Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparative study on generating simulated Landsat NDVI images using data fusion and regression method-the case of the Korean Peninsula.
Lee, Mi Hee; Lee, Soo Bong; Eo, Yang Dam; Kim, Sun Woong; Woo, Jung-Hun; Han, Soo Hee.
Afiliação
  • Lee MH; National Disaster Management Research Institute, Ulsan, South Korea.
  • Lee SB; National Disaster Management Research Institute, Ulsan, South Korea.
  • Eo YD; Department of Advanced Technology Fusion, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea. eoandrew@konkuk.ac.kr.
  • Kim SW; Department of Advanced Technology Fusion, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Woo JH; Department of Advanced Technology Fusion, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Han SH; Department of Geoinformatics Engineering, Kyungil University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.
Environ Monit Assess ; 189(7): 333, 2017 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28608301
ABSTRACT
Landsat optical images have enough spatial and spectral resolution to analyze vegetation growth characteristics. But, the clouds and water vapor degrade the image quality quite often, which limits the availability of usable images for the time series vegetation vitality measurement. To overcome this shortcoming, simulated images are used as an alternative. In this study, weighted average method, spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (STARFM) method, and multilinear regression analysis method have been tested to produce simulated Landsat normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) images of the Korean Peninsula. The test results showed that the weighted average method produced the images most similar to the actual images, provided that the images were available within 1 month before and after the target date. The STARFM method gives good results when the input image date is close to the target date. Careful regional and seasonal consideration is required in selecting input images. During summer season, due to clouds, it is very difficult to get the images close enough to the target date. Multilinear regression analysis gives meaningful results even when the input image date is not so close to the target date. Average R 2 values for weighted average method, STARFM, and multilinear regression analysis were 0.741, 0.70, and 0.61, respectively.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Ambiental / Análise de Regressão / Imagens de Satélites Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Ambiental / Análise de Regressão / Imagens de Satélites Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article