Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Global Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Goldstein, Daniel A; Chen, Qiushi; Ayer, Turgay; Chan, Kelvin K W; Virik, Kiran; Hammerman, Ariel; Brenner, Baruch; Flowers, Christopher R; Hall, Peter S.
Afiliação
  • Goldstein DA; Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petach, Tikvah, Israel dgolds8@emory.edu.
  • Chen Q; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Ayer T; H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Chan KKW; H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Virik K; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
  • Hammerman A; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Brenner B; Department of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Flowers CR; Clalit Health Services Headquarters, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Hall PS; Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petach, Tikvah, Israel.
Oncologist ; 22(6): 694-699, 2017 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28592621
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the U.S., the addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated to provide 0.10 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $571,000/QALY. Due to variability in pricing, value for money may be different in other countries. Our objective was to establish the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in mCRC in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and Israel.

METHODS:

We performed the analysis using a previously established Markov model for mCRC. Input data for efficacy, adverse events, and quality of life were considered to be generalizable and therefore identical for all countries. We used country-specific prices for medications, administration, and other health service costs. All costs were converted from local currency to U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in March 2016. We conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) to assess the model robustness across parameter uncertainties.

RESULTS:

Base case results demonstrated that the highest ICER was in the U.S. ($571,000/QALY) and the lowest was in Australia ($277,000/QALY). In Canada, the U.K., and Israel, ICERs ranged between $351,000 and $358,000 per QALY. PSA demonstrated 0% likelihood of bevacizumab being cost-effective in any country at a willingness to pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY.

CONCLUSION:

The addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy for mCRC consistently fails to be cost-effective in all five countries. There are large differences in cost-effectiveness between countries. This study provides a framework for analyzing the value of a cancer drug from the perspectives of multiple international payers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab varies significantly between multiple countries. By conventional thresholds, bevacizumab is not cost-effective in metastatic colon cancer in the U.S., the U.K., Australia, Canada, and Israel.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Análise Custo-Benefício / Bevacizumab Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Asia / Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Análise Custo-Benefício / Bevacizumab Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Asia / Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article