Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effect of a Primary Care Provider Incentive Program on Pediatric Emergency Medicine Visits.
Li, Joyce; Patel, Binita; Giardino, Angelo P; Camp, Elizabeth A; Macias, Charles G.
Afiliação
  • Patel B; Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine.
  • Giardino AP; Department of General Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Camp EA; Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine.
  • Macias CG; Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 35(5): 363-368, 2019 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30557218
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of a financial incentive program targeting primary care providers (PCPs) with the goal of decreasing emergency department (ED) utilization.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in a single health maintenance organization comparing ED visit/1000 member-months before and after the physician incentive program in 2009. We compared the median ED visit rate between physicians who did (PIP) and did not participate (non-PIP) from 2009 to 2012. We used 2008 data as a baseline study period to compare the ED visit rate between PIP and non-PIP providers to detect any inherent difference between the 2 groups.

RESULTS:

A total of 1376 PCPs were enrolled. A total of US $18,290,817 was spent in total on incentives. Overall, the median ED visit rate for all providers was statistically significantly lower during the study period (baseline period, study period 56.36 ED visits/1000 member-months vs 45.82, respectively, P < 0.001). During the baseline period in our fully adjusted linear regression for degree, specialty, education, and board status, PIP versus non-PIP visits were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.17). During the study period in our fully adjusted model, we found that PIP had statistically significant fewer ED visits compared with non-PIP (P = 0.02). In a subgroup analysis of providers who did and did not receive an incentive payment, in the fully adjusted linear regression, providers who received any payment had statistically significant fewer ED visits/1000 member-months (P < 0.001). In addition, we found in the fully adjusted analysis that those providers who received at least 1 incentive payment for meeting after-hours criteria had statistically significantly fewer ED visits/1000 member-months (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

A financial incentive program to provide PCPs with specific targets and goals to decrease pediatric ED utilization can decrease ED visits.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Planos de Incentivos Médicos / Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Hospitais Pediátricos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Planos de Incentivos Médicos / Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Hospitais Pediátricos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article