Further decompensation in cirrhosis: Results of a large multicenter cohort study supporting Baveno VII statements.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prognostic weight of further decompensation in cirrhosis is still unclear. We investigated the incidence of further decompensation and its effect on mortality in patients with cirrhosis. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Multicenter cohort study. The cumulative incidence of further decompensation (development of a second event or complication of a decompensating event) was assessed using competing risks analysis in 2028 patients. A 4-state model was built: first decompensation, further decompensation, liver transplant, and death. A cause-specific Cox model was used to assess the adjusted effect of further decompensation on mortality. Sensitivity analyses were performed for patients included before or after 1999. In a mean follow-up of 43 months, 1192 patients developed further decompensation and 649 died. Corresponding 5-year cumulative incidences were 52% and 35%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of death and liver transplant after further decompensation were 55% and 9.7%, respectively. The most common further decompensating event was ascites/complications of ascites. Five-year probabilities of state occupation were 24% alive with first decompensation, 21% alive with further decompensation, 7% alive with a liver transplant, 16% dead after first decompensation without further decompensation, 31% dead after further decompensation, and <1% dead after liver transplant. The HR for death after further decompensation, adjusted for known prognostic indicators, was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.23-1.71) ( p <0.001). The significant impact of further decompensation on survival was confirmed in patients included before or after 1999. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhosis, further decompensation occurs in ~60% of patients, significantly increases mortality, and should be considered a more advanced stage of decompensated cirrhosis.

Thirty-Day Readmissions Are Largely Not Preventable in Patients With Cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital readmissions are common in patients with cirrhosis, but there are few studies describing readmission preventability. We aimed to describe the incidence, causes, and risk factors for preventable readmission in this population. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis hospitalized at a single center between June 2014 and March 2020 and followed up for 30 days postdischarge. Demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic data, functional status, and quality of life were collected. Readmission preventability was independently and systematically adjudicated by 3 reviewers. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare those with (i) preventable readmission, (ii) nonpreventable readmission/death, and (iii) no readmission. RESULTS: Of 654 patients, 246 (38%) were readmitted, and 29 (12%) were preventable readmissions. Reviewers agreed on preventability for 70% of readmissions. Twenty-two (including 2 with preventable readmission) died. The most common reasons for readmission were hepatic encephalopathy (22%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13%), acute kidney injury (13%), and ascites (6%), and these reasons were similar between preventable and nonpreventable readmissions. Preventable readmission was often related to paracentesis timeliness, diuretic adjustment monitoring, and hepatic encephalopathy treatment. Compared with nonreadmitted patients, preventable readmission was independently associated with racial and ethnic minoritized individuals (odds ratio [OR] 5.80; 95% CI, 1.96-17.13), nonmarried marital status (OR 2.88; 95% CI, 1.18-7.05), and admission in the prior 30 days (OR 3.45; 95% CI, 1.48-8.04). DISCUSSION: For patients with cirrhosis, readmission is common, but most are not preventable. Preventable readmissions are often related to ascites and hepatic encephalopathy and are associated with racial and ethnic minorities, nonmarried status, and prior admissions.

Burden of Portal Hypertension Complications Is Greater in Liver Transplant Wait-Listed Registrants with End-Stage Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) awaiting liver transplantation (LT) remains poorly defined. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between T2DM and clinical outcomes among patients with LT waitlist registrants. We hypothesize that the presence of T2DM will be associated with worse clinical outcomes. METHODS: 593 patients adult (age 18 years or older) who were registered for LT between 1/2010 and 1/2017 were included in this retrospective analysis. The impact of T2DM on liver-associated clinical events (LACE), survival, hospitalizations, need for renal replacement therapy, and likelihood of receiving LT were evaluated over a 12-month period. LACE was defined as variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to determine the association between T2DM and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The baseline prevalence of T2DM was 32% (n = 191) and patients with T2DM were more likely to have esophageal varices (61% vs. 47%, p = 0.002) and history of variceal hemorrhage (23% vs. 16%, p = 0.03). The presence of T2DM was associated with increased risk of incident ascites (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.11, 3.28, p = 0.019). Patients with T2DM were more likely to require hospitalizations (56% vs. 49%, p = 0.06), hospitalized with portal hypertension-related complications (22% vs. 14%; p = 0.026), and require renal replacement therapy during their hospitalization. Patients with T2DM were less likely to receive a LT (37% vs. 45%; p = 0.03). Regarding MELD labs, patients with T2DM had significantly lower bilirubin at each follow-up; however, no differences in INR and creatinine were noted. CONCLUSION: Patients with T2DM are at increased risk of clinical outcomes. This risk is not captured in MELD score, which may potentially negatively affect their likelihood of receiving LT.

Low back pain in patients hospitalised with liver cirrhosis- a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lower back pain is a common issue, but little is known about the prevalence of pain in patients with liver cirrhosis during hospitalisation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine lower back pain in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: The sample consisted of patients with liver cirrhosis (n = 79; men n = 55; women n = 24; mean age = 55.79 ± 12.52 years). The hospitalised patients were mobile. The presence and intensity of pain were assessed in the lumbar spine during hospitalisation. The presence of pain was assessed using the visual analogue pain scale (0-10). The range of motion of the lower spine was assessed using the Schober and Stibor tests. Frailty was measured by Liver Frailty Index (LFI). The condition of liver disease was evaluated using The Model For the End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Pugh score (CPS) and ascites classification. Student's t test and Mann-Whitney test were used for analysis of the difference of group. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey post hoc test was used to test differences between categories of liver frailty index. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test pain distribution. Statistical significance was determined at the α-0.05 significance level. RESULT: The prevalence of pain in patients with liver cirrhosis was 13.92% (n = 11), and the mean intensity of pain according to the visual analogue scale was 3.73 (± 1.90). Lower back pain was present in patients with ascites (15.91%; n = 7) and without ascites (11.43%; n = 4). The prevalence of lower back pain was not statistically significant between patients with and without ascites (p = 0,426). The base of Schober's assessment mean score was 3.74 cm (± 1.81), and based on Stibor's assessment mean score was 5.84 cm (± 2.23). CONCLUSION: Lower back pain in patients with liver cirrhosis is a problem that requires attention. Restricted spinal mobility has been reported in patients with back pain, according to Stibor, compared to patients without pain. There was no difference in the incidence of pain in patients with and without ascites.

Bile Acid Profiles in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Their Ability to Predict Hepatic Decompensation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Altered bile acid (BA) homeostasis is an intrinsic facet of cholestatic liver diseases, but clinical usefulness of plasma BA assessment in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) remains understudied. We performed BA profiling in a large retrospective cohort of patients with PSC and matched healthy controls, hypothesizing that plasma BA profiles vary among patients and have clinical utility. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Plasma BA profiling was performed in the Clinical Biochemical Genetics Laboratory at Mayo Clinic using a mass spectrometry based assay. Cox proportional hazard (univariate) and gradient boosting machines (multivariable) models were used to evaluate whether BA variables predict 5-year risk of hepatic decompensation (HD; defined as ascites, variceal hemorrhage, or encephalopathy). There were 400 patients with PSC and 302 controls in the derivation cohort (Mayo Clinic) and 108 patients with PSC in the validation cohort (Norwegian PSC Research Center). Patients with PSC had increased BA levels, conjugated fraction, and primary-to-secondary BA ratios relative to controls. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) increased total plasma BA level while lowering cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid concentrations. Patients without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) had primary-to-secondary BA ratios between those of controls and patients with ulcerative colitis. HD risk was associated with increased concentration and conjugated fraction of many BA, whereas higher G:T conjugation ratios were protective. The machine-learning model, PSC-BA profile score (concordance statistic [C-statistic], 0.95), predicted HD better than individual measures, including alkaline phosphatase, and performed well in validation (C-statistic, 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PSC demonstrated alterations of plasma BA consistent with known mechanisms of cholestasis, UDCA treatment, and IBD. Notably, BA profiles predicted future HD, establishing the clinical potential of BA profiling, which may be suited for use in clinical trials.

Low incidence of venous thromboembolism after gynecologic oncology surgery: Who is at greatest risk?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the 30-day incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after gynecologic oncologic surgery and identify perioperative factors associated with postoperative VTE. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried to identify all gynecologic oncology cases from 2013 to 2019. Clinical and surgical characteristics, VTE events and 30-day postoperative complications were retrieved. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression models were performed to compare characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients with and without VTE. RESULTS: A total of 63,198 gynecologic oncology patients were included. The incidence of 30-day postoperative VTE was 1.2% (n = 781). On multivariable analysis, postoperative VTE was significantly associated with ascites (odds ratio (OR) 1.8), disseminated cancer (OR 1.7), pre-operative albumin <30 g/L (OR 1.9), laparotomy (OR 2.8), operative time > 180 min (OR 2.0), and increased surgical complexity (OR 2.2) (all p < 0.001). The incidence of VTE was higher after laparotomy compared to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (2.3% v. 0.6%, p < 0.001). When stratified by type of gynecologic malignancy undergoing laparotomy, incidence of VTE was higher in patients with ovarian (2.4%) and uterine (2.4%) malignancies, compared to cervical cancer (1.1%) (p < 0.001). The 30-day incidence of VTE was 1.7% in 2013 compared to 0.9% in 2019 (laparotomy: 2.6% in 2013 to 1.6% in 2019 and MIS: 0.8% in 2013 to 0.4% in 2019). CONCLUSION: Postoperative VTE is a potentially preventable complication of gynecologic oncology surgery. Our findings indicate that laparotomy, ascites, disseminated cancer, longer operative time, and low pre-operative albumin are risk factors for VTE.

Real-world clinical features, health-care utilization, and economic burden in decompensated cirrhosis patients: A national database.

BACKGROUND: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis are well known to experience morbidity and mortality. AIM: We assessed clinical characteristics, health-care utilization, and economic burden according to the type, number, and combination of decompensation-related complications. METHODS: We used recent nationally representative sample data from 2016 to 2018, covering approximately 13% of hospitalized patients in South Korea annually. Decompensation-related complications included ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), gastroesophageal variceal (GEV) bleeding, and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). RESULTS: Among 14 601 patients with decompensated cirrhosis, 11 201 (76.7%) experienced ≥ 1 decompensation-related complications, and approximately three-quarters underwent hospitalization. The most prevalent decompensation-related complications were ascites (54.8%), GEV bleeding (33.2%), HE (27.4%), and HRS (3.6%). Patients with GEV bleeding exhibited the highest hospitalization rate (95.7%), and patients with HE or HRS underwent hospitalization for 4 weeks/year due to decompensated cirrhosis. Hospitalization costs were 1.9 times higher in patients with HRS than in those with ascites alone ($9022 vs $4673; P < 0.01). Once patients developed decompensation-related complications, 41.3% had ≥ 2 types of decompensation-related complications. As the number of decompensation-related complications increased from 0 to ≥ 3, health-care utilization and economic burden significantly increased in a stepwise manner; patients with ascites, GEV bleeding, and HE visited medical institutions 2.2 times more (11 vs 5/year; P < 0.01) and incurred 6.4 times greater medical expenditure ($11 060 vs $1728/year; P < 0.01) than those with ascites only. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients had multiple decompensation-related complications and socioeconomic burdens for decompensated cirrhosis considering admission rate, hospital stay, and costs increased markedly, depending on the number of decompensation-related complications.

Identifying Ascites in Patients with Cirrhosis Using Administrative Codes and Diuretic Use: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Ascites is associated with significantly increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Large population studies are necessary to determine the burden and impact of ascites; however, ascites ICD-10 codes perform poorly in the identification of patients. METHODS: We utilized three independent retrospective cohorts at the University of Michigan (cohorts 1 and 2) and Duke University (cohort 3). Cohort 1: Child A5-6 patients followed up to 10 years (n = 150); cohort 2: Child A5-B7 patients with portal hypertension followed for up to 1 year (n = 65); cohort 3: cross-sectional cohort of patients evaluated for liver transplant (n = 100). We computed performance characteristics for ascites-related ICD-10 codes (K70.31, K70.11, K71.51, R18.8), as well as loop and/or potassium-sparing diuretics. RESULTS: A total of 315 patients were included across three cohorts. Algorithms including any ascites code provided better sensitivity and equivalent specificity to R18.8 alone for all cohorts. In cohort 2, we found that loop diuretics, potassium-sparing diuretics, and a combination of both with a cirrhosis code were highly sensitive (82.3% for each) and specific (89.1-93.5%). In contrast, ascites codes were insensitive. In patients with moderate-severe ascites, a combination of recorded diuretics showed high sensitivity and specificity (95.2% and 86.8%). In Cohort 3's transplant evaluation patients, we found that loop diuretics, potassium-sparing diuretics, and a combination of both with a cirrhosis code were highly sensitive (90.4%, 78.8% and 75.0%, respectively) and specific (85.0%, 90.0% and 95.0%, respectively). For moderate-severe cirrhosis, loop diuretics and R18.8 showed higher sensitivity (77.8%) and specificity (88.9%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Diuretic records with a cirrhosis code improve the identification of ascites. This method for identifying ascites should be used in future large dataset studies.

Spontaneous Ascitic Fluid Infection: Are we Experiencing an Epidemiological shift in Causative Organisms?

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous ascitic fluid infection (SAI) is common in cirrhotic patients leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Third-generation cephalosporins are currently recommended as first-line therapy. This is a retrospective observational study that aims to determine bacterial etiology, susceptibility patterns of SAI, and its correlation with model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted on 274 consecutive cases admitted in Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India. Cases of cirrhosis (irrespective of etiology) with ascites between the ages of 18-85 years were included in this study. Ascitic fluid of every patient was aspirated under all aseptic measures and was sent for biochemical, culture, and cytological analysis. RESULTS: Of the 274 patients studied, 34 (12.4%) patients were diagnosed to have SAI. Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites (CNNA) was present in 27 patients, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) was present in six patients, and monomicrobial bacteriascites was seen in one patient. Mean age of patients enrolled was 56.05 ± 2.47 years. Eighty-two percent were males and 18% were females. Alcohol (45.45%) was the leading cause of cirrhosis followed by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) related cirrhosis (26.47.7%) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) related cirrhosis (11.46%) and cryptogenic cirrhosis (8.82%). Average MELD-Na score was 25 and the CTP class C was most common. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most commonly isolated organism followed by Escherichia coli. The various factors that predispose to development of SBP include low ascitic fluid protein concentration, a high level of serum bilirubin, deranged serum creatinine, high Child-Pugh score, and high MELD-Na score. CONCLUSION: Ascitic fluid analysis remains the single most important test for identifying and assessing a course of SBP. Early diagnosis and treatment will reduce the mortality rate in these patients.

Clinical features and diagnostic approaches for abdominal tuberculosis: five-year experience from a non-tuberculosis-designated hospital in China.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: abdominal tuberculosis (TB) is a common form of extrapulmonary TB but it is still a diagnostic dilemma in clinical practice. This study aimed to highlight the clinical features and diagnostic approaches for abdominal TB. METHODS: seventy cases of diagnosed abdominal TB were retrospectively collected between August 1st, 2015 and June 30th, 2020. They were classified as peritoneal TB, lymph node TB, gastrointestinal TB, visceral TB or mixed TB. RESULTS: eighteen patients were diagnosed with peritoneal TB, nine with lymph node TB, five with gastrointestinal TB, two with visceral TB and 36 with mixed TB. More than 65 % of the patients had tuberculosis of other sites except the abdomen. The median diagnosis time was 60 days. Ascites (58.6 %), abdominal distension (48.6 %), weight loss (44.3 %) and fever (42.9 %) were the most common symptoms. The overall microbiological and histological detection rates were 70.0 % and 38.6 %, respectively. The non-ascite samples yielded a higher microbiological confirmation rate (63.6 %) than the total samples (40.8 %). Diagnosis was confirmed histologically in 18 patients (69.2 %). Forty-five cases (64.3 %) were clinically diagnosed. Invasive procedures such as surgery (6/7), percutaneous biopsy (7/7) and endoscopy in lymph node TB (4/5) had high confirmation rates. CONCLUSIONS: the diagnosis of abdominal TB should be reached by a combination of clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological and pathological findings.

Incidence and risk factors for postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ovarian malignancy. There is no meta-analysis available on this topic so far. The aim of our study was to quantitatively synthesize the data from studies with respect to the incidence and risk factors for postoperative VTE among cases with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for papers containing the key words "venous thromboembolism", "postoperative", "postoperation", "ovarian neoplasm", "ovary neoplasm", "ovarian cancer", "ovary cancer", and "cancer of ovary". Studies selection, data extraction, quality assessment of eligible studies were performed independently by our different reviewers. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine postoperative VTE incidence and risk factors in women with EOC. Sensitivity analysis were used to verify the robustness of the results of meta-analyses if necessary. RESULTS: In total, 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled incidence for postoperative symptomatic VTE was 3% (95% CI, 0.03-0.04) and for postoperative symptomatic as well as asymptomatic VTE was 8% (95% CI, 0.07-0.09). The presence of history of VTE (OR, 2.37), advanced-stages (OR, 2.35), high complexity of surgery (OR, 2.20), clear cell carcinoma of ovary (OR, 2.53) and residual disease>1 cm (OR, 2.57) significantly increase the likelihood of having postoperative VTE. Other risk factors for postoperative VTE in EOC patients were BMI>30 (OR, 1.58), per 10-years increase in age (OR, 1.22), ASA score>2 (OR, 1.45), ascites (OR, 2.07), the diameter of residual disease is between 0 cm to 1 cm (OR, 2.06) and smoking history (OR, 1.54). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that VTE, especially subclinical VTE, is a prevalent complication in postoperative patients with EOC. History of VTE, advanced FIGO stages, high complexity of surgery, obesity, older age, ascites, higher ASA score, smoking history and suboptimal debulking are associated with this increased incidence of postoperative VTE among patients with EOC. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020209662.

Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors in comparison with DPP4 inhibitors on ascites and death in veterans with cirrhosis on metformin.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) may have favourable neurohumoral and metabolic effects in patients with chronic liver disease. However, studies examining SGLT2i in this population have been limited to patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and have focused on surrogate biomarkers. Our aim was to evaluate whether SGLT2i can reduce the incidence of ascites and death over a period of 36 months in patients with cirrhosis and diabetes mellitus. Using electronic health data from Veterans Affairs hospitals in the United States, we conducted a propensity score matched intention-to-treat analysis among veterans on metformin who subsequently received either SGLT2i or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Among 423 matched pairs (in total, 846 patients), we found no significant difference in the risk for ascites (hazard ratio 0.68 for SGLT2i, 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.25; p = .22) but did find that SGLT2i users had a reduced risk for death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.99; p < .05). In comparison with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, SGLT2i may improve survival for patients with cirrhosis who require additional pharmacotherapy for diabetes mellitus beyond metformin, but confirmatory studies are necessary.

Ascites development is associated with worse outcome in patients after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We provide detailed analysis and outcomes in patients post-kidney transplant (KT) developing ascites, which has never been categorically reported. METHODS: Ascites was identified by ICD9/10 codes and detailed chart review in patients post-KT from 01/2004-06/2019. The incidence of patient death and graft loss were determined per 100-person-years, and the incidence rate ratio was obtained. RESULTS: Of 3329 patients receiving KT, 83 (2.5%) patients had new-onset ascites, of whom 58% were male, 21% blacks, and 29% whites. Seventy-five percentage were on hemodialysis. Patients were maintained primarily on tacrolimus and mycophenolate for immunosuppression. Only 14% of patients with ascites had the appropriate diagnostic workup. There was a trend toward an increased mortality in patients with ascites (incidence rate ratio, IRR [95% CI]: 1.8 [0.92, 3.19], p = .06), and a significantly higher incidence of graft loss (IRR: 5.62 [3.97, 7.76], p < .001), compared with non-ascites patients. When classified by ascites severity, determined by imaging, moderate/severe ascites patients had the worst clinical outcomes, with a mortality of 32% and graft failure in 57%, compared with 9% and 10%, respectively, in those without ascites. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort employing stepwise analysis of ascites post-KT, worse outcomes were noted, dictating the need for optimized management to improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Ascites.

OBJECTIVES: Ascites is a pathologic buildup of fluid in the peritoneal cavity. Knowledge is lacking in clinical outcome in pediatric patients with ascites. We aim to identify and assess clinical variables, associated with morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients who are hospitalized with ascites. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients ages 0 to 21 hospitalized at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1983 and 2010 with an ICD-9 discharge diagnosis of ascites (789.5, 789.51, 789.59). A total of 518 pediatric patients were studied, all with a diagnosis of ascites during hospitalization. Study outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) as a proxy for morbidity and death at hospital discharge for mortality. Variables analyzed included demographic data, ascites etiology and grade, comorbidities, and laboratory markers. Variables were analyzed by log-linear regression and competing risk model. RESULTS: Among the 3 age groups (0-5, 6-12, and 13-21), the 0 to 5 age group experienced significantly increased LOS (P < 0.001) and mortality (P = 0.027). Ascites etiology of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) and the presence of hydrothorax or thrombocytopenia was also significantly associated with increased LOS. Ascites with the etiology of congestive hepatopathy and the presence of grade 3 ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, hydrothorax, hyponatremia, and thrombocytopenia were associated with increased mortality. Additionally, black pediatric patients have an increased risk of mortality (P = 0.027). Other factors including sex, leukopenia, portal vein thrombosis, and splenomegaly were not associated with LOS or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients hospitalized with ascites are associated with specific demographic and clinical factors. Further studies are required to apply this knowledge to predict the clinical outcomes.

Ascites volume at the time of primary debulking and overall survival of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of malignant ascites volume on the outcomes of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma who undergo primary debulking surgery. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma and bulky intra-abdominal (TIIIC) disease between 2010 and 2015, who underwent primary debulking surgery followed by multi-agent chemotherapy and known status of residual disease, were drawn from the National Cancer Database. Based on available information, the presence and volume of malignant ascites was categorized as absent, low (<980 mL), and high (>980 mL) volume. Median overall survival was determined from Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log rank test. A multivariate Cox model was constructed to control for confounders. RESULTS: 2493 patients were identified; 31.9% (n=795) had no ascites, 40.2% (n=1001) had low, and 28% (n=697) had high volume malignant ascites. Rate of complete gross resection was higher for patients with no ascites (65.9%) compared with those with low (35.6%) and high (23%) volume ascites (p<0.001). After controlling for stage, histology, grade, age, and comorbidities, compared with those with no ascites, patients with low (odds ratio (OR) 3.49, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.89 to 4.26) and high (OR 6.40, 95% CI 5.07 to 8.06) volume ascites were more likely to have gross residual disease. For patients who achieved complete gross resection after controlling for confounders compared with patients with no ascites, those with low (hazard ratio (HR) 1.37, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.72) and high volume ascites (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.55) had worse overall survival. Similarly, patients with low volume ascites had better survival compared with those with high volume ascites (HR 0.71 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The presence and volume of malignant ascites at the time of primary debulking surgery was associated with the likelihood of achieving a complete gross resection and worse overall survival.

Association Between Ascites and Clinical Findings in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND Complications are the most important outcome determinants for acute pancreatitis (AP). We designed this single-center retrospective study to evaluate the clinical findings (complications, disease severity, and outcomes) of 218 patients with AP and to identify variables associated with ascites. MATERIAL AND METHODS We extracted clinical data from consecutive patients with AP and divided them into 2 groups based on presence or absence of ascites. We compared disease severity, complications, and outcomes between groups. RESULTS We analyzed data from 218 patients with AP (43 with ascites and 175 without it). The patients with ascites had a more severe disease (higher incidence of pancreatic inflammation [90.70% vs 68.57%; P=0.003], higher modified computed tomography severity index score [2.00 (0.00-2.00) vs 4.00 (4.00-6.00); P<0.001], higher incidence of moderate/severe AP [53.49% vs 13.14%; P<0.001]) and poorer outcomes (higher incidence of ventilation [6.98% vs 0.57%; P=0.025] and vasopressor use [4.65% vs 0%; P=0.038], and longer hospital stays [10.00 (7.00-13.00) vs 8.00 (5.00-10.00); P=0.007]) than those without ascites. Moreover, patients with ascites also displayed a higher risk for pancreatic fluid collection (odds ratio [OR]=9.206; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.613-32.447; P<0.001), renal failure (OR=5.732; 95% CI, 1.025-32.041; P=0.024), respiratory failure (OR=6.242; 95% CI, 1.034-37.654; P=0.029), and pleural effusion (OR=5.186; 95% CI, 1.381-19.483; P<0.001) than those without ascites. CONCLUSIONS The findings from the experience of a single center of patients with AP showed that pancreatic fluid collections, renal failure, respiratory failure, and pleural effusion were associated with the development of ascites.

ALPPS for Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Did Aggressive Surgery Lead to the Oncological Benefit? An International Multi-center Study.

BACKGROUND: ALPPS is found to increase the resectability of primary and secondary liver malignancy at the advanced stage. The aim of the study was to verify the surgical and oncological outcome of ALPPS for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: The study cohort was based on the ALPPS registry with patients from 31 international centers between August 2009 and January 2018. Propensity score matched patients receiving chemotherapy only were selected from the SEER database as controls for the survival analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients undergoing ALPPS were recruited, 99 completed the second stage with median inter-stage duration of 11 days. The median kinetic growth rate was 23 ml/day. R0 resection was achieved in 87 (85%). Initially high rates of morbidity and mortality decreased steadily to a 29% severe complication rate and 7% 90-day morbidity in the last 2 years. Post-hepatectomy liver failure remained the main cause of 90-day mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed insufficient future liver remnant at the stage-2 operation (FLR2) to be the only risk factor for severe complications (OR 2.91, p = 0.02). The propensity score matching analysis showed a superior overall survival in the ALPPS group compared to palliative chemotherapy (median overall survival: 26.4 months vs 14 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates: 82.4%, 70.5% and 39.6% vs 51.2%, 21.4% and 11.3%, respectively, p < 0.01). The survival benefit, however, was not confirmed in the subgroup analysis for patients with insufficient FLR2 or multifocal ICC. CONCLUSION: ALPPS showed high efficacy in achieving R0 resections in locally advanced ICC. To get the most oncological benefit from this aggressive surgery, ALPPS would be restricted to patients with single lesions and sufficient FLR2.

Patients with cirrhosis and SBP: Increase in multidrug-resistant organisms and complications.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a serious complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. In recent years, it has been postulated that the rate of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is increasing, especially in nosocomial SBP patients. Aim of the present work was to investigate this hypothesis and its possible clinical consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three culture-positive patients between 2007 and 2014 were compared with 81 patients between 2015 and 2017, to study the change of microbiological profiles and their clinical consequences. The cirrhosis patients with bacterascites requiring treatment were included as well. RESULTS: The most prevalent Gram-negative bacteria isolated from ascites were Enterobacterales (31.6%) and in Gram-positive pathogens Staphylococci (22.8%). There was a significant increase in MDROs (22.3% ICU 40.7%, P = .048), accompanied by an increased incidence of sepsis (from 21.4% to 37.0%, P = .021), hepatorenal syndrome (from 40.8% to 58.0%, P = .007) and the need of catecholamine therapy (from 21.4% to 38.8%, P = .036). Nosocomial origin correlated with higher MDRO proportion, more complications and lower antimicrobial susceptibility rates in 12 commonly used antibiotics. MDROs were confirmed as an isolated predictor for inpatient mortality and complications in multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: The feeling in clinical practice that MDROs have increased in the last 11 years could be confirmed in our study in Munich, Germany. Nosocomial SBP correlated with significantly higher MDRO rates (nearly 50%) and complication rates. In our opinion, an antibiotic combination with comprehensive effect should be taken into account in nosocomial SBP patients in this region.

Exacerbation of hepatic cirrhosis may trigger admission for epilepsy and status epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether acute exacerbations of cirrhotic liver disease are associated with higher odds of readmission for epilepsy or status epilepticus. METHODS: The New York State Inpatient Database is a statewide dataset containing data on 97% of hospitalizations for New York State. In this retrospective, case-crossover design study, we used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify index status epilepticus and epilepsy admissions. The primary exposure was defined as admission due to an acute exacerbation of cirrhotic liver disease. The case-crossover analysis tested whether exposure to a hepatic exacerbation within progressively longer case periods (14, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 days before index admission), compared to control periods 1 year before the case period, was associated with readmission for epilepsy or status epilepticus. RESULTS: The odds ratio for subsequent admission for epilepsy after exposure to an acute exacerbation of cirrhotic liver disease was significant in the 30-day window at 2.072 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.095-3.92, P = .0252) and peaked in the 150-day window at 2.742 (95% CI = 1.817-4.137, P < .0001). In the status epilepticus group, all case periods demonstrated significantly elevated odds of subsequent admission following hepatic exacerbation. SIGNIFICANCE: Hepatic exacerbations are associated with increased odds for hospital admissions for epilepsy and status epilepticus across several timeframes.

Feasibility and Procedural Safety of alfapump System Implantation by IR: Experience from the MOSAIC Study, a Multicenter, Open-Label Prospective Study in Cirrhotic Patients with Refractory Ascites.

PURPOSE: To evaluate feasibility, procedural outcomes, and safety aspects of implantation of the alfapump system for management of refractory ascites by interventional radiology (IR) methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The multicenter open-label prospective MOSAIC study included 29 patients (mean age 60.0 y ± 9.9; range, 32-72 y, 17 [56.7%] male) with cirrhotic refractory ascites who received an alfapump system implanted by IR. The fully subcutaneous alfapump system consists of a pump and 2 silicone catheters, whose distal ends are inserted in the peritoneum and the bladder, respectively. The device moves ascites from the peritoneum to the bladder, reducing the requirement of paracentesis. Pumped volume and speed can be customized as required. The implant procedure was performed under general or local anesthesia. Both catheters were placed under ultrasound guidance. The pump was inserted in a subcutaneous pocket on the upper abdomen. Incidence and severity of procedure-related serious adverse events up to 3 months after implantation were recorded. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 29 (100%) IR implant procedures. The pump was usually implanted on the right abdomen (76.7%). In 5 patients, deviation from the Instructions for Use was required. Adverse events (requirement of additional incisions, postoperative bleed) occurred in 3 patients. At 3 months after implantation, 3 possibly procedure-related serious adverse events (ascites leakage, bacterial peritonitis, postoperative bleeding) had occurred. Two explantations (2/29; 6.8%) (cellulitis, pump pocket infection) and 4 reinterventions (pump or catheter replacement) were required, corresponding to an adverse event incidence rate of 9/29 (31.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of the alfapump using IR methods is both feasible and technically successful.