Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Concurrent use of cisplatin or cetuximab with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.
Levy, Antonin; Blanchard, Pierre; Bellefqih, Sara; Brahimi, Nacéra; Guigay, Joël; Janot, François; Temam, Stéphane; Bourhis, Jean; Deutsch, Eric; Daly-Schveitzer, Nicolas; Tao, Yungan.
Afiliação
  • Levy A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94850, Villejuif, France.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 190(9): 823-31, 2014 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24638267
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The goal of the present work was to compare outcomes of definitive concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy (BRT) in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Between 2006 and 2012, 265 patients with locally advanced HNSCC were treated at our institution with CRT (n = 194; 73%) with three cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks) or BRT (n = 71; 27%) with weekly cetuximab. Patients receiving BRT had more pre-existing conditions (Charlson index ≥ 2) than the CRT group (p = 0.005).

RESULTS:

Median follow-up was 29 months. In all, 56% of patients treated with CRT received the planned three cycles (92% at least two cycles) and 79% patients treated with BRT received six cycles or more. The 2-year actuarial overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 72% and 61%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis (MVA), T4 stage, N2-3 stage, smoking status (current smoker as compared with never smoker), and non-oropharyngeal locations predicted for OS, whereas BRT association with OS was of borderline significance (p = 0.054). The 2-year actuarial locoregional control (LRC) and distant control (DC) rates were 73 and 79%, respectively. CRT was independently associated with an improved LRC (2-year LRC 76% for CRT vs. 61% for BRT) and DC (2-year LRC 81% for CRT vs. 68% for BRT) in comparison with BRT (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01 in the MVA). Subgroup analyses showed that T4 patients benefited significantly from CRT (vs. BRT) in LRC, while T1-3 did not. BRT patients had more G3-4 skin complications (p < 0.001) and CRT patients had higher rates of feeding tube placement (p = 0.006) and G3-4 gastrointestinal toxicities (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

This retrospective analysis showed a better LRC in locally advanced HNSCC treated by cisplatin-based CRT than cetuximab-based BRT, and a nonsignificant trend towards an improved OS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Otorrinolaringológicas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Cisplatino / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Otorrinolaringológicas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Cisplatino / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article