Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between the wild and captive Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang).
Gao, H; Chi, X; Qin, W; Wang, L; Song, P; Cai, Z; Zhang, J; Zhang, T.
Afiliação
  • Gao H; Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai Province, China.
  • Chi X; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Qin W; Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai Province, China.
  • Wang L; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Song P; Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai Province, China.
  • Cai Z; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang J; Key Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, Province, China.
  • Zhang T; Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai Province, China.
J Appl Microbiol ; 126(6): 1869-1878, 2019 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30825354
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The gut microbiota has a great effect on the health and nutrition of the host. Manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may improve animal health and growth performance. The objectives of our study were to characterize the faecal microbiota between wild and captive Tibetan wild asses and discuss the differences and their reasons. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Through high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4-V5 region, we studied the gut microbiota composition and structure of Tibetan wild asses in winter, and analysed the differences between wild and captive groups. The results showed that the most common bacterial phylum in Tibetan wild ass faeces samples was Bacteroidetes, while the phylum Firmicutes was dominant in captive Tibetan wild ass faecal samples. The relative abundance of Firmicutes, Tenericutes and Spirochaetes were significantly higher (P < 0·01) than in the wild groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Captivity reduces intestinal microbial diversity, evenness and operational taxonomic unit number due to the consumption of industrial food, therefore, increasing the risk of disease prevalence and affecting the health of wildlife. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY We studied the effect of the captive environment on intestinal micro-organisms. This article provides a theoretical basis for the ex-situ conservation of wild animals in the future.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equidae / Biodiversidade / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equidae / Biodiversidade / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article