Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer.
Bertucci, François; Finetti, Pascal; Simeone, Ines; Hendrickx, Wouter; Wang, Ena; Marincola, Francesco M; Viens, Patrice; Mamessier, Emilie; Ceccarelli, Michele; Birnbaum, Daniel; Bedognetti, Davide.
Afiliação
  • Bertucci F; Equipe Oncologie Prédictive, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Institut Paoli-Calmettes, INSERM UMR1068, CNRS UMR725, Marseille, France. bertuccif@ipc.unicancer.fr.
  • Finetti P; Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. bertuccif@ipc.unicancer.fr.
  • Simeone I; Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. bertuccif@ipc.unicancer.fr.
  • Hendrickx W; Equipe Oncologie Prédictive, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Institut Paoli-Calmettes, INSERM UMR1068, CNRS UMR725, Marseille, France.
  • Wang E; Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Milan, Italy.
  • Marincola FM; Research Branch, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
  • Viens P; Research Branch, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
  • Mamessier E; Research Branch, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
  • Ceccarelli M; Abbvie Corporation, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Br J Cancer ; 119(11): 1383-1391, 2018 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30353048
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The immunologic constant of rejection (ICR) is a broad phenomenon of Th-1 immunity-mediated, tissue-specific destruction.

METHODS:

We tested the prognostic value of a 20-gene ICR expression signature in 8766 early breast cancers.

RESULTS:

Thirty-three percent of tumours were ICR1, 29% ICR2, 23% ICR3, and 15% ICR4. In univariate analysis, ICR4 was associated with a 36% reduction in risk of metastatic relapse when compared with ICR1-3 (p = 2.30E-03). In multivariate analysis including notably the three major prognostic signatures (Recurrence score, 70-gene signature, ROR-P), ICR was the strongest predictive variable (p = 9.80E-04). ICR showed no prognostic value in the HR+/HER2- subtype, but prognostic value in the HER2+ and TN subtypes. Furthermore, in each molecular subtype and among the tumours defined as high risk by the three prognostic signatures, ICR4 patients had a 41-75% reduction in risk of relapse as compared with ICR1-3 patients. ICR added significant prognostic information to that provided by the clinico-genomic models in the overall population and in each molecular subtype. ICR4 was independently associated with achievement of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 2.97E-04).

CONCLUSION:

ICR signature adds prognostic information to that of current proliferation-based signatures, with which it could be integrated to improve patients' stratification and guide adjuvant treatment.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article