Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 5.598
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Immunol Rev ; 326(1): 130-150, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39275992

RESUMO

The prevalence of allergies has been globally escalating. While allergies could appear at any age, they often develop in early life. However, the significant knowledge gap in the field is the mechanisms by which allergies affect certain people but not others. Investigating early factors and events in neonatal life that have a lasting impact on determining the susceptibilities of children to develop allergies is a significant area of the investigation as it promotes the understanding of neonatal immune system that mediates tolerance versus allergies. This review focuses on the research over the recent 10 years regarding the potential maternal factors that influence offspring allergies with a view to food allergy, a potentially life-threatening cause of anaphylaxis. The role of breast milk, maternal diet, maternal antibodies, and microbiota that have been suggested as key maternal factors regulating offspring allergies are discussed here. We also suggest future research area to expand our knowledge of maternal-offspring interactions on the pathogenesis of food allergy.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Feminino , Gravidez , Animais , Leite Humano/imunologia , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/imunologia , Tolerância Imunológica , Microbiota/imunologia , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Exposição Materna/efeitos adversos , Recém-Nascido , Alérgenos/imunologia
2.
N Engl J Med ; 388(19): 1755-1766, 2023 May 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37163622

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No approved treatment for peanut allergy exists for children younger than 4 years of age, and the efficacy and safety of epicutaneous immunotherapy with a peanut patch in toddlers with peanut allergy are unknown. METHODS: We conducted this phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving children 1 to 3 years of age with peanut allergy confirmed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. Patients who had an eliciting dose (the dose necessary to elicit an allergic reaction) of 300 mg or less of peanut protein were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive epicutaneous immunotherapy delivered by means of a peanut patch (intervention group) or to receive placebo administered daily for 12 months. The primary end point was a treatment response as measured by the eliciting dose of peanut protein at 12 months. Safety was assessed according to the occurrence of adverse events during the use of the peanut patch or placebo. RESULTS: Of the 362 patients who underwent randomization, 84.8% completed the trial. The primary efficacy end point result was observed in 67.0% of children in the intervention group as compared with 33.5% of those in the placebo group (risk difference, 33.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 22.4 to 44.5; P<0.001). Adverse events that occurred during the use of the intervention or placebo, irrespective of relatedness, were observed in 100% of the patients in the intervention group and 99.2% in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in 8.6% of the patients in the intervention group and 2.5% of those in the placebo group; anaphylaxis occurred in 7.8% and 3.4%, respectively. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 0.4% of patients in the intervention group and none in the placebo group. Treatment-related anaphylaxis occurred in 1.6% in the intervention group and none in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving children 1 to 3 years of age with peanut allergy, epicutaneous immunotherapy for 12 months was superior to placebo in desensitizing children to peanuts and increasing the peanut dose that triggered allergic symptoms. (Funded by DBV Technologies; EPITOPE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03211247.).


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Arachis/efeitos adversos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/complicações , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/terapia , Administração Cutânea
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 154(3): 679-689.e5, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763171

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Celery root is known to cause severe allergic reactions in patients sensitized to mugwort pollen. OBJECTIVE: We studied clinically well-characterized patients with celery allergy by IgE testing with a comprehensive panel of celery allergens to disentangle the molecular basis of what is known as the celery-mugwort syndrome. METHODS: Patients with suspected food allergy to celery underwent a standardized interview. Main inclusion criteria were a positive food challenge with celery or an unambiguous case history of severe anaphylaxis. IgE to celery allergens (rApi g 1.01, rApi g 1.02, rApi g 2, rApi g 4, nApi g 5, rApi g 6, rApi g 7) and to mugwort allergens (rArt v 1, rArt v 3, rArt v 4) were determined. IgE levels ≥0.35 kUA/L were regarded positive. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients with allergy to celery were included. Thirty patients had mild oral or rhinoconjunctival symptoms, and 49 had systemic reactions. Sixty-eight percent had IgE to celery extract, 80% to birch pollen, and 77% to mugwort pollen. A combination of Api g 1.01, 1.02, 4, 5, and 7 increased the diagnostic sensitivity for celery allergy to 92%. The lipid transfer proteins Api g 2 and Api g 6 were not relevant in our celery-allergic population. IgE to Api g 7, detected in 52% of patients, correlated closely (r = 0.86) to Art v 1 from mugwort pollen. Eleven of 12 patients with monosensitization to Api g 7 were IgE negative to celery extract. The odds ratio for developing a severe anaphylactic reaction rather than only mild oral symptoms was about 6 times greater (odds ratio, 5.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-32.0; P = .0410) for Api g 7-sensitized versus -nonsensitized subjects. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for routine diagnostic tests to assess sensitization to Api g 7, not only to increase test sensitivity but also to identify patients at risk of a severe allergic reaction to celery.


Assuntos
Alérgenos , Antígenos de Plantas , Apium , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Proteínas de Plantas , Pólen , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Alérgenos/imunologia , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Apium/imunologia , Apium/efeitos adversos , Artemisia/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Proteínas de Plantas/imunologia , Pólen/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/diagnóstico , Síndrome
4.
Am J Hum Genet ; 108(8): 1540-1548, 2021 08 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34246321

RESUMO

Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA) is a life-threatening food allergy triggered by wheat in combination with the second factor such as exercise. The identification of potential genetic risk factors for this allergy might help high-risk individuals before consuming wheat-containing food. We aimed to identify genetic variants associated with WDEIA. A genome-wide association study was conducted in a discovery set of 77 individuals with WDEIA and 924 control subjects via three genetic models. The associations were confirmed in a replication set of 91 affected individuals and 435 control individuals. Summary statistics from the combined set were analyzed by meta-analysis with a random-effect model. In the discovery set, a locus on chromosome 6, rs9277630, was associated with WDEIA in the dominant model (OR = 3.95 [95% CI, 2.31-6.73], p = 7.87 × 10-8). The HLA-DPB1∗02:01:02 allele displayed the most significant association with WDEIA (OR = 4.51 [95% CI, 2.66-7.63], p = 2.28 × 10-9), as determined via HLA imputation following targeted sequencing. The association of the allele with WDEIA was confirmed in replication samples (OR = 3.82 [95% CI, 2.33-6.26], p = 3.03 × 10-8). A meta-analysis performed in the combined set revealed that the HLA-DPB1∗02:01:02 allele was significantly associated with an increased risk of WDEIA (OR = 4.13 [95% CI, 2.89-5.93], p = 1.06 × 10-14). Individuals carrying the HLA-DPB1∗02:01:02 allele have a significantly increased risk of WDEIA. Further validation of these findings in independent multiethnic cohorts is needed.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/patologia , Exercício Físico , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Cadeias beta de HLA-DP/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/patologia , Adulto , Alelos , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/metabolismo
5.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 54(1): 11-20, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38168878

RESUMO

Perioperative anaphylaxis (PA) is a severe condition that can be fatal, but data on PA mortality are scarce. The aim of this article is to review the epidemiology, elicitors and risk factors for PA mortality and identify knowledge gaps and areas for improvement regarding the management of severe PA. PA affects about 100 cases per million procedures. Mortality is rare, estimated at 3 to 5 cases per million procedures, but the PA mortality rate is higher than for other anaphylaxis aetiologies, at 1.4% to 4.8%. However, the data are incomplete. Published data mention neuromuscular blocking agents and antibiotics, mainly penicillin and cefazolin, as the main causes of fatal PA. Reported risk factors for fatal PA vary in different countries. Most frequently occurring comorbidities are obesity, male gender, cardiovascular diseases and ongoing treatment with beta-blockers. However, there are no clues about how these factors interact and the impact of individual risk factors. The pathophysiology of fatal PA is still not completely known. Genetic factors such as deficiency in PAF-acetyl hydrolase and hereditary alpha-tryptasemia, have been reported as modulators of severe anaphylaxis and possible targets for specific treatments. Our review underlines unmet needs in the field of fatal PA. Although we confirmed the need for timely administration of an adequate dose of adrenaline and the proper infusion of fluids, there is no evidence-based data on the proper dose of intravenous titrated adrenaline and which clinical manifestations would flag the need for fluid therapy. There are no large clinical studies supporting the administration of alternative vasopressors, such as glucagon and methylene blue. Further research on pathophysiological mechanisms of PA and its severity may address these issues and help clinicians to define new therapeutic approaches.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Humanos , Masculino , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Epinefrina , Fatores de Risco , Cefazolina , Obesidade/complicações
6.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 54(7): 470-488, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866583

RESUMO

In this review, we compare different refractory anaphylaxis (RA) management guidelines focusing on cardiovascular involvement and best practice recommendations, discuss postulated pathogenic mechanisms underlining RA and highlight knowledge gaps and research priorities. There is a paucity of data supporting existing management guidelines. Therapeutic recommendations include the need for the timely administration of appropriate doses of aggressive fluid resuscitation and intravenous (IV) adrenaline in RA. The preferred second-line vasopressor (noradrenaline, vasopressin, metaraminol and dopamine) is unknown. Most guidelines recommend IV glucagon for patients on beta-blockers, despite a lack of evidence. The use of methylene blue or extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is also suggested as rescue therapy. Despite recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of anaphylaxis, the factors that lead to a lack of response to the initial adrenaline and thus RA are unclear. Genetic factors, such as deficiency in platelet activating factor-acetyl hydrolase or hereditary alpha-tryptasaemia, mastocytosis may modulate reaction severity or response to treatment. Further research into the underlying pathophysiology of RA may help define potential new therapeutic approaches and reduce the morbidity and mortality of anaphylaxis.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Humanos , Anafilaxia/terapia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico
7.
J Autoimmun ; 143: 103164, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194789

RESUMO

The term Hoigné's syndrome denotes a mimicker of anaphylaxis, which occurs immediately after the parenteral administration of a drug and is likely caused by non-thrombotic pulmonary and systemic drug micro-embolization. It has so far been documented uniquely in case reports and small case series. Because this condition has never been systematically evaluated, we performed a structured literature review (pre-registered as CRD42023392962). The search was carried out in Excerpta Medica, National Library of Medicine, and Google Scholar. Cases with features consistent with anaphylaxis, urticaria, angioedema, asthma, syncope, anxiety, or panic attack triggered by needle phobia, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity were excluded. For the final analysis, we retained reports published between 1951 and 2021, which presented 247 patients with Hoigné's syndrome: 37 children and 211 adults with a male: female ratio of 2.1 : 1.0. The patients presented within 1 min after parenteral administration of a drug (intramuscular penicillin in 90 % of the cases) with chest discomfort, shortness of breath, fear of death, psychomotor agitation, and auditory or visual hallucinations and impairment. Recovery occurred within 30 min. The diagnosis of Hoigné's syndrome was also established in five patients 66-91 years of age with pre-existing cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, who suddenly died after the administration of penicillin despite not exhibiting the aforementioned symptoms. It was therefore speculated that pulmonary drug micro-embolization induced a lethal cardiovascular compromise in these individuals. Histologic investigations supporting this hypothesis were performed in only one case. The diagnosis of Hoigné's pulmonary drug micro-embolization was established also in five patients with pre-existing cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, who suddenly died after the administration of penicillin despite not exhibiting the afore mentioned symptoms. Histologic investigations supporting this hypothesis were performed in only one case. In conclusion, Hoigné's syndrome is an uncommon non-immune-mediated reaction. This report seeks to promote broader awareness and knowledge regarding this alarming mimicker of anaphylaxis. Diagnosis relies solely on clinical evaluation.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Humanos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Síndrome , Criança , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/terapia
8.
Allergy ; 79(2): 485-498, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38112286

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Food allergy is a leading cause of anaphylaxis worldwide. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only treatment shown to modify the natural history of allergic disease, but application to food allergy has been hindered by risk of severe allergic reactions and short-lived efficacy. Allergen-derived peptides could provide a solution. PVX108 comprises seven short peptides representing immunodominant T-cell epitopes of major peanut allergens for treatment of peanut allergy. METHODS: Pre-clinical safety of PVX108 was assessed using ex vivo basophil activation tests (n = 185). Clinical safety and tolerability of single and repeat PVX108 doses were evaluated in a first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in peanut-allergic adults (46 active, 21 placebo). The repeat-dose cohort received six doses over 16 weeks with safety monitored to 21 weeks. Exploratory immunological analyses were performed at pre-dose, Week 21 and Month 18 after treatment. RESULTS: PVX108 induced negligible activation of peanut-sensitised basophils. PVX108 was safe and well tolerated in peanut-allergic adults. There were no treatment-related hypersensitivity events or AEs of clinical concern. The only events occurring more frequently in active than placebo were mild injection site reactions. Exploratory immunological analyses revealed a decrease in the ratio of ST2+ Th2A:CCR6+ Th17-like cells within the peanut-reactive Th pool which strengthened following treatment. CONCLUSION: This study supports the concept that PVX108 could provide a safe alternative to whole peanut immunotherapies and provides evidence of durable peanut-specific T-cell modulation. Translation of these findings to clinical efficacy in ongoing Phase 2 trials would provide important proof-of-concept for using peptides to treat food allergy.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim , Adulto , Humanos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Basófilos , Arachis/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos , Administração Oral
9.
Allergy ; 79(3): 702-710, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093663

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data on occupational anaphylaxis is scarce, and there is a need of more knowledge about work-related anaphylactic episodes. METHODS: Based on the data of the Anaphylaxis Registry, we identified cases related to occupational exposure and analyzed the elicitors, demographics, severity of clinical reaction and management. RESULTS: Since 2017, 5851 cases with an information about the occupational relation of the anaphylactic episode were registered whereby 225 (3.8%) were assigned to be caused by an occupational allergen. The vast majority of these occupational anaphylaxis cases were caused by insects (n = 186, 82.7%) followed by food (n = 27, 12.0%) and drugs (n = 8, 3.6%). Latex elicited occupational anaphylaxis in only two cases. Beekeepers, gardeners, farmers, and individuals working in professions associated with food handling, for example, employees in restaurants, bakery, pastry, and cooks were most frequently affected. The comparison of the occupational insect venom-induced anaphylaxis to a group of non-occupational insect anaphylaxis in adults (n = 1842) revealed a significant younger age in occupational anaphylaxis (46 vs. 53 years), a predominance of bee-induced cases (38% vs. 17%), and a higher rate of venom immunotherapy in a primary care setting (3.3% vs. 1.3%, p = .044). In the occupational- versus non-occupational adults with food-induced anaphylaxis atopic dermatitis as concomitant atopic disease was observed more frequently (n = 486; 20% vs. 10%), although this was not significant. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the impact of venom allergy in work-related anaphylaxis. Foods and drugs are less frequently elicitors, and latex-induced occupational anaphylaxis was rare. More data are needed to determine risk factors associated with occupational anaphylaxis.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Venenos de Artrópodes , Adulto , Humanos , Abelhas , Animais , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Látex , Fatores de Risco , Venenos de Artrópodes/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos , Insetos , Sistema de Registros
10.
Allergy ; 79(3): 690-701, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38071735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vaccine-associated anaphylaxis is a rare but life-threatening reaction that occurs within minutes to hours of exposure to allergens. As studies utilizing large-scale data to investigate this topic are limited, further research is needed to assess its burden, long-term trends, and associated risk factors so as to gain a comprehensive understanding of vaccine-associated anaphylaxis globally. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the global burden of vaccine-associated anaphylaxis and related vaccines. METHOD: This study utilized the World Health Organization International Pharmacovigilance Database, in which reports of vaccine-associated anaphylaxis between 1967 and 2023 were obtained (total reports = 131,255,418). We estimated the global reporting counts, reported odds ratio (ROR), and information component (IC) to identify the relationship between 19 vaccines and associated anaphylaxis in 156 countries and territories. RESULTS: We identified 31,676 reports of vaccine-associated anaphylaxis among 363,290 reports of all-cause anaphylaxis. The cumulative number of reports on vaccine-associated anaphylaxis has gradually increased over time, with a dramatic increase after 2020, owing to reports of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-associated anaphylaxis. The typhoid vaccines were associated with the most anaphylactic reports (ROR: 4.35; IC0.25 : 1.86), followed by encephalitis (3.27; 1.45), hepatitis B (2.69; 1.30), cholera (2.65; 0.54), hepatitis A (2.44; 1.12), influenza (2.36; 1.16), inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 (2.21; 1.02), and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (1.89; 0.79). In terms of age- and sex-specific risks, vaccine-associated anaphylaxis reports develop more frequently in females and at young ages. The Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine anaphylaxis reports were associated with the highest fatality rate (15.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple vaccines are associated with various spectra and risks of anaphylaxis, clinicians should recognize the possibility of anaphylaxis occurring with all vaccines, particularly the COVID-19 mRNA and inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccines, and consider the risk factors associated with vaccine anaphylaxis reports. Further studies are warranted to identify better ways of preventing vaccine-associated anaphylaxis.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Vacinas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Farmacovigilância , Vacinas/efeitos adversos
11.
Allergy ; 79(5): 1317-1328, 2024 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462795

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology and management of anaphylaxis are not well-reported in Asia. METHODS: A regional pediatric anaphylaxis registry was established by the Asia-Pacific Research Network for Anaphylaxis (APRA), using standardized protocols for prospective data collection, to evaluate the triggers and management of anaphylaxis in the Asia-Pacific region. Pediatric patients below 18 years presenting with anaphylaxis across four Asian countries/cities (Thailand, Singapore, Hong Kong (HK), and Qingdao) were included. Allergen triggers, symptoms, anaphylaxis severity, and management were compared. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2022, 721 anaphylaxis episodes in 689 patients from 16 centers were identified. The mean age at anaphylaxis presentation was 7.0 years (SD = 5.2) and 60% were male. Food was the most common trigger (62%), particularly eggs and cow's milk in children aged 3 years and below. In school-age children, nut anaphylaxis was most common in HK and Singapore, but was rare in the other countries, and wheat was the top allergen in Bangkok. Shellfish anaphylaxis was most common in children aged 7-17. Adrenaline was administered in 60% of cases, with 9% given adrenaline before hospital arrival. Adrenaline devices were prescribed in up to 82% of cases in Thailand but none in Qingdao. CONCLUSIONS: The APRA identified food as the main trigger of anaphylaxis in children, but causative allergens differed even across Asian countries. Fewer than two-thirds of cases received adrenaline treatment, pre-hospital adrenaline usage was low, and adrenaline device prescription remained suboptimal. The registry recognizes an unmet need to strengthen anaphylaxis care and research in Asia-Pacific.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Humanos , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/terapia , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Ásia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Lactente , Alérgenos/imunologia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Sistema de Registros
12.
Allergy ; 79(6): 1440-1454, 2024 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193233

RESUMO

The recent recognition of a syndrome of tick-acquired mammalian meat allergy has transformed the previously held view that mammalian meat is an uncommon allergen. The syndrome, mediated by IgE antibodies against the oligosaccharide galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal), can also involve reactions to visceral organs, dairy, gelatin and other products, including medications sourced from non-primate mammals. Thus, fittingly, this allergic disorder is now called the alpha-gal syndrome (AGS). The syndrome is strikingly regional, reflecting the important role of tick bites in sensitization, and is more common in demographic groups at risk of tick exposure. Reactions in AGS are delayed, often by 2-6 h after ingestion of mammalian meat. In addition to classic allergic symptomatology such as urticaria and anaphylaxis, AGS is increasingly recognized as a cause of isolated gastrointestinal morbidity and alpha-gal sensitization has also been linked with cardiovascular disease. The unusual link with tick bites may be explained by the fact that allergic cells and mediators are mobilized to the site of tick bites and play a role in resistance against ticks and tick-borne infections. IgE directed to alpha-gal is likely an incidental consequence of what is otherwise an adaptive immune strategy for host defense against endo- and ectoparasites, including ticks.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Imunoglobulina E , Picadas de Carrapatos , Doenças Transmitidas por Carrapatos , Urticária , Animais , Humanos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Dissacarídeos/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/etiologia , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Mamíferos/imunologia , Carne/efeitos adversos , Síndrome , Picadas de Carrapatos/imunologia , Picadas de Carrapatos/complicações , Carrapatos/imunologia , Urticária/imunologia , Urticária/etiologia , Doenças Transmitidas por Carrapatos/imunologia
13.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(8): 794-802, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527454

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis represents the most severe end of the spectrum of allergic reactions. Frequent elicitors of anaphylaxis are insects, foods, and drugs. This paper summarizes recent development with regard to emerging and novel elicitors of anaphylaxis. SUMMARY: Food allergens on the rise include pulses (like pea, chickpea), seeds (hemp, chia), nuts (cashew), pseudograins (buckwheat, quinoa), fruits, and microalgae. Novel foods are foods that were not consumed to any significant extent in the European Union before May 1997, which includes four edible insects (mealworm, migratory locust, house cricket, and buffalo worm). Recent investigations have pointed out the risk of anaphylaxis associated with the consumption of yellow mealworm for people allergic to shellfish and house dust mites. In Europe, fire ants (mostly Solenopsis invicta) and Vespa velutina nigrithorax represent invasive species, which account for increasing numbers of anaphylactic reactions. Also, several new drugs, especially biologicals, have been associated with anaphylaxis. KEY MESSAGES: Elicitors of anaphylaxis are changing as a result of (i) increase in demand for plant-based food, (ii) introduction of novel foods, (iii) spreading of allergens by climate changes and globalization, or (iv) due to exposure to newly developed drugs.


Assuntos
Alérgenos , Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Humanos , Animais , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Alérgenos/imunologia
14.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(1): 56-62, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37729879

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Skin tests are one of the most widely used diagnostic tools for suspected drug allergies in children. Studies on systemic reactions occurring during skin testing with allergens have mostly been conducted in pediatric and adult patient groups together. However, data on adverse reactions including allergic reactions after drug skin tests in children are scarce. It is aimed to determine the adverse reactions after skin test in children with suspected drug allergy. METHODS: Patients who underwent a drug skin test due to the suspicion of drug allergy between May 2017 and June 2020 were evaluated, retrospectively. Data about adverse reactions seen after skin testing at the testing area in the clinic were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 1,073 children (585 [54.5%] boys and 488 [45.5%] girls) with a median age of 7.5 years. A total of 12 (1.1%) reactions were detected after skin testing, and 4 (0.4%) of them were allergic reactions. Of the allergic reactions, three were anaphylaxis and one was urticaria. Two of the reactions (1 anaphylaxis and 1 urticaria) were detected after the skin prick test and the remaining 2 were detected after intradermal test. Three of the nonallergic reactions were considered as vasovagal reactions and seven were considered as nonspecific and anxiety-related reactions. CONCLUSION: Although drug skin tests were generally well-tolerated and adverse reactions were rare, severe allergic reactions including anaphylaxis may ensue. Skin tests should be necessarily performed in clinical settings in experienced centers.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Urticária , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Criança , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes Cutâneos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Urticária/diagnóstico , Urticária/etiologia
15.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(3): 228-236, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052182

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) and adrenaline autoinjector (AAI) are important therapies in venom anaphylaxis. Adherence to VIT and AAI in patients with venom allergy has been evaluated in a few studies; however, solid data are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate VIT and AAI retrieval rates in patients with venom allergy with a special focus on adherence to treatment. Adherence was compared to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with inhalant allergens. METHODS: This was a retrospective study among patients registered for allergen immunotherapy at the Allergy Center, Odense University Hospital, Denmark, from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. Data on purchased immunotherapy and AAI were obtained from the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze if allergen, age, sex, mastocytosis, and treatment site affected adherence. RESULTS: The 3-year adherence to VIT was 92.4% (244/264) compared to 87.4% (215/246) in SCIT with inhalant allergens, and the 5-year adherence to VIT was 84.1% (222/264) compared to 74.8% (184/246) in SCIT with inhalant allergens (p = 0.045). Females treated with VIT were more adherent than males (p = 0.45 [3-year], p = 0.008 [5-year]), whereas allergen, age, mastocytosis, or treatment site did not significantly affect adherence. Only 28.6% of patients (12/42) purchased an AAI after premature termination of VIT. CONCLUSION: In this register-based study, we found that the 3- and 5-year adherences to VIT and SCIT with inhalant allergens are at the upper end of the spectrum hitherto reported. Patients' 5-year adherence to VIT was higher than patients' 5-year adherence to SCIT with inhalant allergens. If VIT was prematurely terminated, less than 1/3 would have purchased an AAI.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos , Mastocitose , Hipersensibilidade a Veneno , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicina Estatal , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos , Imunoterapia
16.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(5): 456-459, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412847

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Changes in the cytokine profile from type 2 to type 1 together with the induction of regulatory cells are expected during hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT). The present study was aimed to investigate the changes in type 1, type 2, and regulatory cytokines induced by a Vespula spp. VIT in patients with anaphylaxis to Vespa velutina. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with anaphylaxis due to Vespa velutina were treated with Vespula spp. VIT. Serum cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, and IFN-É£) were measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months after starting VIT. RESULTS: A significant increase in serum IFN-y was detected after 6 and 12 months of VIT. An increase in serum IL-10 and a decrease in IL-5 were observed after 12 months. IL-4 was undetectable all along the study, and an unexpected increase of IL-13 was present at 12 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: Vespula spp. VIT seems to be able to induce a shift to type 1 cytokine production measured through IFN-y levels and IL-10 production after, at least, 6 and 12 months of VIT, respectively.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Citocinas , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Venenos de Vespas , Vespas , Humanos , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Anafilaxia/terapia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Citocinas/metabolismo , Citocinas/sangue , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Animais , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Venenos de Vespas/imunologia , Vespas/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/imunologia , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/terapia , Adulto Jovem , Alérgenos/imunologia
17.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(8): 761-766, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527445

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In 15-35 percent of patients with anaphylaxis, the triggering allergen cannot be found; therefore, a diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) is made. We report on the outcomes in patients with IA treated with omalizumab. METHODS: We included consequent omalizumab-treated IA adult patients treated with omalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Out of 7 patients, 6 were female, median age 40 years with the frequency of anaphylaxis episodes from 3 in 2 years to 5 in 4 months. Baseline tryptase ranged from 1.71 to 12.0 µg/L. An increase in tryptase during anaphylaxis was documented in 6 patients. Activating KIT p.D816V variant was detected in 2 patients. One patient also had hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT). The duration of omalizumab treatment was 0.5-7.5 years. None of the patients have experienced an anaphylactic reaction since the start of treatment. Mild systemic reactions were reported in 6 patients (86%). The presence of underlying cMCD had no impact on the treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: All patients in our study had complete responses to omalizumab. The presence of KIT p.D816V and HαT did not influence the response to omalizumab treatment.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Antialérgicos , Omalizumab , Humanos , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Triptases/sangue
18.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 185(10): 953-963, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830344

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ibuprofen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), is the most frequent medication to be involved in hypersensitivity drug reactions (HDRs). Other analgesic/anti-inflammatory drugs in the arylpropionic group are also relevant, albeit to a lesser extent. Ibuprofen is widely consumed by people of all ages, both on medical prescription and over the counter; moreover, it is an organic contaminant of surface waters and foods. While numerous drugs cause HDR, ibuprofen's underlying mechanisms are more intricate and involve both specific immunological and non-immunological mediated reactions. SUMMARY: we concentrate on immediate responses, including urticaria with or without angioedema, anaphylaxis, and angioedema, classifying reactions according to whether they are caused by single or multiple NSAIDs and based on the mechanisms at play. Both groups may experience anaphylaxis, defined as an immediate, severe systemic reaction involving at least two organs, though the frequency and severity can vary. Following this classification, more clinical manifestations can be identified. Diagnosis is partly based on a detailed clinical history, including information about ibuprofen and/or other arylpropionic derivatives involved, the interval between drug intake and symptoms onset, clinical manifestations, number of episodes, and the patient's tolerance or response to other medications - mainly non-chemically related NSAID - both before and after reactions to ibuprofen and/or other arylpropionic drugs. A drug provocation test is frequently necessary to make a diagnosis. KEY MESSAGE: Because ibuprofen is the most widely prescribed NSAID, it is reasonable to assume its role as the leading cause of HDR will only become more important.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Hipersensibilidade Imediata , Ibuprofeno , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/etiologia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Propionatos/efeitos adversos
19.
Transfusion ; 64(5): 949-951, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566573

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported increasing rates of alpha-gal syndrome, an allergic response after meat ingestion (AGS). AGS has been associated with prior exposure to tick bites or other biologics characterized by a life-threatening immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitivity to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) an oligosaccharide structurally similar to the group B antigen on red blood cells (RBC) found in most non-primate mammalian meat and products derived from these mammals. In 2023, Transfusion reported 3 group O recipients of group B plasma in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area with no history of meat allergy who had anaphylactic transfusion reactions compatible with AGS. AIMS: We investigated allergic reactions in 2 additional patients who received ABO minor-incompatible blood products at 2 hospitals in the D.C. area during fall 2023. METHODS: For both patients, a medical chart review was performed and IgE levels to alpha-gal were measured. RESULTS: The first patient, a 64-year-old, O-positive patient status post heart transplant with no known allergies, was admitted with acute COVID-19 induced antibody-mediated transplant rejection and placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). While undergoing plasma exchange (PLEX) (50% albumin/50% fresh frozen plasma (FFP)), the patient tolerated 2 units of group O FFP and 1 unit of group A FFP before becoming hemodynamically unstable during transfusion of 1 unit of B-positive FFP. PLEX was stopped. The patient later died of sepsis from underlying causes. The second patient, a 57-year-old O-positive man with a history of melanoma and neuro fibromatosis type 1, was undergoing an abdominal resection including transfusion of 3 units of O-positive RBC when he suffered hypotension and ventricular tachycardia requiring intraoperative code after receiving 2 units of group B FFP. Hiveswere noted after resuscitation. The patient had a history of tick bites but no known allergies. He is alive 5 months after the possible allergic event. Both patients had full transfusion reaction evaluations and immunology testing results above the positive cutoff for anti-alpha-gal IgE. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Two patients with O-positive blood and no known allergies experience danaphyl axis after transfusion with group B FFP. The symptoms cannot definitively be imputed to an allergic transfusion reaction, but the presence of IgE against alpha-gal supports an association. Medicating patients with antihistamines and IV steroids pre-transfusion may prevent allergic reactions. Restricting group B plasma-containing products (plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate) for patients who experience AGS-like symptoms may be considered.


Assuntos
Sistema ABO de Grupos Sanguíneos , COVID-19 , Estado Terminal , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Sistema ABO de Grupos Sanguíneos/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/sangue , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/sangue , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Feminino , Incompatibilidade de Grupos Sanguíneos/imunologia , Plasma/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia
20.
Immunity ; 43(4): 788-802, 2015 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26410628

RESUMO

Experimental IgE-mediated food allergy depends on intestinal anaphylaxis driven by interleukin-9 (IL-9). However, the primary cellular source of IL-9 and the mechanisms underlying the susceptibility to food-induced intestinal anaphylaxis remain unclear. Herein, we have reported the identification of multifunctional IL-9-producing mucosal mast cells (MMC9s) that can secrete prodigious amounts of IL-9 and IL-13 in response to IL-33, and mast cell protease-1 (MCPt-1) in response to antigen and IgE complex crosslinking, respectively. Repeated intragastric antigen challenge induced MMC9 development that required T cells, IL-4, and STAT6 transcription factor, but not IL-9 signals. Mice ablated of MMC9 induction failed to develop intestinal mastocytosis, which resulted in decreased food allergy symptoms that could be restored by adoptively transferred MMC9s. Finally, atopic patients that developed food allergy displayed increased intestinal expression of Il9- and MC-specific transcripts. Thus, the induction of MMC9s is a pivotal step to acquire the susceptibility to IgE-mediated food allergy.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Interleucina-9/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/imunologia , Mastócitos/imunologia , Mastocitose/imunologia , Transferência Adotiva , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Animais , Sequência de Bases , Células da Medula Óssea/citologia , Linhagem da Célula , Quimases/biossíntese , Quimases/genética , Diarreia/etiologia , Diarreia/imunologia , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Duodeno/imunologia , Duodeno/patologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/patologia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/complicações , Interleucina-9/biossíntese , Interleucina-9/genética , Interleucinas/biossíntese , Interleucinas/metabolismo , Interleucinas/fisiologia , Mastócitos/metabolismo , Mastócitos/transplante , Mastocitose/patologia , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Ovalbumina/administração & dosagem , Ovalbumina/imunologia , Ovalbumina/toxicidade , RNA Mensageiro/biossíntese , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Fator de Transcrição STAT6/fisiologia , Especificidade da Espécie , Linfócitos T/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA