RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whether proton-pump inhibitors are beneficial or harmful for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients undergoing invasive ventilation is unclear. METHODS: In this international, randomized trial, we assigned critically ill adults who were undergoing invasive ventilation to receive intravenous pantoprazole (at a dose of 40 mg daily) or matching placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the intensive care unit (ICU) at 90 days, and the primary safety outcome was death from any cause at 90 days. Multiplicity-adjusted secondary outcomes included ventilator-associated pneumonia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and patient-important bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 4821 patients underwent randomization in 68 ICUs. Clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 25 of 2385 patients (1.0%) receiving pantoprazole and in 84 of 2377 patients (3.5%) receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 0.47; P<0.001). At 90 days, death was reported in 696 of 2390 patients (29.1%) in the pantoprazole group and in 734 of 2379 patients (30.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.04; P = 0.25). Patient-important bleeding was reduced with pantoprazole; all other secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing invasive ventilation, pantoprazole resulted in a significantly lower risk of clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding than placebo, with no significant effect on mortality. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; REVISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03374800.).
Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Pantoprazol , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Respiração Artificial , Humanos , Pantoprazol/uso terapêutico , Pantoprazol/efeitos adversos , Pantoprazol/administração & dosagem , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevenção & controle , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbenzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbenzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbenzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Úlcera Péptica/prevenção & controle , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Método Duplo-Cego , Estresse Fisiológico , AdultoRESUMO
Annual prevalence estimates of peptic ulcer disease range between 0·12% and 1·5%. Peptic ulcer disease is usually attributable to Helicobacter pylori infection, intake of some medications (such as aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications), or being critically ill (stress-related), or it can be idiopathic. The clinical presentation is usually uncomplicated, with peptic ulcer disease management based on eradicating H pylori if present, the use of acid-suppressing medications-most often proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)-or addressing complications, such as with early endoscopy and high-dose PPIs for peptic ulcer bleeding. Special considerations apply to patients on antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents. H pylori treatment has evolved, with the choice of regimen dictated by local antibiotic resistance patterns. Indications for primary and secondary prophylaxis vary across societies; most suggest PPIs for patients at highest risk of developing a peptic ulcer, its complications, or its recurrence. Additional research areas include the use of potassium-competitive acid blockers and H pylori vaccination; the optimal approach for patients at risk of stress ulcer bleeding requires more robust determinations of optimal patient selection and treatment selection, if any. Appropriate continuation of PPI use outweighs most possible side-effects if given for approved indications, while de-prescribing should be trialled when a definitive indication is no longer present.
Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Úlcera Péptica , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Úlcera Péptica/prevenção & controle , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with a decreased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, and the decreasing prevalence of such infection might contribute to the increasing incidence of this tumor. We examined the hypothesis that eradication treatment of H pylori increases the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This population-based multinational cohort, entitled "Nordic Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Project (NordHePEP)," included all adults (≥18 years) receiving H pylori eradication treatment from 1995-2018 in any of the 5 Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden) with follow-up throughout 2019. Data came from national registers. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by dividing the cancer incidence in the exposed cohort by that of the entire Nordic background populations of the corresponding age, sex, calendar period, and country. Analyses were stratified by factors associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma (ie, education, comorbidity, gastroesophageal reflux, and certain medications). RESULTS: Among 661,987 participants who contributed 5,495,552 person-years after eradication treatment (median follow-up, 7.8 years; range, 1-24 years), 550 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma developed. The overall SIR of esophageal adenocarcinoma was not increased (SIR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97). The SIR did not increase over time after eradication treatment, but rather decreased and was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.86) at 11-24 years after treatment. There were no major differences in the stratified analyses. The overall SIR of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, calculated for comparison, showed no association (SIR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: This absence on an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma after eradication treatment of H pylori suggests eradication is safe from a cancer perspective.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Antibacterianos , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/microbiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/microbiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Helicobacter pylori/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Incidência , Idoso , Adulto , Fatores de Risco , Países Escandinavos e Nórdicos/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
Several observational studies have suggested that proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use might increase diabetes risk, but the mechanism remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of PPI use on gut microbiota and bile acids (BAs) profiles, and to explore whether these changes could mediate the association of PPIs use with fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels and insulin resistance (IR) in Chinese population. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Shenzhen, China, from April to August 2021, enrolled 200 eligible patients from the local hospital. Participants completed a questionnaire and provided blood and stool samples. Gut microbiome was measured by16S rRNA gene sequencing, and bile acids were quantified by UPLC-MS/MS. Insulin resistance (IR) was assessed using the Homeostasis Model Assessment 2 (HOMA2-IR). PPI use was positively associated with higher levels of FBG and HOMA2-IR after controlling for possible confounders. PPI users exhibited a decreased Firmicutes and an increase in Bacteroidetes phylum, alongside higher levels of glycoursodeoxycholic acid (GUDCA) and taurochenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA). Higher abundances of Bacteroidetes and Fusobacterium as well as higher levels of TCDCA in PPI users were positively associated with elevated FBG or HOMA2-IR. Mediation analyses indicated that the elevated levels of FBG and HOMA2-IR with PPI use were partially mediated by the alterations in gut microbiota and specific BAs (i.e., Fusobacterium genera and TCDCA). Long-term PPI use may increase FBG and HOMA2-IR levels, and alterations in gut microbiota and BAs profiles may partially explain this association.
Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Resistência à Insulina , Humanos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Ácidos e Sais Biliares , Cromatografia Líquida , Estudos Transversais , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Bacteroidetes , Glucose/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan and tetracycline (VT) dual therapy as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with penicillin allergy. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, treatment-naïve adults with H. pylori infection and penicillin allergy were randomised 1:1 to receive either open-label VT dual therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg two times per day+tetracycline 500 mg three times a day) or bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT; lansoprazole 30 mg two times per day+colloidal bismuth 150 mg three times a day+tetracycline 500 mg three times a day+metronidazole 400 mg three times a day) for 14 days. The primary outcome was non-inferiority in eradication rates in the VT dual group compared with the BQT group. Secondary outcomes included assessing adverse effects. RESULTS: 300 patients were randomised. The eradication rates in the VT group and the BQT group were: 92.0% (138/150, 95% CI 86.1% to 95.6%) and 89.3% (134/150, 95% CI 83.0% to 93.6%) in intention-to-treat analysis (difference 2.7%; 95% CI -4.6% to 10.0%; non-inferiority p=0.000); 94.5% (138/146, 95% CI 89.1% to 97.4%) and 93.1% (134/144, 95% CI 87.3% to 96.4%) in modiï¬ed intention-to-treat analysis (difference 1.5%; 95% CI -4.9% to 8.0%; non-inferiority p=0.001); 95.1% (135/142, 95% CI 89.7% to 97.8%) and 97.7% (128/131, 95% CI 92.9% to 99.4%) in per-protocol analysis (difference 2.6%; 95% CI -2.9% to 8.3%; non-inferiority p=0.000). The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were significantly lower in the VT group (14.0% vs 48.0%, p=0.000), with fewer treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs (2.0% vs 8.7%, p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: VT dual therapy demonstrated efficacy and safety as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection in the penicillin-allergic population, with comparable efficacy and a lower incidence of TEAEs compared with traditional BQT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300074693.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Penicilinas , Pirróis , Sulfonamidas , Tetraciclina , Humanos , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Tetraciclina/uso terapêutico , Tetraciclina/efeitos adversos , Tetraciclina/administração & dosagem , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/efeitos adversos , Bismuto/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Metronidazol/efeitos adversos , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Lansoprazol/uso terapêutico , Lansoprazol/administração & dosagem , Lansoprazol/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Previous studies have suggested that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) more than doubles the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, this association may be confounded. Therefore, we conducted a register-based cohort study to examine the risk of AKI in users and nonusers of PPIs among cancer patients treated with ICIs in Denmark from 2011 through 2021 while accounting for a comprehensive range of potential confounders. PPI use was determined based on redeemed prescriptions of PPIs before ICI initiation. We identified laboratory-recorded AKI events within the first year after ICI initiation. We estimated the risks and hazard ratios (HRs) of AKI while accounting for a comprehensive range of confounders (including comorbidities and comedication) by propensity score weighting. Furthermore, we performed an additional per-protocol analysis while accounting for informative censoring by weighting. We identified 10 200 cancer patients including 2749 (27%) users, 6214 (61%) nonusers, and 1237 (12%) former users of PPIs. PPI users had an increased risk of AKI compared to nonusers (1-year risk, 24.7% vs 19.9%; HR, 1.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.29-1.56]); however, this association attenuated when accounting for confounders (weighted 1-year risk, 24.2% vs 23.8%; weighted HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.93-1.21]). In the per-protocol analysis, the crude HR was 1.86 (95% CI, 1.63-2.12), while the weighted HR was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.03-1.49). Thus, the association between PPI use and AKI could largely be explained by confounding, suggesting that previous studies may have overestimated the association.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Neoplasias , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce the bioavailability of several anticancer drugs. The impact of PPIs co-administered with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors is controversial. We aimed to clarify whether the concomitant use of PPIs impacts palbociclib and abemaciclib effectiveness in breast cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study, conducted across 4 medical institutions in Japan, consecutively included patients with endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer, receiving palbociclib or abemaciclib between December 2017 and August 2022. Propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Treatment efficacy and safety with and without PPIs were compared. Progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio. RESULTS: The study included 240 patients. After 1:1 matching, 112 patients were treated with and without PPIs. The median progression-free survival period was 1.2 years in the PPI group and 1.3 years in the non-PPI group (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.70-2.02). The median overall survival period was 3.6 years in the PPI group, whereas it was not reached in the non-PPI group (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.61-2.47). Consistent results were obtained for subgroups receiving palbociclib (nâ =â 177) and abemaciclib (nâ =â 63) without propensity score matching. Adverse event incidence and severity were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors is unlikely to be affected by concomitant PPI use. Future prospective pharmacokinetic studies are warranted.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Quinase 4 Dependente de Ciclina , Quinase 6 Dependente de Ciclina , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/farmacologia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Quinase 6 Dependente de Ciclina/antagonistas & inibidores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quinase 4 Dependente de Ciclina/antagonistas & inibidores , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Piperazinas/farmacologia , Piperazinas/administração & dosagem , Aminopiridinas/uso terapêutico , Aminopiridinas/farmacologia , Aminopiridinas/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/farmacologia , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Benzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Benzimidazóis/farmacologia , Benzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Prior studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is associated with increased risk of dementia; however, these have been limited by incomplete assessment of medication use and failure to account for confounders. Furthermore, prior studies have relied on claims-based diagnoses for dementia, which can lead to misclassification. We investigated the associations of PPI and histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use with dementia and cognitive decline. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomized trial of aspirin in the United States and Australia, including 18,934 community-based adults ≥65 years of all races/ethnicities. Baseline and recent PPI and H2RA use were determined according to review of medications during annual in-person study visits. Incident dementia was defined according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria. Secondary endpoints include cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND) and changes in cognition. Associations of medication use with dementia and CIND outcomes were examined using Cox proportional hazards models. Changes in cognitive test scores were examined using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Baseline PPI use vs nonuse was not associated with incident dementia (multivariable hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.08), CIND (multivariable hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.09), or with changes in overall cognitive test scores over time (multivariable B, -0.002; standard error, 0.01; P = .85). Similarly, no associations were observed between H2RA use and all cognitive endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: In adults ≥65 years of age, PPI and H2RA use were not associated with incident dementia, CIND, or decline in cognition over time. These data provide reassurance about the safety of long-term use of PPIs among older adults.
Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Idoso , Humanos , Aspirina , Cognição , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a serious complication. There are limited data on the benefit of preventive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use to reduce the risk of UGIB in DOAC users. METHODS: We included patients with AF receiving DOAC from 2015 to 2020 based on the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. The propensity score (PS) weighting method was used to compare patients with PPI use and those without PPI use. The primary outcome was hospitalization for UGIB. Weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: A total of 165,624 patients were included (mean age: 72.2 ± 10.8 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4.3 ± 1.8; mean HAS-BLED score: 3.3 ± 1.2). Among them, 99,868 and 65,756 were in the non-PPI group and PPI group, respectively. During a median follow-up of 1.5 years, the PPI group was associated with lower risks of hospitalization for UGIB and UGIB requiring red blood cell transfusion than non-PPI group (weighted HR, 0.825; 95% CI, 0.761-0.894 and 0.798; 95% CI, 0.717-0.887, respectively, both P < .001). The benefits of PPI on the risk of hospitalization for UGIB were greater in those with older age (≥75 years), higher HAS-BLED score (≥3), prior GIB history, and concomitant use of antiplatelet agent (all P-for-interaction < .1). Low-dose PPI was consistently associated with a lower risk of significant UGIB by 43.6-49.3% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large Asian cohort of patients with AF on DOAC, PPI co-therapy is beneficial for reducing the risk of hospitalization for UGIB, particularly in high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Humanos , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevenção & controle , República da Coreia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Administração Oral , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) have been increasingly used to treat upper gastrointestinal disorders, replacing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Whereas PPIs are associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer (GC) after Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication, it is uncertain whether PCABs carry the same risk. METHODS: Using a population-based claims database in Japan, we identified patients who were prescribed a clarithromycin-based first regimen of Hp eradication between 2015 and 2018. Patients who failed this regimen and those diagnosed with GC before or within 1 year after Hp eradication were excluded. We compared GC incidence between PCAB users and histamine type-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) users, matching them on the basis of propensity scores calculated with considerations for age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, comorbidities, and co-administered medications. PCABs included only vonoprazan in this study. RESULTS: Among 54,055 patients, 568 (1.05%) developed GC during the follow-up period (mean, 3.65 years). The cumulative incidence of GC was 1.64% at 3 years, 2.02% at 4 years, and 2.36% at 5 years in PCAB users and 0.71% at 3 years, 1.04% at 4 years, and 1.22% at 5 years in H2RA users. The use of PCABs was associated with a higher GC risk (matched hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.25; P = .016). Longer PCAB use and high-dose PCAB use were significantly associated with higher incidence of GC. Sensitivity analyses showed the risk of GC incidence among PCAB users was comparable with that of PPI users. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PCABs was associated with an increased risk of GC among Hp-eradicated patients, with duration/dose response effects.
Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Pirróis , Neoplasias Gástricas , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Japão/epidemiologia , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Incidência , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Helicobacter pylori , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Previous studies confirm vonoprazan-amoxicillin effectiveness for Helicobacter pylori. This study aims to investigate vonoprazan with varying amoxicillin dose and duration. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial enrolled patients with treatment naive H pylori infection from 5 clinical centers. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to H-VA-10 (vonoprazan 20 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) + amoxicillin 750 mg 4 times a day, 10 days), L-VA-10 (vonoprazan 20 mg b.i.d. + amoxicillin 1000 mg b.i.d, 10 days), and H-VA-14 (vonoprazan 20 mg b.i.d + amoxicillin 750 mg 4 times a day, 14 days) in a 1:1:1 ratio. The eradication rate was assessed using the 13C-urea breath test at least 28 days after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 623 eligible patients, 516 patients were randomized. In both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, eradication rates were comparable between H-VA-10 and H-VA-14 groups (86.6% vs 89.5% and 90.9% vs 94.5%, P = .021 and .013 for noninferiority, respectively). However, eradication rates were significantly lower in the L-VA-10 group than the H-VA-14 group (79.7% vs 89.5% and 82.0% vs 94.5%, P = .488 and .759, respectively). Rates of study withdrawal, loss to follow-up, and adverse events were similar across study groups. CONCLUSIONS: H-VA-10 and H-VA-14 regimens provide satisfactory efficacy for H pylori infection, and the L-VA-10 regimen was inferior. CLINICALTRIALS: gov number: NCT05719831.
Assuntos
Amoxicilina , Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Pirróis , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Amoxicilina/administração & dosagem , Amoxicilina/efeitos adversos , Helicobacter pylori/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Adulto , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Esquema de MedicaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Whether 10-day short-course vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (VA-dual) is noninferior to the standard 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (B-quadruple) against Helicobacter pylori eradication has not been determined. This trial aimed to compare the eradication rate, adverse events, and compliance of 10-day VA-dual regimen with standard 14-day B-quadruple regimen as first-line H. pylori treatment. METHODS: This prospective randomized clinical trial was performed at 3 institutions in eastern China. A total of 314 treatment-naive, H. pylori -infected patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either 10-day VA-dual group or 14-day B-quadruple group. Eradication success was determined by 13 C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after treatment. Eradication rates, adverse events, and compliance were compared between groups. RESULTS: Eradication rates of VA-dual and B-quadruple groups were 86.0% and 89.2% ( P = 0.389), respectively, by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis; 88.2% and 91.5% ( P = 0.338), respectively, by modified ITT analysis; and 90.8% and 91.3% ( P = 0.884), respectively, by per-protocol (PP) analysis. The efficacy of the VA-dual remained noninferior to B-quadruple therapy in all ITT, modified ITT, and PP analyses. The incidence of adverse events in the VA-dual group was significantly lower compared with that in the B-quadruple group ( P < 0.001). Poor compliance contributed to eradication failure in the VA-dual group ( P < 0.001), while not in the B-quadruple group ( P = 0.110). DISCUSSION: The 10-day VA-dual therapy provided satisfactory eradication rates of >90% (PP analysis) and lower rates of adverse events compared with standard 14-day B-quadruple therapy as first-line H. pylori therapy. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300070100.
Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Pirróis , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Adesão à Medicação , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is common, but PPI may reduce the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the impact of PPI use on clinical outcomes in post-PCI patients, by incorporating P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) and CYP2C19 genotyping results. METHODS: From a multicenter registry of patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation and received clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), patients who were prescribed a PPI at the time of PCI (PPI users) were compared to those who were not (non-users). The primary outcome included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or cerebrovascular accident at 12 months. Major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] types 3-5) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (BARC types 3-5) were important secondary outcomes. The adjusted outcomes were compared using a 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matching and competing risk analysis. RESULTS: Of 13,160 patients, 2,235 (17.0%) were prescribed PPI, with an average age of 65.4 years. PPI users had higher on-treatment PRU levels than non-users. After PS matching, the primary outcome occurred in 51 patients who were PPI users (cumulative incidence, 4.7%) and 41 patients who were non-users (cumulative incidence, 3.7%; log-rank p = 0.27). In carriers of both CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, PPI use was linked to an increased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-8.78). The incidence of major bleeding and GI bleeding (BARC types 3-5) was comparable between PPI users and non-users in the PS-matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In post-PCI patients receiving clopidogrel-based DAPT, PPI use was not linked to an increased risk of adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, but there was a small but significant increase in on-treatment PRU. Future research using a more individualized approach would further elucidate these interactions and guide evidence-based clinical practices.
Assuntos
Clopidogrel , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19 , Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Humanos , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Stents Farmacológicos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Resultado do Tratamento , Sistema de Registros , População do Leste AsiáticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the drugs most commonly used in critically ill patients. Although mainly applied temporarily for stress ulcer prophylaxis, their application is frequently not terminated. Potential adverse effects of PPI treatment could impact the outcome in case of unnecessary and, therefore, avoidable long-term continuation. We tested the hypotheses that nonindicated PPI therapy continued beyond hospital discharge is associated with increased morbidity, rehospitalization rate, and mortality. DESIGN: Nationwide retrospective cohort study considering critically ill patients treated on German ICUs between January, 2017, and December, 2018 with a 2-year follow-up. SETTING: A total of 591,207 patient datasets of a German healthcare insurer were screened. PATIENTS: We identified 11,576 ICU patients who received PPI therapy for the first time during their index ICU stay without having an indication for its continuation. INTERVENTIONS: The cohort was stratified into two groups: 1) patients without further PPI therapy and 2) patients with continuation of PPI therapy beyond 8 weeks after hospital discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Frequency of predescribed adverse events associated with PPI therapy, 1-year rehospitalization rate, and 2-year mortality were determined. The proportion of patients with continued PPI therapy without an objectifiable indication was 41.7% (4,825 of 11,576 patients). These patients had a 27% greater risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.39; p < 0.001) and a 17% greater risk of cardiovascular events (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26; p < 0.001). Continued PPI therapy was associated with a 34% greater risk of rehospitalization (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23-1.47) and a nearly 20% greater 2-year mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.27; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that an unnecessary continuation of PPI therapy after hospital discharge may significantly impact morbidity and mortality. To avoid potentially harmful overuse of a PPIs, intensivists should ensure timely cessation of a temporarily indicated PPI therapy.
Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Humanos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Pontuação de PropensãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are recognized risk factors for acquisition and recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), yet combined effects remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the short- and long-term effects of antibiotics and PPIs on CDI risk and recurrence. METHODS: Population-based study including all 43â152 patients diagnosed with CDI in Sweden (2006-2019), and 355â172 matched population controls without CDI. The impact of antibiotics and PPIs on CDI risk and recurrence was explored for recent (0-30 days) and preceding (31-180 days) use prior to their first CDI diagnosis, using multivariable conditional logistic regression presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval, adjusted for demographics, comorbidities and other drugs. RESULTS: Compared to controls, the combined effect of recent PPIs and antibiotics [ORAB+PPIâ=â17.51 (17.48-17.53)] on CDI risk was stronger than the individual effects [ORABâ=â15.37 (14.83-15.93); ORPPIâ=â2.65 (2.54-2.76)]. Results were less pronounced for exposure during the preceding months. Dose-response analyses showed increasing exposure correlated with CDI risk [recent use: ORABâ=â6.32 (6.15-6.49); ORPPIâ=â1.65 (1.62-1.68) per prescription increase].Compared to individuals without recurrence (rCDI), recent [ORABâ=â1.30 (1.23-1.38)] and preceding [ORABâ=â1.23 (1.16-1.31); ORPPIâ=â1.12 (1.03-1.21)] use also affected the risk of recurrence yet without significant interaction between both. Recent macrolides/lincosamides/streptogramins; other antibacterials including nitroimidazole derivates; non-penicillin beta lactams and quinolones showed the strongest association with CDI risk and recurrence, particularly for recent use. PPI use, both recent and preceding, further increased the CDI risk associated with almost all antibiotic classes. CONCLUSION: Recent and less recent use of PPIs and systemic antibiotics was associated with an increased risk of CDI, particularly in combination.
Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium , Quinolonas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Estreptograminas , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are invaluable therapeutic options in a variety of dyspeptic diseases. In addition to their well-known risk profile, PPI consumption is related to food and environmental allergies, dysbiosis, osteoporosis, as well as immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). The latter, although a rare event, around 1%-3%, due to the extraordinarily high rate of prescription and consumption of PPIs are related to a substantial risk. In this Position Paper, we provide clinicians with practical evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of HSRs to PPIs. Furthermore, the unmet needs proposed in the document aim to stimulate more in-depth investigations in the topic.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Hipersensibilidade Imediata , Hipersensibilidade , Humanos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/terapia , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Testes CutâneosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed medications for dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux. There are concerns about their use in the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). SUMMARY: The available published literature fails to support an association with PPI and the development of CKD. Placebo-controlled trials demonstrate no difference in the incidence of CKD between placebo and PPI. If one examines the data according to the Bradford Hill perspective incorporating temporal relationship, the strength of association, dose-response relationship, replacement of findings, cessation of exposure, specificity of the association, and consistency with other knowledge, one can only conclude that there is no consistent relationship between PPI use and the development of CKD, or its progression. KEY MESSAGES: There is insufficient evidence to link PPI exposure with the development or progression of CKD.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Progressão da Doença , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) is important problem in dialysis patients. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may inhibit iron absorption, few studies have examined associations between PPIs and ESA-resistant anemia in hemodialysis patients. This study examined the associations between PPIs and ESA-resistant anemia in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: The present study was a cross-sectional study using repeated 4-month observations, up to eight observations/patient, from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (J-DOPPS). The primary outcome was erythropoietin resistance index (ERI). ESA dose, hemoglobin, proportion of erythropoietin-resistant anemia, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and ferritin were also examined. Linear or risk-difference regression models were used with generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measurements. RESULTS: Of 1,644 patients, 867 patients had PPI prescriptions (52.7%). Patients prescribed PPI had higher ERI, higher ESA dose, and lower TSAT levels. Multivariable analysis for 12,048 four-month observations showed significantly greater ERI in PPI users (adjusted difference 0.95 IU/week/kg/[g/dL] [95% CI: 0.40-1.50]). Significant differences were also found in ESA dose (336 IU/week [95% CI: 70-602]) and the prevalence of erythropoietin-resistant anemia (3.9% [2.0-5.8%]) even after adjusted for TSAT and ferritin. Among possible mediators between the association of PPIs and anemia, TSAT was significantly different between PPI users and non-users (adjusted difference, -0.82% [95% CI: -1.56 to -0.07]). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the associations between PPI and ERI, ESA dose, and TSAT in hemodialysis patients; physicians should consider anemia's associations with PPIs in hemodialysis patients.
Assuntos
Anemia , Eritropoetina , Hematínicos , Humanos , Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Epoetina alfa/farmacologia , Ferritinas , Hematínicos/farmacologia , Japão , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Diálise RenalRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. However, they pose the risk of immune-related adverse events, including ICI-mediated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI). Recent studies have implicated proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as potential contributors to ICI-AKI development. This meta-analysis examines the association between PPI use and ICI-AKI, exploring a potential modifiable risk factor in ICI therapy while also reviewing the possible outcomes of ICI-AKI. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, assessing the risk of ICI-AKI in cancer patients concurrently using PPIs and potential outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate heterogeneity and potential biases. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies involving 12,694 patients were included. In total, we analyzed 639 patients with all-cause AKI and 779 patients with ICI-AKI. The pooled OR for the overall incidence of AKI from all-causes was 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.40) among patients on PPIs. Specifically, the risk of ICI-AKI associated with PPI use was significantly higher, with a pooled OR of 1.84 (95% CI 1.16-2.90). This indicates approximately 84% higher likelihood of developing ICI-AKI with concurrent use of PPIs. Additionally, among patients with ICI-AKI, 67% had complete or partial recovery of renal function, 32% progressed to chronic kidney disease (CKD), and about 36% died during a follow-up period of at least 3 months. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis highlights the importance of cautious PPI prescription in cancer patients undergoing ICI therapy. Clinicians are advised to evaluate the risks and benefits of PPI use and consider alternative therapies when feasible.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , IncidênciaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Acid suppression medications, such as proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and other gastrointestinal disorders. However, concerns regarding potential long-term side effects are brought up by the overuse of PPIs. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between PPI usage, allergy, and asthma in the general US population. METHODS: Data of individuals aged ≥20 years who had information on PPI use and questionnaires on allergy and asthma in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006 were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between PPI use, prevalent allergy, and asthma. RESULTS: A total of 4,481 participants (representing 198,543,007 US individuals after weighting) were included in the analyses. PPI use was not significantly associated with the presence of allergy or asthma in the general study population after adjustment. However, in females without steroid exposure, PPI use was significantly associated with increased odds of allergy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.002-2.86), among which esomeprazole use was significantly associated with increased odds of allergy (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.30-5.54) and lansoprazole with increased odds of asthma (aOR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.50-7.87) as compared to no PPI use. Duration of PPI use was not significantly associated with allergy or asthma. CONCLUSIONS: In US women without steroid exposure, PPI use is associated with increased likelihood of prevalent allergy and asthma.