Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Results From a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of a RBX2660-A Microbiota-Based Drug for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.
Dubberke, Erik R; Lee, Christine H; Orenstein, Robert; Khanna, Sahil; Hecht, Gail; Gerding, Dale N.
Afiliação
  • Dubberke ER; Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Lee CH; Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario.
  • Orenstein R; Vancouver Island Health Authority, Victoria, British Columbia.
  • Khanna S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Hecht G; Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix.
  • Gerding DN; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(8): 1198-1204, 2018 09 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617739
ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite advancements, recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) remain an urgent public health threat with insufficient response rates to currently approved antibiotic therapies. Microbiota-based treatments appear effective, but rigorous clinical trials are required to optimize dosing strategies and substantiate long-term safety.

Methods:

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2B trial enrolled adults with 2 or more CDI recurrences to receive 2 doses of RBX2660, a standardized microbiota-based drug (group A); 2doses of placebo (group B); or 1 dose of RBX2660 followed by 1 dose of placebo (group C). Efficacy was defined as prevention of recurrent CDI for 8 weeks following treatment. Participants who had a recurrence within 8 weeks were eligible to receive up to 2 open-label RBX2660 doses. The primary endpoint was efficacy for group A compared to group B. Secondary endpoints included the efficacy of group C compared to group B, combined efficacy in the blinded and open-label phases, and safety for 24 months.

Results:

The efficacy for groups A, B, and C were 61%, 45%, and 67%, respectively. The primary endpoint was not met (P = .152). One RBX2660 dose (group C) was superior to placebo (group B; P = .048), and the overall efficacy (including open-label response) for RBX2660-treated participants was 88.8%. Adverse events did not differ significantly among treatment groups.

Conclusions:

One, but not 2, doses of RBX2660 was superior to placebo in this randomized, placebo-controlled trial. These data provide important insights for a larger phase 3 trial and continued clinical development of RBX2660. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02299570.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Biológica / Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa / Clostridioides difficile / Infecções por Clostridium / Microbiota / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Biológica / Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa / Clostridioides difficile / Infecções por Clostridium / Microbiota / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article