undergoing reoperative surgery were excluded. RESULTS: From 1710 patients who underwent parathyroid surgery, 1082 met inclusion criteria in order to focus on a homogeneous data set. These patients had a mean age of 60.1 ± 12.5 years and 76.4% were female. The overall cure rate was 98.3%, reflecting a success rate that increased from 95.5% during the first 200 cases to 99.7% over the final 300 cases. The complication rate was 1.7%. Over 2 decades, the patient phenotype evolved toward milder disease and smaller adenomas. A learning curve of 200 cases was required to become a proficient parathyroid surgeon; to achieve exceptional results required several hundred additional cases. Parathyroid surgery represents a higher proportion of an endocrine surgery practice than previously (54.0% in 2019 compared with 25.5% in 2004). CONCLUSION: A focused practice dedicated to endocrine surgery yields surgical volumes exceeding 500 cases annually. There has been a steady shift toward parathyroid surgery. A lengthy learning curve can be shortened by pursuit of several specific strategies that are outlined in detail.


Assuntos
Adenoma/cirurgia , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/cirurgia , Glândulas Paratireoides/cirurgia , Neoplasias das Paratireoides/cirurgia , Paratireoidectomia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Glândulas Paratireoides/patologia , Paratireoidectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Tireoidectomia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 63: 104-115, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29275224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastric adenocarcinoma accounted for 6.8% of new cancer cases and 8.8% of cancer deaths worldwide in 2012. Although resection is the cornerstone for cure, several aspects of surgical intervention remain controversial or sub-optimally applied at the population level. These include staging, extent of lymph node dissection (LND), optimal requirements of LN assessment, minimum resection margins, surgical technique (laparoscopic vs. open), relationship between surgical volumes and patient outcomes, and resection of stage IV gastric cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to inform surgical care. RESULTS: The evidence included in this systematic review consists of one guideline, seven systematic reviews and 48 primary studies. CONCLUSIONS: All patients should be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting and a staging CT of the chest and abdomen should always be performed. Diagnostic laparoscopy should be performed in patients at risk for stage IV disease. A D2 LND is preferred for curative-intent resection in advanced non-metastatic gastric cancer. At least 16 LNs should be assessed for adequate staging of curative-resected gastric cancer. Gastric cancer surgery should aim to achieve an RO resection margin. In the metastatic setting, surgery should only be considered for palliation of symptoms. Patients should be referred to higher volume centres, and those with adequate support to manage potential complications. Laparoscopic resections should be performed to the same standards as open resections.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA