Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells.
Utheim, O A; Pasovic, L; Raeder, S; Eidet, J R; Fostad, I G; Sehic, A; Roald, B; de la Paz, M F; Lyberg, T; Dartt, D A; Utheim, T P.
Afiliação
  • Utheim OA; Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Pasovic L; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Raeder S; Norwegian Dry Eye Clinic, Oslo, Norway.
  • Eidet JR; Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Fostad IG; Norwegian Dry Eye Clinic, Oslo, Norway.
  • Sehic A; Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Roald B; Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • de la Paz MF; Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lyberg T; Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Dartt DA; Department of Maxillofacial surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Utheim TP; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
PLoS One ; 14(3): e0212524, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30861002
PURPOSE: Transplantation of limbal stem cells is a promising therapy for limbal stem cell deficiency. Limbal cells can be harvested from either a healthy part of the patient's eye or the eye of a donor. Small explants are less likely to inflict injury to the donor site. We investigated the effects of limbal explant size on multiple characteristics known to be important for transplant function. METHODS: Human limbal epithelial cells were expanded from large versus small explants (3 versus 1 mm of the corneal circumference) for 3 weeks and characterized by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. Epithelial thickness, stratification, outgrowth, ultrastructure and phenotype were assessed. RESULTS: Epithelial thickness and stratification were similar between the groups. Outgrowth size correlated positively with explant size (r = 0.37; P = 0.01), whereas fold growth correlated negatively with explant size (r = -0.55; P < 0.0001). Percentage of cells expressing the limbal epithelial cell marker K19 was higher in cells derived from large explants (99.1±1.2%) compared to cells derived from small explants (93.2±13.6%, P = 0.024). The percentage of cells expressing ABCG2, integrin ß1, p63, and p63α that are markers suggestive of an immature phenotype; Keratin 3, Connexin 43, and E-Cadherin that are markers of differentiation; and Ki67 and PCNA that indicate cell proliferation were equal in both groups. Desmosome and hemidesmosome densities were equal between the groups. CONCLUSION: For donor- and culture conditions used in the present study, large explants are preferable to small in terms of outgrowth area. As regards limbal epithelial cell thickness, stratification, mechanical strength, and the attainment of a predominantly immature phenotype, both large and small explants are sufficient.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Células-Tronco / Limbo da Córnea / Epitélio Corneano / Proliferação de Células / Células Epiteliais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Células-Tronco / Limbo da Córnea / Epitélio Corneano / Proliferação de Células / Células Epiteliais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article