Histamine H2-receptor antagonism improves conduit artery endothelial function and reduces plasma aldosterone level without lowering arterial blood pressure in angiotensin II-hypertensive mice.

Aldosterone through the mineralocorticoid receptor MR has detrimental effects on cardiovascular disease. It reduces the bioavailability of nitric oxide and impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. In resistance arteries, aldosterone impairs the sensitivity of vascular smooth muscle cells to nitric oxide by promoting the local secretion of histamine which activates H2 receptors. The present experiments tested in vivo and ex vivo the hypothesis that systemic H2-receptor antagonism reduces arterial blood pressure and improves vasodilatation in angiotensin II-induced chronic hypertension. Hypertension was induced by intravenous infusion of angiotensin II (60 ng kg-1 min-1) in conscious, unrestrained mice infused concomitantly with the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine (27.8 µg kg-1 min-1) or vehicle for 24 days. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were recorded by indwelling arterial catheter. Resistance (mesenteric) and conductance (aortae) arteries were harvested for perfusion myography and isometric tension recordings by wire myography, respectively. Plasma was analyzed for aldosterone concentration. ANGII infusion resulted in elevated arterial blood pressure and while in vivo treatment with ranitidine reduced plasma aldosterone concentration, it did not reduce blood pressure. Ranitidine improved ex vivo endothelial function (acetylcholine 10-9 to 10-6 mol L-1) in mesenteric resistance arteries. This was abolished by ex vivo treatment with aldosterone (10-9 mol L-1, 1 h). In aortic segments, in vivo ranitidine treatment impaired relaxation. Activation of histamine H2 receptors promotes aldosterone secretion, does not affect arterial blood pressure, and protects endothelial function in conduit arteries but promotes endothelial dysfunction in resistance arteries during angiotensin II-mediated hypertension. Aldosterone contributes little to angiotensin II-induced hypertension in mice.

Association Between Vonoprazan and the Risk of Gastric Cancer After Helicobacter pylori Eradication.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) have been increasingly used to treat upper gastrointestinal disorders, replacing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Whereas PPIs are associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (GC) after Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication, it is uncertain whether PCABs carry the same risk. METHODS: Using a population-based claims database in Japan, we identified patients who were prescribed a clarithromycin-based first regimen of Hp eradication between 2015 and 2018. Patients who failed this regimen and those diagnosed with GC before or within 1 year after Hp eradication were excluded. We compared GC incidence between PCAB users and histamine type-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) users, matching them on the basis of propensity scores calculated with considerations for age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, comorbidities, and co-administered medications. PCABs included only vonoprazan in this study. RESULTS: Among 54,055 patients, 568 (1.05%) developed GC during the follow-up period (mean, 3.65 years). The cumulative incidence of GC was 1.64% at 3 years, 2.02% at 4 years, and 2.36% at 5 years in PCAB users and 0.71% at 3 years, 1.04% at 4 years, and 1.22% at 5 years in H2RA users. The use of PCABs was associated with a higher GC risk (matched hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.25; P = .016). Longer PCAB use and high-dose PCAB use were significantly associated with higher incidence of GC. Sensitivity analyses showed the risk of GC incidence among PCAB users was comparable with that of PPI users. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PCABs was associated with an increased risk of GC among Hp-eradicated patients, with duration/dose response effects.

The combined use of anti-peptic agents is associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: a nationwide case-control study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Long-term use of acid suppressants such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) has been associated with the risk of osteoporotic fracture. Acid suppressants and muco-protective agents (MPAs) are often used together as anti-ulcer agents. We evaluated the association between the risk of osteoporotic fracture and the combined use of these anti-peptic agents. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was conducted by analyzing the Korean National Health Insurance Data from 2014 to 2020. Patients who had been prescribed anti-peptic agents, such as PPI, H2RA, or MPA, were included. Considering the incidence of osteoporotic fractures, the case group (n = 14,704) and control group (n = 58,816) were classified by 1:4 matching based on age and sex. RESULTS: The use of all types of anti-peptic agents was associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures (PPI: hazard osteoratio [HR], 1.31; H2RA: HR, 1.44; and MPA: HR, 1.33; all p < 0.001). Compared to PPI alone, the combined use of "PPI and H2RA" (HR, 1.58; p = 0.010) as well as "PPI, H2RA, and MPA" (HR, 1.71; p = 0.001) was associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. However, compared with PPI alone, "MPA and PPI or H2RA" was not associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. CONCLUSION: This study found that the combined use of "PPI and H2RA" was associated with a higher risk of osteoporotic fractures. In cases where deemed necessary, the physicians may initially consider prescribing the combination use of MPA.

Risk of circulatory diseases associated with proton-pump inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records in Thailand.

Background: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are prescribed to treat gastric acid-related diseases, while they may also have potential risks to population health. Recent studies suggested that a potential mechanism explaining the association between PPIs and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) includes the inhibition of the nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide (NO) pathway. However, previous observational studies showed controversial results of the association. In addition, the inhibition of the NO pathway due to PPIs use may lead to peripheral vascular diseases (PVD); however, none of the studies explore the PPI-PVD association. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association of PPIs with circulatory diseases (CVD, ischemic strokes or IS, and PVD). Methods: We conducted a retrospective hospital-based cohort study from Oct 2010 to Sep 2017 in Songkhla province, Thailand. PPIs and histamine 2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) prescriptions were collected from electronic pharmacy records, while diagnostic outcomes were retrieved from electronic medical records at Songklanagarind hospital. Patients were followed up with an on-treatment approach. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to measure the association comparing PPIs vs H2RAs after 1:1 propensity-score-matching. Sub-group analysis, multi-bias E-values, and array-based sensitivity analysis for some covariates were used to assess the robustness of associations. Results: A total of 3,928 new PPIs and 3,928 H2RAs users were included in the 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort. As compared with H2RAs, the association of PPIs with CVD, IS, and PVD, the hazard ratios were 1.76 95% CI = [1.40-2.20] for CVD, 3.53 95% CI = [2.21-5.64] for ischemic strokes, and 17.07 95% CI = [13.82-76.25] for PVD. The association between PPIs and each outcome was significant with medication persistent ratio of over 50%. In addition, the association between PPIs and circulatory diseases was robust to unmeasured confounders (i.e., smoking and alcohol). Conclusion: PPIs were associated with circulatory diseases, particularly ischemic strokes in this hospital-based cohort study, whereas, the strength of associations was robust to unmeasured confounders.

Maintenance proton pump inhibitor use and risk of colorectal cancer: a Swedish retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA) associated with long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a large nationwide cohort. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This research was conducted at the national level, encompassing the entire population of Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: This study utilised Swedish national registries to identify all adults who had ≥180 days of cumulative PPI use between July 2005 and December 2012, excluding participants who were followed up for less than 1 year. A total of 754 118 maintenance PPI users were included, with a maximum follow-up of 7.5 years. INTERVENTIONS: Maintenance PPI use (cumulative≥180 days), with a comparator of maintenance histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the risk of CRA, presented as standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the impact of indications, tumour locations, tumour stages and the duration of follow-up. A multivariable Poisson regression model was fitted to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs of PPI versus H2RA use. RESULTS: Maintenance PPI users exhibited a slightly elevated risk of CRA compared to the general population (SIR 1.10, 95% CI=1.06 to 1.13) for both men and women. Individuals aged 18-39 (SIR 2.79, 95% CI=1.62 to 4.47) and 40-49 (SIR 2.02, 95% CI=1.65 to 2.45) had significantly higher risks than the general population. Right-sided CRA showed a higher risk compared to the general population (SIR 1.26, 95% CI=1.20 to 1.32). There was no significant difference in the risk of CRA between maintenance PPI users and maintenance H2RA users (IRR 1.05, 95% CI=0.87 to 1.27, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance PPI use may be associated with an increased risk of CRA, but a prolonged observation time is needed.

Associations of proton pump inhibitors with susceptibility to influenza, pneumonia, and COVID-19: Evidence from a large population-based cohort study.

Background: Adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have raised wide concerns. The association of PPIs with influenza is unexplored, while that with pneumonia or COVID-19 remains controversial. Our study aims to evaluate whether PPI use increases the risks of these respiratory infections. Methods: The current study included 160,923 eligible participants at baseline who completed questionnaires on medication use, which included PPI or histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), from the UK Biobank. Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity score-matching analyses were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Comparisons with H2RA users were tested. PPI use was associated with increased risks of developing influenza (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.12-1.56) and pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-1.59). In contrast, the risk of COVID-19 infection was not significant with regular PPI use (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.99-1.17), while the risks of severe COVID-19 (HR 1.19. 95% CI 1.11-1.27) and mortality (HR 1.37. 95% CI 1.29-1.46) were increased. However, when compared with H2RA users, PPI users were associated with a higher risk of influenza (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.19-2.54), but the risks with pneumonia or COVID-19-related outcomes were not evident. Conclusions: PPI users are associated with increased risks of influenza, pneumonia, as well as COVID-19 severity and mortality compared to non-users, while the effects on pneumonia or COVID-19-related outcomes under PPI use were attenuated when compared to the use of H2RAs. Appropriate use of PPIs based on comprehensive evaluation is required. Funding: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171698, 82170561, 81300279, 81741067, 82100238), the Program for High-level Foreign Expert Introduction of China (G2022030047L), the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangdong Province (2021B1515020003), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2022A1515012081), the Foreign Distinguished Teacher Program of Guangdong Science and Technology Department (KD0120220129), the Climbing Program of Introduced Talents and High-level Hospital Construction Project of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (DFJH201923, DFJH201803, KJ012019099, KJ012021143, KY012021183), and in part by VA Clinical Merit and ASGE clinical research funds (FWL).

Effect of proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor antagonists on acute kidney injury in septic patients at high risk for developing stress ulcers.

BACKGROUND: To compare the effects of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use on the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in septic patients at high risk for developing stress ulcers. METHODS: Using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV version 2.2 database, septic patients with high-risk factors for stress ulcers (i.e., shock, coagulopathy, invasive mechanical ventilation, or chronic liver diseases) were included. Exposures included PPIs and H2RAs within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission or prior to ICU admission. The primary end point was severe sepsis-associated AKI as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria stage 3 (KDIGO-3). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the effect size. RESULTS: 4731 PPI users and 4903 H2RA users were included. After PSM, there were 1785 pairs exposed to PPIs and H2RAs. In the PSM cohort, the cumulative incident KDIGO-3 rate was higher in the PPI group than in the H2RA group (log-rank test, p = 0.009). Regression analyses showed that PPI exposure [adjusted hazard ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.58, p = 0.002] was associated with incident KDIGO-3 compared with H2RA use. This association remained consistent in sensitivity analyses. Additionally, the PPI group had a higher need for kidney replacement therapy compared with the H2RA group (3.6% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Among septic patients at high risk for developing stress ulcers, PPI exposure was associated with incident KDIGO-3 AKI compared with H2RA use.

Riesgo de fractura e inhibidores de la bomba de protones: otra razón para un uso adecuado / Proton pump inhibitors and increased fracture hazard. Another reason for an appropriate prescription of these drugs

CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES DEL ESTUDIO: el uso de tratamiento antisecretor en el primer año de vida, inhibidores de bomba de protones solos o en combinación con antagonistas de receptores H2, está asociado con un incremento del riesgo de fracturas en niños. Este riesgo puede ser mayor si el tratamiento se inicia en los primeros meses de vida y es de mayor duración. COMENTARIO DE LOS REVISORES: el aumento del riesgo de fracturas asociado al tratamiento antisecretor durante el primer año es un argumento más para valorar cuidadosamente la indicación de estos fármacos, especialmente los inhibidores de la bomba de protones, sobre todo en tratamientos precoces o prolongados

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: infant proton pump inhibitors alone or together with H2 receptor antagonists is associated with an increased childhood fracture risk. This risk appears amplified by duration or early initiation of the therapy. REVIEWERS' COMMENTARY: the increased risk of fractures associated with antisecretory treatment during the first year of life another argument to carefully assess the indication of these drugs, especially proton pump inhibitors, particularly in treatments at an early age or long-term treatments

Tratamento antissecretor da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico pediátrica - uma revisão sistemática / Antisecretory treatment for pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease - a systematic review

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors and histamine H2 receptor antagonists are two of the most commonly prescribed drug classes for pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease, but their efficacy is controversial. Many patients are treated with these drugs for atypical manifestations attributed to gastroesophageal reflux, even that causal relation is not proven. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of proton pump inhibitors and histamine H2 receptor antagonists in pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease through a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review was performed, using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The search was limited to studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish. There was no limitation regarding date of publication. Studies were considered eligible if they were randomized-controlled trials, evaluating proton pump inhibitors and/or histamine H2 receptor antagonists for the treatment of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease. Studies published only as abstracts, studies evaluating only non-clinical outcomes and studies exclusively comparing different doses of the same drug were excluded. Data extraction was performed by independent investigators. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO platform (CRD42016040156). RESULTS: After analyzing 735 retrieved references, 23 studies (1598 randomized patients) were included in the systematic review. Eight studies demonstrated that both proton pump inhibitors and histamine H2 receptor antagonists were effective against typical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and that there was no evidence of benefit in combining the latter to the former or in routinely prescribing long-term maintenance treatments. Three studies evaluated the effect of treatments on children with asthma, and neither proton pump inhibitors nor histamine H2 receptor antagonists proved to be significantly better than placebo. One study compared different combinations of omeprazole, bethanechol and placebo for the treatment of children with cough, and there is no clear definition on the best strategy. Another study demonstrated that omeprazole performed better than ranitidine for the treatment of extraesophageal reflux manifestations. Ten studies failed to demonstrate significant benefits of proton pump inhibitors or histamine H2 receptor antagonists for the treatment of unspecific manifestations attributed to gastroesophageal reflux in infants. CONCLUSION: Proton pump inhibitors or histamine H2 receptor antagonists may be used to treat children with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but not to treat asthma or unspecific symptoms.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: Inibidores de bomba de prótons e antagonistas dos receptores H2 da histamina são duas das mais comumente prescritas classes de medicações para a doença do refluxo gastroesofágico pediátrica, mas sua eficácia é controversa. Muitos pacientes são tratados com essas drogas por manifestações atípicas atribuídas ao refluxo gastroesofágico, mesmo que uma relação causal não esteja comprovada. OBJETIVO: Avaliar os inibidores da bomba de prótons e os antagonistas dos receptores H2 da histamina na doença do refluxo gastroesofágico pediátrica através de uma revisão sistemática. MÉTODOS: Realizou-se uma revisão sistemática, utilizando as bases de dados MEDLINE, EMBASE e Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A pesquisa foi limitada a estudos publicados em inglês, português e espanhol. Não houve limitação quanto à data de publicação. Os estudos foram considerados elegíveis se fossem ensaios controlados randomizados que avaliassem inibidores da bomba de prótons e/ou antagonistas dos receptores H2 da histamina para o tratamento da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico pediátrica. Estudos publicados apenas como resumos, estudos que não avaliassem desfechos clinicamente relevantes e estudos que comparassem exclusivamente diferentes doses do mesmo fármaco foram excluídos. A extração de dados foi realizada por pesquisadores independentes. O protocolo do estudo foi registrado na plataforma PROSPERO (CRD42016040156). RESULTADOS: Após a análise das 735 referências identificadas, 23 estudos (1598 pacientes randomizados) foram incluídos na revisão sistemática. Oito estudos demonstraram que tanto os inibidores da bomba de prótons como os antagonistas dos receptores H2 da histamina eram eficazes contra as manifestações típicas da doença de refluxo gastroesofágico e que não havia evidências de benefício na combinação dessas classes de drogas ou na prescrição rotineira de tratamentos de manutenção de longo prazo. Três estudos avaliaram o efeito dos tratamentos em crianças com asma e, nem os inibidores da bomba de prótons, nem os antagonistas dos receptores H2 da histamina se mostraram significativamente melhores do que o placebo. Um estudo comparou diferentes combinações de omeprazol, betanecol e placebo para o tratamento de crianças com tosse, e não há uma definição clara sobre a melhor estratégia terapêutica. Outro estudo demonstrou que o omeprazol apresentou melhor desempenho do que a ranitidina para o tratamento de manifestações extraesofágicas da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico. Dez estudos não tiveram sucesso em demonstrar benefícios significativos dos inibidores da bomba de prótons ou dos antagonistas dos receptores H2 da histamina para o tratamento de manifestações inespecíficas atribuídas ao refluxo gastroesofágico em crianças menores de 1 ano de idade. CONCLUSÃO: Inibidores da bomba de prótons ou antagonistas dos receptores H2 da histamina podem ser utilizados para tratar crianças com doença de refluxo gastroesofágico, mas não para tratar asma ou sintomas inespecíficos.

Prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency in type 2 diabetic patients using metformin: a cross-sectional study / Prevalência de deficiência de vitamina B12 em pacientes diabéticos do tipo 2 usando metformina: um estudo transversal

ABSTRACT: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency varies from 5.8% to 30% among patients undergoing long-term treatment with metformin. Because of the paucity of data on Brazilian patients, this study aimed to determine the frequency of B12 deficiency and related factors among Brazilian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using metformin. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study at a public university hospital. METHODS: Patients with T2DM and a control group of non-diabetics were included. Serum B12 levels were measured and biochemical B12 deficiency was defined as serum levels < 180 pg/ml. Associations between B12 deficiency and age, duration of T2DM, duration of use and dosage of metformin, and use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine H2 antagonists were determined. RESULTS: 231 T2DM patients using metformin (T2DM-met) and 231 controls were included. No difference in the frequency of PPI or H2-antagonist use was seen between the groups. B12 deficiency was more frequent in the T2DM-met group (22.5% versus 7.4%) and this difference persisted after excluding PPI/H2-antagonist users (17.9% versus 5.6%). The factors that interfered with serum B12 levels were PPI/H2-antagonist use and duration of metformin use ≥ 10 years. Use of PPI/H2-antagonists was associated with B12 deficiency, with an odds ratio of 2.60 (95% confidence interval, 1.34-5.04). CONCLUSIONS: Among T2DM patients, treatment with metformin and concomitant use of PPI/H2-antagonists are associated with a higher chance of developing B12 deficiency than among non-diabetics.

RESUMO: CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: A prevalência de deficiência de vitamina B12 varia de 5,8% a 30% nos pacientes em tratamento a longo prazo com metformina. Devido à escassez de dados em pacientes brasileiros, este estudo determinou a frequência de deficiência de B12 e fatores relacionados em pacientes brasileiros com diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) usando metformina. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo transversal em hospital público universitário. MÉTODOS: Pacientes com DM2 e um grupo controle de não diabéticos foram incluídos. Os níveis séricos de vitamina B12 foram dosados e deficiência bioquímica de B12 foi definida como níveis séricos < 180 pg/ml. Foi investigada a associação entre deficiência de B12 e idade, duração do DM2, duração do uso e dose de metformina, uso de inibidores de bomba de prótons (IBP) ou antagonistas dos receptores histamínicos H2 (antagonistas-H2). RESULTADOS: 231 pacientes DM2 usando metformina (DM2-met) e 231 controles foram incluídos. Não houve diferença na frequência de uso de IBP/antagonistas-H2 entre os grupos. Deficiência de B12 foi mais frequente no grupo DM2-met (22,5% versus 7,4%) e essa diferença persistiu após exclusão dos usuários de IBP/antagonistas-H2 (17,9% versus 5,6%). Fatores que interferiram nos níveis séricos de B12 foram: uso de IBP/antagonistas-H2 e duração do uso de metformina ≥ 10 anos. O uso de IBP/antagonistas-H2 associou-se com deficiência de B12, com um risco relativo de 2,60 (95% intervalo de confiança, 1,34-5,04). CONCLUSÕES: Considerando pacientes com DM2, o tratamento com metformina e uso concomitante de IBP/antagonistas-H2 estão associados com maior chance de desenvolver deficiência de B12 quando comparado aos não diabéticos.

Treatment of Recalcitrant Chronic Urticaria With Nonsedating Antihistamines: Is There Evidence for Updosing?

Los antihistamínicos no sedantes constituyen el tratamiento de primera elección para todas las formas de urticaria. En pacientes con urticaria recalcitrante que no responden a dosis convencionales de antihistamínicos los lineamientos actuales recomiendan el incremento de la dosis hasta 4 veces hasta obtener un mejor control de la enfermedad. Aunque el número de investigaciones es reducido, existen datos convincentes de estudios controlados para cetirizina, levocetirizina y desloratadina que sustentan el uso de dosis superiores en pacientes no respondedores. Se ha observado que la utilización de mayores dosis de antihistamínicos no se asocia con un incremento de la frecuencia de efectos adversos o de somnolencia. Se requieren estudios adicionales con otros antihistamínicos de segunda generación para mejorar el tratamiento de los pacientes que presentan urticaria severa recalcitrante (AU)

Nonsedating antihistamines are the first-choice treatment for all forms of urticaria. In patients with recalcitrant urticaria who do not respond to conventional doses of antihistamines, current guidelines recommend increasing doses by up to 4 times in order to obtain better control of the disease. Although few studies have been conducted, there are convincing data from controlled trials for cetirizine, levocetirizine, and desloratadine that support the use of increased doses of such drugs in unresponsive patients. The use of higher doses of antihistamines has not been associated with increased adverse effects or somnolence. More studies with other second-generation antihistamines are required in order to improve the treatment of patients with severe, recalcitrant urticaria (AU)

Alteraçoes no teste ultra-rápido da urease e no exame anatomopatológico para Helicobacter pylori induzidas por drogas anti-secretoras / Changes in ultrarapid urease test and histopathological examination for Helicobacter pylori by antisecretory drugs

One of the major problems when evaluating dyspeptic patients at public hospitals is the large interval between the consultation and the endoscopy, leading to the prescription of antisecretory drugs, what can be responsible for false results on examinations. AIM: To evaluate changes in ultrarapid urease test and histopathological examination for Helicobacter pylori by antisecretory drugs. METHODS: In a prospective double-blind study, 50 patients with dyspeptic complaints and endoscopic diagnosis of peptic ulcer, erosive gastritis, esophagitis or duodenitis, with a positive urease test, were randomized to a 7-day course of treatment with either omeprazole 20 mg or ranitidine 300 mg a day. Before and after treatment, two biopsy specimens each were obtained from the antrum and corpus and an ultrarapid urease test and a histopathological examination for Helicobacter pylori were performed. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in the results of ultrarapid urease test and histopathological examination for Helicobacter pylori after treatment with ranitidine. With omeprazole, we observed a decrease in positive results in ultrarapid urease test and histopathological examination for Helicobacter pylori in the antrum, but not in the corpus. CONCLUSION: Omeprazole, used for 7 days, can lead to negative results in ultrarapid urease test and histopathological examination for Helicobacter pylori in the antrum, and should not be employed in patients before the endoscopy is performed.

Reacción medicamentosa tipo enfermedad del suero / Pharmacological reaction like serum sickness

Presentamos un caso de enfermedad del suero en una paciente de 3 años de edad que, tras realizar tratamiento con amoxicilina-clavulánico durante 7 días, mostró clínica de urticaria y artralgias

We report a case of serum sickness in a 3-year-old patient who presented urticaria and arthralgias after seven days of treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanic

Principales interacciones medicamentosas en una emergencia hospitalaria: análisis de 100 casos / Main drug interactions at hospital: emergency department analysis of 100 cases

Revisamos prospectivamente las historias clínicas de 100 pacientes consecutivos que ingresaron por emergencia de un hospital general el primer tremestre de 1991, para determinar fármacos más frecuentemente usados y sus interacciones utilizando un programa computarizado (Drug Interaction Program) haciendo énfasis en medicamentos antiulcerosos. El número de drogas indicada por pacientes fue 4.29 ñ 1.39. Los antiácidos (39%) y la cimetidina (35%) ocuparon el tercero y cuarto lugar. Hubo interaciones en 79 pacientes y en 66 (84%) fueron importantes, promediandose 2.44 ñ 2.13 interacciones por paciente. Los antiácidos y la cimetidina fueron igualmente indicados, de 35 pacientes que recibieron cimetidina 3 (8.5%) tenían indicación primaria de su uso (Hemorragia Digestiva). La interacción clínica de la cimetidina con otros medicamentos es analizada. Nuestros resultados indican que las interacciones medicamentosas son un riesgo permanente en nuestros hospitales. Sugerimos la utilización de un programa computarizado de interacciones medicamentosas o una tabla actualizada de medicamentos en las emergencias de nuestros hospitales

Interacciones medicamentosas de los antiulcerosos / Drug interactions of anti-ulcus drugs

La interacción es la alteración en el efecto de un fármaco producida por la administración de otro fármaco. Los antiulcerosos pueden presentar interacciones con otros fármacos por cuatro mecanismos: 1. Alteración de la absorción intestinal (antiácidos, sucralfato y antisecretores); 2. Unión competitiva a la citocromo P450 (anti-H2 e inhibidores de la bomba de protones); 3. Alteración del aclaramiento renal (anti-H2); 4. Inhibición de la alcohol-deshidrogenasa (anti-H2). Se revisan las interacciones de antiácidos, sucralfato, anti-H2, agente procinéticos (metoclopramida, betanecol, cisaprida), inhibidores de la bomba de protones, misoprostol y sales de bismuto. Se destaca que pantoprazol es el inhibidor de la bomba de protones que menos interacciones medicamentosas presenta. Por último se hacen unas recomendaciones para evitar la aparición de interacciones (AU)

Ulcera peptica: etiopatogenia y tratamiento; aspectos recientes / Peptic ulcer: etiopathogenia and treatment; current aspects

Se hace una revision de los aspectos recientes sobre ulcera peptica, tanto en el nuevo concepto sobre factores relacionados con la etiologia, como en las actuales modalidades de tratamiento para dicha entidad. Ademas se mencionan los cambios en las tecnicas quirurgicas empleadas en los ultimos anos

Enfermedad ulcerosa clorhidropéptica no complicada. Perspectivas y praxis terapéuticas / Clorhydropeptic ulcerous disease without complications: Therapeutic perspective and praxis

La mayoría de las úlceras clorhidropéptica cicatriza cuando se reduce adecuadamente la acción agresora ácida durante una fracción de las 24 horas del día: (a) neutralizando en el lumen de la secreción; (b) actuando sobre receptores en las membranas de las células parietales. Los antagonistas del receptor-2 de la histmina en dosis nocturna única reducen el tiempo total de cicatrización de 90 por ciento de las úlceras duodenales y gástricas a 6 y 8 semanas promediales, respectivamente. La vida media de eliminación es corta, no se acumulan y los efectos colaterales, cuya incidencia real con dosis habituales es muy baja, son reversibles. Los antiácidos ( hidróxido de aluminio ) y bloquedores del receptor-1 de la muscarina ( pirenzepina ) son alternativas de segunda línea en la estrategia terapeútica general. Omeprazol, un bloqueador de la bomba de protones, se acumula intracelularmente y alcanza niveles de inhibición casi total; por ello mismo se restrige su uso a determinados problemas clínicos graves y sólo durante lapsos breves. Bismuto coloidal y sucralfato se adhieren a la base de la úlcera y promueven su curación eficazmente. Prostaglandina E2 y sus análogos combinan la acción antisecretora con la " citoprotección " directa: su indicación principal es la prevención de recurrencias de lesiones gástricas en pacientes bajo tratamiento obligado con anti-inflamatorios no esteroideos. Dosis moderadas de bloqueadores del receptor H2 durante periodos hasta de 2 años disminuyen apreciablemente las recurrencias de la enfermedad ulcerosa común. El tratamiento quirúrgico es apreciable a casos precisos

Uso y abuso de los bloqueadores de los receptores H2 de la histamina en pacientes hospitalizados / Use and abuse of histamine H2 receptor blockers in hospitalized patients

Objetivo: Evaluar si los bloqueadores de los receptores H2 de la histamina (BH2) son adecuadamente prescritos en pacientes hospitalizados fuera de unidades de medicina crítica. Antecedentes: Los BH2 son prescritos frecuentemente, pero su buena tolerancia y accesibilidad han contribuido al abuso de estos fármacos. Métodos: Vigilamos 678 pacientes admitidos en tres hospitales del pais hasta incluir 100 enfermos de cada uno de ellos (300 en total) que consecutivamente recibieron BH2. Se registró la indicación para su uso, la vía de administración, la dosis y efectos secundarios. Se recopilaron las recomendaciones internacionalmente aceptadas sobre el uso de BH2 para así considerar si el tratamiento se indicó correctamente. Resultados: Doscientos veintisiete pacientes recibieron BH2 con fines profilácticos, pero sólo en 79 casos (35 por ciento) se encontró una justificación clara para su uso. Los BH2 fueron prescritos para tratar enfermedad ulcerosa o hemorragia del aparato digestivo proximal en 17 pacientes (6 por ciento). Dos de cada tres enfermos recibieron más de 10 dosis de BH2 siendo la ranitidina el más frecuentemente prescrito. Conclusiones: Aunque los BH2 son productos que provocan pocas reacciones adversas, su uso en pacientes hospitalizados debe ser rigurosamente supervisado. De hecho, la mayoría de nuestros pacientes no necesitaban BH2, por lo que su uso rutinario debe ser proscrito para evitar costos innecesarios