Preservation of native sigmoid colon for secondary continent cystostomy after multivisceral transplantation for chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction.

Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is characterized by severe digestive +/- urinary dysmotility. If the conservative management fails, multivisceral transplantation (MVT) may be needed. However, urinary dysmotility remains after MVT and requires to continue urinary catheterizations and/or drainage. We report on a boy with severe CIPO complicated by (1) chronic intestinal obstruction requiring total parenteral nutrition, decompression gastrostomy, and ileostomy; (2) recurrent line infections; (3) hepatic fibrosis; and (4) distension of the bladder and upper urinary tract, and recurrent urinary infections, leading to non-continent cystostomy for urinary drainage. He underwent MVT at the age of 5 years. The transplant included the liver, stomach, duodenum and pancreas, small bowel, and right colon. The distal native sigmoid colon was preserved. Fifteen months later, he underwent a pull through of the transplanted right colon (Duhamel's procedure), together with a tube continent cystostomy (Monti's procedure) using the native sigmoid. Postoperative course was uneventful, and the remaining ileostomy was closed 3 months later. Five years post-transplant, he is alive and well. He is fed by mouth with complementary gastrostomy feeding at night. He has 3-6 stools per day, with occasional soiling. The cystostomy is used for intermittent urinary catheterization 4 times/day and continuous drainage at night. He is dry, with rare afebrile urinary infections, normal renal function, and un-dilated upper urinary tract. Conclusion: in severe CIPO with urinary involvement, preservation of the distal native sigmoid colon during MVT allows secondary creation of a continent tube cystostomy, which is useful to manage persistent urinary disease.

Anti-plasma cell treatment in refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia in a child with multivisceral transplant.

BACKGROUND: Warm-antibody AIHA is known to complicate solid organ (SOT) and HSCT, the disease maybe refractory to standard therapy. Immunosuppressive therapies as well as IVIG, and rituximab have been the main stay of treatment. Over the past decade, B-lymphocyte targeted, anti-CD-20 antibody has been recognized in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and utilized in AIHA. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor that causes apoptosis of plasma cells, is an appealing targeted therapy in secondary AIHA and has demonstrated efficacy in HSCT patients. From our experience, we advocate for early targeted therapy that combines B cell with plasma cell depletion. CASE REPORT: We describe a 4-year-old-girl with stage III neuroblastoma, complicated with intestinal necrosis needing multivisceral transplant developed warm AIHA 1-year after transplantation, and following an adenovirus infection. She received immunoglobulin therapy, rituximab, sirolimus, plasmapheresis, and long-term prednisolone with no sustained benefit while developing spinal fractures related to the latter therapy. She received bortezomib for intractable AIHA in combination with rituximab with no appreciable adverse effects. Three years later the child remains in remission with normal reticulocyte and recovered B cells. In the interim, she required chelation therapy for iron overload related to blood transfusion requirement during the treatment of AIHA. CONCLUSION: We propose early targeted anti-plasma cell therapy with steroid burst, IVIG, rituximab, and possible plasmapheresis may reduce morbidity in secondary refractory w-AIHA.

Fatal Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with virus-infected T cells after pediatric multivisceral transplantation: A proof-of-concept case report.

BACKGROUND: EBV-associated HLH driven by EBV-infected CD8+ T cells is a rare complication after pediatric solid organ transplantation. The etiology and disease spectrum of post-transplant EBV-HLH are poorly understood, and making a precise diagnosis and providing optimal treatment remain a challenge. METHODS/CASE DESCRIPTION/RESULTS: We report a 2-year-old multivisceral transplant recipient who developed fever and cytopenia with a persistent high EBV-load state. Repeated tissue examinations and CT scans could not identify a localized mass, which is the key to the diagnosis of PTLD as per the WHO classification. Hence, EBV-HLH was diagnosed by clinical manifestations as well as characterization of EBV-infected cells, pathological examination on cell block of pleural effusion and clonality analysis. This EBV-HLH did not respond to intensive chemotherapy, resulted in the recipient's death, acting similarly to hematological malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Characterization of EBV-infected cells in peripheral blood should be considered when persistent high EBV loads develop with symptoms consistent with PTLD, but no evidence of localized mass, and the tissue diagnosis is unavailable after pediatric solid organ transplantation.

Long-term survival in visceral transplant recipients in the new era: A single-center experience.

There is a paucity of data on long-term outcomes following visceral transplantation in the contemporary era. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of all visceral allograft recipients who underwent transplant between November 2003 and December 2013 with at least 3-year follow-up data. Clinical data from a prospectively maintained database were used to assess outcomes including patient and graft survival. Of 174 recipients, 90 were adults and 84 were pediatric patients. Types of visceral transplants were isolated intestinal transplant (56.3%), combined liver-intestinal transplant (25.3%), multivisceral transplant (16.1%), and modified multivisceral transplant (2.3%). Three-, 5-, and 10-year overall patient survival was 69.5%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, while 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall graft survival was 67%, 62%, and 61%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors of survival included pediatric recipient (P = .001), donor/recipient weight ratio <0.9 (P = .008), no episodes of severe acute rejection (P = .021), cold ischemia time <8 hours (P = .014), and shorter hospital stay (P = .0001). In conclusion, visceral transplantation remains a good option for treatment of end-stage intestinal failure with parenteral nutritional complications. Proper graft selection, shorter cold ischemia time, and improvement of immunosuppression regimens could significantly improve the long-term survival.

Visceral arterial embolization prior to multivisceral transplantation in recipient with cirrhosis, extensive portomesenteric thrombosis, and hostile abdomen: Performance and outcome analysis.

Multivisceral transplant (MVT) for cirrhosis, and portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PVT), is fraught with life-threatening thrombo-hemorrhagic complications. Embolization of native viscera has been attempted in a handful of cases with mixed results. We carried out a comparative analysis of angiographic, intra-operative, and pathological findings in three recipients of MVT who were deemed exceptionally high hemorrhagic risk and therefore underwent preoperative visceral embolization. All recipients were male with cirrhosis, PVT, and a surgical history indicative of diffuse visceral adhesions; status post-liver transplantation (n = 2) and proctocolectomy (n = 1). The first patient had two Amplatzer II embolization plugs placed 2 cm from the origins of celiac and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries. Distal migration of the celiac plug into gastroduodenal artery (GDA) and ensuing ischemia reperfusion injury, presumably contributed to severe disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and intra-operative mortality. In the other two recipients, distal Gelfoam embolization of the SMA, GDA, and splenic arteries was performed, and although remarkable hemorrhage and coagulopathy occurred, embolization, undoubtedly, facilitated exenteration and improved outcomes. Pathologic examination in these cases confirmed ischemic necrosis of eviscerated bowel. In conclusion, liver-sparing, preoperative distal embolization of native viscera with Gelfoam is beneficial, but entails several pitfalls. It should currently be reserved for MVT recipients who otherwise are at unacceptably high risk.

Visceral transplantation in patients with intestinal-failure associated liver disease: Evolving indications, graft selection, and outcomes.

Intestinal failure (IF)-associated liver disease (IFALD) is widely recognized as a lethal complication of long-term parenteral nutrition. The pathophysiology of IFALD is poorly understood but appears to be multifactorial and related to the inflammatory state in the patient with IF. Visceral transplant for IFALD includes variants of intestine, liver, or combined liver-intestine allografts. Graft selection for an individual patient depends on the etiology of IF, abdominal and vascular anatomy, severity of IFALD, and potential for intestinal rehabilitation. The past decade has witnessed dramatic improvement in the management of IFALD, principally due to improved lipid emulsion formulations and the multidisciplinary care of the patient with IF. As the recognition and treatment of IFALD continue to improve, the requirement of liver-inclusive visceral grafts appears to be decreasing, representing a paradigm shift in the care of the patient with IF. This review highlights the current indications, graft selection, and outcomes of visceral transplantation for IFALD.

Graft versus host disease after multivisceral transplantation: A UK center experience and update on management.

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) following transplantation of an intestine-containing graft occurs more frequently than with other solid organ transplants and is known to have a poor outcome. The presentation differs from other solid organ transplants, as the gastrointestinal tract is not involved following intestinal transplant. Diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms arising due to native tissue damage and the detection of donor T lymphocytes in circulating blood (T-cell chimerism). The ideal treatment strategy has not been defined, with advocates for both increased and decreased immunosuppression. We reviewed all cases of GVHD in an adult intestinal transplant center in the United Kingdom and report on management strategies of five cases and methods of detecting T-cell chimerism. The practice in our center has evolved with experience. The first two patients received an increase in immunosuppression, which was only successful in one case. Subsequently, reducing immunosuppression has been more effective. However, patients with bone marrow involvement have a poorer prognosis. We demonstrate successful treatment of GVHD after multivisceral transplant with a reduction in immunosuppression. This should be followed by vigilant graft surveillance and serial monitoring of the level of T-cell chimerism, with reintroduction of immunosuppression at the earliest sign of graft dysfunction.

Imaging of Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation.

Intestinal transplantation has evolved from its experimental origins in the mid-20th century to its status today as an established treatment option for patients with end-stage intestinal failure who cannot be sustained with total parenteral nutrition. The most common source of intestinal failure in both adults and children is short-bowel syndrome, but a host of other disease processes can lead to this common end-point. The development of intestinal transplantation has presented multiple hurdles for the transplant community, including technical challenges, immunologic pitfalls, and infectious complications. Despite these hurdles, the success rate has climbed over the past decades owing to achievements that include improved surgical techniques, new immunosuppressive regimens, and more effective strategies for posttransplant surveillance and management. Nearly 2800 intestinal transplants have been performed worldwide, and current patient and graft survival rates are now comparable to those of other types of solid organ transplantations. As their population continues to increase, it will be increasingly likely that intestinal-transplant patients will seek imaging at sites other than transplant centers. Therefore, it is important that diagnostic and interventional radiologists be familiar with the procedure, its common variations, and the spectrum of postoperative complications. In this article, the authors provide an overview of intestinal transplantation, including the indications, variations, expected postoperative anatomy, and range of potential complications. ©RSNA, 2018.

En Bloc Multivisceral and Kidney Transplantation in an HIV Patient: First Case Report.

The continual improvement in outcome with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and visceral transplantation for gut failure stimulated our interest in lifting HIV infection as a contraindication for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. This report is the first to describe visceral transplantation in a patient with HIV infection. A HAART regimen was introduced in the setting of short-gut syndrome with successful suppression of HIV viral load. The indication for en bloc multivisceral and kidney transplantation was end-stage liver failure with portomesenteric venous thrombosis and chronic renal insufficiency. The underlying hepatic pathology was alcoholic and home parenteral nutrition-associated cirrhosis. Surgery was complicated due to technical difficulties with excessive blood loss and long operative time. The complex posttransplant course included multiple exploratory laparotomies due to serious intra-abdominal and systemic infections. Heavy immunosuppression was required to treat recurrent episodes of severe allograft rejection. Posttransplant oral HAART successfully sustained undetectable viral load. Unfortunately, the patient succumbed to sepsis 3 months posttransplant. With new insights into the biology of gut immunity, mechanisms of allograft tolerance, and HIV-associated immune dysregulation, successful outcome is anticipated, particularly in patients who are in need of isolated intestinal and less-organ-contained visceral allografts.

Abdominal transplantation for unresectable tumors in children: the zooming out principle.

PURPOSE: To present our experience in abdominal transplantations to manage unresectable abdominal neoplasms in children and to describe the role of extensive surgeries in such cases. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 22 abdominal transplantations in 21 patients for abdominal tumors over 16 years. Transplantation techniques included liver transplant (LT), multivisceral transplant (MVTx), and intestinal autotransplant (IA). Follow-up intervals ranged from 0.3 to 168 months (median 20 months). RESULTS: LT alone was performed in 15 patients for primary malignant (11) and benign (4) liver tumors. Pathological classification included HB hepatoblastoma (6), HCC hepatocellular cancer (3), hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma HEH (1), angiosarcoma (1), benign vascular tumors (3), and adenoma (1). IA was performed in four patients for lesions involving the root of the mesentery; tumors of the head of pancreas (3) and mesenteric hemangioma (1). MVTx was performed in 2 patients for malignancies; pancreaticoblastoma (1), recurrent hepatoblastoma (1), and in one patient as a rescue procedure after IA failure. Four of the eleven patients who underwent LT for malignant liver tumor had metastatic disease at presentation. Six of them died of recurrent neoplasm (3), transplant-related complications (2), and underlying disease (1). All LT patients who had benign tumors are alive with functioning grafts. All IA patients survived and are on an oral diet, with one patient requiring TPN supplementation. One of the three patients who underwent MVTx died of metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Allo/auto transplantation for abdominal tumors is a valuable modality when conventional treatments fail or are not feasible.

Preoperative arterial embolization facilitates multivisceral transplantation for portomesenteric thrombosis.

Multivisceral transplantation (MvTx) for diffuse venous portomesenteric thrombosis is a surgically and anesthesiologically challenging procedure, partly because of the risk of massive bleeding during visceral exenteration. Preoperative visceral artery embolization might reduce this risk. In three consecutive MvTx, the celiac trunk (CT) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were embolized immediately pretransplant. We analyzed demographics, serum D-lactate, pH, base excess, hemoglobin, blood pressure, transfused packed cell (PC) units, intervention time and outcome. Results are reported as median (range). All recipients were male (43, 22, 47 years old). Portomesenteric thrombosis followed antiphospholipid syndrome, neuroendocrine tumor and liver cirrhosis. A peritransplant D-lactate peak of 6.1 (5.1-7.6) mmol/L, lowest pH of 7.24 (7.18-7.36) and lowest base excess level of -9.5 (-7.6 to -11.5) were observed. Values normalized within 3 h posttransplant. Embolization and exenteration times were 80 (70-90) min and 140 (130-165) min, respectively, during which blood pressure remained stable, lowest hemoglobin was 6.1 (6.1-7.6) g/dL and three (2-4) PC were administered. All procedures were uneventful. Follow-up was 7 (4-9) months. The first patient died 4 months post-MvTx after an intracranial bleeding; the other patients are doing well. Our experience suggests that preoperative embolization of CT and SMA facilitates native organ resection in MvTx.

Post-transplant persistent lymphopenia is a strong predictor of late survival in isolated intestine and multivisceral transplantation.

Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) has been identified as a prognostic factor in liver transplantation. We hypothesized that a lower ALC may be linked to poor outcomes in isolated intestinal/multivisceral transplantation (IIT/MVT). The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of ALC in IIT/MVT. A total 141 IIT/MVT patients were eligible for the study. Post-transplant ALCs (at 3, 6, and 12 months) were evaluated, and prognostic impact of trend of ALC during the first year was investigated. Of these 141 patients, 108 patients survived in the first year (1-year survivors). One-year survivors were categorized according to post-transplant ALC at each time point. When ALC was decreased throughout the first year (post-transplant persistent lymphopenia: <500/µl at 3, 6, and 12 months), patient survival (P < 0.001, hazard ratio = 5.09) and graft survival (P < 0.001, hazard ratio = 5.15) after the first year was significantly worse, and this remained to be an independent risk factor. Negative impact of persistent lymphopenia on patient and graft survival was significant regardless of type of intestinal graft. Infection leading to mortality occurred more frequently in the persistent lymphopenia group (43% vs. 24%). Trend of post-transplant ALC may be a strong predictive marker for long-term outcome in 1-year survivors after IIT/MVT.

Radiologic features of pancreatic and biliary complications following composite visceral transplantation.

Small bowel transplantation is a surgical technique reserved for patients with end-stage intestinal failure. Despite its inherent technical difficulties, it has emerged as the standard of care for these patients. This article reviews the background and different surgical techniques for this procedure and then fully describes the spectrum of imaging findings of pancreatic and biliary complications, which have a prevalence of up to 17%, after this procedure based on 23-year single-center experience. The pancreaticobiliary complications encountered in our experience and discussed in this article include: ampullary stenosis, biliary cast, choledocholithiasis, bile leak, recurrent cholangitis, acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic duct fistula. Familiarity with the broad spectrum of PB complications and their variable manifestations will help radiologists to accurately diagnose these complications which have relatively high morbidity and mortality in these immune-compromised patients.

Procurement for visceral organ transplantation: where to cannulate and how to perfuse?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite significant improvements in visceral organ transplantation over the last few decades, some technical aspects of organ harvesting remain controversial. The purpose of this article is to review and summarize the latest literature on how to perfuse in multiorgan procurement. RECENT FINDINGS: Few prospective studies have analyzed and compared technical aspects of harvesting such as cannulation (aortic-only versus dual aortic and portal flush), flush rates and volumes as well as flush pressures (high pressure vs. gravity). However, these and most data available from additional retrospective and experimental studies do not clearly support one harvesting technique over another. SUMMARY: Currently, because of lack of superiority data, no clear guidelines exist on what cannulation techniques to apply during organ procurements in visceral organ transplantation. Additional prospective trials are needed to clarify these questions.

Abdominal Wall Closure in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: A State-Of-The-Art Review of Vascularized Abdominal Wall and Nonvascularized Rectus Fascia Transplantation.

Failure to close the abdomen after intestinal or multivisceral transplantation (Tx) remains a frequently occurring problem. Two attractive reconstruction methods, especially in large abdominal wall defects, are full-thickness abdominal wall vascularized composite allograft (AW-VCA) and nonvascularized rectus fascia (NVRF) Tx. This review compares surgical technique, immunology, integration, clinical experience, and indications of both techniques. In AW-VCA Tx, vascular anastomosis is required and the graft undergoes hypotrophy post-Tx. Furthermore, it has immunologic benefits and good clinical outcome. NVRF Tx is an easy technique without the need for vascular anastomosis. Moreover, a rapid integration and neovascularization occurs with excellent clinical outcome.

Indications for Multivisceral Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Consensus remains elusive in the definition and indications of multivisceral transplantation (MVT) within the transplant community. MVT encompasses transplantation of all organs reliant on the celiac artery axis and the superior mesenteric artery in different combinations. Some institutions classify MVT as involving the grafting of the stomach or ascending colon in addition to the jejunoileal complex. MVT indications span a wide spectrum of conditions, including tumors, intestinal dysmotility disorders, and trauma. This systematic review aims to consolidate existing literature on MVT cases and their indications, providing an organizational framework to comprehend the current criteria for MVT.

Survival of patients evaluated for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation - the Scandinavian experience.

OBJECTIVE: The current treatment of choice for patients with intestinal failure is parenteral nutrition, whereas medical therapy or resection is preferred for patients with neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NEPT) along with liver metastasis. As the survival of patients undergoing intestinal and multivisceral transplantation is improving, the discussion for expansion of treatment options has become a subject of debate. The aim was to investigate the outcome for patients referred for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation and to determine which patient group are the ones most likely to benefit the most from transplantation. METHODS: The authors included all patients evaluated for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital and The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital center between February 1998 and November 2009. Patients were classified according to proposed treatment strategy, and the outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 43 adults and 19 children with either intestinal failure or NEPT with liver metastases were evaluated for transplantation. Of these patients, 15 adults and 5 children were transplanted. Transplantation was lifesaving for most children - all the children survived after transplantation, but 70% (4/6) died while awaiting transplantation. Among the adult patients with intestinal failure, the survival rate for patients considered to be stable on parenteral nutrition was higher than the transplanted adult patients. The survival rate of patients with NEPT was similar to the results seen among patients transplanted for intestinal failure. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the poor prognosis of patients with intestinal failure awaiting transplantation and indicate that different transplantation criteria may be applied for adults and children, especially when early transplantation is the preferred treatment. The role of multivisceral transplantation in patients with NEPT remains uncertain.

Nonsurgical care of intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients: a review for the intensivist.

Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation has evolved from an experimental procedure to the treatment of choice for patients with irreversible intestinal failure and serious complications related to long-term parenteral nutrition. Increased numbers of transplant recipients and improved survival rates have led to an increased prevalence of this patient population in intensive care units. Management of intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients is uniquely challenging because of complications arising from the high incidence of transplant rejection and its treatment. Long-term comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney failure, and neurological sequelae, also develop in this patient population as survival improves. This article is intended for intensivists who provide care to critically ill recipients of intestinal and multivisceral transplants. As perioperative care of intestinal/multivisceral transplant recipients has been described elsewhere, this review focuses on common nonsurgical complications with which one should be familiar in order to provide optimal care. The article is both a review of the current literature on multivisceral and isolated intestinal transplantation as well as a reflection of our own experience at the University of Miami.

A radiologist's guide to small bowel and multivisceral transplantation.

This review will describe the indications for the various small bowel containing transplants. The importance of early referral will be highlighted. Radiologists play a central role in assessing these complex patients prior to transplantation. Furthermore, in the postoperative period, radiologists play an important part in diagnosing and treating complications.