Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Yield of peritoneal cytology in staging patients with gastric and gastroesophageal cancer.
Allen, Casey J; Newhook, Timothy E; Vreeland, Timothy J; Das, Prajnan; Minsky, Bruce D; Blum, Mariela; Song, Shumei; Ajani, Jaffer; Ikoma, Naruhiko; Mansfield, Paul F; Roy-Chowdhuri, Sinchita; Badgwell, Brian D.
Afiliação
  • Allen CJ; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Newhook TE; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Vreeland TJ; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Das P; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Minsky BD; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Blum M; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Song S; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Ajani J; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Roy-Chowdhuri S; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
J Surg Oncol ; 120(8): 1350-1357, 2019 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31612494
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Guidelines for gastric and gastroesophageal (GE) cancer recommend staging laparoscopy (SL) with peritoneal cytology (PC). However, the reliability of PC is unknown. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity of PC.

METHODS:

We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent SL and PC for gastric and GE cancer. Test sensitivity of PC for detecting peritoneal disease was assessed. Survival analyses were used to examine the implication of PC.

RESULTS:

There were 1186 patients that underwent SL and PC; 282 (24%) were found with carcinomatosis. PC was analyzed in 214 (76%) of these patients and 77 (36%) were found to have no malignant cells. In this setting, PC had a sensitivity of 64% for confirming peritoneal disease. Those with peritoneal disease had a poorer 5-year overall survival (5.8% vs 37.7%; P < .001). Those with positive PC without carcinomatosis had a similar survival to those with gross disease with and without cytological confirmation (both P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

PC has limited sensitivity for detecting peritoneal disease. Positive PC alone carries a similar poor survival as in patients with gross carcinomatosis. Improvements in the identification of microscopic disease in peritoneal washings are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Peritônio / Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Lavagem Peritoneal / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Peritônio / Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Lavagem Peritoneal / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article