Comparing mortality among adult, general intensive care units in England with varying intensivist cover patterns: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Research has demonstrated that intensivist-led care of the critically ill is associated with reduced intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a relation exists between intensivist cover pattern (for example, number of days of continuous cover) and patient outcomes among adult general ICUs in England. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study by using data from a pooled case mix and outcome database of adult general critical care units participating in the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme. Consecutive admissions to participating units for the years 2010 to 2011 were linked to a survey of intensivist cover practices. Our primary outcome of interest was mortality at ultimate discharge from acute-care hospital. RESULTS: The analysis included 80,122 patients admitted to 130 ICUs in 128 hospitals. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relation between intensivist cover patterns (days of continuous cover, grade of physician staffing at nighttime, and frequency of daily handovers) and acute hospital mortality, adjusting for patient case mix. No relation was seen between days of continuous cover by a single intensivist or grade of physician staffing at nighttime and acute hospital mortality. Acute hospital mortality and ICU length of stay were not associated with intensivist characteristics, intensivist full-time equivalents per bed, or years of clinical experience. Intensivist participation in handover was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.55); however, only nine units reported no intensivist participation. CONCLUSIONS: We found no relation between days of continuous cover by a single intensivist or grade of physician staffing at nighttime and patient outcomes in adult, general ICUs in England. Intensivist participation in handover was associated with increased mortality; further research to confirm or refute this finding is required.

[Funktionsoberarzt. Pseudo-title or meaningful position?]. / Funktionsoberarzt. Pseudotitel oder sinnvolle Position?

The position of the Funktionsoberarzt ("functioning senior physician") is to date not specified. Nevertheless, in the majority of hospitals the position exists, although the function and responsibilities are not clearly defined. Frequently, it is thought that the position represents a consultant who works independently, but who is still supported by experienced colleagues to achieve the full qualification for a senior physician. In contrast, others indicate that the position represents a consultant who works as a senior physician with all responsibilities, but without an established post and without the corresponding reimbursement. A critical disadvantage of the position is that frequently the duties of both a resident and senior physician must be managed. Rotation between the two functions results in a higher workload, and the lack of identity and acceptance may lead to frustration. Therefore, we feel that the position is only meaningful if the Funktionsoberarzt works exclusively as a senior physician who is supported for complex surgeries and decisions by more experienced colleagues. In addition, the position should only be temporary and the time period for the position should be defined in advance.

[Short-term prognostication of recently admitted patients to internal medicine wards by the staff].

BACKGROUND: The "dying patient" law in Israel deals with end- of-life decisions. AIM: This prospective study evaluates the ability of internal medicine staff to assess the short-term prognosis of recently admitted patients. METHODS: During the period November 1st 2008 until January 6th 2009, the staff of the internal medicine wards received questionnaires regarding their recently admitted patients (up to 72 hours from the time of admission). The questionnaires included thestaff member's role assessment of each patient's prognosis for the next two weeks. Later, charts of the patients were examined for demographic data and outcome. RESULTS: Questionnaires regarding 599 patients were completed. The outcome was validated in 466 of these patients. Nurse's filled in 259 questionnaires, residents at early stage (before the first residency exam) completed 437, senior residents (after this exam] filled in 75 and senior/attending physicians filled in 329 patients' questionnaires. Overall, 69, patients died within 14 days. The sensitivity of assessment of short-term prognosis was low (0.38) but the specificity was very high (0.95). The positive predictive value was 0.61. Among physicians, the positive predictive value increased with seniority, but nurses had the highest positive predictive value scores (0.73). The negative predictive value was 0.89 without significant differences among the 4 studied groups. CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine staff has limited capacity to accurately assess short-term prognosis of recently admitted patients.

Smoking habits among Israeli hospital doctors: a survey and historical review.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a serious health issue worldwide. Smoking trends among physicians predict similar trends in the general population. Little is known about current smoking rates among physicians. OBJECTIVES: To investigate current smoking trends a Israeli physicians. METHODS: All practicing physicians at a tertiary university-affiliated medical center in central Israel were invited to complete a Web-based questionnaire on smoking habits and smoking-related issues via the institutional email. Findings were compared to those in the general population and between subgroups. RESULTS: Of the 90 responders (53 male, 88 Jewish), 54 (60%) had never smoked, 21 (23.3%) were past smokers, and 15 (16.7%) were current smokers. The rate of current smokers was lower than in the general population. The proportion of current smokers was higher among residents than attending physicians and among physicians in surgical compared to medical specialties. Past smokers accounted for 17.9% of the residents (average age at quitting 26.2 years) and 28.1% of the attending hysicians (average age at quitting 33.0 years). Non-smokers more frequently supported harsh anti-smoking legislation. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of smoking is lower in physicians than in the general population but has not changed over the last 15 years. Anti-smoking programs should particularly target physicians in surgical specialties.

Perceptions and attitudes of clinicians in Spain toward clinical practice guidelines and grading systems: a protocol for a qualitative study and a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have become a very popular tool for decision making in healthcare. While there is some evidence that CPGs improve outcomes, there are numerous factors that influence their acceptability and use by healthcare providers. While evidence of clinicians' knowledge, perceptions and attitudes toward CPGs is extensive, results are still disperse and not conclusive. Our study will evaluate these issues in a large and representative sample of clinicians in Spain. METHODS/DESIGN: A mixed-method design combining qualitative and quantitative research techniques will evaluate general practitioners (GPs) and hospital-based specialists in Spain with the objective of exploring attitudes and perceptions about CPGs and evidence grading systems. The project will consist of two phases: during the first phase, group discussions will be carried out to gain insight into perceptions and attitudes of the participants, and during the second phase, this information will be completed by means of a survey, reaching a greater number of clinicians. We will explore these issues in GPs and hospital-based practitioners, with or without previous experience in guideline development. DISCUSSION: Our study will identify and gain insight into the perceived problems and barriers of Spanish practitioners in relation to guideline knowledge and use. The study will also explore beliefs and attitudes of clinicians towards CPGs and evidence grading systems used to rate the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations. Our results will provide guidance to healthcare researchers and healthcare decision makers to improve the use of guidelines in Spain and elsewhere.

Validity of the Prescriber Information in the Danish National Prescription Registry.

The aim of this study was to measure the validity of the prescriber information recorded in the Danish National Prescription Registry (DNPR). The prescriber information recorded in the pharmacies' electronic dispensing system was considered to represent the prescriber information recorded in the DNPR. Further, the problem of validity of the prescriber information pertains only to non-electronic prescriptions, as these are manually entered into the dispensing system. The recorded prescriber information was thus validated against information from a total of 2000 non-electronic prescriptions at five Danish community pharmacies. The validity of the recorded prescriber information was measured at the level of the individual prescriber and the prescriber type, respectively. The proportion of non-electronic prescriptions with incorrect registrations was 22.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 20.6-24.3) when considering individual prescriber identifiers and 17.8% (95% CI: 16.1-19.5) when considering prescriber type. When excluding prescriptions specifically registered as 'missing prescriber identifier', the proportions decreased to 9.5% (95% CI: 8.2-11.0) and 4.1% (95% CI: 3.2-5.1), respectively. The positive predictive values for the classification of prescriber types were in the range of 94.0-99.2%, while the sensitivity ranged between 64.6% and 91.8%. With a maximum of 14% non-electronic prescriptions of all prescriptions in the DNPR in 2015, this corresponds to correct classification of prescriber types in the DNPR of at least 97.5%. In conclusion, the prescriber information in the DNPR was found to be valid, especially in recent years. Researchers should be aware of the low sensitivity towards prescriptions from private practicing specialists.

Walking at work: a pedometer study assessing the activity levels of doctors.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation cites a sedentary lifestyle as one of the top ten causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide.4 A recent, large-scale clinical study showed that brisk walking and vigorous exercise are associated with substantial (and similar) reductions in the incidence of coronary heart disease. Current guidelines suggest 10,000 steps per day as an appropriate activity target for healthy adults. AIMS: This study aims to assess whether doctors are meeting this daily walking target during working-hours, and whether additional out-of-hours exercise is required. METHODS: 16 doctors from St. John's Hospital in Livingston (comprising 4 Medical Consultants, 4 Surgical Consultants, 4 Medical PRHOs and 4 Surgical PRHOs) each used a belt-worn pedometer to record all steps made during 5 consecutive day shifts. Stride length and total daily steps were recorded. Steps made out-with working hours were not counted. Total steps and hours worked were recorded at the end of each day. RESULTS: Average daily steps recorded were 7907 (Medical PRHOs), 5068 (Surgical PRHOs), 4822 (Surgical Consultants) and 4647 (Medical Consultants). P values of < 0.1 were obtained for the variation in steps between the Medical PRHOs and both the Consultant Surgeons and Consultant Physicians. Distance walked per shift varied from 3.84 (Consultant Physicians) to 6.85 kilometres (Medical PRHOs). CONCLUSION: Walking at work does provide a substantial proportion of a doctor's recommended daily activity quota. However, it is still necessary to engage in additional, out-of-hours exercise in order to consistently meet the current recommendations for physical exercise.

A Quality Improvement Project to Improve Family Recognition of Medical Team Member Roles.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that inpatients and families in academic settings have a limited ability to recall either their medical team members or the roles of those members. This is an important issue for patient and family satisfaction as well as patient safety. The objective of this study was to increase families' recognition of medical team members' roles. METHODS: We established a multidisciplinary quality improvement leadership team, measured family recognition of medical team members and their roles, and conducted 2 PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles. The first intervention was standardization of the content and delivery of our verbal team introductions to ensure inclusion of essential elements and family engagement. The second intervention was addition of an informational white board in each patient room. The prospective study included 105 families in the preintervention phase, 103 post-PDSA cycle 1, and 92 post-PDSA cycle 2. RESULTS: After conduction of 2 PDSA cycles, the recognition of the attending role increased from 49% to 87% (P = .000), the resident role from 39% to 73% (P = .000), and the medical student from 75% to 89% (P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary quality improvement model was effective in improving family recognition of the roles of attending physicians, resident physicians, and medical students. Consistent attention to engaging the families and explaining our roles as well as providing informational white boards are effective interventions to facilitate this process.

Identification of depression by medical and surgical general hospital physicians.

Little information is available about identification of mental distress by general hospital physicians (GHPs). We compared, among patients admitted in a General Hospital, depressed patients with patients identified as depressed by the GHPs. A random sample of 1,039 patients were screened with the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Afterwards, all high scorers and a probability sample of low scorers were interviewed with a variety of measures, including the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Primary Care version (CIDI-PHC). GHPs recorded the presence of depression on a Physician Encounter Form. Patients were more likely to have depression detected on medical than surgical wards. Of the 195 patients who had a depression, the GHPs assessed 32.5% as depressed. A number of factors associated with CIDI diagnoses were not significantly associated with being identified by the GHPs - female gender, two or more life events in the previous year, and a previous history of depression. The identification by the GHPs was associated with a higher probability of contacts with medical professionals and of antidepressant drug prescriptions during the year which followed the first interview.

Neonatal cranial ultrasound interpretation: a clinical audit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the abilities of doctors to interpret neonatal cranial ultrasound scans. DESIGN AND SETTING: High resolution scanned images of six important neonatal cranial ultrasound abnormalities were posted as a questionnaire to the 59 neonatal units in the North and South Thames regions. RESULTS: Forty two questionnaires were returned (71%). Currently 56% of those interpreting cranial ultrasound scans are neonatal registrars, 27% are consultant paediatricians or neonatologists, and 17% are radiologists. The response rate from registrars was excellent (97%), but it was poor from consultant paediatric (38%) and radiological (40%) staff. The mean accurate identification of cerebral abnormalities was only 59% (range 45-71%). Only 44% of the neonatal registrars, compared with nearly all the consultant staff, have had any formal training in cranial ultrasonography. CONCLUSIONS: The data highlight the current accuracy of neonatal cranial ultrasound scan reporting in the Greater London region and have important implications for clinical services and research studies. Doctors who are responsible for interpreting neonatal cranial ultrasound scans should have formal training and supervision, and more formal reporting would improve and maintain standards. The findings raise significant doubts about the accuracy of local interpretation of cranial ultrasound scans in multicentre research studies.

A lay person versus a trained endoscopist: can the preop endoscopy simulator detect a difference?

The purpose of this study was to establish construct validation of a flexible sigmoidoscopy simulator by comparing training-level grouped subjects. These included clerical staff (n = 10), residents (n = 19), and experts (n = 5). Each participant performed 3 scopes. The ANOVA group-based results for trainer-measured variables are shown in Table 1. These results demonstrate that the flexible sigmoidoscopy simulator distinguished the trained from the untrained and the resident from the expert. Although there was no statistically significant differences between the senior residents and the experts, the expert commonly outperformed the residents. Establishing the transferability of simulator training to real life is next. If the transfer of skill can be established, it may give rise to a new skills training approach.

Professional satisfaction of doctors working in a super-speciality hospital in Bangalore.

The doctors' assessment of their jobs provides an insight into those facets of the profession which need attention. This study assessed the professional satisfaction of 80 doctors who responded to the 80 item multifaceted questionnaire. Although the doctors were generally satisfied with the various facets of their jobs and career, variation in the level of satisfaction was noted. Personal background revealed that 80% of doctors had good academic and family background. The most satisfied group of doctors were the consultants with a performance based pay scale. Housekeeping, interpersonal relationship among doctors, nursing care and the pay scale of junior doctors are areas to which the administration should pay special attention if the professional satisfaction of doctors is to be improved.

Promoting physician productivity through a variable compensation system.

Integrated delivery systems must find ways to achieve optimal physician productivity and accountability, while fostering an entrepreneurial attitude among physicians. Lovelace Health Systems, Albuquerque, New Mexico, has implemented a variable compensation system designed for this purpose. An assessment of Lovelace's physician productivity had indicated performance well below national medians. To offer physicians a strong incentive to increase productivity, Lovelace developed a variable compensation system based on the resource-based relative value scale and relative value units. Lovelace also developed benchmark productivity targets.

Reclassifying physicians as employees for Federal tax purposes.

The Internal Revenue Service is attempting to reclassify many physicians as hospital employees rather than as independent contractors. Reclassifying physicians as employees could leave thousands of physicians and hospitals facing costly employment tax audits and owing millions of dollars in back taxes and penalties. In addition, some hospital pension and benefits plans that have misclassified physicians could be invalidated, and substantial penalties could be imposed on hospitals.

How to create valid physician profiles.

The simplest way to profile physicians' hospital practices is to rank them by their patients' length of stay and hospital charges, asserts guest columnist Patrice Spath, RHIT, a health care consultant with Brown-Spath Associates. The assumption is that those physicians whose patients have a higher length of stay and/or charges are the physicians who have high complication rates, provide less-than-adequate patient care, or are not practicing cost-effective care.