Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Temporal trends in safety and complication rates of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Muthalaly, Rahul G; John, Roy M; Schaeffer, Benjamin; Tanigawa, Shinichi; Nakamura, Tomofumi; Kapur, Sunil; Zei, Paul C; Epstein, Laurence M; Tedrow, Usha B; Michaud, Gregory F; Stevenson, William G; Koplan, Bruce A.
Afiliação
  • Muthalaly RG; Arrhythmia Service, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • John RM; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Schaeffer B; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Tanigawa S; Arrhythmia Service, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Nakamura T; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kapur S; Arrhythmia Service, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Zei PC; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Epstein LM; Arrhythmia Service, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Tedrow UB; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Michaud GF; Arrhythmia Service, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Stevenson WG; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Koplan BA; Arrhythmia Service, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 29(6): 854-860, 2018 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29570900
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly common, but is associated with potential major complications. Technology, experience, and protocols have evolved significantly in recent times, and may have impacted procedural safety. We sought to compare AF ablation safety profiles, including complication rates and fluoroscopy times in a "modern" versus "historical" cohort. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

We evaluated consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation from a modern cohort (MC) from 2014 to 2015 and a historic cohort (HC) from 2009 to 2011 for complications. Major complications were categorized according to Heart Rhythm Society guidelines. We included 1,425 patients, 726 in the HC and 699 in the MC. The MC was older, had more OSA and less valvular AF. Fifty-two (3.5%) procedures suffered major complications across the cohorts, with significantly fewer in the MC (5.0% vs. 2.3%, P  =  0.007). The largest reductions were seen in vascular, hemorrhagic, ischemic stroke, and perforation/tamponade related complications. Periprocedural antiplatelets drugs (aHR 2.1 [95 CI 1.1-3.9], P  =  0.02) and force-sensing catheters (aHR 0.4 [95 CI 0.2-0.9], P  =  0.03) were independently related to major complication rates. Direct oral anticoagulants and uninterrupted anticoagulation were not associated with complications. There was a decrease in both fluoroscopy (-17.4 minutes [95 CI 19.2-15.6], P < 0.0001) and radiofrequency ablation times (-561 seconds [95CI -750 to -371], P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The safety profile of AF ablation has improved significantly in less than a decade.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article