Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: A Randomized Trial.
Beck, Roy W; Riddlesworth, Tonya D; Ruedy, Katrina; Ahmann, Andrew; Haller, Stacie; Kruger, Davida; McGill, Janet B; Polonsky, William; Price, David; Aronoff, Stephen; Aronson, Ronnie; Toschi, Elena; Kollman, Craig; Bergenstal, Richard.
Afiliação
  • Beck RW; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Riddlesworth TD; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Ruedy K; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Ahmann A; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Haller S; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Kruger D; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • McGill JB; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Polonsky W; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Price D; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Aronoff S; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Aronson R; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Toschi E; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Kollman C; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
  • Bergenstal R; From Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, Texas; Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Behavioral Diabetes Inst
Ann Intern Med ; 167(6): 365-374, 2017 09 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28828487
ABSTRACT

Background:

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which studies have shown is beneficial for adults with type 1 diabetes, has not been well-evaluated in those with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin.

Objective:

To determine the effectiveness of CGM in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily injections of insulin.

Design:

Randomized clinical trial. (The protocol also included a type 1 diabetes cohort in a parallel trial and subsequent second trial.) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02282397).

Setting:

25 endocrinology practices in North America. Patients 158 adults who had had type 2 diabetes for a median of 17 years (interquartile range, 11 to 23 years). Participants were aged 35 to 79 years (mean, 60 years [SD, 10]), were receiving multiple daily injections of insulin, and had hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of 7.5% to 9.9% (mean, 8.5%). Intervention Random assignment to CGM (n = 79) or usual care (control group, n = 79). Measurements The primary outcome was HbA1c reduction at 24 weeks.

Results:

Mean HbA1c levels decreased to 7.7% in the CGM group and 8.0% in the control group at 24 weeks (adjusted difference in mean change, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.5% to 0.0%]; P = 0.022). The groups did not differ meaningfully in CGM-measured hypoglycemia or quality-of-life outcomes. The CGM group averaged 6.7 days (SD, 0.9) of CGM use per week.

Limitation:

6-month follow-up.

Conclusion:

A high percentage of adults who received multiple daily insulin injections for type 2 diabetes used CGM on a daily or near-daily basis for 24 weeks and had improved glycemic control. Because few insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes currently use CGM, these results support an additional management method that may benefit these patients. Primary Funding Source Dexcom.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Automonitorização da Glicemia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemiantes / Insulina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Automonitorização da Glicemia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemiantes / Insulina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article