The Efficacy and Safety of an Intra-articular Dual-Acting Antibacterial Agent (TNP-2092) for Implant Infection-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Owing to the presence of microbial biofilm on the implant, the eradication of biofilm-associated infections poses a challenge for antibiotic therapies. The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the novel antibiotic agent TNP-2092 in the context of implant infections. In vivo, rats with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with antibiotics showed an increase in body weight and decrease in swelling, temperature, and width of knee, compared with the control group. Meanwhile, inflammatory markers in synovium and serum were decreased in the TNP-2092 group, consistent with the pathological results. Moreover, TNP-2092 was effective in eliminating bacteria and disruption biofilm formation, and further alleviated the abnormal bone absorption and reactive bone changes around the prosthesis. In conclusion, intra-articular injection of TNP-2092 is safe and effective in treating knee PJI in a rat model. The study provides a foundation for the future utilization of TNP-2092 in the management of implant-related infections.

How We Approach Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy Following Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

The optimal treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains uncertain. Patients undergoing debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) receive extended antimicrobial treatment, and some experts leave patients at perceived highest risk of relapse on suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). In this narrative review, we synthesize the literature concerning the role of SAT to prevent treatment failure following DAIR, attempting to answer 3 key questions: (1) What factors identify patients at highest risk for treatment failure after DAIR (ie, patients with the greatest potential to benefit from SAT), (2) Does SAT reduce the rate of treatment failure after DAIR, and (3) What are the rates of treatment failure and adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation in patients receiving SAT? We conclude by proposing risk-benefit stratification criteria to guide use of SAT after DAIR for PJI, informed by the limited available literature.

Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Caused by Pasteurella dagmatis, Germany.

An 81-year-old male patient in Germany had prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by Pasteurella dagmatis after a domestic cat bite. We surgically treated a paravalvular abscess and administered definitive antibiotic therapy consisting of penicillin G and levofloxacin. The patient was discharged from the intensive care unit in good condition 21 days after the surgery.

Phase 1 study of the pharmacokinetics and clinical proof-of-concept activity of a biofilm-disrupting human monoclonal antibody in patients with chronic prosthetic joint infection of the knee or hip.

We report the results of a first-in-human phase 1 clinical study to evaluate TRL1068, a native human monoclonal antibody that disrupts bacterial biofilms with broad-spectrum activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species. The study population consisted of patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of the knee or hip, including both monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections, that are highly resistant to antibiotics due to biofilm formation. TRL1068 was administered via a single pre-surgical intravenous infusion in three sequentially ascending dose groups (6, 15, and 30 mg/kg). Concomitant perioperative antibiotics were pathogen-targeted as prescribed by the treating physician. In this double-blinded study, 4 patients were randomized to receive placebo and 11 patients to receive TRL1068 on day 1, as well as targeted antibiotics for 7 days prior to the scheduled removal of the infected implant and placement of an antibiotic-eluting spacer as the first stage of the standard of care two-stage exchange arthroplasty. No adverse events attributable to TRL1068 were reported. TRL1068 serum half-life was 15-18 days. At day 8, the concentration in synovial fluid was approximately 60% of the blood level and thus at least 15-fold above the threshold for biofilm-disrupting activity in vitro. Explanted prostheses were sonicated to release adherent bacteria for culture, with elimination of the implant bacteria observed in 3 of the 11 patients who received TRL1068, which compares favorably to prior PJI treatments. None of the patients who received TRL1068 had a relapse of the original infection by the end of the study (day 169). CLINICAL TRIALS: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04763759.

Antibiotic Therapy for 6 or 12 Weeks for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: The management of prosthetic joint infection usually consists of a combination of surgery and antimicrobial therapy. The appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy for this indication remains unclear. METHODS: We performed an open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial to compare 6 weeks with 12 weeks of antibiotic therapy in patients with microbiologically confirmed prosthetic joint infection that had been managed with an appropriate surgical procedure. The primary outcome was persistent infection (defined as the persistence or recurrence of infection with the initial causative bacteria, with an antibiotic susceptibility pattern that was phenotypically indistinguishable from that at enrollment) within 2 years after the completion of antibiotic therapy. Noninferiority of 6 weeks of therapy to 12 weeks of therapy would be shown if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the absolute between-group difference (the value in the 6-week group minus the value in the 12-week group) in the percentage of patients with persistent infection within 2 years was not greater than 10 percentage points. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients from 28 French centers were randomly assigned to receive antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks (205 patients) or for 12 weeks (205 patients). Six patients who withdrew consent were not included in the analysis. In the main analysis, 20 patients who died during follow-up were excluded, and missing outcomes for 6 patients who were lost to follow-up were considered to be persistent infection. Persistent infection occurred in 35 of 193 patients (18.1%) in the 6-week group and in 18 of 191 patients (9.4%) in the 12-week group (risk difference, 8.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 15.6); thus, noninferiority was not shown. Noninferiority was also not shown in the per-protocol and sensitivity analyses. We found no evidence of between-group differences in the percentage of patients with treatment failure due to a new infection, probable treatment failure, or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with microbiologically confirmed prosthetic joint infections that were managed with standard surgical procedures, antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks was not shown to be noninferior to antibiotic therapy for 12 weeks and resulted in a higher percentage of patients with unfavorable outcomes. (Funded by Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, French Ministry of Health; DATIPO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01816009.).

Left ventricular assist device-associated driveline infections as a specific form of complicated skin and soft tissue infection/acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection - issues and therapeutic options.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review comments on the current guidelines for the treatment of wound infections under definition of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). However, wound infections around a catheter, such as driveline infections of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are not specifically listed under this definition in any of the existing guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Definitions and classification of LVAD infections may vary across countries, and the existing guidelines and recommendations may not be equally interpreted among physicians, making it unclear if these infections can be considered as ABSSSI. Consequently, the use of certain antibiotics that are approved for ABSSSI may be considered as 'off-label' for LVAD infections, leading to rejection of reimbursement applications in some countries, affecting treatment strategies, and hence, patients' outcomes. However, we believe driveline exit site infections related to LVAD can be included within the ABSSSI definition. SUMMARY: We argue that driveline infections meet the criteria for ABSSSI which would enlarge the 'on-label' antibiotic armamentarium for treating these severe infections, thereby improving the patients' quality of life.

Vancomycin trough concentration in adult patients with periprosthetic joint infection: A machine learning-based covariate model.

AIMS: Although there are various model-based approaches to individualized vancomycin (VCM) administration, few have been reported for adult patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This work attempted to develop a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting VCM trough concentration in adult PJI patients. METHODS: The dataset of 287 VCM trough concentrations from 130 adult PJI patients was split into a training set (229) and a testing set (58) at a ratio of 8:2, and an independent external 32 concentrations were collected as a validation set. A total of 13 covariates and the target variable (VCM trough concentration) were included in the dataset. A covariate model was respectively constructed by support vector regression, random forest regression and gradient boosted regression trees and interpreted by SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP). RESULTS: The SHAP plots visualized the weight of the covariates in the models, with estimated glomerular filtration rate and VCM daily dose as the 2 most important factors, which were adopted for the model construction. Random forest regression was the optimal ML algorithm with a relative accuracy of 82.8% and absolute accuracy of 67.2% (R2 =.61, mean absolute error = 2.4, mean square error = 10.1), and its prediction performance was verified in the validation set. CONCLUSION: The proposed ML-based model can satisfactorily predict the VCM trough concentration in adult PJI patients. Its construction can be facilitated with only 2 clinical parameters (estimated glomerular filtration rate and VCM daily dose), and prediction accuracy can be rationalized by SHAP values, which highlights a profound practical value for clinical dosing guidance and timely treatment.

Dalbavancin as suppressive therapy for implant-related infections: a case series with therapeutic drug monitoring and review of the literature.

Implant-related infections may need suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). We describe a SAT strategy using dalbavancin with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This is a retrospective bicentric study of patients with implant-related infection who received dalbavancin SAT between January 2021 and September 2023. Fifteen patients were included. Median number of injections was 4 (IQR: 2-7). Median time between two reinjections was 57 days (IQR 28-82). Dalbavancin plasma concentrations were above 4 mg/L for 97.9% of dosages (93/95) and above 8 mg/L for 85% (81/95). These results support the use of dalbavancin SAT for implant-related infections.

New advances in management and treatment of cardiac implantable electronic devices infections.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are increasingly used worldwide, and infection of these devices remains one of the most feared complications.CIED infections (CDIs) represent a challenge for physicians and the healthcare system in general as they require prolonged hospitalization and antibiotic treatment and are burdened by high mortality and high costs, so management of CDIs must be multidisciplinary.The exact incidence of CDIs is difficult to define, considering that it is influenced by various factors mainly represented by the implanted device and the type of procedure. Risk factors for CDIs could be divided into three categories: device related, patient related, and procedural related and the etiology is mainly sustained by Gram-positive bacteria; however, other etiologies cannot be underestimated. As a matter of fact, the two cornerstones in the treatment of these infections are device removal and antimicrobial treatment. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring and PK/PD correlations should be encouraged in all patients with CDIs receiving antibiotic therapy and may result in a better clinical outcome and a reduction in antibiotic resistance and economic costs.In this narrative review, we look at what is new in the management of these difficult-to-treat infections.

Burden of Candida-related vascular graft infection: a nested-case control study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess risk factors of candida-related Vascular Graft Infections (VGIs). METHODS: We did a case-control study (1:4) matched by age and year of infection, nested in a cohort of patient with a history of VGIs. Cases were defined by a positive culture for Candida spp. in biological samples and controls were defined by a positive culture for bacterial strains only in biological samples. Risk factors for Candida-related VGIs were investigated using multivariate logistic regression. Mortality were compared using survival analysis. RESULTS: 16 Candida-related VGIs were matched to 64 bacterial-related VGIs. The two groups were comparable regarding medical history and clinical presentation. Candida-related VGIs were associated with bacterial strains in 88% (14/16). Gas/fluid-containing collection on abdominal CT scan and the presence of an aortic endoprosthesis were risk factors for Candida spp.-related VGIs [RRa 10.43 [1.81-60.21] p = 0.009 RRa and 6.46 [1.17-35.73] p = 0.03, respectively]. Candida-related VGIs were associated with a higher mortality when compared to bacterial-related VGIs (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Candida-related VGIs are severe. Early markers of Candida spp. infection are needed to improve their outcome. The suspicion of aortic endoprosthesis infection may necessitate probabilistic treatment with antifungal agents.

Outcomes in orthopedic device infections due to Streptococcus agalactiae: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Group B streptococci (Streptococcus agalactiae) (GBS) is a rare cause of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurring in patients with comorbidities and seems to be associated with a poor outcome. Depiction of GBS PJI is scarce in the literature. METHODS: A retrospective survey in 2 referral centers for bone joint infections was done Patients with a history of PJI associated with GBS between 2014 and 2019 were included. A descriptive analysis of treatment failure was done. Risk factors of treatment failure were assessed. RESULTS: We included 61 patients. Among them, 41 had monomicrobial (67%) infections. The median duration of follow-up was 2 years (interquartile range 2.35) Hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus were the most reported comorbidities (49%, 50%, and 36% respectively). Death was observed in 6 individuals (10%) during the initial management. The rate of success was 63% (26/41). Removal of the material was not associated with remission (p = 0.5). We did not find a specific antibiotic regimen associated with a better outcome. CONCLUSION: The results show that S. agalactiae PJIs are associated with high rates of comorbidities and a high treatment failure rate with no optimal treatment so far.

Prosthetic joint infection caused by Mediterraneibacter gnavus following total knee arthroplasty, challenges in anaerobic bacteria identification.

BACKGROUND: Mediterraneibacter gnavus is a Gram positive, non-sporulated, obligate anaerobe diplococci. It was first described in 1974 by Moore et al. (under the name Ruminococcus gnavus) from faeces and contents of the gastrointestinal tract of humans. It is a relatively common member of the human gut microbiota, nevertheless its role as a pathogenic bacterium has not been completely elucidated yet and it seems to depend on numerous factors, including those of the host. Here we present a case of prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty by M. gnavus. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74 years old patient was admitted to the emergency department presenting with acute onset of left knee pain and swelling 20 days after total left knee arthroplasty. Follow-up revealed erythema and oedema without signs of fluctuation or purulent discharge from the surgical wound and elevated inflammatory reactants. Synovial fluid was taken for bacterial culture and antibiotic treatment with ceftazidime and daptomycin was established. Examination of the synovial fluid revealed abundant polymorphonuclear leucocytes, without visualizing bacteria. After four days of incubation, anaerobic culture exhibit growth of small, grey, umbilicated colonies in pure culture on Schaedler agar. The microorganism was identified as R. gnavus by MALDI-TOF (Bruker Daltonics) and M. gnavus by 16S ribosomal bacterial sequencing. The isolated showed susceptibility to the most commonly used anaerobicidal antibiotics except for clindamycin. Surgical treatment and infection source control included DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention) and vacuum assisted therapy. The patient was discharged after six weeks with a 3-month course of oral amoxicillin as consolidation therapy. Subsequent follow-up revealed adequate wound healing with no signs of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Mediterraneibacter gnavus have been reported as the causal microorganism in a range of human infections, nevertheless its identification remains challenging. Infection of prosthetic joints by anaerobic microorganisms is uncommon and is not considered in its empirical antibiotic treatment, thus, correct and swift identification of anaerobic bacteria in these cases is paramount.

Absorbable antibiotic beads for treatment of LVAD driveline infections.

BACKGOUND: Infections of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) driveline are a dreaded complication that results in high mortality and morbidity. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients with severe continuous-flow LVAD (HVAD, Heartmate 2, and Heartmate 3) driveline infection. These infections, which developed on an average of 960.4 ± 843.9 days after LVAD placement, were refractory to systemic antibiotics and local wound care. All were treated with extensive surgical debridement, local installation of absorbable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (vancomycin and tobramycin), primary wound closure, and 6 weeks of systemic antibiotics after surgery. RESULTS: Four patients had resolution of DLI, and one had a recurrent infection at another part of the driveline 7 months after the complete resolution of the previous site. This patient was successfully treated with debridement and bead placements. Three patients still have their LVADs, while two received orthotopic heart transplants. At the time of the transplant, there was no evidence of gross infection of the LVAD drivelines or pumps. At the average follow-up time of 425.8 ± 151 days, no patients have an active infection. CONCLUSION: Treatment of LVAD driveline infection with absorbable antibiotic beads with primary wound closure is a viable option and merits further investigation.

Antibiotic Efficacy against Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms on Synthetic and Biological Vascular Grafts.

BACKGROUND: Biofilm formation is one of the greatest challenges encountered in vascular graft infections. Our aim is to compare the efficacy of 5 antibiotics against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) biofilms on the surface of 4 vascular grafts. METHODS: In vitro study of 2 clinical MSSA strains (MSSA2 and MSSA6) and 4 vascular grafts (Dacron, Dacron-silver-triclosan (DST), Omniflow-II, and bovine pericardium). After a 24-hr incubation period, the graft samples were divided into 6 groups: growth control (no treatment), ciprofloxacin 4.5 mg/L, cloxacillin 100 mg/L, dalbavancin 300 mg/L, daptomycin 140 mg/L, and linezolid 20 mg/L. Quantitative cultures were obtained and results expressed as log10 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). Analysis of variance was performed to compare biofilm formation between the different groups. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation MSSA2 count on the growth control Dacron graft was 10.05 ± 0.31 CFU/mL. Antibiotic treatment achieved a mean reduction of 45%; ciprofloxacin was the most effective antibiotic (64%). Baseline MSSA2 counts were very low on the DST (0.50 ± 1.03 CFU/mL) and Omniflow-II (0.33 ± 0.78 CFU/mL) grafts. On the bovine pericardium patch, the count was 9.87 ± 0.50 CFU/mL, but this was reduced by a mean of 45% after antibiotic treatment (61% for ciprofloxacin). The mean MSSA6 count on the growth control Dacron graft was 9.63 ± 0.53 CFU/mL. Antibiotics achieved a mean reduction of 48%, with ciprofloxacin performing best (67% reduction). The baseline MSSA6 count on the DST graft was 8.54 ± 0.73 CFU/mL. Antibiotics reduced biofilm formation by 72%; cloxacillin was the most effective treatment (86%). The MSSA6 count on the untreated Omniflow-II graft was 1.17 ± 1.52 CFU/mL. For the bovine pericardium patch, it was 8.98 ± 0.67 CFU/mL. The mean reduction after antibiotic treatment was 46%, with cloxacillin achieving the greatest reduction (68%). CONCLUSIONS: In this in vitro study, ciprofloxacin and cloxacillin performed best at reducing biofilms formed by clinical MSSA strains on the surface of biological and synthetic vascular grafts.

Propensity of Candida spp. prosthetic joint infection clinical isolates to form aggregates in synovial fluid and the clinical ramifications.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial aggregation has been shown to occur in synovial fluid which are resistant to high concentrations of antibiotics. Yet the propensity of Candida spp. to form aggregates is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of numerous Candida spp. to form synovial fluid aggregates and the clinical ramifications of the aggregates. METHODS: Nine different Candidal prosthetic joint infection clinical isolates were evaluated for their ability to form aggregates at static and dynamic conditions and their resistance to high concentrations of amphotericin. Furthermore, the ability of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) to disrupt the aggregates and enhance amphotericin activity was assessed. RESULTS: The results show that all species of Candida spp. evaluated formed aggregates in synovial fluid under dynamic conditions that were resistant to amphotericin. Yet no aggregates formed in tryptic soy broth under any conditions or in synovial fluid under static conditions. As well, when TPA was combined with amphotericin there was a statistically significant decrease (p < .005) in the amount of colony forming units per mL for all Candidal species evaluated. Interestingly, for Candida krusei there was no colony forming units observed after exposure to TPA and amphotericin. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that Candidal species form synovial fluid aggregates that are resistant to high dose amphotericin similar to those that occur with bacteria. However, the varying ability of the different Candida spp. to form hyphae and pseudohyphae compared to yeast cells may have direct impacts on the hardiness of the aggregates and thereby have clinical ramifications with respect to treatment durations.

Static Versus Articulating Spacer: Does Infectious Pathogen Type Affect Treatment Success?

BACKGROUND: Treatment with a static or an articulating antibiotic-containing spacer is a common strategy for treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), yet many patients have persistent infections after spacer treatment. Although previous studies have compared the efficacy of a static and articulating spacer for treating PJI, few studies have assessed infection control from the time of spacer implantation, or they defined treatment failure as including reinfection, reoperation, or chronic suppressive therapy. Additionally, few studies have examined whether there is an interaction between spacer and pathogen type with respect to treatment success. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there a difference in failure-free survival (defined as no reoperation, reinfection, or suppressive antibiotic therapy) between static and articulating spacers after spacer implantation for PJI? (2) Did the relationship between spacer type and failure-free survival differ by pathogen type (staphylococcal versus nonstaphylococcal and difficult-to-treat [including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus , Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Enterococcus spp , and other gram-negative bacterium] versus not-difficult-to-treat organisms)? METHODS: Between January 2014 and January 2022, a convenience sample of 277 patients was identified as having knee PJIs treated with an articulating (75% [208 of 277]) or static (25% [69 of 277]) antibiotic spacer and potentially eligible for this study. During that time, providers at our institution generally used spacers for later-presenting or chronic infections. Spacer choice was determined by surgeon preference, with static spacers used more often in instances of higher bone loss and poor soft tissue coverage. Thirty-one patients (8 static and 23 articulating spacers) were considered lost to follow-up or had incomplete datasets and were excluded from the analysis, resulting in a final analysis cohort of 246 patients: 25% (61 of 246) received a static spacer and 75% (185 of 246) received an articulating spacer. The mean ± standard deviation age of patients was 66 ± 9.9 years, BMI was 33.3 ± 6.9 kg/m 2 , and Elixhauser score was 18.1 ± 16.9. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. Pathogen type was collected and categorized as staphylococcal versus nonstaphylococcal , and difficult-to-treat (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , methicillin-susceptible S. aureus , Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Enterococcus spp , and other gram-negative bacterium) versus not-difficult-to-treat, as defined by an infectious disease physician. Other variables we collected included sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, BMI, and Elixhauser score. The primary outcome of interest was failure-free survival, which was a composite time-to-event outcome, with failure defined as reoperation, reinfection, death owing to infection, or chronic antibiotic use at a minimum of 1 year after the completion of the patient's Stage 1 postoperative antibiotic course, whichever came first. Reinfection was determined by the treating physicians in accordance with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines and included an evaluation of infectious laboratory values, cultures, and clinical signs of infection. We compared static and articulating spacers using a Cox proportional hazards model, with spacer type as the primary predictor variable. We compared staphylococcal versus nonstaphylococcal and difficult-to-treat versus not-difficult-to-treat infections by running additional models with interaction terms between spacer type and pathogen type. RESULTS: No difference was observed in the cause-specific hazard ratio for static versus articulating (reference) spacers (HR 1.45 [95% confidence interval 0.94 to 2.22]; p = 0.09), after adjusting for covariates. Additionally, no difference in the association between spacer type and failure-free survival was found between pathogen types or treatment difficulty after evaluating interactions (staphylococcal HR 0.37 [95% CI 0.15 to 0.91], nonstaphylococcal HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.49 to 1.28]; p value for interaction = 0.14; difficult-to-treat HR 0.37 [95% CI 0.14 to 0.99], not-difficult-to-treat HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.47 to 1.20]; p value for interaction = 0.20). CONCLUSION: The lack of a difference in failure-free survival and insufficient evidence of a difference in the association between spacer type and treatment failure by pathogen type suggests that infectious organism may not be an important consideration in the decision about spacer treatment type. Further studies should aim to elucidate which patient factors are the most influential in surgeon decision-making when choosing a spacer type in patients with PJI of the knee.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

The heavy burden and treatment challenges of fungal periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review of 489 joints.

BACKGROUND: Fungal periprosthetic joint infection (FPJI) is an infrequent but devastating complication that imposes a heavy burden on patients. At present, a consensus regarding the most optimal surgical option for patients with FPJI, the ideal duration of systemic antifungal treatment, and many other issues has not been reached. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed on the PubMed and Embase databases. The search criteria employed were as follows: (fungal OR candida OR mycotic) AND periprosthetic joint infection. Initially, the titles and abstracts were screened, and subsequently, studies deemed irrelevant or duplicative were eliminated. Following this, the complete texts of remaining articles were thoroughly examined. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 489 joints in 24 articles were screened out. We further extracted the demographic characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, etc.), clinical presentation, fungal species, presence of bacterial coinfection, surgical methods, systemic and local antifungal therapy, and treatment outcomes. Subgroup data were analyzed according to fungal species and bacterial coinfection. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to ascertain the risk factors associated with the infection recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 506 fungi were identified within 489 joints. The most prevalent fungal species were Candida albicans (41.5%). Out of 247 joints (50.5%) presenting with concurrent fungal and bacterial infections. Among the initial surgical interventions, two-stage exchange was the most common (59.1%). The infection recurrence rates of DAIR, resection arthroplasty, two-stage, one-stage, and three-stage exchange were 81.4%, 53.1%, 47.7%, 35.0%, and 30%, respectively. The mean duration of systemic antifungal therapy was 12.8 weeks. The most common drugs used both in intravenous (55.9%) and oral therapy (84.0%) were fluconazole. The proportion of patients who used antifungal drugs after replantation (two-stage and three-stage) was 87.6%. 33.2% of cement spacer or fixed cement contained antifungal drugs, of which amphotericin B was the main choice (82.7%). FPJI caused by candida albicans (OR = 1.717, p = 0.041) and DAIR (OR = 8.433, p = 0.003) were risk factors for infection recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage exchange remains the most commonly used surgical approach. The reliability of one- and three-exchange needs further evaluation due to the small sample size. Antifungal-loaded cement spacers, and direct intra-articular injections of antimycotics after reimplatation should be strongly considered. Medication is not standardized but rather individualized according to microbiology and the status of patients.

Two-dimensional liquid chromatography measurement of meropenem concentration in synovial fluid of patients with periprosthetic joint infection.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication following joint replacement surgery. One potential treatment approach for PJI could be the combination of one-stage revision and intra-articular infusion of antibiotics. Meropenem is one of the commonly used intra-articular antibiotics in our institution. Determining the concentration of meropenem in the joint cavity could be crucial for optimizing its local application, effectively eradicating biofilm infection, and improving PJI treatment outcomes. In this study, we developed a simple, precise, and accurate method of two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC) for determining the concentration of meropenem in human synovial fluid. The method was then validated based on the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Meropenem showed good linearity in the range of 0.31-25.01 µg/mL (r ≥ .999). Selectivity, intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy, extraction recovery, and stability validation results were all within the acceptance range. This method has been successfully applied to the determination of synovial fluid samples from PJI patients, providing a useful detection method for meropenem therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in PJI patients.

Outcomes after débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for prosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo total shoulder arthroplasty usually have excellent long-term outcomes. However, a subset of patients is diagnosed with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requiring revision procedures and prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of recurrent shoulder PJI in patients undergoing débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), single-stage revision, and 2-stage revision. We also sought to compare outcomes and complications across procedures. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients diagnosed with PJI after primary shoulder arthroplasty between January 2010 and August 2021. Patients were included if they underwent treatment with DAIR, single-stage revision, or 2-stage revision. Demographic information, surgical details, complications, laboratory data, postoperative antibiotic regimen, and infectious pathogen were collected. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes were collected: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Shoulder Activity Scale, and PROMIS Upper Extremity. Chi-square, t test, and 1-way analysis of variance were used as appropriate to evaluate each factor. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the study, 26% treated with DAIR, 9% treated with single-stage revision, and 65% treated with 2-stage revision. There were no significant differences in patient comorbidities. Patients undergoing DAIR were diagnosed significantly earlier than those undergoing single- and 2-stage revision procedures (12.6 ± 22.9 months vs. 49.6 ± 48.4 vs. 25.0 ± 26.6, P = .010). Recurrent PJI was noted in 23.1% of patients: 29.4% of DAIR patients, no single-stage patients, and 23.8% of 2-stage patients (P = .330). Patients undergoing 2-stage revision with treatment failure had a significantly higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (0.2 ± 3.7 vs. 3.7 ± 3.9, P = .027). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes across groups. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing treatment of shoulder PJI with DAIR did not have an increased rate of reinfection compared with single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. Patients treated with DAIR were diagnosed with PJI significantly earlier than those undergoing single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. There was no difference in complication rates between groups. This information adds to the body of work detailing outcomes after DAIR for shoulder PJI and provides encouraging data for use in this patient population. Future studies with a larger sample size may be conducted to further investigate specific pathogens, infection timelines, and antibiotic regimens that reduce the risk of treatment failure.

Non-cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with higher rates of elbow periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common source of failure following elbow arthroplasty. Perioperative prophylactic antibiotics are considered standard of care. However, there are no data regarding the comparative efficacy of various antibiotics in the prevention of PJI for elbow arthroplasty. Previous studies in shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasty have demonstrated higher rates of PJI with administration of non-cefazolin antibiotics. The elbow has higher rates of PJI than other joints. Therefore, this study evaluated whether perioperative antibiotic choice affects rates of PJI in elbow arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution, prospectively collected total joint registry database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary elbow arthroplasty between 2003 and 2021. Elbows with known infection prior to arthroplasty (25) and procedures with incomplete perioperative antibiotic data (7) were excluded, for a final sample size of 603 total elbow arthroplasties and 19 distal humerus hemiarthroplasties. Cefazolin was administered in 561 elbows (90%) and non-cefazolin antibiotics including vancomycin (32 elbows, 5%), clindamycin (27 elbows, 4%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (2 elbows, 0.3%) were administered in the remaining 61 elbows (10%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the association between the antibiotic administered and the development of PJI. Infection-free survivorship was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Deep infection occurred in 47 elbows (7.5%), and 16 elbows (2.5%) were diagnosed with superficial infections. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients receiving non-cefazolin alternatives were at significantly higher risk for any infection (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-5.0; P < .01) and deep infection (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.5; P < .01) compared with cefazolin administration. Multivariable analysis, controlling for several independent predictors of PJI (tobacco use, male sex, surgical indication other than osteoarthritis, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score), showed that non-cefazolin administration had a higher risk for any infection (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.3; P < .01) and deep infection (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.3; P < .01). Survivorship free of infection was significantly higher at all time points for the cefazolin cohort. DISCUSSION: In primary elbow arthroplasty, cefazolin administration was associated with significantly lower rates of PJI compared to non-cefazolin antibiotics, even in patients with a greater number of prior surgeries, which is known to increase the risk of PJI. For patients with penicillin or cephalosporin allergies, preoperative allergy testing or a cefazolin test dose should be considered before administering non-cefazolin alternatives.