RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Infections are a serious short- and long-term problem after pediatric organ transplantation. In immunocompromised patients, they can lead to transplant rejection or a severe course with a sometimes fatal outcome. Vaccination is an appropriate means of reducing morbidity and mortality caused by vaccine-preventable diseases. Unfortunately, due to the disease or its course, it is not always possible to establish adequate vaccine protection against live-attenuated viral vaccines (LAVVs) prior to transplantation. LAVVs such as measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) are still contraindicated in solid organ transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy (IST), thus creating a dilemma. AIM: This review discusses whether, when, and how live-attenuated MMR vaccines can be administered effectively and safely to pediatric liver transplant recipients based on the available data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed for literature on live-attenuated MMR vaccination in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). RESULTS: Nine prospective observational studies and three retrospective case series were identified in which at least 833 doses of measles vaccine were administered to 716 liver transplant children receiving IST. In these selected patients, MMR vaccination was well tolerated and no serious adverse reactions to the vaccine were observed. In addition, an immune response to the vaccine was demonstrated in patients receiving IST. CONCLUSION: Due to inadequate vaccine protection in this high-risk group, maximum efforts must be made to ensure full immunization. MMR vaccination could also be considered for unprotected patients after LT receiving IST following an individual risk assessment, as severe harm from live vaccines after liver transplantation has been reported only very rarely. To this end, it is important to establish standardized and simple criteria for the selection of suitable patients and the administration of the MMR vaccine to ensure safe use.
Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Caxumba/induzido quimicamente , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/induzido quimicamente , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Atenuadas/uso terapêutico , Vacinação , Anticorpos Antivirais , Estudos Observacionais como AssuntoRESUMO
On 22 February 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) stated that, following the recent resurgence of measles cases in Europe, more than half the world's countries could expect significant measles outbreaks this year. Measles is a highly infectious virus with a primary case reproduction number (R0) of 12-18. Measles infection can be severe, resulting in pneumonia, and also more rarely in subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), which occurs in 1 child out of every 1,000 and can be fatal. Until the 1990s, the hope of eliminating measles seemed possible following the successful development of effective vaccines, given individually or in the combined measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Vaccine hesitancy due to misinformation about possible vaccine side effects, reduced vaccine uptake during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and lack of awareness of the severe consequences of measles infection have contributed to low vaccine uptake, resulting in vulnerable communities. This article aims to review the recent resurgence of measles cases in the US, Europe, and the UK, to provide a reminder of the potential severity of measles, and to consider the causes of the failure to eliminate this vaccine-preventable viral infection.
Assuntos
Sarampo , Doenças Preveníveis por Vacina , Criança , Humanos , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Doenças Preveníveis por Vacina/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Preveníveis por Vacina/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Vacinação , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Long-term seroprotection against the measles and mumps viruses has not been reported in childhood cancer survivor (CCS) who received two-lifetime doses of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. We performed a retrospective study of measles and mumps titers among 55 CCS who received standard chemotherapy and two MMR vaccinations at any time. Over 75% of CCS who received at least one MMR prior to their cancer diagnosis had a negative or equivocal titer to measles or mumps. In contrast, all CCS who received the MMR series following their cancer treatment demonstrated long-term seroprotection to both viruses at a mean of 8.2 years after their last vaccination.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Sarampo , Caxumba , Neoplasias , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Caxumba/tratamento farmacológico , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/tratamento farmacológico , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Sarampo/tratamento farmacológico , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Anticorpos AntiviraisRESUMO
Numerous studies have investigated the efficacy of intralesional immunotherapy for warts, but there are a lack of studies investigating the efficacy of alternative intralesional immunotherapies following failure of initial intralesional immunotherapy. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine for the treatment of pediatric warts following failure of intralesional therapy with Candida antigen. Following intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine administration, 8/51 (15.5%) patients had complete resolution of their warts, 6/51 (12%) had near complete resolution, 19/51 (37%) had partial improvement, 12/51 (23.5%) had no change, and 6/51 (12%) had worsening. Although limited by retrospective nature and low sample size, our results demonstrate that intralesional immunotherapy with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine provides an alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of recalcitrant pediatric warts in patients who fail to respond to intralesional Candida antigen.
Assuntos
Sarampo , Caxumba , Verrugas , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacina contra Rubéola , Caxumba/tratamento farmacológico , Verrugas/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Antígenos de Fungos/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intralesionais , Candida , Sarampo/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess measles experience, practice, and knowledge by pediatricians in the context of resurgent US outbreaks in 2018-2019. STUDY DESIGN: A nationally representative network of pediatricians were surveyed by email and mail from January to April 2020. RESULTS: The response rate was 67% (297 of 444). In the 3 years preceding the survey, 52% of the respondents reported awareness of measles cases in/near their community. Most thought that media reports about recent measles outbreaks had decreased delay/refusal of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine (6% "greatly decreased"; 66% "moderately decreased"). More than 60% of the pediatricians responded correctly for 6 of 9 true/false measles knowledge items. Less than 50% responded correctly for 3 true/false items, including statements about pretravel MMR recommendations for a preschooler and measles isolation precautions. The most common resources that the pediatricians would "sometimes" or "often/always" consult for measles information were those from the American Academy of Pediatrics (72%), a state or local public health department (70%), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (63%). More than 90% of the pediatricians reported correct clinical practice for MMR vaccination of a 9-month-old before international travel. More than one-third of the respondents did not have a plan for measles exposures in their clinic. Pediatricians aware of measles cases in/near their community in the previous 3 years and those working in a hospital/clinic or Health Maintenance Organization setting were more likely to have a plan for measles exposures. CONCLUSIONS: During this time of heightened risk for measles outbreaks, there are opportunities to strengthen the knowledge and implementation of measles pretravel vaccination and infection prevention and control recommendations among pediatricians.
Assuntos
Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Criança , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Lactente , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Pediatras , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , VacinaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Improved routine immunizations in Japan have led to a reduction in vaccine-preventable diseases. Due to changes in the vaccination program, current young adults received their second vaccination for measles and rubella at different times depending on their birth year, and most of them have not been vaccinated against varicella and mumps. This study investigated the effect of vaccine programs on the immunity of people in Japan. METHODS: Immunoglobulin G antibody (IgG) titers against four viruses were determined by enzyme immunoassay in 795 students at a medical university. Titers for measles and rubella were compared according to the students' birth dates (Group 1: April 2, 1990-April 1, 2000; Group 2: April 2, 2000). RESULTS: The titers of students that satisfied the standard IgG values against measles, rubella, varicella, and mumps were 24.3%, 56.9%, 87.4%, and 47.2%, respectively. Measles and rubella titers were lower in group 2 (estimated mean period from last vaccination, 7.0 years) than group 1 (13.5 years) (p = 0.023 measles, p = 0.037 rubella), indicating attenuation of titers over time. Varicella and mumps antibody prevalence indicated that these infections were endemic, whereas rates of negative titers were higher than those for measles and rubella. CONCLUSIONS: IgG titers against viruses were affected by vaccination programs. Declining titers after vaccination should be monitored when the diseases are almost eliminated and boosting is absent. Antibody testing is meaningful for recommending vaccinations and for surveillance of waning immunity. Continuous improvements of vaccination program should be considered to prevent and eliminate diseases.
Assuntos
Varicela , Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Anticorpos Antivirais , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Japão/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Caxumba/tratamento farmacológico , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Molluscum contagiosum (MC) is a mucocutaneous viral infection, often self-limiting but untreated lesions can often last for 2 months to 2 years. Previously intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine has been tried for the treatment of warts but no studies exist of its use in MC. We report our experience with intralesional MMR in 22 patients of MC. The study was carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of intralesional MMR vaccine in patients of MC. We retrospectively analyzed records of patients who received intralesional MMR for MC from September 2018 to September 2019. Demographic characteristics, number, size, and site of molluscum lesions, number of MMR injections given, and response were recorded. Records of 22 patients were analyzed. There were 10 males and 12 females. The age of the patients ranged from 6 to 50 years with a mean of 19.72 ± 10.92. At the end of 12 weeks, 18 patients (81.8%) had complete clearance of lesions, with 4 patients (18.18%) having a partial response of more than 50%. No patient showed less than 50% or no response. In only one patient who had giant molluscum, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation was noted. No other adverse effect was seen in any of the patients. MMR is a safe, effective, easy to administer, time-saving, and inexpensive therapy for lesions of MC.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Molusco Contagioso , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Índia , Injeções Intralesionais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Molusco Contagioso/tratamento farmacológico , Molusco Contagioso/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Intralesional immunotherapy using different types of antigens is considered an effective and safe treatment option for different types of warts. However, there are few studies that illustrate the use of these antigens in the treatment of periungual warts as a distinct type of warts. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of three antigens: measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine, Candida antigen, and purified protein derivative (PPD) in the treatment of periungual warts. METHODS: The study included 150 patients who were randomly assigned to 3 groups with 50 patients in each. Each agent was injected intralesionally at a dose of 0.1 mL into the largest wart at 2-week intervals until complete clearance or for a maximum of 5 sessions. RESULTS: Complete clearance of warts was observed in 70%, 80%, and 74% in PPD, Candida antigen, and MMR vaccine groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the therapeutic response between the 3 studied groups. Adverse effects were transient and insignificant in the 3 groups. No recurrence of the lesions was reported in any of the studied groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intralesional antigen immunotherapy seems to be an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of periungual warts.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Fungos/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Doenças da Unha/terapia , Doenças da Unha/virologia , Verrugas/terapia , Adolescente , Antígenos de Fungos/administração & dosagem , Candida/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais , Masculino , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The measles vaccine, first introduced in 1963, directly led to a dramatic decrease in the incidence of the disease. Measles transitioned from being a common childhood disease, affecting approximately three to four million children annually, to being eradicated in the United States in 2000. What was once an astounding victory for modern medicine, however, has recently seen a dramatic reversal in fortune, with a resurgence of measles cases in the United States. Hence, it merits careful discussion. RECENT FINDINGS: The United States has seen more measles cases in 2019 than in any prior year in the past 30 years. These outbreaks are because of many factors but a significant cause is the increase in vaccine refusal within sub-populations in America. This finding indicates that the current approach that healthcare workers take with families towards MMR vaccination could be more effective. SUMMARY: This article aims to educate the reader about the measles virus and its clinical presentation, the MMR vaccine and its overwhelming success, and the concerning current national and international trends in measles outbreaks. Importantly, we focus on positions proposed by hesitant vaccinators and determine how medical providers can participate in productive conversation about vaccination to better gain trust and guide improved shared clinical decision-making.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo/uso terapêutico , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Criança , Humanos , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos , VacinaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Safety of live vaccines in patients treated with immunosuppressive therapies is not well known, resulting in contradictory vaccination recommendations. We describe here the first case of vaccine-associated measles in a patient on natalizumab treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A young female patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis on natalizumab treatment received the live attenuated measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine in preparation for a change in her treatment in favour of fingolimod, with established immunosuppressive qualities. Seven days after receiving the vaccine, our patient experienced diffuse muscle pain, fatigue, and thereafter developed a fever and then an erythematous maculopapular rash, compatible with vaccine associated measles. This was later confirmed by a positive measles RT-PCR throat swab. The patient's symptoms resolved without any sequelae. CONCLUSION: In this case report we review the immunosuppressive qualities of natalizumab and the evidence in favour and against live vaccines in patients on this treatment. Our findings reveal the insufficient understanding of the immunosuppressive effects of new immunomodulators, and thus of the safety of live vaccines in patients on such medications. While this case triggers precaution, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that natalizumab treatment could favor the onset of vaccine-associated measles.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Sarampo/etiologia , Natalizumab/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Exantema/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Imunossupressão/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Sarampo/diagnóstico , Vacina contra Sarampo/uso terapêutico , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/efeitos adversos , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Natalizumab/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lebanon has experienced several measles and mumps outbreaks in the past 20 years. In this article, a case-based surveillance of both measles and mumps outbreaks in Lebanon was carried out in an attempt to outline factors contributing to the failure of elimination plans and to provide potential solutions. The relationship between the outbreaks of both diseases was described and explored. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study of confirmed cases of measles and mumps in Lebanon between 2003 and 2018 collected from the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health Epidemiological Surveillance Unit public database was carried out. The information collected was graphically represented taking into consideration dates of reported cases, age groups affected, and vaccination status. RESULTS: The mean number of measles cases was 150.25 cases/year in the 1-4 years age group, 87 cases/year in individuals aging between 5 and 14, and 63.68 cases/year in those > 14 years old. In the latter group, only 18.05% were unvaccinated. The mean number of mumps cases was 30.4 cases/year in the < 4 year age group and 53.8 cases/year in the 10-19 years age group. During the study period, every spike in measles cases was followed by a similar spike in mumps. 9.66% of measles cases occurred in individuals who received at least 2 doses of the vaccine, 52.26% in the unvaccinated, and 38% in those whose vaccination status was undetermined. CONCLUSIONS: Measles in Lebanon is a disease of the pediatric population, but adults remain at risk. Outbreaks of mumps followed those of measles and were mainly among adolescents. Presence of a large number of Syrian refugees in the country may further complicate the situation. Vaccination activities need to be intensified.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Caxumba/epidemiologia , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Líbano/epidemiologia , Masculino , Sarampo/virologia , Morbillivirus/imunologia , Morbillivirus/isolamento & purificação , Caxumba/virologia , Vírus da Caxumba/imunologia , Vírus da Caxumba/isolamento & purificação , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Refugiados , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess catch-up vaccination of older children and adolescents during the first two years of the "No jab, no pay" policy linking eligibility for federal family assistance payments with childhood vaccination status. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional analysis of Australian Immunisation Register data on catch-up vaccination of children aged 5 to less than 7 years before (January 2013 - December 2014; baseline) and during the first two years of "No jab, no pay" (December 2015 - December 2017), and of children aged 7 to less than 10 years and young people aged 10 to less than 20 years ("No jab, no pay" period only). MAIN OUTCOMES: Catch-up vaccination rates for measles-mumps-rubella vaccine second dose (MMR2), by age group, Indigenous status, and socio-economic status; catch-up vaccination of children aged 5 to less than 7 years (third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine [DTPa3], MMR1), before and after introduction of "No jab, no pay". RESULTS: The proportion of incompletely vaccinated children aged 5 to less than 7 years who received catch-up DTPa3 was higher under "No jab, no pay" than during the baseline period (15.5% v 9.4%). Of 407 332 incompletely vaccinated people aged 10 to less than 20 years, 71 502 (17.6%) received catch-up MMR2 during the first two years of "No jab, no pay", increasing overall coverage for this age group from 86.6% to 89.0%. MMR2 catch-up activity in this age group was greater in the lowest socio-economic status areas than in the highest status areas (29.1% v 7.6%), and also for Indigenous than for non-Indigenous Australians (35.8% v 17.1%). MMR2 catch-up activity in 2016 and 2017 peaked mid-year. CONCLUSIONS: Linking family assistance payments with childhood vaccination status and associated program improvements were followed by substantial catch-up vaccination activity, particularly in young people from families of lower socio-economic status.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/uso terapêutico , Programas de Imunização , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Assistência Pública , Política Pública , Adolescente , Austrália , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Governo Federal , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Cobertura Vacinal , Adulto JovemRESUMO
CONTEXT: In response to numerous mumps outbreaks reported throughout the United States in 2016 and 2017, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended a third dose of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine for groups of persons determined by public health authorities to be at increased risk for acquiring mumps because of an outbreak. OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance for health departments when implementing the ACIP recommendation. DESIGN: Draft guidance was developed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention subject matter experts based on technical consultations with health departments and review of published and unpublished data regarding mumps outbreaks. The guidance was finalized based on input from experts from the ACIP Mumps Work Group and local and state epidemiologists through the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists and the National Association of County and City Health Officials. RESULTS: We developed guidance to assist public health authorities when determining which groups are at increased risk for acquiring mumps and should receive a third dose of MMR vaccine. During outbreaks, public health authorities identify groups of persons with known or likely close contact exposure to a mumps patient. Then, evidence of transmission and likelihood of transmission in a group's setting can be used to determine whether these groups are at increased risk. Additional epidemiologic and implementation factors may also be considered. All persons in the group at increased risk for acquiring mumps should receive a dose of MMR vaccine, including those with unknown vaccination status or those who have evidence of presumptive immunity other than documented 2 doses of MMR vaccine; no additional dose is recommended for persons who had received 3 or more doses before the outbreak. CONCLUSION: This guidance provides a framework for public health authorities to use when considering a third dose of MMR in response to mumps outbreaks while maintaining flexibility to incorporate local factors related to individual outbreaks.
Assuntos
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./tendências , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organização & administração , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Estados UnidosRESUMO
CONTEXT: During January 2016 to June 2017, US health departments (HDs) reported 150 mumps outbreaks. Most occurred among populations with high 2-dose measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage, prompting the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to examine the evidence for use of a third dose of MMR vaccine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HD experiences with mumps outbreak control and use of a third MMR dose during outbreaks. DESIGN: An online survey assessing mumps outbreak characteristics, outbreak response measures, challenges, and lessons learned from previous outbreaks was distributed to all 81 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists member HDs in August 2017. RESULTS: Sixty-one (75%) HDs responded; 46 (75%) had experience with ≥1 mumps outbreak(s) during January 2016 to August 2017. Twenty (43%) HDs recommended a third or outbreak MMR dose during mumps outbreaks; of these, 19 completed the section on use of a third dose and 8 (40%) rated the intervention "somewhat effective" or better. Health departments that used a third/outbreak dose suggested implementing the recommendation early and to a targeted group. Forty-three (73%) HDs reported having a policy for excluding persons without presumptive immunity from outbreak settings; of these, 37 (86%) had some degree of legal authority to implement this policy. Exclusion compliance improved with the use of personalized notification letters, focus groups of excluded persons and the community, and standardized messaging. Other outbreak control measures included cohorting of exposed or susceptible persons, mobile vaccination clinics and home visits, contact monitoring via text messaging, and facilitating student isolation with meal delivery and excused class absences. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed heterogeneity across HDs' mumps outbreak responses but also identified common challenges that will inform future Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance. These results were considered in the October 2017 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendation for use of a third dose of MMR vaccine for persons at increased risk for mumps during an outbreak and in the development of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance for HDs when applying the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendation.
Assuntos
Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Saúde Pública/métodos , Comitês Consultivos/organização & administração , Comitês Consultivos/tendências , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Caxumba/tratamento farmacológico , Caxumba/epidemiologia , Saúde Pública/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to gather information on demographic and health indicators, primarily vaccination status, of Syrians under temporary protection in five provinces of Turkey and to develop infrastructure for vaccination planning. METHODS: The population under study consists of 89,986 Syrian children, 0-4 years of age, residing in Ankara, Mersin, Gaziantep, Izmir, and Bursa. Initially, we planned to evaluate 2,339 children, although a total of 2,827 children were evaluated by the end of the study. RESULTS: Of these children, 74% were born in Turkey, while 20% were born in Syria. In addition, 22.4% (n = 634) of the children were never vaccinated, and of these, 67.0% (n = 425) were born in Turkey. In other words, one in five Syrian children born in Turkey (20.3%) had never been vaccinated. Of the Syrian children under temporary protection, the missing vaccinations were as follows: hepatitis B (54.7%); Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (62.5%); five-component combined vaccine (64.6%); conjugated pneumococcal vaccine (58.0%); oral polio vaccine (70.8%); measles, mumps, and rubella (76.6%); varicella (66.8%); and hepatitis A vaccine (76.0%). CONCLUSION: It is important to increase the immunization rates of Syrian children under temporary protection and establish regular vaccination procedures.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização , Programas de Imunização , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Caxumba/epidemiologia , Síria/etnologia , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Until recently, measles exposures were relatively rare and so, consequently, were an afterthought for cancer patients and/or blood and marrow transplant recipients and their providers. Declines in measles herd immunity have reached critical levels in many communities throughout the United States due to increasing vaccine hesitancy, so that community-based outbreaks have occurred. The reemergence of measles as a clinical disease has raised serious concerns among immunocompromised patients and those who work within the cancer and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) community. Since live attenuated vaccines, such as measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), are contraindicated in immunocompromised patients, and with no approved antiviral therapies for measles, community exposures in these patients can lead to life-threatening infection. The lack of data regarding measles prevention in this population poses a number of clinical dilemmas. Herein specialists in Infectious Diseases and HCT/cellular therapy endorsed by the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy address frequently asked questions about measles in these high-risk cancer patients and HCT recipients and provide expert opinions based on the limited available data.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/terapia , Humanos , Sarampo/imunologia , Sarampo/patologia , Neoplasias/imunologia , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To illustrate how data triangulation involving routine data sources can optimize data usage and provide insights into vaccine programme effectiveness by considering measles vaccination and disease incidence data in England. METHODS: We obtained data on measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage in birth cohorts from 1985 to 2016 from child health records and adjusted for under-ascertainment and catch-up campaigns. We assumed that the population had no natural immunity and that vaccine effectiveness was 95% for one dose and 99.75% for two doses. Vaccinations done outside the routine schedule and in people who entered England after the age of immunization were identified from primary care records. Measles susceptibility was defined as the percentage of individuals who were not immune despite all vaccination activities. We triangulated measles susceptibility and incidence data. FINDINGS: Median susceptibility was 4.6% (range: 1.2-9.2). Among cohorts eligible for two MMR vaccine doses, those born between 1998 and 2004 were most susceptible. Measles incidence was highest in these cohorts. Data from primary care and child health records were comparable for cohorts after 2000, suggesting that little supplementary vaccination took place. For cohorts before 2000, primary care data quality was insufficient for accurately estimating coverage. CONCLUSION: Triangulating routine data on measles vaccination coverage and disease surveillance provided new insights into population immunity and helped identify vulnerable groups, which was useful for prioritizing public health actions to close gaps in immunity. This approach could be applied in any country that routinely records vaccine coverage and disease incidence.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Masculino , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Registro Médico Coordenado , Irlanda do Norte/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , VacinaçãoRESUMO
The spread of fake news and misinformation on social media is blamed as a primary cause of vaccine hesitancy, which is one of the major threats to global health, according to the World Health Organization. This paper studies the effect of the diffusion of misinformation on immunization rates in Italy by exploiting a quasi-experiment that occurred in 2012, when the Court of Rimini officially recognized a causal link between the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism and awarded injury compensation. To this end, we exploit the virality of misinformation following the 2012 Italian court's ruling, along with the intensity of exposure to nontraditional media driven by regional infrastructural differences in Internet broadband coverage. Using a Difference-in-Differences regression on regional panel data, we show that the spread of this news resulted in a decrease in child immunization rates for all types of vaccines.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas/uso terapêutico , Criança , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Itália , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Vacinas contra Poliovirus/uso terapêutico , Mídias Sociais , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Background & objectives: : Globally, there is an effort to eliminate the measles and control rubella as these diseases lead to considerable morbidity and mortality especially among under-five children and are important public health problems. This study was aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) antibodies among children of age 5-10 yr in Chandigarh, north India, to provide evidence on prevalent immunity levels. Methods: : This cross-sectional study was conducted in Chandigarh, among 196 randomly selected healthy children (5-10 yr), who received either one or two doses of measles or MMR combination vaccine. Socio-economic background and immunization history were recorded. Blood sample (2 ml) was collected to estimate the MMR IgG antibody titres by using ELISA kits. Results: : Protective seroprevalence of MMR antibodies was 40.8, 75.5 and 86.2 per cent, respectively. The geometric mean titres of MMR IgG antibodies in the study children were 11.3, 50.6 and 54.3 international units (IU)/ ml, respectively. The proportion of seroprotected children for measles was significantly higher among those who had received two or more doses (46.4%) of measles vaccine compared to those who had received single dose (35.6%) (P <0.001). About 16 per cent of children had received single dose of MMR vaccine. Among these, 71.4 and 100 per cent were seroprotected against mumps and rubella, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions: : A large proportion of children aged 5-10 yr lacked protective immunity against measles (60%); about one-fourth (15-25%) were susceptible to infection with mumps and rubella virus. Mumps vaccination may be considered to be included in National Immunization Schedule for children with periodic serosurveillance.
Assuntos
Sarampo/epidemiologia , Caxumba/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Adolescente , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Lactente , Masculino , Sarampo/sangue , Sarampo/imunologia , Vírus do Sarampo/patogenicidade , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/uso terapêutico , Caxumba/sangue , Caxumba/imunologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/sangue , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/imunologia , Vírus da Rubéola/patogenicidade , VacinaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of MMR vaccine in the treatment of juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis as adjuvant therapy by experimental research. METHODS: Thirty-one children with RRP were enrolled and assigned randomly to intervention group or control group. Fifteen subjects in intervention group were treated with local application MMR vaccine on the lesion after surgery; sixteen subjects in the control group were treated with surgical excision alone. The quantity of virus of positive specimens was measured by fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: After treatment with MMR vaccine, viral load of intervention group was (9.56 ± 11.03) × 108 copies/ml, that of control group was (22.01 ± 17.78) × 108 copies/ml, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: Local application MMR vaccine as adjuvant therapy can reduce HPV viral load significantly. It is suggested that the MMR vaccine may inhibit replication of HPV DNA, but the curative effect needs further confirmation.