Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee.
Saxby, David John; Bryant, Adam L; Modenese, Luca; Gerus, Pauline; Killen, Bryce A; Konrath, Jason; Fortin, Karine; Wrigley, Tim V; Bennell, Kim L; Cicuttini, Flavia M; Vertullo, Christopher; Feller, Julian A; Whitehead, Tim; Gallie, Price; Lloyd, David G.
Afiliação
  • Saxby DJ; 1Innovations in Health Technology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, AUSTRALIA; 2Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, AUSTRALIA; 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, UNITED KINGDOM; 4INSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, UNITED KINGDOM; 5Laboratory of Human Motion, Education and Health, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, FRANCE; 6Department of Epidemiology and
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 48(11): 2195-2206, 2016 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27337173
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate differences in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed (ACLR) and healthy individuals in terms of the magnitude of the tibiofemoral contact forces, as well as the relative muscle and external load contributions to those contact forces, during walking, running, and sidestepping gait tasks.

METHODS:

A computational EMG-driven neuromusculoskeletal model was used to estimate the muscle and tibiofemoral contact forces in those with single-bundle combined semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autograft ACLR (n = 104, 29.7 ± 6.5 yr, 78.1 ± 14.4 kg) and healthy controls (n = 60, 27.5 ± 5.4 yr, 67.8 ± 14.0 kg) during walking (1.4 ± 0.2 m·s), running (4.5 ± 0.5 m·s) and sidestepping (3.7 ± 0.6 m·s). Within the computational model, the semitendinosus of ACLR participants was adjusted to account for literature reported strength deficits and morphological changes subsequent to autograft harvesting.

RESULTS:

ACLR had smaller maximum total and medial tibiofemoral contact forces (~80% of control values, scaled to bodyweight) during the different gait tasks. Compared with controls, ACLR were found to have a smaller maximum knee flexion moment, which explained the smaller tibiofemoral contact forces. Similarly, compared with controls, ACLR had both a smaller maximum knee flexion angle and knee flexion excursion during running and sidestepping, which may have concentrated the articular contact forces to smaller areas within the tibiofemoral joint. Mean relative muscle and external load contributions to the tibiofemoral contact forces were not significantly different between ACLR and controls.

CONCLUSIONS:

ACLR had lower bodyweight-scaled tibiofemoral contact forces during walking, running, and sidestepping, likely due to lower knee flexion moments and straighter knee during the different gait tasks. The relative contributions of muscles and external loads to the contact forces were equivalent between groups.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Corrida / Caminhada / Músculo Esquelético / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Marcha / Articulação do Joelho Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Corrida / Caminhada / Músculo Esquelético / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Marcha / Articulação do Joelho Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article