Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations and adverse pregnancy outcomes: analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials.
Rogozinska, Ewelina; Zamora, Javier; Marlin, Nadine; Betrán, Ana Pilar; Astrup, Arne; Bogaerts, Annick; Cecatti, Jose G; Dodd, Jodie M; Facchinetti, Fabio; Geiker, Nina R W; Haakstad, Lene A H; Hauner, Hans; Jensen, Dorte M; Kinnunen, Tarja I; Mol, Ben W J; Owens, Julie; Phelan, Suzanne; Renault, Kristina M; Salvesen, Kjell Å; Shub, Alexis; Surita, Fernanda G; Stafne, Signe N; Teede, Helena; van Poppel, Mireille N M; Vinter, Christina A; Khan, Khalid S; Thangaratinam, Shakila.
Afiliação
  • Rogozinska E; Meta-Analysis Group, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK. e.rogozinska@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Zamora J; Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. e.rogozinska@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Marlin N; Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Betrán AP; Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Ramon y Cajal (IRYCIS) CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain.
  • Astrup A; Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Bogaerts A; Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Cecatti JG; Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Allé 51, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Dodd JM; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 - Box 805, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Facchinetti F; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Geiker NRW; Rua Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, São Paulo, Campinas, CEP, 13083-887, Brazil.
  • Haakstad LAH; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
  • Hauner H; Women's and Children's Hospital, Women's and Children's Health Network, Women's and Babies Division, 72 King William St, North Adelaide, SA, 5006, Australia.
  • Jensen DM; The Robinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Norwich Centre, 55 King William St, North Adelaide, SA, 5006, Australia.
  • Kinnunen TI; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother Infant Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, largo del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
  • Mol BWJ; Clinical Nutrition Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Kildegårdsvej 28, DK-2900 Hellerup, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Owens J; Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Sognsveien 220, 0863, Oslo, Norway.
  • Phelan S; Else Kröner-Fresenius-Zentrum für Ernährungsmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
  • Renault KM; Steno Diabetes Center Odense and Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 6/4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
  • Salvesen KÅ; Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Shub A; Unit of Health Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, 33014, Tampere, Finland.
  • Surita FG; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
  • Stafne SN; The Robinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Norwich Centre, 55 King William St, North Adelaide, SA, 5006, Australia.
  • Teede H; Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research Office, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
  • van Poppel MNM; Kinesiology Department, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA.
  • Vinter CA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
  • Khan KS; Obstetric Clinic, JMC, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Thangaratinam S; Department of Laboratory Medicine Children's and Women's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Olav Kyrres gate 11, 7006, Trondheim, Norway.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 322, 2019 Sep 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31477075
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High Body Mass Index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) affect an increasing number of pregnancies. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has issued recommendations on the optimal GWG for women according to their pre-pregnancy BMI (healthy, overweight or obese). It has been shown that pregnant women rarely met the recommendations; however, it is unclear by how much. Previous studies also adjusted the analyses for various women's characteristics making their comparison challenging.

METHODS:

We analysed individual participant data (IPD) of healthy women with a singleton pregnancy and a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 or more from the control arms of 36 randomised trials (16 countries). Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to describe the association between GWG outside (above or below) the IOM recommendations (2009) and risks of caesarean section, preterm birth, and large or small for gestational age (LGA or SGA) infants. The association was examined overall, within the BMI categories and by quartile of GWG departure from the IOM recommendations. We obtained aOR using mixed-effects logistic regression, accounting for the within-study clustering and a priori identified characteristics.

RESULTS:

Out of 4429 women (from 33 trials) meeting the inclusion criteria, two thirds gained weight outside the IOM recommendations (1646 above; 1291 below). The median GWG outside the IOM recommendations was 3.1 kg above and 2.7 kg below. In comparison to GWG within the IOM recommendations, GWG above was associated with increased odds of caesarean section (aOR 1.50; 95%CI 1.25, 1.80), LGA (2.00; 1.58, 2.54), and reduced odds of SGA (0.66; 0.50, 0.87); no significant effect on preterm birth was detected. The relationship between GWG below the IOM recommendation and caesarean section or LGA was inconclusive; however, the odds of preterm birth (1.94; 1.31, 2.28) and SGA (1.52; 1.18, 1.96) were increased.

CONCLUSIONS:

Consistently with previous findings, adherence to the IOM recommendations seem to help achieve better pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, even in the context of clinical trials, women find it difficult to adhere to them. Further research should focus on identifying ways of achieving a healthier GWG as defined by the IOM recommendations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Macrossomia Fetal / Resultado da Gravidez / Cesárea / Nascimento Prematuro / Retardo do Crescimento Fetal / Ganho de Peso na Gestação / Obesidade Materna Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Macrossomia Fetal / Resultado da Gravidez / Cesárea / Nascimento Prematuro / Retardo do Crescimento Fetal / Ganho de Peso na Gestação / Obesidade Materna Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article