Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Parental opinions towards the "No Jab, No Pay" policy in Australia.
Trent, Mallory J; Zhang, Elissa J; Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad; MacIntyre, C Raina.
Afiliação
  • Trent MJ; Biosecurity Program, Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: mallory.trent@unsw.edu.au.
  • Zhang EJ; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: elissa.zhang@student.unsw.edu.au.
  • Chughtai AA; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: abrar.chughtai@unsw.edu.au.
  • MacIntyre CR; Biosecurity Program, Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: r.macintyre@unsw.edu.au.
Vaccine ; 37(36): 5250-5256, 2019 08 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31371225
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2016, Australia introduced the "No Jab, No Pay" legislation, which removed the option of non-medical exemptions from the vaccination requirements to receive certain family and child care tax benefits. We aimed to gauge parental support for "No Jab, No Pay" and explore how it has impacted parental attitudes towards vaccination, particularly among families that are reliant on the tax benefits linked to vaccination under "No Jab, No Pay".

METHODS:

An online survey distributed to parents with children under 5 in Australia assessed parental knowledge and opinions towards childhood vaccination and the "No Jab, No Pay" policy.

RESULTS:

A total of 411 parents completed the survey. The majority of parents reported their child was either fully vaccinated or they intended to fully vaccinate. Eighty-two percent of parents were in favour of "No Jab, No Pay." The belief that vaccine-preventable diseases are a significant risk to unvaccinated children was a predictor of supporting the "No Jab, No Pay" policy (AOR = 5.95, 95% CI = [3.60, 10.94], p < 0.001). Parents that depend on the financial benefits associated with "No Jab, No Pay" and parents that utilize child care services were significantly more likely to reconsider vaccination, if they previously hesitated or objected, because of the policy (AOR = 9.66, 95% CI = [4.98, 18.72], p < 0.001 and AOR = 2.09, 95% CI = [1.04, 4.17], p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION:

We found that there is widespread support for "No Jab, No Pay" among parents of young children, but parents that depend on the financial benefits or utilize child care services may be disproportionately affected by the policy. Childhood vaccination coverage in Australia could best be improved by increasing access to vaccination services and by imposing significant administrative barriers to obtaining non-medical exemptions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article