Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lessons learnt from a process evaluation of an exercise intervention in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation.
Persoon, S; Chinapaw, M J M; Buffart, L M; Brug, J; Kersten, M J; Nollet, F.
Afiliação
  • Persoon S; Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Chinapaw MJM; Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Buffart LM; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Brug J; Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Kersten MJ; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Nollet F; Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28960542
This paper describes the process evaluation of an 18-week supervised exercise programme in 50 patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. The intervention included 30 exercise sessions with six resistance exercises and interval training. We evaluated the context, dose delivered and received, and patients' and physiotherapists' satisfaction with the intervention. Ninety-two per cent of the patients trained within 15 km of their home address, with an average session attendance of 86%. Most patients trained at the prescribed intensity for four of the six resistance exercises, but the dose delivered and received of the two remaining resistance exercises and interval training could not be determined. Both patients and physiotherapists highly appreciated the programme (score of 8.3 and 7.9 out of 10 respectively). This process evaluation provided valuable lessons for future trials: (1) It is possible to deliver supervised exercise training to this patient group in local physiotherapy practices; (2) to determine dose received all intervention components should be standardised; and (3) to optimise data collection, all study materials should be tested more extensively prior to the start of the intervention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma não Hodgkin / Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde / Transplante de Células-Tronco / Terapia por Exercício / Mieloma Múltiplo / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma não Hodgkin / Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde / Transplante de Células-Tronco / Terapia por Exercício / Mieloma Múltiplo / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article