Analysis of policy interventions to attract and retain nurse midwives in rural areas of Malawi: A discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate and unequal distribution of health workers are significant barriers to provision of health services in Malawi, and challenges retaining health workers in rural areas have limited scale-up initiatives. This study therefore aims to estimate cost-effectiveness of monetary and non-monetary strategies in attracting and retaining nurse midwife technicians (NMTs) to rural areas of Malawi. METHODS: The study uses a discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology to investigate importance of job characteristics, probability of uptake, and intervention costs. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with NMTs and students to identify recruitment and retention motivating factors. Through policymaker consultations, qualitative findings were used to identify job attributes for the DCE questionnaire, administered to 472 respondents. A conditional logit regression model was developed to produce probability of choosing a job with different attributes and an uptake rate was calculated to estimate the percentage of health workers that would prefer jobs with specific intervention packages. Attributes were costed per health worker year. RESULTS: Qualitative results highlighted housing, facility quality, management, and workload as important factors in job selection. Respondents were 2.04 times as likely to choose a rural job if superior housing was provided compared to no housing (CI 1.71-2.44, p<0.01), and 1.70 times as likely to choose a rural job with advanced facility quality (CI 1.47-1.96, p<0.01). At base level 43.9% of respondents would choose a rural job. This increased to 61.5% if superior housing was provided, and 72.5% if all facility-level improvements were provided, compared to an urban job without these improvements. Facility-level interventions had the lowest cost per health worker year. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate housing and facility-level improvements have the greatest impact on rural job choice, while also creating longer-term improvements to health workers' living and working environments. These results provide practical evidence for policymakers to support development of workforce recruitment and retention strategies.

Increasing access to prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV services through the private sector in Uganda.

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether private midwives can perform HIV counselling and testing, provide antiretroviral treatment and contraceptives, and how this affects access to services especially among young and HIV-positive women. METHODS: A formative study was conducted between January and April 2009 to assess care-seeking practices and perceptions on the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) and family planning services in Wakiso district, central Uganda. A household survey supplemented by 12 focus group discussions and 66 key informant interviews was carried out between January and April 2009. RESULTS: 10,706 women, mean age 25.8 years (14-49 years) were interviewed. The majority of women, 4786 (57%) were in the lowest wealth quintile; 62.0% were not using family planning (p<0.000); 56.2% did not access HIV counselling and testing because they feared knowing their HIV status (p<0.013), while 66.5% feared spouses knowing their HIV status (p<0.013). Access to these services among the young women and those with no education was also poor. Private midwives provide HIV testing to 7.8% of their clients; 5.9% received antiretroviral drugs and 8.6% received contraceptives. Client satisfaction with services at private midwifery practices was high. Private midwives are trusted and many clients confide in them. An intervention through private midwives was perceived to improve access because of short distances and no transport costs. Adolescents prioritized confidentiality, while subsidizing costs, community sensitisation and focusing on male spouses were overwhelmingly recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Private midwives clinics are potential delivery outlets for PMTCT in Uganda. A well-designed intervention linking them to the public sector and the community could increase access to services.

An exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis: Comparison between a midwife-led birth unit and a standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in Belgium.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare midwife-led and consultant-led obstetrical care for women with uncomplicated low-risk pregnancies. We estimated costs and maternal outcomes in both units to achieve a cost-effectiveness ratio. DESIGN: The cost-analysis was made according to the "intention to treat" concept in order to minimize bias associated with the non-randomization of participants. At the obstetric-led unit, women received care from both midwives and medical staff while those in the alternative structure called 'Le Cocon' only received care from midwives. SETTING: The obstetric-led unit of the Erasme University-Hospital in Brussels and its alongside midwife-led unit. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included all low-risk pregnant women from 1 March 2014 until 31 October 2015 who were affiliated to the MLOZ (Mutualités Libres-Onafhankelijke Ziekenfondsen; third Belgian statutory health care insurer). INTERVENTIONS: The cost calculation involved a bottom-up approach. The health care consumption of each participant was obtained from MLOZ's data. The study included costs occurred the beginning of pregnancy until 3 months post-partum. Clinical data were extracted from the patient medical records. FINDINGS: Compared to the traditional obstetric-led unit, the alternative midwife-led unit was associated with a cost reduction for the national payer (∆ = -€397.39, p = 0.046) and for the patient (∆ = - €44.19, p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in rates of caesarean, instrumental birth and epidural analgesia between MLU and OLU. A sensitivity analysis was performed (Appendix C) but does not change the overall results and conclusions. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Due to the small size of the samples, no statistical differences were found. More analysis is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness regarding the use of epidural analgesia, caesarean and instrumental birth rates in the midwife-led unit. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Given the economical findings, this could contribute to reduce health expenditures for both women (out of pocket) and state (public payer via health care insurers).

The effects of medical liability on obstetric care supply in Michigan.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine Michigan obstetric providers' provision of obstetric care and the impact of malpractice concerns on their practice decisions. STUDY DESIGN: Data were obtained from 899 Michigan obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians, and nurse-midwives via a statewide survey. Statistical tests were conducted to examine differences in obstetric care provision and the influence of various factors across specialties. RESULTS: Among providers currently practicing obstetrics, 18.3%, 18.7%, and 11.9% of obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians, and nurse-midwives, respectively, planned to discontinue delivering babies in the next 5 years, and 35.5%, 24.5%, and 12.6%, respectively, planned to reduce their provision of high-risk obstetric care. "Risk of malpractice litigation" was 1 of the most cited factors affecting providers' decision to include obstetrics in their practice. CONCLUSION: Litigation risk appears to be an important factor influencing Michigan obstetric providers' decisions about provision of care. Its implications for obstetric care supply and patients' access to care warrants further research.

Liability insurance in midwifery education: faculty and student needs versus academic realities.

The objective of this study was to examine faculty and student liability claims and insurance problems in midwifery education. The American College of Nurse-Midwives Professional Liability Section and Division of Education developed and administered an Internet survey to 45 midwifery programs. Of the 39 programs that responded to the survey, 28 (72%) were previously involved in a liability claim, yielding a maximum claim incidence of 1%. Liability coverage was provided to midwifery faculty and students by a variety of mechanisms, including sovereign immunity, organizational trust funds, and private insurance. The costs of annual liability coverage ranged from $1,500 to $7,000 for faculty and from $1,000 to $1,800 for students. Six of 31 program directors (19%) knew a student who did not enroll because of the cost of liability insurance. Thirty of the 39 directors (77%) reported difficulty with obtaining clinical placements as a result of liability-related preceptor concerns. Midwifery student involvement in liability claims is low; however, liability insurance is required by hospitals for clinical practice and many clinical preceptors. The price of private liability insurance is a disincentive for students to study midwifery and for clinical preceptors to work with students. Midwifery program directors and academic administrators must advocate for affordable liability coverage.

Professional liability issues and practice patterns of obstetric providers in Washington State.

OBJECTIVE: To describe recent changes in obstetric practice patterns and liability insurance premium costs and their consequences to Washington State obstetric providers (obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians, certified nurse midwives, licensed midwives). METHODS: All obstetrician-gynecologists, rural family physicians, certified nurse midwives, licensed midwives, and a simple random sample of urban family physicians were surveyed about demographic and practice characteristics, liability insurance characteristics, practice changes and limitations due to liability insurance issues, obstetric practices, and obstetric practice environment changes. RESULTS: Fewer family physicians provide obstetric services than obstetrician-gynecologists, certified nurse midwives, and licensed midwives. Mean liability insurance premiums for obstetric providers increased by 61% for obstetrician-gynecologists, 75% for family physicians, 84% for certified nurse midwives, and 34% for licensed midwives from 2002 to 2004. Providers' most common monetary responses to liability insurance issues were to reduce compensation and to raise cash through loans and liquidating assets. In the 2 years of markedly increased premiums, obstetrician-gynecologists reported increasing their cesarean rates, their obstetric consultation rates, and the number of deliveries. They reported decreasing high-risk obstetric procedures during that same period. CONCLUSION: Liability insurance premiums rose dramatically from 2002 to 2004 for Washington's obstetric providers, leading many to make difficult financial decisions. Many obstetric providers reported a variety of practice changes during that interval. Although this study's results do not document an impending exodus of providers from obstetric practice, rural areas are most vulnerable because family physicians provide the majority of rural obstetric care and are less likely to practice obstetrics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparative Cost of Early Infant Male Circumcision by Nurse-Midwives and Doctors in Zimbabwe.

BACKGROUND: The 14 countries that are scaling up voluntary male medical circumcision (VMMC) for HIV prevention are also considering early infant male circumcision (EIMC) to ensure longer-term reductions in HIV incidence. The cost of implementing EIMC is an important factor in scale-up decisions. We conducted a comparative cost analysis of EIMC performed by nurse-midwives and doctors using the AccuCirc device in Zimbabwe. METHODS: Between August 2013 and July 2014, nurse-midwives performed EIMC on 500 male infants using AccuCirc in a field trial. We analyzed the overall unit cost and identified key cost drivers of EIMC performed by nurse-midwives and compared these with costing data previously collected during a randomized noninferiority comparison trial of 2 devices (AccuCirc and the Mogen clamp) in which doctors performed EIMC. We assessed direct costs (consumable and nonconsumable supplies, device, personnel, associated staff training, and waste management costs) and indirect costs (capital and support personnel costs). We performed one-way sensitivity analyses to assess cost changes when we varied key component costs. RESULTS: The unit costs of EIMC performed by nurse-midwives and doctors in vertical programs were US$38.87 and US$49.77, respectively. Key cost drivers of EIMC were consumable supplies, personnel costs, and the device price. In this cost analysis, major cost drivers that explained the differences between EIMC performed by nurse-midwives and doctors were personnel and training costs, both of which were lower for nurse-midwives. CONCLUSIONS: EIMC unit costs were lower when performed by nurse-midwives compared with doctors. To minimize costs, countries planning to scale up EIMC should consider using nurse-midwives, who are in greater supply than doctors and are the main providers at the primary health care level, where most infants are born.

Brexit could hit nursing regulator's finances.

The UK's decision to leave the EU could hit the Nursing and Midwifery Council's income, the regulator has warned.

Findings from the analysis of the American College of Nurse-Midwives' membership surveys: 2000-2003.

Findings from the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) membership data provide descriptive information about selected characteristics of certified nurse-midwives (CNMs), certified midwives (CMs), and students enrolled in ACNM-accredited programs who are members of the organization. This article presents findings from the analysis of membership data for the years 2000 to 2003. Members remain predominantly white and female, with their age averaging in the mid-40s. Similarly, student demographics reflect little change from those reported in prior years. Students are primarily white, female, and in the mid-30s. Proportionately, there has been little increase in the diversity of members. The proportion of CNMs/CMs with a bachelor's degree continues to rise, as does the proportion of CNMs/CMs holding doctoral degrees. The majority of CNMs/CMs identified a broad domain of clinical midwifery practice as their primary responsibility in their primary employment, and hospitals remain the largest employer of responding midwives. The salaries of employed midwives appear to be increasing, although the modal salary (60,000 US dollars to 69,000 US dollars ) is unchanged from prior years. The profile of the membership has remained fairly constant, with small changes in the trend over time noted for age, employment patterns, and attendance at birth sites for the 4 years analyzed.