Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Correlates of Use and Perceived Effectiveness of Non-pharmacologic Strategies for Chronic Pain Among Patients Prescribed Long-term Opioid Therapy.
Lozier, Crystal C; Nugent, Shannon M; Smith, Ning X; Yarborough, Bobbi Jo; Dobscha, Steven K; Deyo, Richard A; Morasco, Benjamin J.
Afiliação
  • Lozier CC; VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA. crystal.lozier@va.gov.
  • Nugent SM; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. crystal.lozier@va.gov.
  • Smith NX; VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Yarborough BJ; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Dobscha SK; Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Deyo RA; Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Morasco BJ; VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(Suppl 1): 46-53, 2018 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29633138
OBJECTIVE: Non-pharmacologic treatments (NPTs) are recommended for chronic pain. Information is limited on patient use or perceptions of NPTs. We examined the frequency and correlates of use and self-rated helpfulness of NPTs for chronic pain among patients who are prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). METHODS: Participants (n = 517) with musculoskeletal pain who were prescribed LTOT were recruited from two integrated health systems. They rated the frequency and utility of six clinician-directed and five self-directed NPTs for chronic pain. We categorized NPT use at four levels based on number of interventions used and frequency of use (none, low, moderate, high). Analyses examined clinical and demographic factors that differed among groups for both clinician-directed and self-directed NPTs. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of participants reported use of any NPT for pain within the prior 6 months. NPTs were rated as being helpful by more than 50% of users for all treatments assessed (range 51-79%). High users of clinician-directed NPTs were younger than non-users or low-frequency users and had the most depressive symptoms. In both clinician-directed and self-directed categories, high NPT users had significantly higher pain disability compared to non-NPT users. No significant group differences were detected on other demographic or clinical variables. In multivariable analyses, clinician-directed NPT use was modestly associated with younger age (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96-0.98) and higher pain disability (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.02). Variables associated with greater self-directed NPT use were some college education (OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.13-2.84), college graduate or more (OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.20-3.40), and higher pain disability (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: NPT use was associated with higher pain disability and younger age for both clinician-directed and self-directed NPTs and higher education for self-directed NPTs. These strategies were rated as helpful by those that used them. These results can inform intervention implementation and be used to increase engagement in NPTs for chronic pain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Dor Musculoesquelética / Dor Crônica / Manejo da Dor / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Dor Musculoesquelética / Dor Crônica / Manejo da Dor / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article