Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A phase I-II evaluation of veliparib (NSC #737664), topotecan, and filgrastim or pegfilgrastim in the treatment of persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Kunos, Charles; Deng, Wei; Dawson, Dawn; Lea, Jayanthi S; Zanotti, Kristine M; Gray, Heidi J; Bender, David P; Guaglianone, Perry P; Carter, Jori S; Moore, Kathleen N.
Afiliação
  • Kunos C; *Summa Cancer Institute, Summa Health System, Akron, OH; †NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistics and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; ‡Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; §UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; ∥University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; ¶University of Washington, Seattle, WA; #University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; **Decatur Memorial Hospital, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; ††Vi
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 25(3): 484-92, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25594147
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition by veliparib during cytotoxic topotecan administration with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim neutrophil support in women with persistent or recurrent uterine cervix cancer. EXPERIMENTAL

DESIGN:

This phase I-II trial examined twice-daily oral veliparib (10 mg) given during once-daily intravenous topotecan (0.6 mg/m²) on days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until disease progression or until toxicity prohibited further therapy. Toxicity and objective response rate were primary endpoints.

RESULTS:

Twenty-seven women were enrolled. Frequently reported grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicities were anemia (59%), thrombocytopenia (44%), leukopenia (22%), and neutropenia (19%). There were 2 partial responses (7% [90% confidence interval, 1%-22%]). Four patients had a disease progression date more than 6 months after the start of veliparib-topotecan therapy. Patients with low immunohistochemical expression (0-1+) of PARP-1 in their primary uterine cervix cancer were more likely to have a longer progression-free interval (hazard ratio, 0.25; P = 0.02) and survival (hazard ratio, 0.12; P = 0.005) after veliparib-topotecan therapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinical activity of a veliparib-topotecan combination was minimal in women with persistent or recurrent uterine cervix cancer. Women whose uterine cervix cancers express PARP-1 at low levels may benefit preferentially from PARP inhibitors combined with cytotoxic therapies, suggesting further study of PARP expression as an integral triage biomarker.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article