Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of treatment center and hospital volume on survival for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Wright, Jason D; Huang, Yongmei; Ananth, Cande V; Tergas, Ana I; Duffy, Cassandra; Deutsch, Israel; Burke, William M; Hou, June Y; Neugut, Alfred I; Hershman, Dawn L.
Afiliação
  • Wright JD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States. Electronic address: jw2459
  • Huang Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States.
  • Ananth CV; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, United States.
  • Tergas AI; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and S
  • Duffy C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States.
  • Deutsch I; Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States.
  • Burke WM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States.
  • Hou JY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; New York Presbyterian Hospital, United States.
  • Neugut AI; Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United S
  • Hershman DL; Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, United States; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, United S
Gynecol Oncol ; 139(3): 506-12, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26177552
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Procedural volume is associated with outcomes for many surgical interventions. Little is known about the association between volume and outcomes of radiation. We examined the association between treatment center and hospital volume and outcomes for women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radiation.

METHODS:

Women with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer treated with primary radiation from 1998 to 2011 and recorded in the National Cancer Database were examined. Hospital volume was estimated as the mean annualized volume, while center-specific effects on care were examined using a hospital-specific random effect. Multivariable regression models adjusted for metrics of treatment quality were used to estimate survival.

RESULTS:

20,766 patients treated at 1115 hospitals were identified. The median follow-up was 24.2months while 5-year survival was 36.5% (95% CI, 35.6-37.4%). Higher hospital volume was associated with receipt of brachytherapy (P<0.05), but had no effect on use of chemotherapy. In a multivariable model accounting for clinical and demographic factors as well as quality of care, hospital volume was not associated with survival (P=0.25). The specific hospital in which patients received care was the strongest predictor of survival (P<0.0001) followed by stage, year of diagnosis and treatment quality (P<0.0001 for all). The hospital-specific effect on mortality expressed as a hazard ratio, ranged from 0.66 to 1.53 across hospitals.

CONCLUSION:

For locally advanced cervical cancer, hospital volume has a minimal impact on outcome; however, the specific center in which care is delivered is strongly associated with survival.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Institutos de Câncer / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Adenocarcinoma / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Carcinoma Adenoescamoso / Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos / Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Institutos de Câncer / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Adenocarcinoma / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Carcinoma Adenoescamoso / Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos / Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article