Discovering overtreatment: second-opinion dilemma.
J Vasc Surg
; 60(6): 1690-2, 2014 Dec.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-25454110
ABSTRACT
An experienced vascular surgeon, Dr Al Wright, specializing in venous disease, often sees self-referred patients seeking second opinions primarily for ablation therapy and is deeply disturbed at what he finds. Some patients have no reflux on ultrasound examination and, thus, no treatment is indicated. Others were told they need a ludicrous three to seven ablations in each leg where only one or at most two are needed. Several advertise their services in the media. Dr Wright asked esteemed colleagues from the American Venous Forum what they recommended and they suggested sending a copy of his consultation to the first consultant with the goal of shaming him. He also notified the state medical board 2 years ago about one egregious repeat offender, without action. What should he do? A. Do as suggested, send your consult along with a harsh letter. B. Do nothing. It is none of your business. C. Notify the state medical board, again. D. Notify the insurance companies and regulators. E. There is no good venue to deal with the problem.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Encaminhamento e Consulta
/
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares
/
Insuficiência Venosa
/
Procedimentos Desnecessários
/
Má Conduta Profissional
/
Técnicas de Ablação
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2014
Tipo de documento:
Article