Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of a new psychophysical method to assess intranasal trigeminal chemosensory function.
Huart, C; Hummel, T; Kaehling, C; Konstantinidis, I; Hox, V; Mouraux, A; Rombaux, P.
Afiliação
  • Huart C; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium; Institute of Neuroscience, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Hummel T; Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Kaehling C; Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Konstantinidis I; Second Academic Otorhinolaryngology Department, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Hox V; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Mouraux A; Institute of Neuroscience, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Rombaux P; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium; Institute of Neuroscience, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Rhinology ; 57(5): 375-384, 2019 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31576819
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a new psychophysical test to assess intranasal trigeminal chemosensory function. METHODOLOGY: The test is similar to the Sniffin’ Sticks test, but using pens impregnated with substances preferentially activating trigeminal afferents. Our test comprises detection threshold, discrimination, identification and lateralization tasks. In a first study, we evaluated healthy controls. In a second study, we evaluated the potential usefulness of this test in patients with rhinological conditions. RESULTS: Study 1: 86 controls were included. Threshold, identification and lateralization performance decreased with age. Test-retest reliability was similar to that of olfactory tests. Study 2: results of the controls group were compared to those of 59 patients (14 allergic rhinitis, 11 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), 9 without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and 25 with an olfactory disorder (OD)). Controls had 1) lower detection thresholds compared to CRSwNP, CRSsNP and OD, 2) better discrimination and identification scores compared to OD, and 3) better lateralization scores compared to CRSwNP and CRSsNP. CONCLUSIONS: Our test allows to identify age-related changes in trigeminal chemosensory function. Trigeminal function seems to be differently affected in different pathologies. Further studies are necessary to validate our results and evaluate the impact of olfactory co-activation on the observed results.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sinusite / Rinite / Pólipos Nasais / Transtornos do Olfato Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sinusite / Rinite / Pólipos Nasais / Transtornos do Olfato Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article