Quantitative Measure of Intestinal Permeability Using Blue Food Coloring.

BACKGROUND: Loss of intestinal barrier integrity plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of various gastrointestinal diseases and is implicated in the onset of sepsis and multiple organ failure. An array of methods to assess different aspects of intestinal barrier function suffers from lack of sensitivity, prolonged periods of specimen collection, or high expense. We have developed a technique to measure the concentration of the food dye FD&C Blue #1 from blood and sought to assess its utility in measuring intestinal barrier function in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four healthy volunteers and 10 critically ill subjects in the intensive care unit were recruited in accordance with an institutional review board approved protocol. Subjects were given 0.5 mg/kg Blue #1 enterally as an aqueous solution of diluted food coloring. Five blood specimens were drawn per subject: 0 h (before dose), 1, 2, 4, and 8 h. After plasma isolation, organic extracts were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry detecting the presence of unmodified dye. RESULTS: We found no baseline detectable absorption in healthy volunteers. After including the subjects in the intensive care unit, we compared dye absorption in the six subjects who met criteria for septic shock with the eight who did not. Septic patients demonstrated significantly greater absorption of Blue #1 after 2 h. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel, easy-to-use method to measure intestinal barrier integrity using a food grade dye detectable by mass spectrometry analysis of patient blood following oral administration.

Tracking Antibody Distribution with Near-Infrared Fluorescent Dyes: Impact of Dye Structure and Degree of Labeling on Plasma Clearance.

Monoclonal antibodies labeled with near-infrared (NIR) fluorophores have potential use in disease detection, intraoperative imaging, and pharmacokinetic characterization of therapeutic antibodies in both the preclinical and clinical setting. Recent work has shown conjugation of NIR fluorophores to antibodies can potentially alter antibody disposition at a sufficiently high degree of labeling (DoL); however, other reports show minimal impact after labeling with NIR fluorophores. In this work, we label two clinically approved antibodies, Herceptin (trastuzumab) and Avastin (bevacizumab), with NIR dyes IRDye 800CW (800CW) or Alexa Fluor 680 (AF680), at 1.2 and 0.3 dyes/antibody and examine the impact of fluorophore conjugation on antibody plasma clearance and tissue distribution. At 0.3 DoL, AF680 conjugates exhibited similar clearance to unlabeled antibody over 17 days while 800CW conjugates diverged after 4 days, suggesting AF680 is a more suitable choice for long-term pharmacokinetic studies. At the 1.2 DoL, 800CW conjugates cleared faster than unlabeled antibodies after several hours, in agreement with other published reports. The tissue biodistribution for bevacizumab-800CW and -AF680 conjugates agreed well with literature reported biodistributions using radiolabels. However, the greater tissue autofluorescence at 680 nm resulted in limited detection above background at low (∼2 mg/kg) doses and 0.3 DoL for AF680, indicating that 800CW is more appropriate for short-term biodistribution measurements and intraoperative imaging. Overall, our work shows a DoL of 0.3 or less for non-site-specifically labeled antibodies (with a Poisson distribution) is ideal for limiting the impact of NIR fluorophores on antibody pharmacokinetics.

Sorafenib in advanced melanoma: a critical role for pharmacokinetics?

BACKGROUND: Inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability can lead to suboptimal drug exposure, and therefore might impact the efficacy of sorafenib. This study reports long-term pharmacokinetic monitoring of patients treated with sorafenib and a retrospective pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic analysis in melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Heavily pretreated patients with stage IV melanoma were started on sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (bid). In the absence of limiting toxicity, dose escalation of 200 mg bid levels was done every 2 weeks. Plasma sorafenib measurement was performed at each visit, allowing a retrospective pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic analysis for safety and efficacy. RESULTS: In all, 19 of 30 patients underwent dose escalation over 400 mg bid, and 28 were evaluable for response. The overall disease control rate was 61% (95% confidence interval (CI): 42.6-78.8), including three confirmed responses (12%). Disease control rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were improved in patients with high vs low exposure (80% vs 32%, P=0.02, and 5.25 vs 2.5 months, P=0.005, hazard ratio (HR)=0.28 (95% CI: 0.11-0.73)). In contrast, drug dosing had no effect on PFS. In multivariate analysis, drug exposure was the only factor associated with PFS (HR=0.36 (95% CI: 0.13-0.99)). Diarrhoea and anorexia were correlated with drug dosing, while hypertension and hand-foot skin reaction were correlated with drug exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Although sorafenib had modest efficacy in melanoma, these results suggest a correlation between exposure and efficacy of sorafenib. Therefore, dose optimisation in patients with low exposure at standard doses should be evaluated in validated indications.

Variability of sorafenib toxicity and exposure over time: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib displays major interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. It is unknown whether the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib influence its toxicity. METHODS: We analyzed the severity and kinetics of sorafenib-induced toxicities in unselected consecutive patients with cancer, as well as their relationship with biological, clinical, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Toxicity was recorded bimonthly. Sorafenib plasma concentrations were assessed by liquid chromatography. RESULTS: For 83 patients (median age, 62 years; range, 21-84 years), median sorafenib 12-hour area under the curve (AUC(0-12)) was 52.8 mg · h/L (range: 11.8-199.6). A total of 51 patients (61%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicities, including hand-foot skin reactions (23%), asthenia (18%), and diarrhea (11%). Sorafenib AUC(0-12) preceding grade 3-4 toxicities was significantly higher than that observed in the remaining population (61.9 mg · h/L vs. 53 mg · h/L). In 25 patients treated with fixed doses of sorafenib for the first 4 months, median dose-normalized AUC(0-12) on day 120 was significantly lower than on day 15 (63 vs. 102 mg · h/L). The incidence of hypertension and hand-foot skin reactions significantly decreased over time. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib AUC(0-12) decreases over time, similarly to the incidence of hypertension and hand-foot skin reactions. Monitoring of sorafenib plasma concentrations may help to prevent acute severe toxicities and detect patients with suboptimal exposure at disease progression.

Differences in the pharmacokinetics of 4-amino-3-chlorophenyl hydrogen sulfate, a metabolite of resatorvid, in rats and dogs.

The pharmacokinetics of 4-amino-3-chlorophenyl hydrogen sulfate, M-III of resatorvid, in rats and dogs were investigated using radiolabeled M-III ([(14)C]M-III). The elimination half-life of (14)C in the plasma of rats was approximately 1/30 of that of dogs after intravenous dosing of [(14)C]M-III at 0.5 mg/kg to rats and dogs. The in vitro and in vivo plasma protein binding ratios of M-III were relatively high and were the same in both species. The intrinsic clearance (CL(int)) of M-III in rats was much higher than the glomerular filtration rate in rats. Furthermore, the concentration of [(14)C]M-III in the kidney of rats was much higher than that in the plasma. On the contrary, in dogs, the concentration of [(14)C]M-III in the kidney was very much lower than that in the plasma. These results indicated that M-III was effectively taken up into the kidney and was excreted into the urine in rats; however, in dogs, ineffective renal uptake of M-III was presumed. When [(14)C]M-III and probenecid were simultaneously and continually infused intravenously to rats, the CL(int) of M-III decreased with increasing plasma concentrations of probenecid, indicating that kidney uptake of M-III in rats was inhibited by probenecid. It was also thought that uptake by the organic anion transport system(s) in the basolateral membrane is involved in the renal uptake of M-III in rats. The pharmacokinetic differences of M-III between rats and dogs are considered to be mainly caused by the difference in the urinary excretion via the renal distribution processes.

The plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of sorafenib after intravenous administration in non-human primates.

PURPOSE: Sorafenib is a small molecule inhibitor of multiple signaling kinases thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of many tumors including brain tumors. Clinical trials with sorafenib in primary and metastatic brain tumors are ongoing. We evaluated the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics (PK) of sorafenib after an intravenous (IV) dose in a non-human primate (NHP) model. METHODS: 7.3 mg/kg of sorafenib free base equivalent solubilized in 20% cyclodextrin was administered IV over 1 h to three adult rhesus monkeys. Serial paired plasma and CSF samples were collected over 24 h. Sorafenib was quantified with a validated HPLC/tandem mass spectrometry assay. PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. CSF penetration was calculated from the AUC(CSF) : AUC(plasma). RESULTS: Peak plasma concentrations after IV dosing ranged from 3.4 to 7.6 µg/mL. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) area under the plasma concentration from 0 to 24 h was 28 ± 4.3 µg • h/mL, which is comparable to the exposure observed in humans at recommended doses. The mean ± SD clearance was 1.7 ± 0.5 mL/min/kg. The peak CSF concentrations ranged from 0.00045 to 0.00058 µg/mL. The mean ± SD area under the CSF concentration from 0 to 24h was 0.0048 ± 0.0016 µg•h/mL. The mean CSF penetration of sorafenib was 0.02% and 3.4% after correcting for plasma protein binding. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib is well tolerated in NHP and measurable in CSF after an IV dose. The CSF penetration of sorafenib is limited relative to total and free drug exposure in plasma.

Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with interferon-alpha in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, tumor response, and immunological parameters of sorafenib plus interferon α-2b [corrected] (IFN) in Japanese patients with advanced RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After 2 weeks of IFN-alone treatment, eligible patients received 28-day cycles of continuous sorafenib 200 mg (Cohort 1) or 400 mg (Cohorts 2 and 3) twice daily combined with intramuscular IFN 6 (Cohorts 1 and 2) or 9 (Cohort 3) million international units (MIU) three times a week. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients received at least one dose of sorafenib plus IFN. Five patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The most common DLT was fatigue, experienced in four DLT patients. All 18 patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (AE). The most common treatment-emergent AEs included fatigue, fever, platelets, leukocytes, hemoglobin, weight loss and anorexia. Five patients had confirmed partial response and 11 had stable disease, a response rate of 27.8%. IFN had no relevant impact on the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib administered in combination with IFN was well tolerated, with promising results in efficacy. Continuous sorafenib 400 mg twice daily in combination with IFN 6 MIU three times a week is recommended in Japanese patients with advanced RCC.

Preclincial testing of sorafenib and RAD001 in the Nf(flox/flox) ;DhhCre mouse model of plexiform neurofibroma using magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an inherited disease predisposing affected patients to variable numbers of benign neurofibromas. To date there are no effective chemotherapeutic drugs available for this slow growing tumor. Molecularly targeted agents that aim to slow neurofibroma growth are being tested in clinical trials. So preclinical models for testing potential therapies are urgently needed to prioritize drugs for clinical trials of neurofibromas. PROCEDURE: We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor neurofibroma development in the Nf1(flox/flox) ;DhhCre mouse model of GEM grade I neurofibroma. Based on studies implicating mTOR and Raf signaling in NF1 mutant cells, we tested the therapeutic effect of RAD001 and Sorafenib in this model. Mice were scanned to establish growth rate followed by 8 weeks of drug treatment, then re-imaged after the last dose of drug treatment. Tumor volumes were determined by volumetric measurement. RESULTS: We found that rate of tumor growth varied among mice, as it does in human patients. RAD001 inhibited its predicted target pS6K, yet there was no significant decrease in the tumor volume in RAD001 treated mice compared to the vehicle control group. Sorafenib inhibited cyclinD1 expression and cell proliferation in tumors, and volumetric measurements identified significant decreases in tumor volume in some mice. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that volumetric MRI analysis can be used to monitor the therapeutic effect in the preclinical neurofibroma drug screening, and suggest that Sorafenib might have clinical activity in some neurofibromas.

Pneumatosis intestinalis associated with treatment of cancer patients with the vascular growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib.

Recently, pneumatosis intestinalis has been described in patients receiving bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to VEGF-A. Pneumatosis intestinalis is a condition characterized by subserosal and submucosal gas-filled cysts in the gastrointestinal tract. We report on pneumatosis intestinalis in patients receiving oral anti-VEGF agents. Patients shared the following characteristics: long-term (> 4 months) exposure to anti-VEGF agents, lack of other factors predisposing to pneumatosis intestinalis, and lack of recent surgical intervention. Taken together, these observations suggest that pneumatosis intestinalis is a probable class-effect of anti-VEGF agents.

Functional and clinical evidence of the influence of sorafenib binding to albumin on sorafenib disposition in adult cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Sorafenib, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is highly bound to plasma proteins (>99.5%). Little is known about the influence of variations in sorafenib protein binding on its disposition. The aims of this study were to characterize in vitro sorafenib binding properties to albumin using the quenching fluorescence method and investigate the influence of albuminemia and bilirubinemia on sorafenib disposition in 54 adult cancer patients. RESULTS: In vitro estimate of sorafenib dissociation constant (Kd) for albumin was 0.22 µM [CI95 0.20-0.23]. In physiological conditions, sorafenib unbound fraction would increase 1.7-fold as albuminemia decreased from 45 g/L (680 µM) to 30 g/L (453 µM). In presence of bilirubin, apparent Kd of sorafenib was ~1.5-fold greater for bilirubin/albumin molar ratio of 1:4. In clinical settings, median sorafenib clearance (CL) was 1.42 L/h (0.75-2.13 L/h). In univariate analysis, sex, body mass index, and albuminemia were associated with CL (p = 0.04, 0.048, and 0.008, respectively). In multivariate analysis, albuminemia (p = 0.0036) was the single parameter independently associated with CL. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the major influence of albuminemia on sorafenib clearance and its disposition in cancer patients.