Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical activity at the UK military level 2 hospital in Bentiu, South Sudan during Op TRENTON from June to September 2017.
Bailey, Mark S; Gurney, I; Lentaigne, J; Biswas, J S; Hill, N E.
Afiliação
  • Bailey MS; Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK m.s.bailey@warwick.ac.uk.
  • Gurney I; Academic Department of Military Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK.
  • Lentaigne J; Academic Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK.
  • Biswas JS; Departments of Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
  • Hill NE; Centre for Defence Pathology, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ Mil Health ; 167(5): 304-309, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31005887
INTRODUCTION: Diseases and non-battle injuries (DNBIs) are common on UK military deployments, but the collection and analysis of clinically useful data on these remain a challenge. Standard medical returns do not provide adequate clinical information, and clinician-led approaches have been laudable, but not integrated nor standardised nor used long-term. Op TRENTON is a novel UK military humanitarian operation in support of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan, which included the deployment of UK military level 1 and level 2 medical treatment facilities at Bentiu to provide healthcare for UK and United Nations (UN) personnel. METHODS: A service evaluation of patient consultations and admissions at the UK military level 2 hospital was performed using two data sets collected by the emergency department (ED) and medicine (MED) teams. RESULTS: Over a three-month (13-week) period, 286 cases were seen, of which 51% were UK troops, 29% were UN civilians and 20% were UN troops. The ED team saw 175 cases (61%) and provided definitive care for 113 (40%), whereas the MED team saw and provided definitive care for 128 cases (45%). Overall, there were 75% with diseases and 25% with non-battle injuries. The most common diagnoses seen by the ED team were musculoskeletal injuries (17%), unidentified non-malarial undifferentiated febrile illness (UNMUFI) (17%), malaria (13%), chemical pneumonitis (13%) and wounds (8%). The most common diagnoses seen by the MED team were acute gastroenteritis (AGE) (56%), UNMUFI (12%) and malaria (9%). AGE was due to viruses (31%), diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (32%), other bacteria (6%) and protozoa (12%). CONCLUSION: Data collection on DNBIs during the initial phase of this deployment was clinically useful and integrated between different departments. However, a standardised, long-term solution that is embedded into deployed healthcare is required. The clinical activity recorded here should be used for planning, training, service development and targeted research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Militares Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa / America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Militares Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa / America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article