Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trade-off between pulse rate and radiation dose during modified barium swallow examination: what is the reality?
Galgano, S J; Gauntt, D; Boyd, M R; Trahan, D; Jackson, B E; Koehler, R E; Canon, C L; McNamara, M M; Zarzour, J G.
Afiliação
  • Galgano SJ; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiology, Birmingham, AL, USA. Electronic address: samuelgalgano@uabmc.edu.
  • Gauntt D; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Boyd MR; University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Trahan D; University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Jackson BE; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Koehler RE; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Canon CL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • McNamara MM; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Zarzour JG; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Clin Radiol ; 74(9): 736.e9-736.e12, 2019 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31256907
AIM: To evaluate the effect of modification of dose mode and frame rate on patient radiation dose during modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of consecutive MBS examinations performed over 6 months in the inpatient setting. Patients were divided into two cohorts: pre-implementation of the MBS Impairment Profile (MBSImP; low rate, normal dose) and post-implementation (high rate, low dose). Prior to implementation, pulse rate and dose testing were performed on multiple phantoms. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-nine patients were included in the pre-implementation cohort and 378 in the post-implementation cohort. Phantom dose testing demonstrated no significant difference in dose on either phantom between low rate/normal dose and high rate/low dose modes. Prior to MBS standardisation, the mean radiation dose was 5.86 (±4.35) mGy. Following standardisation, the mean radiation dose was 4.72 (±3.77) mGy (p<0.0001). The mean fluoroscopy time for MBS prior to standardisation was 83.8 (±44.4) seconds and the mean fluoroscopy time for MBS after standardisation was 82.3 (±39.8) seconds (p=0.62). The dose rate for MBS prior to standardisation was 4.35 (±2.42) and the dose rate for MBS after standardisation was 3.55 (±2.41) mGy/s (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Adjustments made to lower the dose mode and the increase in fluoroscopy frame rate decreased the patient radiation dose and did not increase fluoroscopy time.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Sulfato de Bário / Transtornos de Deglutição / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Sulfato de Bário / Transtornos de Deglutição / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article