Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidental findings on multiparametric MRI performed for evaluation of prostate cancer.
Sherrer, Rachael L; Lai, Win Shun; Thomas, John V; Nix, Jeffrey W; Rais-Bahrami, Soroush.
Afiliação
  • Sherrer RL; Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
  • Lai WS; Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
  • Thomas JV; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Jefferson Tower N354, 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
  • Nix JW; Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
  • Rais-Bahrami S; Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. sraisbahrami@uabmc.edu.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 43(3): 696-701, 2018 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28677001
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and MRI/Ultrasound (US) fusion-guided biopsy are relatively new techniques for improved detection, staging, and active surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa). As with all imaging modalities, MRI reveals incidental findings (IFs) which carry the risk of increased cost, patient anxiety, and iatrogenic morbidity due to workup of IFs. Herein, we report the IFs from 684 MRIs for evaluation of PCa and consider their characteristics and clinical significance.

METHODS:

Patients underwent mp-MRI prostate protocol incorporating triplanar T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI as well as a post-contrast abdominopelvic MRI with the primary indication of detection or evaluation of PCa. A total of 684 consecutive prostate MRI reports performed in a series of 580 patients were reviewed. All extraprostatic findings reported were logged and then categorized by organ system and potential clinical significance.

RESULTS:

There were 349 true IFs found in 233 (40%) of the 580 patients. One hundred nineteen additional extraprostatic findings were unsuspected but directly related to PCa staging, while the 349 IFs were unrelated and thus truly incidental beyond study indication. While the majority of true IFs were non-urologic, only 6.6% of IFs were considered clinically significant, non-urologic findings, and more than a third of MRI reports had urologic IFs not related to PCa.

CONCLUSIONS:

Rates of incidental findings on prostate indication MRI are similar to other abdominopelvic imaging studies. However, only 6.6% of the IFs were considered to be clinically significant non-urologic findings. Further investigations are needed to assess downstream workup of these IFs and resulting costs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Achados Incidentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Achados Incidentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article