Romiplostim for Treatment of Children and Young Adults With Severe Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) induce trilineage hematopoiesis under conditions with acquired hematopoietic failure. We evaluated safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of a TPO-RA, romiplostim (Nplate), with or without standard-of-care immunosuppressive therapy (±IST) for children (ages < 21 y) with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory severe aplastic anemia (SAA) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Data were collected from an observational study and a single arm interventional pilot study. The safety outcome was treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Efficacy was evaluated by complete hematopoietic response (CHR) at week 24. Romiplostim was commenced at 5 µg/kg/week, with dose escalation of 2.5 µg/kg/week (maximum, 20 µg/kg/dose) based on platelet response. Romiplostim was continued until CHR was observed. Ten subjects (SAA, 9 [IST, 4; without IST, 5]; MDS, 1) completed the study (median age: 9.2 y). Median romiplostim dose was 10 µg/kg/week (range: 5 to 17.5 µg/kg/week). The cumulative incidence of CHR was 70.4% (95% CI, 20.2%-92.6%). Among 21 AEs (Grade 1 to 3), 3 were attributed to romiplostim. At a median posttherapy follow-up of 10.9 months (range: 0.7 to 77.5), no clonal evolution, bone marrow fibrosis or mortality was reported. This proof-of-concept study provides data about short-term safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of romiplostim (±IST) for treatment of pediatric SAA/MDS.

Real-world use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in older patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia.

The efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TRAs) in older patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are unknown. We investigated TRA response and switch, thrombotic/hemorrhagic risk, and sustained responses off-treatment (SROTs) in 384 patients with ITP aged ≥60 years. After 3 months, 82.5% and 74.3% of eltrombopag- and romiplostim-treated patients, respectively, achieved a response; 66.7% maintained the response (median follow-up, 2.7 years). Eighty-five (22.2%) patients switched to the alternative TRA; although no cross-toxicity was observed, 83.3% of resistant patients had a response after the switch. Thirty-four major thromboses (3 fatal) and 14 major hemorrhages (none fatal) occurred in 18 and 10 patients, respectively, while on TRAs and were associated with thrombosis history (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.04, P = .05) and platelet count <20 × 109/L (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.69; P = .04), respectively, at TRA start. A recurrent event occurred in 15.6% of patients surviving thrombosis, in all cases but 1 during persisting TRA treatment (incidence rate, 7.7 per 100 patient-years). All recurrences occurred in the absence of adequate antithrombotic secondary prophylaxis. Sixty-two (16.5%) responding patients discontinued TRAs; 53 (13.8%) patients maintained SROTs, which were associated with TRA discontinuation in complete response (P < .001). Very old age (≥75 years; 41.1%) was associated with the more frequent start of TRAs in the persistent/acute phase but not with response or thrombotic/hemorrhagic risk. TRAs are effective in older patients with ITP, with no fatal hemorrhages and with SROTs in a significant portion of patients. Caution is warranted in patients with a history of thrombosis, and a careful risk/benefit balance should be considered.

Use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists for immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: results from a multicenter study.

Management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) during pregnancy can be challenging because treatment choices are limited. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (Tpo-RAs), which likely cross the placenta, are not recommended during pregnancy. To better assess the safety and efficacy of off-label use of Tpo-RAs during pregnancy, a multicenter observational and retrospective study was conducted. Results from 15 pregnant women with ITP (pregnancies, n = 17; neonates, n = 18) treated with either eltrombopag (n = 8) or romiplostim (n = 7) during pregnancy, including 2 patients with secondary ITP, were analyzed. Median time of Tpo-RA exposure during pregnancy was 4.4 weeks (range, 1-39 weeks); the indication for starting Tpo-RAs was preparation for delivery in 10 (58%) of 17 pregnancies, whereas 4 had chronic refractory symptomatic ITP and 3 were receiving eltrombopag when pregnancy started. Regarding safety, neither thromboembolic events among mothers nor Tpo-RA-related fetal or neonatal complications were observed, except for 1 case of neonatal thrombocytosis. Response to Tpo-RAs was achieved in 77% of cases, mostly in combination with concomitant ITP therapy (70% of responders). On the basis of these preliminary findings, temporary off-label use of Tpo-RAs for severe and/or refractory ITP during pregnancy seems safe for both mother and neonate and is likely to be helpful, especially before delivery.

Efficacy and safety of romiplostim in refractory aplastic anaemia: a Phase II/III, multicentre, open-label study.

A previous dose-finding study has suggested that romiplostim is effective in patients with refractory aplastic anaemia (AA) and 10 µg/kg once weekly was recommended as a starting dose. In this Phase II/III, multicentre, open-label study, romiplostim was administered subcutaneously at a fixed dose of 10 µg/kg once weekly for 4 weeks (weeks 1-4) followed by weekly doses (5, 10, 15 and 20 µg/kg) titrated by platelet response for up to 52 weeks (weeks 5-52). A total of 31 patients with AA who were refractory to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and thrombocytopenia (platelet count of ≤30 × 109 /l) were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint of the proportion of patients achieving any haematological (platelet, neutrophil and erythrocyte) response at week 27 was 84% [95% confidence interval (CI) 66-95%]. Trilineage response was 39% (95% CI 22-58%) at week 53. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were headache and muscle spasms (each 13%). All AEs were mild or moderate except for three patients with Grade 3 hepatic AEs; no AEs necessitated romiplostim discontinuation. Two patients developed cytogenetic abnormalities, of whom one returned to normal karyotype at last follow-up. High-dose romiplostim is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with AA refractory to IST.

Successful treatment of refractory secondary immune thrombocytopenia (antiphospholipid antibody syndrome-associated) with the combination of rituximab and romiplostim at the cost of severe bone pain: A case report and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disorder associated with increased thrombocyte destruction and impaired production in the bone marrow. Proposed mechanisms include an antibody or autoreactive T-cell-associated autoimmunity and thrombopoietin deficiency among others. Clinical manifestations are predominantly mucocutaneous hemorrhages including petechiae, purpura, mucosal bleeding in the urinary or the gastrointestinal tracts, menorrhagia, and epistaxis. The purpose of the treatment is to prevent bleeding rather than normalizing the platelet counts. First-line treatments include corticosteroids ± intravenous immunoglobulin and Anti-D which mainly decrease antibody-mediated platelet destruction and increase the number of peripheral Tregs. Second-line and subsequent therapies include splenectomy, chimeric anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab), which eliminates B cells and act as an immunomodulatory agent, and Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (romiplostim), which promote platelet production. CASE REPORT: We describe a 40-year-old male patient diagnosed with immune thrombocytopenia that was refractory to first-line corticosteroid and intravenous immunoglobulin and second-line romiplostim monotherapy treatments.Management and outcome: The patient was given the romiplostim and rituximab combination which not only successfully treated thrombocytopenia but also resulted in grade 3 bone pains and the patient's subsequent refusal to continue therapy. DISCUSSION: Common adverse effects of rituximab are infusion reactions and prolonged immunosuppression; those of romiplostim include thrombosis, headaches, arthralgia-myalgia, and gastrointestinal symptoms. This case shows that romiplostim has not caused any discernible side effects when given alone, while combination with rituximab resulted in severe bone and joint pains. We hypothesize that this combination regimen shows a synergistic effect both in terms of efficacy and adverse-effect probability and/or severity.

Assessment of romiplostim immunogenicity in adult patients in clinical trials and in a global postmarketing registry.

Antibodies to first-generation recombinant thrombopoietin (TPO) neutralized endogenous TPO and caused thrombocytopenia in some healthy subjects and chemotherapy patients. The second-generation TPO receptor agonist romiplostim, having no sequence homology to TPO, was developed to avoid immunogenicity. This analysis examined development of binding and neutralising antibodies to romiplostim or TPO among adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 13 clinical trials and a global postmarketing registry. 60/961 (6·2%) patients from clinical trials developed anti-romiplostim-binding antibodies post-baseline. The first positive binding antibody was detected 14 weeks (median) after starting romiplostim, at median romiplostim dose of 2 µg/kg and median platelet count of 29.5 × 109 /l; most subjects had ≥98·5% of platelet assessments showing response. Neutralising antibodies to romiplostim developed in 0·4% of patients, but were unrelated to romiplostim dose and did not affect platelet count. Thirty-three patients (3·4%) developed anti-TPO-binding antibodies; none developed anti-TPO-neutralising antibodies. In the global postmarketing registry, 9/184 (4·9%) patients with spontaneously submitted samples had binding antibodies. One patient with loss of response had anti-romiplostim-neutralising antibodies (negative at follow-up). Collectively, anti-romiplostim-binding antibodies developed infrequently. In the few patients who developed neutralising antibodies to romiplostim, there was no cross-reactivity with TPO and no associated loss of platelet response.

Safety and efficacy of self-administered romiplostim in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: Results of an integrated database of five clinical trials.

Romiplostim self-administration by patients or caregivers may offer time/cost savings to healthcare professionals (HCPs) and convenience for patients who avoid weekly clinic visits. We performed an integrated analysis of five clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of romiplostim self-administration. Data were analyzed from adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who received weekly romiplostim via self-administration or from an HCP. Patients who achieved a stable romiplostim dose for ≥3 weeks (HCP group ≥5 weeks to provide an appropriate index date to enable comparisons with the self-administration group) with platelet counts ≥50 × 109 /L were eligible. In the self-administration (n = 621) vs HCP (n = 133) groups, respectively, median age was 53 vs 58 years, median time since primary ITP diagnosis was 3.7 vs 2.5 years, and median baseline platelet count at ITP diagnosis was 19.0 vs 20.0 × 109 /L. In the self-administration and HCP-dosed groups, median romiplostim treatment duration was 89 vs 52 weeks and median total number of doses was 81 vs 50, respectively. In the self-administration and HCP groups, respectively: 95.0% and 100.0% of patients achieved ≥1 platelet response (defined as weekly platelet count ≥50 × 109 /L without rescue medication in previous 4 weeks); the median percentage of weeks with a response was 94.5% and 95.9%; and rescue medication was used in 36.7% and 39.8% of patients. Self-administration did not adversely affect safety; duration-adjusted rates for all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and bleeding TEAEs were numerically lower with self-administration. Romiplostim self-administration appears effective and well tolerated in eligible patients with ITP.

Regulation of Antioxidant Stress-Responsive Transcription Factor Nrf2 Target Gene in the Reduction of Radiation Damage by the Thrombocytopenia Drug Romiplostim.

Ionizing radiation induces severe oxidative stress, resulting in individual death by acute radiation syndrome. The nuclear factor-erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) plays an important role in the antioxidant response pathway. Recently, romiplostim (RP), an idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura therapeutic drug, was reported to completely rescue mice exposed to lethal total-body irradiation (TBI). However, the details underlying the mechanism for reducing radiation damage remain largely unknown. To elucidate the involvement of the master redox regulator Nrf2 in the radio-mitigative efficacy of RP on TBI-induced oxidative stress, expression of Nrf2 target genes in hematopoietic tissues such as bone marrow, spleen, and lung from mice treated with RP for three consecutive days after 7 Gy of X-ray TBI was analyzed. RP promoted the recovery of bone marrow cells from day 10 and the significant up-regulation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAD(P)H) dehydrogenase quinone 1 (Nqo1), glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (Gclc) and glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit (Gclm) was observed compared to the TBI mice. RP also promoted the recovery of splenic cells on day 18, and the significant up-regulation of Nqo1, Gclc and Gclm in spleen both on day 10 and 18 and Nqo1 and Gclm in lung on day 10 was observed compared to the TBI mice. The present study suggests that the radio-mitigative effects of RP indicates on the activation of Nrf2 target genes involved in redox regulation and the antioxidative function, especially Nqo1, Gclc and Gclm. It is indicating the importance of these genes in the maintenance of biological homeostasis in response to radiation-induced oxidative stress.

Use of Romiplostim during pregnancy as a rescue therapy in primary immune thrombocytopenia: Literature review and case description.

Thrombocytopenia could appear during pregnancy, in up to 8-10% of the cases, where 3-5% is related to an autoimmune process so-called immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We present a 34-year-old woman debuted at 13 weeks gestation, with a platelet count of 19 × 109/L and petechiae. She did not respond to initial treatment with corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. At this point, considering the limited treatment options due to toxicity and/or teratogenesis of other drugs proven to be effective against ITP like azathioprine, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, etc. and the risk of bleeding symptoms, either from mother or fetus, we decided to begin treatment with Romiplostim (thrombopoietin receptor agonist). On reviewing the literature at this matter, only eight cases with ITP were treated during pregnancy with Romiplostim and only one of those, the ITP, was refractory to Romiplostim. In a retrospective study, Romiplostim used as a bridge to surgery in 47 patients stated a platelet count increment higher than 100 × 109/L in 79% cases after two doses of Romiplostim. According to bibliography, we decided to start Romiplostim to our patient at 35 weeks of gestation with a spectacular platelet count recovery of 158 × 109/L within 1 week of treatment, at 36th week, and after induced labor, she had on the very next day an eutocic vaginal childbearing without major bleeding complications.

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists for Severe Thrombocytopenia after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Experience of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.

Persistent thrombocytopenia is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Romiplostim and eltrombopag are the currently available thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), and some studies with very small numbers of cases have reported their potential efficacy in the allo-SCT setting. The present retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of TPO-RAs in 86 patients with persistent thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT. Sixteen patients (19%) had isolated thrombocytopenia (PT), and 71 (82%) had secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR). TPO-RA therapy was started at a median of 127 days (range, 27 to 1177 days) after allo-SCT. The median initial and maximum administered doses were 50 mg/day (range, 25 to 150 mg/day) and 75 mg/day (range, 25 to 150 mg/day), respectively, for eltrombopag and 1 µg/kg (range, 1 to 7 µg/kg) and 5 µg/kg (range, 1 to 10 µg/kg), respectively, for romiplostin. The median platelet count before initiation of TPO-RA therapy was 14,000/µL (range, 1000 to 57,000/µL). Platelet recovery to ≥50,000/µL without transfusion support was achieved in 72% of patients at a median time of 66 days (range, 2 to 247 days). Eighty-one percent of the patients had a decreased number of megakaryocytes before treatment, showing a slower response to therapy (P = .011). The median duration of treatment was 62 days (range, 7 to 700 days). Grade 3-4 adverse events (hepatic and asthenia) were observed in only 2% of the patients. At last follow-up, 81% of patients had discontinued TPO-RAs and maintained response, and 71% were alive. To our knowledge, this is the largest series analyzing the use of TPO-RAs after allo-SCT reported to date. Our results support the efficacy and safety in this new setting. Further prospective trials are needed to increase the level of evidence and to identify predictors of response.

Romiplostim in adult patients with newly diagnosed or persistent immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) for up to 1 year and in those with chronic ITP for more than 1 year: a subgroup analysis of integrated data from completed romiplostim studies.

The thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim is approved for second-line use in chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but its effects in patients with ITP for ≤1 year are not well characterized. This analysis of pooled data from 9 studies included patients with ITP for ≤1 year (n = 311) or >1 year (n = 726) who failed first-line treatments and received romiplostim, placebo or standard of care. In subgroup analysis by ITP duration, patient incidences for platelet response at ≥75% of measurements were higher for romiplostim [ITP ≤1 year: 74% (204/277); ITP >1 year: 71% (450/634)] than for placebo/standard of care [ITP ≤1 year: 18% (6/34); ITP >1 year: 9% (8/92)]. Of patients with ≥9 months on study, 16% with ITP ≤1 year and 6% with ITP >1 year discontinued romiplostim and maintained platelet counts ≥50 × 109 /l for ≥6 months without ITP treatment (treatment-free remission). Independent of ITP duration, rates of serious adverse events and bleeding were lower with romiplostim than placebo/standard of care and thrombotic events occurred at similar rates. In this analysis, romiplostim and placebo/standard of care had similar safety profiles and romiplostim increased platelet counts in patients with either ITP ≤1 year or ITP >1 year, with more treatment-free remission in those with ITP ≤1 year.

Long-term treatment with romiplostim and treatment-free platelet responses in children with chronic immune thrombocytopenia.

Children with immune thrombocytopenia for ≥6 months completing a romiplostim study received weekly subcutaneous romiplostim (1-10 µg/kg targeting platelet counts of 50-200×109/L) in this extension to examine romiplostim's long-term safety and efficacy. Sixty-five children received romiplostim for a median of 2.6 years (range: 0.1-7.0 years). Median baseline age was 11 years (range: 3-18 years) and platelet count was 28×109/L (range: 2-458×109/L). No patient discontinued treatment for an adverse event. Median average weekly dose was 4.8 mg/kg (range: 0.1-10 mg/kg); median platelet counts remained >50×109/L, starting at week 2. Nearly all patients (94%) had ≥1 platelet response (≥50×109/L, no rescue medication in the previous 4 weeks), 72% had responded at ≥75% of visits, and 58% had responded at ≥90% of visits. Treatment-free response (platelets ≥50×109/L ≥24 weeks without immune thrombocytopenia treatment) was seen in 15 of 65 patients while withholding romiplostim doses. At onset of treatment-free response, the nine girls and six boys had a median immune thrombocytopenia duration of four years (range: 1-12 years) and had received romiplostim for two years (range: 1-6 years). At last observation, treatment-free responses lasted for a median of one year (range: 0.4-2.1 years), with 14 of 15 patients still in treatment-free response. Younger age at first dose and platelet count >200×109/L in the first four weeks were associated with treatment-free responses. In this 7-year open-label extension, three-quarters of the patients responded ≥75% of the time, and romiplostim was well tolerated, with no substantial treatment-related adverse events. Importantly, 23% of children maintained treatment-free platelet responses while withholding romiplostim and all other immune thrombocytopenia medications for ≥6 months. (Registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01071954).

Second-line treatments in children with immune thrombocytopenia: Effect on platelet count and patient-centered outcomes.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with isolated thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic risk. While many children with ITP can be safely observed, treatments are often needed for various reasons, including to decrease bleeding, or to improve health related quality of life (HRQoL). There are a number of available second-line treatments, including rituximab, thrombopoietin-receptor agonists, oral immunosuppressive agents, and splenectomy, but data comparing treatment outcomes are lacking. ICON1 is a prospective, multi-center, observational study of 120 children starting second-line treatments for ITP designed to compare treatment outcomes including platelet count, bleeding, and HRQoL utilizing the Kids ITP Tool (KIT). While all treatments resulted in increased platelet counts, romiplostim had the most pronounced effect at 6 months (P = .04). Only patients on romiplostim and rituximab had a significant reduction in both skin-related (84% to 48%, P = .01 and 81% to 43%, P = .004) and non-skin-related bleeding symptoms (58% to 14%, P = .0001 and 54% to 17%, P = .0006) after 1 month of treatment. HRQoL significantly improved on all treatments. However, only patients treated with eltrombopag had a median improvement in KIT scores at 1 month that met the minimal important difference (MID). Bleeding, platelet count, and HRQoL improved in each treatment group, but the extent and timing of the effect varied among treatments. These results are hypothesis generating and help to improve our understanding of the effect of each treatment on specific patient outcomes. Combined with future randomized trials, these findings will help clinicians select the optimal second-line treatment for an individual child with ITP.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonist switch in children with persistent and chronic severe immune thrombocytopenia: A retrospective analysis in a large tertiary center.

We retrospectively analyzed sequential therapy with romiplostim and eltrombopag in 23 children with immune thrombocytopenia: switching from romiplostim to eltrombopag (10 patients) or vice versa (13 patients). The median age of patients at enrollment in the study was 5.6 years (2-15 years). Switching from romiplostim to eltrombopag was effective in eight (80%) patients, whereas switching from eltrombopag to romiplostim was effective in eight (62%) patients. The response rate was similar in patients failing the first thrombopoietin receptor agonist and those who had previous response. To date, all responders continue to maintain platelets over 50 × 109 /L at 13-39 months after switching.

Eltrombopag for Delayed Platelet Recovery and Secondary Thrombocytopenia Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children.

The delay in platelet recovery after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is closely related to the overall survival rate of transplanted children. The use of platelet-producing agents such as eltrombopag and romiplostim has made great progress in treating diseases such as immune thrombocytopenia and aplastic anemia. However, the use of such drugs in patients with thrombocytopenia after transplantation, especially in children, is rare. This study aimed to report eltrombopag treatment for 3 children with primary platelet engraftment failure and secondary thrombocytopenia after allogeneic HSCT. Of these patients, 2 had platelets stabilized at ≥50×10/L after eltrombopag treatment and subsequent withdrawal of eltrombopag. All 3 patients showed no clear adverse reactions. The results indicated a wide application prospect of eltrombopag treatment in children with thrombocytopenia after allogeneic HSCT.

Dynamic dosing of romiplostim in patients with immune thrombocytopenia purpura: Two case reports.

Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia purpura. When following FDA-approved romiplostim prescribing recommendations to withhold treatment for platelet counts above 400k/µL, some patients exhibit a precipitous decline in their platelet count potentially causing patient harm. We present two cases where stable platelet counts were achieved only through persistent weekly dosing of romiplostim despite platelet counts above 400k/µL on the day of administration. Therefore, continuous weekly dosing of romiplostim despite platelet count being above 400k/µL combined with twice weekly vigilant monitoring is an alternative method of romiplostim dosing that mitigates severe fluctuations in platelets. We also discuss important details, postulated mechanisms, and evidence-based mitigation strategies.

Initial romiplostim dosing and time to platelet response in patients with treatment refractory immune thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist recommended as a second-line therapy for immune thrombocytopenia. An initial dose of 1 mcg/kg/week subcutaneously with weekly 1 mcg/kg dose escalation is recommended per package labeling. Optimizing romiplostim dosing for hospitalized, corticosteroid- and intravenous immunoglobulin-refractory patients with severe thrombocytopenia secondary to immune thrombocytopenia may be critical for improving platelet responses, reducing the risk of bleeding, and decreasing hospital length of stay. Limited data are available evaluating the efficacy and safety of higher initial doses. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the time to platelet ≥ 10 × 109/L between patients who received an initial romiplostim dose of ≥2 mcg/kg/week compared to the standard initial dose of 1 mcg/kg/week. Secondary objectives included time to platelet response ≥ 30 × 109/L and ≥50 × 109/L, percentage of patients achieving platelet responses, hospital length of stay, and incidence of adverse events and bleeding complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study including hospitalized adults with corticosteroid- and intravenous immunoglobulin-refractory immune thrombocytopenia. A baseline platelet < 10 × 109/L was required. Patients were stratified by their initial romiplostim dose into Cohort 1 (1 mcg/kg/week) and Cohort 2 (≥2 mcg/kg/week). A review of electronic medical records and descriptive statistics generated findings. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included, 4 in Cohort 1 and 14 in Cohort 2. Patients in Cohort 2 had a median initial dose of 4.5 mcg/kg/week. Patients in Cohort 2 achieved a platelet ≥ 10 × 109/L in a median of 2 days versus 4.5 days for Cohort 1. More patients in Cohort 2 achieved a platelet ≥ 30 × 109/L (42.9% vs. 25%) and platelet ≥ 50 × 109/L (28.6% vs. 25%). The median hospital length of stay was shorter in Cohort 2 (13.5 vs. 20 days). Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was noted less frequently in Cohort 2 (28.6% vs. 75%), while major bleeding was more frequent in Cohort 2 (14.3% vs. 0%). No thrombotic events occurred. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that higher initial romiplostim doses may be safe for hospitalized patients with treatment-refractory immune thrombocytopenia. Compared to Food and Drug Administration-approved dosing, higher initial doses may shorten time to platelet responses and hospital length of stay. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

A Case of Multiple Cerebral Infarction Preceding Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

BACKGROUND: Although it was suggested that idiopathic thromobocytopenic purpura (ITP) can be a paradoxical cause of cerebral infarction, previous reports indicate that cerebral infarction associated with ITP occurs when thrombocytopenia is already evident at the onset of cerebral infarction. CASE REPORT: We report a case of multiple cerebral infarction that preceded acute exacerbation of ITP. An 80-year-old woman with a history of ITP presented with tetraplegia, and brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple infarction in bilateral cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres. For ITP, she was treated with oral prednisolone and subcutaneous injection of thrombopoietin receptor agonists. Her platelet count was within the normal range at the onset of cerebral infarction. Medical work-up did not reveal the obvious causes of her multiple cerebral infarction. On day 10 of hospitalization, she showed melena and oral hemorrhage and her platelet count markedly decreased. Her platelet-associated IgG level was elevated and a diagnosis of acute exacerbation of ITP was made. She was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and her platelet count increased moderately. However, her neurological symptoms and cerebral infarction on magnetic resonance imaging deteriorated accompanied by hemorrhagic transformation. Finally, she died of respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our case suggests that thrombophilia accompanied by ITP can precede actual exacerbation of ITP and we have to consider ITP as a possible cause of multiple cerebral infarction, even when the platelet count is within the normal range at the onset of cerebral infarction.

Romiplostim for the management of perioperative thrombocytopenia.

Thrombocytopenic patients requiring invasive surgery have few options to improve their platelet count preoperatively. This is a single-centre, retrospective review of thrombocytopenic patients receiving the thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim perioperatively to allow for surgical interventions. Patient characteristics, romiplostim use, and surgical and safety outcomes (bleeding, thrombosis, transfusions) were collected and analysed. Forty-seven patients underwent 51 surgical procedures (ranging from total hip arthroplasty to open cardiac surgery) with romiplostim support. Thrombocytopenia aetiologies included immune thrombocytopenia, chronic liver disease, haematological malignancy, drug-related thrombocytopenia, and hereditary thrombocytopenia. Median (range) platelet counts improved, from 47 × 109 /l (9-120 × 109 /l) at romiplostim initiation to 164 × 109 /l (28-603 × 109 /l) at the time of surgery (P < 0·0001). A dose of 3 µg/kg per week for 2 doses increased the platelet count to >100 × 109 /l in 79% of patients within 14 days. In 96% of cases, surgery proceeded on schedule without delay or cancellation. Four patients had bleeding events unrelated to thrombocytopenia and 1 patient developed deep venous thrombosis. Six patients required red cell transfusion and 3 patients required platelet transfusion perioperatively. In conclusion, romiplostim was effective in increasing platelet counts to allow surgery to proceed safely and on schedule. Bleeding and thromboembolic events were within acceptable limits for this surgical population.

Risk of thrombosis with anti-phospholipid syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus treated with thrombopoietin-receptor agonists.

OBJECTIVES: The use of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) has increased as a second-line therapy in ITP, but the efficacy and safety of such drugs has not been evaluated in SLE-associated ITP. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2016. Participating centres (n = 11) were secondary- or tertiary-care hospitals belonging to the French national network for adult ITP. RESULTS: We included 18 patients with SLE-ITP treated with TPO-RAs; 10 (55%) had aPL, 5 (27%) showing definite APS. Except for one patient, all (94%) achieved response with TPO-RAs overall. After a median follow-up of 14.7 months with TPO-RAs, four arterial thrombosis events (including one catastrophic APS) occurred in four patients. Two venous thrombosis events occurred in a patient without APS or aPLs. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that aPLs should be systematically screened before TPO-RA initiation in patients with SLE. With aPL positivity, alternative therapy should be discussed (if possible), especially in patients with definite APS or suboptimal adherence to anti-coagulation therapy.