[Robotic-assisted laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800® in woman: Single center experience]. / Implantation du sphincter artificiel AMS 800® chez la femme par cœlioscopie robot-assistée : expérience monocentrique.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is the treatment of last resort of stress urinary incontinence (UI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (IS). The implantation procedure has been described by open surgery and laparoscopy with a significative rate of complication by Lucas et al. (2012) and Costa et al. (2001). We report our experience of implantation of SUA by robotic-assisted laparoscopy (R-SUA) in 17 patients among 3 revisions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, 17 patients have been consecutively included. The surgical technique was described by Fournier et al. The continence was defined by the absence of urine leakage. RESULTS: The median age at implantation was 66,8±7 years, in the primo-implantation (PI) group, one patient had a neurological acontractile bladder, and bladder was open in 11 patients (78,6%) to ensure the bladder neck dissection. In the revision group (R) 3 patients had a complete replacement of SUA for mechanical failure. One vaginal bound was reported, but did not compromise the implantation, and the survival of SUA. Duration of intervention, size of cuff, postoperative catheterization and hospitalization time were respectively 205±34 and 112±8min; 7,7±0.9 and 5.2±0.8cm; 5.9±2.1 and 4.3±4 days; 6.6±1.5 and 7±3.6 days for PI and R groups. At the end of a mean follow-up of 24.6±18.4 and 59±5 months, continence was respectively 86% and 100%, for the PI and R groups. CONCLUSION: The implantation of R-SUA was feasible and safe with encouraging results. Other studies must evaluate the place of R-SUA among the different enabled surgical techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.