Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does the progression-free interval after primary chemotherapy predict survival after salvage chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer?: a Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data analysis.
Moore, Kathleen N; Tian, Chunqiao; McMeekin, D Scott; Thigpen, J Tate; Randall, Marcus E; Gallion, Holly H.
Afiliação
  • Moore KN; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, USA. Kathleen-moore@ouhsc.edu
Cancer ; 116(23): 5407-14, 2010 Dec 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20737572
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study evaluated whether progression-free interval (PFI) following primary chemotherapy (PCT) was predictive of overall survival (OS) after second-line chemotherapy in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS:

This is a pooled analysis of patients who recurred after PCT and were treated with second-line chemotherapy on Gynecologic Oncology Group trials. PFI-1 measured from initiation of PCT to recurrence or treatment-free interval (TFI) measured from completion of PCT to initiation of second-line chemotherapy was evaluated in relation to clinical outcomes.

RESULTS:

A total of 586 patients treated on 5 phase 3 PCT protocols were included. Baseline factors in primary setting associated with clinical outcome after PCT were also predictive of OS after second-line chemotherapy, including race, Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status, grade, and prior radiation therapy (P<.01). PFI-1 was the most significant factor predictive of survival after second-line chemotherapy, with a 30% reduction in the risk of death for PFI-1>6 months compared with ≤6 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.84 [P<.0001]) and median OS after second-line chemotherapy of 10 versus 5 months. A total of 275 patients treated on 9 phase 2 second-line chemotherapy protocols were also evaluated, and TFI>3 months was associated with a 25% reduction in the risk of death (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.97 [P=.030]) and median OS after second-line chemotherapy of 10 versus 7 months compared with TFI≤3 months. The tumor response to second-line chemotherapy was 9.6% versus 5.8%; the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Time to recurrence after PCT is predictive of survival after recurrence in advanced/recurrent EC. However, there is no evidence that this variable can be used in selecting salvage chemotherapy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Terapia de Salvação / Neoplasias do Endométrio / Intervalo Livre de Doença Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Terapia de Salvação / Neoplasias do Endométrio / Intervalo Livre de Doença Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article