ZHX2 in health and disease.

As a transcriptional factor and the negative regulator of alpha fetal protein (AFP), Zinc fingers and homeoboxes 2 (ZHX2) has a well-established role in protection against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, recent studies have suggested ZHX2 as an oncogene in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Moreover, mounting evidence has illustrated a much broader role of ZHX2 in multiple cellular processes, including cell proliferation, cell differentiation, lipid metabolism, and immunoregulation. This comprehensive review emphasizes the role of ZHX2 in health and diseases which have been more recently uncovered.

Controversial roles of hepatocyte nuclear receptor 4 α on tumorigenesis.

Hepatocyte nuclear receptor 4 α (HNF4α) is known to be a master transcription regulator of gene expression in multiple biological processes, particularly in liver development and liver function. To date, the function of HNF4α in human cancers has been widely investigated; however, the critical roles of HNF4α in tumorigenesis remain unclear. Numerous controversies exist, even in studies from different research groups but on the same type of cancer. In the present review, the critical roles of HNF4α in tumorigenesis will be summarized and discussed. Furthermore, HNF4α expression profile and alterations will be examined by pan-cancer analysis through bioinformatics, in order to provide a better understanding of the functional roles of this gene in human cancers.

MiR-520b inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion in gallbladder carcinoma by targeting RAB22A.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have reported that miR-520b exhibited inhibitory effects on various human tumors, whereas the effects of miR-520b on gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) have remained unclear. To investigate the effects of miR-520b on GBC progression and reveal the underlying mechanisms, this study was performed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MiR-520b and RAB22A mRNA levels were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). RAB22A protein level was analyzed via Western blot and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. The proliferation, colony formation ability, migration and invasion of NOZ cells were measured via MTT, colony formation, wound healing and transwell invasion assay respectively. RESULTS: MiR-520b expression level was lower in human GBC tissues than that in neighboring normal tissues. MiR-520b mimic repressed NOZ cell proliferation, colony formation ability, migration and invasion, whereas miR-520b inhibitor exhibited opposite effects. Dual luciferase reporter assay confirmed that miR-520b could bind to the 3'-untranslated regions of RAB22A mRNA. Moreover, RAB22A overexpression significantly abolished the anti-tumor effects of miR-520b in a NOZ cell model. Western blot, qPCR and IHC analysis proved that human GBC tissues showed a higher RAB22A expression level than neighboring normal tissues. Additionally, there was a negative association between miR-520b and RAB22A expression. CONCLUSIONS: MiR-520b had suppressive effects on GBC via targeting RAB22A in vitro.

Oncogenic Activation of Nrf2, Though as a Master Antioxidant Transcription Factor, Liberated by Specific Knockout of the Full-Length Nrf1α that Acts as a Dominant Tumor Repressor.

Liver-specific knockout of Nrf1 in the mouse leads to spontaneous development of non- alcoholic steatohepatitis with dyslipidemia, and then its deterioration results in hepatoma, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive to date. A similar pathological model is reconstructed here by using human Nrf1α-specific knockout cell lines. Our evidence has demonstrated that a marked increase of the inflammation marker COX2 definitely occurs in Nrf1α-/- cells. Loss of Nrf1α leads to hyperactivation of Nrf2, which results from substantial decreases in Keap1, PTEN and most of 26S proteasomal subunits in Nrf1α-/- cells. Further investigation of xenograft model mice showed that malignant growth of Nrf1α-/--derived tumors is almost abolished by silencing of Nrf2, while Nrf1α+/⁺-tumor is markedly repressed by an inactive mutant (i.e., Nrf2-/-ΔTA), but largely unaffected by a priori constitutive activator (i.e., caNrf2ΔN). Mechanistic studies, combined with transcriptomic sequencing, unraveled a panoramic view of opposing and unifying inter-regulatory cross-talks between Nrf1α and Nrf2 at different layers of the endogenous regulatory networks from multiple signaling towards differential expression profiling of target genes. Collectively, Nrf1α manifests a dominant tumor-suppressive effect by confining Nrf2 oncogenicity. Though as a tumor promoter, Nrf2 can also, in turn, directly activate the transcriptional expression of Nrf1 to form a negative feedback loop. In view of such mutual inter-regulation by between Nrf1α and Nrf2, it should thus be taken severe cautions to interpret the experimental results from loss of Nrf1α, Nrf2 or both.