Pulmonary artery catheterization in exacerbations of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED The cost-effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) has been questioned in many clinical situations. We sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of PAC in patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We constructed a decision analysis model and calculated the incremental cost/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved for hypothetical patients, comparing a PAC strategy to one of no PAC. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the stability of conclusions over wide ranges of values. RESULTS: The incremental cost/QALY saved in the cost-effectiveness analysis using baseline data is $77,407 when catheterization-driven therapeutic changes result in a 5% improvement in survival. Cost-effectiveness is sensitive to variations in post-hospital life expectancy, quality of life, and the probability of favorable therapeutic changes resulting from the use of catheterization data. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary artery catheterization in COPD exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation is expensive compared to accepted medical interventions for other conditions, unless changes in therapy prompted by catheterization increase hospital survival to a level 8.7% above baseline. Randomized, controlled trials are needed to investigate the economic impact of PAC and its effect on morbidity and mortality of critically ill patients.