Effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, fumaric acid esters and methotrexate for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a cohort study from BADBIR.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data evaluating effectiveness and persistence of systemic therapies for patients with psoriasis are limited. Objectives To determine the effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, fumaric acid esters (FAEs) and methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), a prospective, multicentre pharmacovigilance register of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving biologic and/or conventional systemic therapies, were analysed. Eligible patients were ≥ 16 years of age receiving a first course of acitretin, ciclosporin, FAEs or methotrexate between 2007 and 2021 with ≥ 6 months' follow-up. Effectiveness was defined as achieving absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (aPASI) ≤ 2 reported ≥ 4 weeks after treatment start date until date of cessation. To identify baseline clinical variables associated with treatment effectiveness, we used multivariable logistic regression models estimating the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of achieving aPASI ≤ 2. To describe drug persistence associated with ineffectiveness, occurrence of adverse events or other reasons for discontinuation, survival estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using a flexible parametric model. Results were obtained using multiple imputed data. RESULTS: In total, 5430 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 1023 (19%) patients were receiving acitretin, 1401 (26%) patients were on ciclosporin, 347 (6%) patients were on FAEs, and 2659 (49%) patients were receiving methotrexate at registration. The proportion of patients who achieved aPASI ≤ 2 was lower for those treated with acitretin [n = 118 (21%)] compared with those receiving ciclosporin [n = 233 (34%)], FAEs [n = 43 (29%)] and methotrexate [n = 372 (32%)]. Factors associated with ineffectiveness included prior experience to previous nonbiologic systemic therapies (acitretin) (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.96), male sex (methotrexate) (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.74), comorbidities (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.97) and alcohol consumption (≤ 14 units per week) (ciclosporin) (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.98). Persistence associated with all reasons for discontinuation showed better survival for methotrexate compared with acitretin, ciclosporin and FAEs cohorts at 12 months [survival estimate 46.1 (95% CI 44.0-48.3), 31.9 (95% CI 29.4-34.7), 30.0 (95% CI 27.5-32.4) and 35.0 (95% CI 29.9-40.9), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The real-world effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, FAEs and methotrexate were generally low. Previous nonbiologic systemic therapies, male sex, comorbidities and alcohol consumption were risk factors associated with treatment ineffectiveness.

Effectiveness and Safety of Acitretin for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Predictors of Clinical Response: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the hair follicle which presents with painful nodules, abscesses, and fistulae in apocrine gland-bearing areas of the skin. Approved treatments include antibiotics and biologic drugs such as adalimumab. Despite these treatments, HS management is challenging. Acitretin is an oral retinoid used for its management as 3rd or 4th line therapy. There is little evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of acitretin treatment for HS, and no reports have previously explored the potential clinical predictors associated with the response to the treatment. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study to assess the effectiveness and safety of acitretin treatment in HS patients who failed to respond to topical therapies. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with moderate to severe HS were included. A significant decrease in the International HS Severity Scoring System (IHS4) score was found over time. Higher basal IHS4 score, family history of HS, follicular phenotype, and history of follicular plugging conditions were potential predictors of response. Most patients did not suffer any adverse events, and no severe side effects were observed. The main cause of discontinuation was lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION: Acitretin can be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with HS. The presence of follicular phenotype or a history of components of follicular occlusion syndrome is associated with better outcomes.

Risk of Psychiatric Disorders in Patients with Psoriasis Prescribed Acitretin versus Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Nationwide Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Acitretin has been linked to the development of psychiatric disturbance. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the psychiatric hazards in patients with psoriasis prescribed acitretin compared with those prescribed disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: This is a nationwide matched cohort study. From Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, adult patients with psoriasis between 1997 and 2013 were screened. Patients prescribed acitretin for at least 30 days per year on average (acitretin cohort) were matched 1:2 with those prescribed DMARDs for at least 30 days per year on average (reference cohort), by means of age, gender, and psoriasis duration. Patients prescribed medication of the corresponding cohort for more than 7 days during the observation period were excluded. Cumulative incidences of psychiatric disorders in both cohorts were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. The modified Cox regression models were constructed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: In total, 1,152 and 2,304 patients in the acitretin and the reference cohorts, respectively, were included. The 4-year cumulative incidence of overall psychiatric disorders (19.62% vs. 12.06%; p < 0.001), mood disorders (12.81% vs. 7.67%; p < 0.001), and psychosis (7.21% vs. 4.63%; p < 0.001) in the acitretin cohort was significantly higher than that in the reference cohort. Acitretin was independently associated with psychiatric disorders (HR 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.85). The risk is more accentuated in the subgroups of comorbid chronic liver disease (HR 2.60, 95% CI: 1.56-4.33) or psoriatic arthritis (HR 3.23, 95% CI: 1.75-5.97). Other independent risk factors included insomnia, acute coronary syndrome, females, and age. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DMARDs, acitretin was associated with higher hazards of psychiatric disorders among psoriasis patients.

Acitretin treatment in antimalarial-refractory/intolerant discoid lupus erythematosus: A prospective, open-label, uncontrolled study.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is often challenging, especially in patients who are refractory or intolerant to topical treatments and first-line systemic drugs, specifically antimalarial drugs. Although acitretin has been shown to be effective in patients with DLE in a few studies, there is no published study describing the long-term efficacy of acitretin with a validated score. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acitretin in patients with antimalarial-refractory/intolerant DLE. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted in patients with antimalarial-refractory/intolerant DLE. All patients were treated with an initial dosage of 10 mg acitretin daily. Clinical response was assessed using the Revised Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (RCLASI) at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. Acitretin was increased to 25 mg daily unless an adequate response was achieved at week 8. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were recruited. Of these, 10 were antimalarial-refractory and four were antimalarial-intolerant. The acitretin therapy was discontinued in one patient after 20 weeks of treatment because of active systemic disease. Of the 13 remaining patients, the mean RCLASI activity scores declined from 21 ± 9 at baseline to 9 ± 4 at week 24. A significant reduction in RCLASI was initially observed at week four and consistently noted at each follow-up visit (p ≤ 0.01). At the end of the study, a marked response was achieved in approximately 80% of patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical response or in the requirement of the up-dosing of acitretin between the refractory and intolerance groups (p = 0.88 and p = 0.326, respectively). Age ≥50 years old, female sex, and generalized DLE were the favorable prognostic factors. No serious adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Acitretin appears to be an effective treatment with acceptable safety profiles for antimalarial-refractory/intolerant DLE.

Biologics combined with conventional systemic agents for the treatment of children with severe psoriasis. Real-life data from the BiPe cohorts and a practice survey among French and Italian pediatric dermatologists.

Combined therapies involve the use of multiple drugs to increase efficacy and reduce the toxicity of individual treatments. We evaluated the use of combinations of conventional systemic therapies and biologics in children with psoriasis in daily practice. This two-part study used data from the 170 children in the Franco-Italian BiPe cohorts to evaluate the use, efficacy, and safety of combined conventional systemic-biologic therapies, and from a survey carried out among French and Italian dermatologists to better understand the reasons for using or avoiding these combinations. In total, 33 children (19.4%) from 13 dermatology centers received 48 combined conventional systemic-biologic therapies (cumulative duration: 43.6 years), including three triple combination therapies (acitretin-methotrexate, with a TNF-alpha inhibitor). A total of 14 different combinations were used, most frequently etanercept-acitretin (n = 10), adalimumab-acitretin (n = 7), adalimumab-methotrexate (n = 5), and ustekinumab-methotrexate (n = 5). The combined therapies were started at biologic initiation in 41 cases (85.4%), and after a period of biologic monotherapy in the remaining 7 cases. Mean PGA and PASI scores decreased between baseline and M3 with all the combinations used. Four serious adverse events were reported, all with favorable outcomes. The survey was completed by 61 dermatologists: 39 (63.9%) had previously used or planned to use the combined therapies, most commonly TNF-alpha inhibitors with acitretin or methotrexate. The main reason for using these treatments was to improve the outcome of biologic therapies in cases of partial efficacy or loss of efficacy. Combined therapies have been used frequently in the treatment of childhood psoriasis, in a range of clinical situations and in variable drug combinations, without significant toxicity. Although the use of these combined therapies needs to be clarified in future management guidelines, these combined therapies should be considered for the treatment of children with severe psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and recalcitrant disease.

Retinoid-induced skeletal hyperostosis in disorders of keratinization.

For disorders of keratinization, topical treatment alone may be ineffective, and systemic retinoid therapy may be indicated. Treatment with systemic retinoids (acitretin, isotretinoin and alitretinoin) has been shown to be effective in reducing disease severity; however, potentially rare adverse effects (AEs) may occur, including hyperostotic skeletal changes. The true prevalence of this AE in adult patients administered life-long therapy is unknown. We identified 3 of 127 (2.4%) patients (with ichthyosis or Darier disease) who had been prescribed isotretinoin with or without acitretin, and who developed radiological signs and clinical symptoms of hyperostosis and ligamentous ossification. This clinical review highlights the significance of retinoid-induced skeletal hyperostosis in patients prescribed long-term, high-dose retinoid therapy for disorders of keratinization. Patients commencing systemic retinoid therapy, particularly women of childbearing age, should be counselled about this important and potentially serious AE, especially if long-term treatment is indicated.

Efficacy of retinoids alone or in combination with other remedies in the management of warts: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The use of combined systemic retinoids and intralesional immunotherapy in the management of warts is still debatable without straightforward evidence. Through network meta-analysis, the current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of systemic retinoids alone or combined with other remedies in the treatment of warts. We searched six literature databases for clinical trials that compared systemic retinoids to local treatments or placebo in wart management. Outcomes were calculated as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence-interval. We used the R software to perform conventional and network meta-analyses (with a frequentist approach). Network meta-analysis of eight trials showed that oral acitretin plus intralesional Candida Ag (OR = 367.71), INF-α plus oral isotretinoin (OR = 223.77), oral acitretin (OR = 117), Candida Ag (OR = 91.93), oral isotretinoin (OR = 62.26) and topical isotretinoin (OR = 17.69) had higher complete recovery rates than placebo. Regarding the P-score, oral acitretin plus intralesional Candida Ag had the highest efficacy in achieving complete response (P-score = 0.88), followed by INF-α plus oral isotretinoin (P-score = 0.79), then oral acitretin (P-score = 0.60). Variable baseline characteristics and lack of data on some outcomes. The current study shows the efficacy for systemic retinoids in the treatment of warts, especially reluctant or recurrent types. Moreover, combinations of systemic retinoids with intralesional immunotherapy yield higher rates of complete clearance with lower recurrence.

Secukinumab and acitretin as a combination therapy for three clinical forms of severe psoriasis in multi-drug refractory patients: A case series of high efficacy and safety profile.

Secukinumab, the first monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-17A, has been shown to have rapid and long-lasting efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, there are still difficult-to-treat cases in which even dose-escalation fails to provide a clinical response. In such cases, combining secukinumab with a conventional systemic agent may be a rational approach. Although methotrexate is most commonly preferred, acitretin may also be considered a good alternative, with its lower hepatotoxic potential. Data are limited regarding the use of combination therapy of secukinumab and acitretin for psoriasis. We herein present three patients with chronic plaque, generalized pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis, respectively, accompanied by multiple comorbidities, in whom skin clearance could not be achieved with several conventional and biologic therapies (including escalated dose regimens of secukinumab in two patients). Alternatively, we used a combination of secukinumab with low-dose acitretin, which resulted in a complete or almost complete skin clearance in all patients, with no adverse events or increased toxicity. Based on our real-life clinical experience with those patients, acitretin seems an effective and safe option to be used in combination with secukinumab. Even in patients who are refractory to multiple drugs including escalated doses of secukinumab, the addition of low-dose acitretin may be helpful in achieving treatment goals, decreasing the need for switching to another biologic therapy.

Drug survival and safety profile of acitretin monotherapy in patients with psoriasis: A multicenter retrospective study.

Acitretin is a nonimmunosuppresive systemic agent used in the treatment of psoriasis. Despite its frequent use, research on drug survival and adverse effects is limited. This study aims to evaluate drug survival, factors associated with survival, and adverse effects. Database of the six tertiary referral center for psoriasis patients treated with acitretin between November 2014 and April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographics of patients, adverse effects, and also drug survival were analyzed. Of 412 patients, 61.2% were male, and 38.8% were female. Common clinical adverse effects were cheilitis (71.4%), dry skin (62.5%), and palmoplantar skin peeling (37.2%). High triglyceride and high total cholesterol levels were observed in 50.0% and 49.5% of patients, respectively. Median survival time (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 18 (13.6-22.4) months. Statistically significant risk factors affecting drug discontinuation were having psoriatic arthritis, age under 65, and receiving previous systemic treatment. Drug survival rates were 56.6%, 25.9%, and 19.8% at 1, 5, and 8 years, respectively. Although mucocutaneous adverse effects of the acitretin were quite frequent, severe, life-treatining ones were infrequent. This old, relatively inexpensive and safe treatment remains a good alternative for the treatment of psoriasis.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris treatment options: A retrospective case series from a tertiary hospital.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a group of uncommon chronic inflammatory skin conditions with unclear pathophysiology and etiology. To date there is limited published literature and no clinical guidelines for the management of PRP. Infliximab, alone or in combination, is the most widely published successful treatment for adults and etanercept for pediatric populations. We present a case series of patients diagnosed with PRP. Retrospective data were collected from a tertiary Australian dermatology department between January 2010 and December 2019 on patients with PRP. Electronic medical records and pathology database were searched. A total of 13 patients were included. Twelve of the 13 patients used topical agents and three patients attempted narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy. All patients received acitretin as first line systemic agent with the dose varying from 10 to 50 mg daily. Six patients treated with acitretin reported adverse events, requiring dose reduction or cessation. Of the nine patients who did not receive a biologic agent, complete clearance of PRP was achieved in five cases. At least one biologic agent was used in four cases with two experiencing a marked improvement. Overall, complete clearance was achieved in six patients. PRP continues to be a challenge to treat with many treatment options used with variable efficacy.

Safety and efficacy profile of oral cyclosporine vs oral methotrexate vs oral acitretin in palmoplantar psoriasis: A hospital based prospective investigator blind randomized controlled comparative study.

Palmoplantar psoriasis (PPP) is a variant of psoriasis which affects only 5% body surface area, but has a devastating impact on affected individual's quality of life. There are few studies assessing efficacy of individual drugs, and few comparative studies of efficacy of two drugs in the literature, however randomized control trial comparing all three drugs against each other has not been done. A total of 75 patients of PPP were enrolled for study and randomly divided into three groups A, B, C of 25 each and assigned for treatment with cyclosporine (CSA) (2.5-5 mg/kg/d), methotrexate (MTX)(7.5-15 mg/week), and acitretin (ACT) (25-50 mg/d), respectively. Modified psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), psoriasis severity scale, visual analogue scale, physician global assessment, and PPQOL were used for monitoring response to therapy and improvement in quality of life up to end of study, and thereafter monthly follow-up was done to find duration of remission for next 90 days. Side effects if any were recorded. There was a statistically significant difference in modified PASI for CSA, MTX, and ACT. The mean modified PASI at baseline was 12.8 ± 4.8 for CSA, 12.57 ± 3.8 for MTX, and 11.92 ± 3.28 for ACT (P = .75). Mean modified PASI reduced to 2.91 ± 1.8 for CSA, 6.57 ± 2.2 for MTX, and 4.7 ± 2.2 for ACT at week 5 (P = <.01). Mean modified PASI further reduced to 0.095 ± 0.35 for CSA, 2.12 ± 1.4 for MTX, and 0.78 ± 0.97 for ACT at end of study (P = <.01). However, average duration of remission was 9 weeks for ACT group, followed by 6.47 and 3 weeks for CSA and MTX group, respectively. Adverse events were comparatively more in ACT group as compared to MTX and CSA groups. PPP affects quality of life tremendously and warrants systemic treatment for the same. CSA provides fastest resolution of lesions and have highest efficacy. MTX and ACT have similar efficacy, but ACT provides longer duration of remission.

Acitretin-induced periungual pyogenic granulomas and review.

Periungual pyogenic granulomas are benign vascular tumors that present as painful, round, spontaneously bleeding lesions composed of rapidly proliferating capillaries and excess tissue. The vast majority of pyogenic granulomas are caused by physical trauma or infectious agents and they may resolve spontaneously. Herein, we highlight a very rare case of periungual pyogenic granulomas induced by the regularly prescribed oral retinoid acitretin during treatment for congenital palmoplantar keratoderma. This unique case showed that it is feasible to continue acitretin therapy in the presence of pyogenic granuloma development if proper dose reduction and topical therapies are utilized. The patient's lesions resolved within two weeks of this protocol's initiation and the pyogenic granulomas did not recur over the course of a six-month follow-up observation period. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed databases for the clinical features and treatments in other reported acitretin-induced pyogenic granuloma cases; we compiled a comprehensive list of other prescription drugs known to cause pyogenic granulomas up-to-date.

Successful clearance of extensive/recalcitrant cutaneous warts by acitretin monotherapy: A case series study.

Most available options for the treatment of warts are limited by the potential for scarring, pain, lack of response, or recurrences, and the patients are often unable to tolerate and accept those experiences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of oral systemic acitretin monotherapy in patients with extensive/recalcitrant cutaneous warts. The patients were given a dose of acitretin of 0.8 mg kg-1 day-1 , and the clinical efficacy and safety of acitretin was assessed every 2 weeks for 2 months. A total of 14 patients (12 males and 2 females) were included, with an age of 14-60 years (mean 33 ± 14.7 years) and a course of 4-48 months (mean 21.6 ± 13.4 months). After 2 months of acitretin treatment, 42.9% (6/14) of patients (including warts of the feet, legs, and hands) exhibited complete response, 28.6% (4/14) excellent response, and 28.6% (4/14) good response. All patients demonstrated significant improvement, and the drug was well tolerated, with no patients discontinuing therapy due to side effects. Common mild side effects included dry skin and cheilitis. There were no recurrences during a follow-up period of 6 months. Acitretin monotherapy is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with extensive/recalcitrant cutaneous warts who are unsuitable for or unwilling to accept traditional treatment methods.

Interventions for mycosis fungoides.

BACKGROUND: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2012: we wanted to assess new trials, some of which investigated new interventions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of interventions for MF in all stages of the disease. SEARCH METHODS: We updated our searches of the following databases to May 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We searched 2 trials registries for additional references. For adverse event outcomes, we undertook separate searches in MEDLINE in April, July and November 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of local or systemic interventions for MF in adults with any stage of the disease compared with either another local or systemic intervention or with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were improvement in health-related quality of life as defined by participants, and common adverse effects of the treatments. Key secondary outcomes were complete response (CR), defined as complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease, and objective response rate (ORR), defined as proportion of patients with a partial or complete response. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence and considered comparisons of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) light treatment as most important because this is first-line treatment for MF in most guidelines. MAIN RESULTS: This review includes 20 RCTs (1369 participants) covering a wide range of interventions. The following were assessed as either treatments or comparators: imiquimod, peldesine, hypericin, mechlorethamine, nitrogen mustard and intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α) (topical applications); PUVA, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP: photochemotherapy), and visible light (light applications); acitretin, bexarotene, lenalidomide, methotrexate and vorinostat (oral agents); brentuximab vedotin; denileukin diftitox; mogamulizumab; chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine; a combination of chemotherapy with electron beam radiation; subcutaneous injection of IFN-α; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor (parenteral systemics). Thirteen trials used an active comparator, five were placebo-controlled, and two compared an active operator to observation only. In 14 trials, participants had MF in clinical stages IA to IIB. All participants were treated in secondary and tertiary care settings, mainly in Europe, North America or Australia. Trials recruited both men and women, with more male participants overall. Trial duration varied from four weeks to 12 months, with one longer-term study lasting more than six years. We judged 16 trials as at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly performance bias (blinding of participants and investigators), attrition bias and reporting bias. None of our key comparisons measured quality of life, and the two studies that did presented no usable data. Eighteen studies reported common adverse effects of the treatments. Adverse effects ranged from mild symptoms to lethal complications depending upon the treatment type. More aggressive treatments like systemic chemotherapy generally resulted in more severe adverse effects. In the included studies, CR rates ranged from 0% to 83% (median 31%), and ORR ranged from 0% to 88% (median 47%). Five trials assessed PUVA treatment, alone or combined, summarised below. There may be little to no difference between intralesional IFN-α and PUVA compared with PUVA alone for 24 to 52 weeks in CR (risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.31; 2 trials; 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). Common adverse events and ORR were not measured. One small cross-over trial found once-monthly ECP for six months may be less effective than twice-weekly PUVA for three months, reporting CR in two of eight participants and ORR in six of eight participants after PUVA, compared with no CR or ORR after ECP (very low-certainty evidence). Some participants reported mild nausea after PUVA but no numerical data were given. One participant in the ECP group withdrew due to hypotension. However, we are unsure of the results due to very low-certainty evidence. One trial comparing bexarotene plus PUVA versus PUVA alone for up to 16 weeks reported one case of photosensitivity in the bexarotene plus PUVA group compared to none in the PUVA-alone group (87 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between bexarotene plus PUVA and PUVA alone in CR (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.80) and ORR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.44) (93 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial comparing subcutaneous IFN-α injections combined with either acitretin or PUVA for up to 48 weeks or until CR indicated there may be little to no difference in the common IFN-α adverse effect of flu-like symptoms (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.88; 82 participants). There may be lower CR with IFN-α and acitretin compared with IFN-α and PUVA (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84; 82 participants) (both outcomes: low-certainty evidence). This trial did not measure ORR. One trial comparing PUVA maintenance treatment to no maintenance treatment, in participants who had already had CR, did report common adverse effects. However, the distribution was not evaluable. CR and OR were not assessable. The range of treatment options meant that rare adverse effects consequently occurred in a variety of organs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: ​​There is a lack of high-certainty evidence to support decision making in the treatment of MF. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, missing data, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be reliably established on the basis of the included RCTs. PUVA is commonly recommended as first-line treatment for MF, and we did not find evidence to challenge this recommendation. There was an absence of evidence to support the use of intralesional IFN-α or bexarotene in people receiving PUVA and an absence of evidence to support the use of acitretin or ECP for treating MF. Future trials should compare the safety and efficacy of treatments to PUVA, as the current standard of care, and should measure quality of life and common adverse effects.

[Acitretin-induced capillary leak syndrome: Case report and literature review]. / Syndrome de fuite capillaire observé sous acitrétine : un cas et revue de la littérature.

BACKGROUND: Retinoids are widely used in dermatology. Adverse effects are frequent and require clinical and laboratory monitoring. Herein we report the case of a patient with secondary capillary leak syndrome (SCLS) associated with acitretin. We then present a review of the literature on systemic retinoids and SFCS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 57-year-old patient consulted following the onset of severe type I pityriasis rubra pilaris. Treatment was initiated comprising topical corticosteroids combined with acitretin at a dose of 0.5mg/kg/day. On the eighth day, voluminous edema appeared, accompanied by weight gain of 8kg in 48h and hypotension. The laboratory assessment showed hypoalbuminemia and hemoconcentration. Acitretin-induced SCLS was diagnosed based on the triple signs of hemoconcentration, hypoalbuminemia and hypotension, as well as rapid improvement following discontinuation of acitretin. DISCUSSION: We collected 7 published clinical cases between 1981 and 2018, including our own case report. Retinoids were indicated only in severe cutaneous diseases. The mean time to onset of SLCS is 9.8 days, with a return to normal 17 days after discontinuation of retinoids. Capillary leak syndrome is a rare and under-diagnosed clinical-laboratory syndrome that must be recognized in order to avoid potentially fatal inappropriate management. It is a rare adverse effect of retinoids used in dermatology and the pathophysiology remains unclear.

[Acute pancreatitis under acitretin]. / Pancréatite aiguë sous acitrétine.

INTRODUCTION: Retinoids are vitamin A derivatives with numerous indications in dermatology. Acute pancreatitis is a rare adverse effect of systemic retinoids. We report a case occurring during acitretin treatment for psoriasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 27-year-old male patient with no history of diabetes, obesity, alcohol consumption or medication consulted for extensive pustular psoriasis. The lipid balance and liver tests were normal. The patient was treated with acitretin at a dose of 25mg/d. Four days after the start of treatment, the patient was admitted to the surgical emergency room for piercing epigastric pain with vomiting of bile, without transit problems. Serum lipase was 20 times the normal value (1278 IU/L). CRP was raised at 155mg/L and triglycerides were normal at 0.66g/L. Ranson's score was 1 and the abdominal scan revealed Balthazar Grade B pancreatitis with a small amount of peritoneal effusion. The ultrasound examination showed absence of gall stones, without dilation of either the intra- or extra-hepatic bile ducts. Acitretin was discontinued due to its possible causative role. The patient was treated by means of parenteral feeding, strict fasting and a proton-pump inhibitor, and a good clinical outcome with gradual normalization of serum lipase and CRP was achieved in 10 days. The patient was subsequently treated with infliximab for psoriasis, with good results. DISCUSSION: In the event of acute abdominal pain in a patient treated with retinoids, a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis should be considered. This complication can occur in the absence of hypertriglyceridemia.

Infertility and teratogenicity after paternal exposure to systemic dermatologic medications: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review assesses effects of paternal exposure to dermatologic medications by using the former US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pregnancy categories as a benchmark. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether systemic dermatologic medications can cause infertility and teratogenicity when taken by men. METHODS: Categories D and X dermatologic medications were identified; a systematic review of the literature and reviews of the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System and prescribing information were performed to identify the effects of these medications on male fertility and teratogenicity. A secondary search was performed to assess for other systemic dermatologic medications causing teratogenicity or infertility following paternal exposure. RESULTS: A total of 13 medications met the inclusion criteria. Of 1,032 studies identified, 19 were included after a systematic review of the literature. Studies evaluating medication effects with paternal exposure were identified for 10 of the 13 evaluated medications, and evidence of a negative effect was identified for 6 medications. LIMITATIONS: We did not encounter any studies for 3 medications that met the inclusion criteria. Information submitted to the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System may not reflect the incidence of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Many former pregnancy category D and X systemic dermatologic medications also have effects on male fertility. More research and better-quality studies are required in this area, particularly studies assessing potential teratogenicity.

Management of pediatric psoriasis with acitretin: A review.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin which can occur at any age-group. Psoriasis in childhood is not uncommon and has genetic susceptibility but usually, an environmental trigger such as infection is thought to initiate the disease process. Pediatric psoriasis has profound effects on both physical and psychosocial health of the patient. Treatment of mild psoriasis can be done with topical therapies but those which do not respond to topical therapies can be treated with phototherapy and systemic therapies. The use of systemic therapies in childhood is mainly based on the published data, case series, expert opinion and the experience as there is the lack of controlled trials in the age group. Based on the experience retinoids are probably the second line drugs for the treatment of pediatric psoriasis which do not respond to topical therapies and phototherapy. Using acitretin in a low dose and with proper physical examinations and laboratory investigations will reduce the hazard of potential serious adverse events. This article gives the review of the use of acitretin in pediatric psoriasis.