Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between Brazilian agro-wastes and activated carbon as adsorbents to remove Ni(II) from aqueous solutions.
Dotto, Guilherme Luiz; Meili, Lucas; de Souza Abud, Ana Karla; Tanabe, Eduardo Hiromitsu; Bertuol, Daniel Assumpção; Foletto, Edson Luiz.
Afiliação
  • Dotto GL; Environmental Processes Laboratory (LAPAM), Chemical Engineering Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil E-mail: guilherme_dotto@yahoo.com.br.
  • Meili L; Separation Systems and Process Optimization Laboratory, Center of Technology, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió 57072-970, Brazil.
  • de Souza Abud AK; Food Technology Department, Center of Exact Sciences and Technology, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju 49100-000, Brazil.
  • Tanabe EH; Environmental Processes Laboratory (LAPAM), Chemical Engineering Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil E-mail: guilherme_dotto@yahoo.com.br.
  • Bertuol DA; Environmental Processes Laboratory (LAPAM), Chemical Engineering Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil E-mail: guilherme_dotto@yahoo.com.br.
  • Foletto EL; Environmental Processes Laboratory (LAPAM), Chemical Engineering Department, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil E-mail: guilherme_dotto@yahoo.com.br.
Water Sci Technol ; 73(11): 2713-21, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27232408
ABSTRACT
This research was performed to find an alternative, low-cost, competitive, locally available and efficient adsorbent to treat nickel (Ni) containing effluents. For this purpose, several Brazilian agro-wastes like sugarcane bagasse (SCB), passion fruit wastes (PFW), orange peel (OP) and pineapple peel (PP) were compared with an activated carbon (AC). The adsorbents were characterized. Effects of fundamental factors affecting the adsorption were investigated using batch tests. Kinetic and equilibrium studies were performed using conventional models. It was verified that the adsorption was favored at pH of 6.0 for all agro-wastes, being dependent of the Ni speciation, point of zero charge and surface area of the adsorbents. The Ni removal percentage was in the following order SCB > OP > AC > PFW > PP. From the kinetic viewpoint, the Elovich model was appropriate to fit the Ni adsorption onto SCB, while for the other adsorbents, the pseudo-first-order model was the most suitable. For all adsorbents, the Langmuir model was the more adequate to represent the equilibrium data, being the maximum adsorption capacities of 64.1 mg g(-1), 60.7 mg g(-1), 63.1 mg g(-1), 48.1 mg g(-1) and 64.3 mg g(-1) for SCB, PFW, OP, PP and AC, respectively. These results indicated that mainly SCB and OP can be used as alternative adsorbents to treat Ni containing effluents.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água / Carvão Vegetal / Biomassa / Níquel Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água / Carvão Vegetal / Biomassa / Níquel Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article